aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/virtiofsd
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>2020-11-09 09:35:48 -0500
committerDr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>2020-12-18 10:08:24 +0000
commite49393a349925567cb83cfe810bc595e42a17883 (patch)
treef71b6aec0a26073e1210f34bcb29061fa988aa47 /tools/virtiofsd
parentff688cd2c7c3a677b71e4ea194a2fa49d07996c8 (diff)
virtiofsd: Use --thread-pool-size=0 to mean no thread pool
Right now we create a thread pool and main thread hands over the request to thread in thread pool to process. Number of threads in thread pool can be managed by option --thread-pool-size. In tests we have noted that many of the workloads are getting better performance if we don't use a thread pool at all and process all the requests in the context of a thread receiving the request. Hence give user an option to be able to run virtiofsd without using a thread pool. To implement this, I have used existing option --thread-pool-size. This option defines how many maximum threads can be in the thread pool. Thread pool size zero freezes thead pool. I can't see why will one start virtiofsd with a frozen thread pool (hence frozen file system). So I am redefining --thread-pool-size=0 to mean, don't use a thread pool. Instead process the request in the context of thread receiving request from the queue. Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20201109143548.GA1479853@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/virtiofsd')
-rw-r--r--tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c36
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
index b264dcbd18..ddcefee427 100644
--- a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
+++ b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
@@ -578,13 +578,18 @@ static void *fv_queue_thread(void *opaque)
struct VuDev *dev = &qi->virtio_dev->dev;
struct VuVirtq *q = vu_get_queue(dev, qi->qidx);
struct fuse_session *se = qi->virtio_dev->se;
- GThreadPool *pool;
-
- pool = g_thread_pool_new(fv_queue_worker, qi, se->thread_pool_size, FALSE,
- NULL);
- if (!pool) {
- fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_ERR, "%s: g_thread_pool_new failed\n", __func__);
- return NULL;
+ GThreadPool *pool = NULL;
+ GList *req_list = NULL;
+
+ if (se->thread_pool_size) {
+ fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: Creating thread pool for Queue %d\n",
+ __func__, qi->qidx);
+ pool = g_thread_pool_new(fv_queue_worker, qi, se->thread_pool_size,
+ FALSE, NULL);
+ if (!pool) {
+ fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_ERR, "%s: g_thread_pool_new failed\n", __func__);
+ return NULL;
+ }
}
fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_INFO, "%s: Start for queue %d kick_fd %d\n", __func__,
@@ -659,14 +664,27 @@ static void *fv_queue_thread(void *opaque)
req->reply_sent = false;
- g_thread_pool_push(pool, req, NULL);
+ if (!se->thread_pool_size) {
+ req_list = g_list_prepend(req_list, req);
+ } else {
+ g_thread_pool_push(pool, req, NULL);
+ }
}
pthread_mutex_unlock(&qi->vq_lock);
pthread_rwlock_unlock(&qi->virtio_dev->vu_dispatch_rwlock);
+
+ /* Process all the requests. */
+ if (!se->thread_pool_size && req_list != NULL) {
+ g_list_foreach(req_list, fv_queue_worker, qi);
+ g_list_free(req_list);
+ req_list = NULL;
+ }
}
- g_thread_pool_free(pool, FALSE, TRUE);
+ if (pool) {
+ g_thread_pool_free(pool, FALSE, TRUE);
+ }
return NULL;
}