aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/block/block-copy.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-11-04block/block-copy: fix s->copy_size for compressed clusterVladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
0e2402452f1f20429 allowed writes larger than cluster, but that's unsupported for compressed write. Fix it. Fixes: 0e2402452f1f20429 Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Message-id: 20191029150934.26416-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
2019-10-28block/block-copy: increase buffered copy requestVladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
No reason to limit buffered copy to one cluster. Let's allow up to 1 MiB. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Message-id: 20191022111805.3432-7-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
2019-10-28block/block-copy: add memory limitVladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Currently total allocation for parallel requests to block-copy instance is unlimited. Let's limit it to 128 MiB. For now block-copy is used only in backup, so actually we limit total allocation for backup job. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Message-id: 20191022111805.3432-6-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
2019-10-28block/block-copy: refactor copyingVladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Merge copying code into one function block_copy_do_copy, which only calls bdrv_ io functions and don't do any synchronization (like dirty bitmap set/reset). Refactor block_copy() function so that it takes full decision about size of chunk to be copied and does all the synchronization (checking intersecting requests, set/reset dirty bitmaps). It will help: - introduce parallel processing of block_copy iterations: we need to calculate chunk size, start async chunk copying and go to the next iteration - simplify synchronization improvement (like memory limiting in further commit and reducing critical section (now we lock the whole requested range, when actually we need to lock only dirty region which we handle at the moment)) Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Message-id: 20191022111805.3432-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
2019-10-28block/block-copy: limit copy_range_size to 16 MiBVladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Large copy range may imply memory allocation and large io effort, so using 2G copy range request may be bad idea. Let's limit it to 16 MiB. It also helps the following patch to refactor copy-with-offload fallback to copy-with-bounce-buffer. Note, that total memory usage of backup is still not limited, it will be fixed in further commit. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Message-id: 20191022111805.3432-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
2019-10-28block/block-copy: allocate buffer in block_copy_with_bounce_bufferVladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Move bounce_buffer allocation block_copy_with_bounce_buffer. This commit simplifies further work on implementing copying by larger chunks (of different size) and further asynchronous handling of block_copy iterations (with help of block/aio_task API). Allocation works fast, a lot faster than disk io, so it's not a problem that we now allocate/free bounce_buffer more times. And we anyway will have to allocate several bounce_buffers for parallel execution of loop iterations in future. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Message-id: 20191022111805.3432-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
2019-10-17block/dirty-bitmap: add bs linkVladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Add bs field to BdrvDirtyBitmap structure. Drop BlockDriverState parameter from bitmap APIs where possible. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> Message-id: 20190916141911.5255-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com [Rebased on top of block-copy. --js] Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
2019-10-10block/backup: use backup-top instead of write notifiersVladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Drop write notifiers and use filter node instead. = Changes = 1. Add filter-node-name argument for backup qmp api. We have to do it in this commit, as 257 needs to be fixed. 2. There are no more write notifiers here, so is_write_notifier parameter is dropped from block-copy paths. 3. To sync with in-flight requests at job finish we now have drained removing of the filter, we don't need rw-lock. 4. Block-copy is now using BdrvChildren instead of BlockBackends 5. As backup-top owns these children, we also move block-copy state into backup-top's ownership. = Iotest changes = 56: op-blocker doesn't shoot now, as we set it on source, but then check on filter, when trying to start second backup. To keep the test we instead can catch another collision: both jobs will get 'drive0' job-id, as job-id parameter is unspecified. To prevent interleaving with file-posix locks (as they are dependent on config) let's use another target for second backup. Also, it's obvious now that we'd like to drop this op-blocker at all and add a test-case for two backups from one node (to different destinations) actually works. But not in these series. 141: Output changed: prepatch, "Node is in use" comes from bdrv_has_blk check inside qmp_blockdev_del. But we've dropped block-copy blk objects, so no more blk objects on source bs (job blk is on backup-top filter bs). New message is from op-blocker, which is the next check in qmp_blockdev_add. 257: The test wants to emulate guest write during backup. They should go to filter node, not to original source node, of course. Therefore we need to specify filter node name and use it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Message-id: 20191001131409.14202-6-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
2019-10-10block/block-copy: split block_copy_set_callbacks functionVladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Split block_copy_set_callbacks out of block_copy_state_new. It's needed for further commit: block-copy will use BdrvChildren of backup-top filter, so it will be created from backup-top filter creation function. But callbacks will still belong to backup job and will be set in separate. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Message-id: 20191001131409.14202-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
2019-10-10block/backup: move in-flight requests handling from backup to block-copyVladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Move synchronization mechanism to block-copy, to be able to use one block-copy instance from backup job and backup-top filter in parallel. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Message-id: 20191001131409.14202-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
2019-10-10block: move block_copy from block/backup.c to separate fileVladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Split block_copy to separate file, to be cleanly shared with backup-top filter driver in further commits. It's a clean movement, the only change is drop "static" from interface functions. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Message-id: 20190920142056.12778-8-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>