aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/hw/display
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'hw/display')
-rw-r--r--hw/display/qxl.c26
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/hw/display/qxl.c b/hw/display/qxl.c
index 747986478f..e628cf1286 100644
--- a/hw/display/qxl.c
+++ b/hw/display/qxl.c
@@ -1893,7 +1893,31 @@ static void qxl_send_events(PCIQXLDevice *d, uint32_t events)
trace_qxl_send_events_vm_stopped(d->id, events);
return;
}
- old_pending = atomic_fetch_or(&d->ram->int_pending, le_events);
+ /*
+ * Older versions of Spice forgot to define the QXLRam struct
+ * with the '__aligned__(4)' attribute. clang 7 and newer will
+ * thus warn that atomic_fetch_or(&d->ram->int_pending, ...)
+ * might be a misaligned atomic access, and will generate an
+ * out-of-line call for it, which results in a link error since
+ * we don't currently link against libatomic.
+ *
+ * In fact we set up d->ram in init_qxl_ram() so it always starts
+ * at a 4K boundary, so we know that &d->ram->int_pending is
+ * naturally aligned for a uint32_t. Newer Spice versions
+ * (with Spice commit beda5ec7a6848be20c0cac2a9a8ef2a41e8069c1)
+ * will fix the bug directly. To deal with older versions,
+ * we tell the compiler to assume the address really is aligned.
+ * Any compiler which cares about the misalignment will have
+ * __builtin_assume_aligned.
+ */
+#ifdef HAS_ASSUME_ALIGNED
+#define ALIGNED_UINT32_PTR(P) ((uint32_t *)__builtin_assume_aligned(P, 4))
+#else
+#define ALIGNED_UINT32_PTR(P) ((uint32_t *)P)
+#endif
+
+ old_pending = atomic_fetch_or(ALIGNED_UINT32_PTR(&d->ram->int_pending),
+ le_events);
if ((old_pending & le_events) == le_events) {
return;
}