aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGreg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>2022-02-15 19:15:29 +0100
committerDr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>2022-02-17 17:22:26 +0000
commit45b04ef48dbbeb18d93c2631bf5584ac493de749 (patch)
treea57ae7b4c6878112c30837dcc07b2a95bdde5e80 /tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
parent963061dc11e762285a6c1825b9c09e48cc8c6f5f (diff)
virtiofsd: Add basic support for FUSE_SYNCFS request
Honor the expected behavior of syncfs() to synchronously flush all data and metadata to disk on linux systems. If virtiofsd is started with '-o announce_submounts', the client is expected to send a FUSE_SYNCFS request for each individual submount. In this case, we just create a new file descriptor on the submount inode with lo_inode_open(), call syncfs() on it and close it. The intermediary file is needed because O_PATH descriptors aren't backed by an actual file and syncfs() would fail with EBADF. If virtiofsd is started without '-o announce_submounts' or if the client doesn't have the FUSE_CAP_SUBMOUNTS capability, the client only sends a single FUSE_SYNCFS request for the root inode. The server would thus need to track submounts internally and call syncfs() on each of them. This will be implemented later. Note that syncfs() might suffer from a time penalty if the submounts are being hammered by some unrelated workload on the host. The only solution to prevent that is to avoid shared mounts. Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220215181529.164070-2-groug@kaod.org> Reviewed-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c')
-rw-r--r--tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c44
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
index 4742be1d1e..dfa2fc250d 100644
--- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
+++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
@@ -3699,6 +3699,49 @@ static void lo_lseek(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, off_t off, int whence,
}
}
+static int lo_do_syncfs(struct lo_data *lo, struct lo_inode *inode)
+{
+ int fd, ret = 0;
+
+ fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "lo_do_syncfs(ino=%" PRIu64 ")\n",
+ inode->fuse_ino);
+
+ fd = lo_inode_open(lo, inode, O_RDONLY);
+ if (fd < 0) {
+ return -fd;
+ }
+
+ if (syncfs(fd) < 0) {
+ ret = errno;
+ }
+
+ close(fd);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void lo_syncfs(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino)
+{
+ struct lo_data *lo = lo_data(req);
+ struct lo_inode *inode = lo_inode(req, ino);
+ int err;
+
+ if (!inode) {
+ fuse_reply_err(req, EBADF);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ err = lo_do_syncfs(lo, inode);
+ lo_inode_put(lo, &inode);
+
+ /*
+ * If submounts aren't announced, the client only sends a request to
+ * sync the root inode. TODO: Track submounts internally and iterate
+ * over them as well.
+ */
+
+ fuse_reply_err(req, err);
+}
+
static void lo_destroy(void *userdata)
{
struct lo_data *lo = (struct lo_data *)userdata;
@@ -3759,6 +3802,7 @@ static struct fuse_lowlevel_ops lo_oper = {
.copy_file_range = lo_copy_file_range,
#endif
.lseek = lo_lseek,
+ .syncfs = lo_syncfs,
.destroy = lo_destroy,
};