diff options
author | Fangrui Song <i@maskray.me> | 2019-11-22 09:00:39 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> | 2019-11-25 06:00:05 +0100 |
commit | 25f74087c695364dfaa87443b1040a3aa5c29008 (patch) | |
tree | b887c91b7bf15b6bef1e614004c9c0b078347b41 /util/cutils.c | |
parent | 2061735ff09f9d5e67c501a96227b470e7de69b1 (diff) |
util/cutils: Fix incorrect integer->float conversion caught by clang
Clang does not like do_strtosz()'s code to guard against overflow:
qemu/util/cutils.c:245:23: error: implicit conversion from 'unsigned long' to 'double' changes value from 18446744073709550592 to 18446744073709551616 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-int-float-conversion]
The warning will be enabled by default in clang 10. It is not
available for clang <= 9.
val * mul >= 0xfffffffffffffc00 is indeed wrong. 0xfffffffffffffc00
is not representable exactly as double. It's half-way between the
representable values 0xfffffffffffff800 and 0x10000000000000000.
Which one we get is implementation-defined. Bad.
We want val * mul > (the largest uint64_t exactly representable as
double). That's 0xfffffffffffff800. Write it as nextafter(0x1p64, 0)
with a suitable comment.
Signed-off-by: Fangrui Song <i@maskray.me>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Patch split, commit message improved]
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191122080039.12771-3-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'util/cutils.c')
-rw-r--r-- | util/cutils.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/util/cutils.c b/util/cutils.c index fd591cadf0..77acadc70a 100644 --- a/util/cutils.c +++ b/util/cutils.c @@ -239,10 +239,12 @@ static int do_strtosz(const char *nptr, const char **end, goto out; } /* - * Values >= 0xfffffffffffffc00 overflow uint64_t after their trip - * through double (53 bits of precision). + * Values near UINT64_MAX overflow to 2**64 when converting to double + * precision. Compare against the maximum representable double precision + * value below 2**64, computed as "the next value after 2**64 (0x1p64) in + * the direction of 0". */ - if ((val * mul >= 0xfffffffffffffc00) || val < 0) { + if ((val * mul > nextafter(0x1p64, 0)) || val < 0) { retval = -ERANGE; goto out; } |