aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests/test-qmp-input-strict.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>2015-11-05 23:35:31 -0700
committerMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>2015-11-10 08:08:21 +0100
commita12a5a1a0132527afe87c079e4aae4aad372bd94 (patch)
tree5338234400f554e439fc3566364b53fa08f65ab5 /tests/test-qmp-input-strict.c
parent3f66f764ee25f10d3e1144ebc057a949421b7728 (diff)
qapi: Simplify error cleanup in test-qmp-*
We have several tests that perform multiple sub-actions that are expected to fail. Asserting that an error occurred, then clearing it up to prepare for the next action, turned into enough boilerplate that it was sometimes forgotten (for example, a number of tests added to test-qmp-input-visitor.c in d88f5fd leaked err). Worse, if an error is not reset to NULL, we risk invalidating later use of that error (passing a non-NULL err into a function is generally a bad idea). Encapsulate the boilerplate into a single helper function error_free_or_abort(), and consistently use it. The new function is added into error.c for use everywhere, although it is anticipated that testsuites will be the main client. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/test-qmp-input-strict.c')
-rw-r--r--tests/test-qmp-input-strict.c21
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/tests/test-qmp-input-strict.c b/tests/test-qmp-input-strict.c
index d91539c647..f1c2e3ba67 100644
--- a/tests/test-qmp-input-strict.c
+++ b/tests/test-qmp-input-strict.c
@@ -180,8 +180,7 @@ static void test_validate_fail_struct(TestInputVisitorData *data,
v = validate_test_init(data, "{ 'integer': -42, 'boolean': true, 'string': 'foo', 'extra': 42 }");
visit_type_TestStruct(v, &p, NULL, &err);
- g_assert(err);
- error_free(err);
+ error_free_or_abort(&err);
if (p) {
g_free(p->string);
}
@@ -198,8 +197,7 @@ static void test_validate_fail_struct_nested(TestInputVisitorData *data,
v = validate_test_init(data, "{ 'string0': 'string0', 'dict1': { 'string1': 'string1', 'dict2': { 'userdef1': { 'integer': 42, 'string': 'string', 'extra': [42, 23, {'foo':'bar'}] }, 'string2': 'string2'}}}");
visit_type_UserDefTwo(v, &udp, NULL, &err);
- g_assert(err);
- error_free(err);
+ error_free_or_abort(&err);
qapi_free_UserDefTwo(udp);
}
@@ -213,8 +211,7 @@ static void test_validate_fail_list(TestInputVisitorData *data,
v = validate_test_init(data, "[ { 'string': 'string0', 'integer': 42 }, { 'string': 'string1', 'integer': 43 }, { 'string': 'string2', 'integer': 44, 'extra': 'ggg' } ]");
visit_type_UserDefOneList(v, &head, NULL, &err);
- g_assert(err);
- error_free(err);
+ error_free_or_abort(&err);
qapi_free_UserDefOneList(head);
}
@@ -229,8 +226,7 @@ static void test_validate_fail_union_native_list(TestInputVisitorData *data,
"{ 'type': 'integer', 'data' : [ 'string' ] }");
visit_type_UserDefNativeListUnion(v, &tmp, NULL, &err);
- g_assert(err);
- error_free(err);
+ error_free_or_abort(&err);
qapi_free_UserDefNativeListUnion(tmp);
}
@@ -244,8 +240,7 @@ static void test_validate_fail_union_flat(TestInputVisitorData *data,
v = validate_test_init(data, "{ 'string': 'c', 'integer': 41, 'boolean': true }");
visit_type_UserDefFlatUnion(v, &tmp, NULL, &err);
- g_assert(err);
- error_free(err);
+ error_free_or_abort(&err);
qapi_free_UserDefFlatUnion(tmp);
}
@@ -260,8 +255,7 @@ static void test_validate_fail_union_flat_no_discrim(TestInputVisitorData *data,
v = validate_test_init(data, "{ 'integer': 42, 'string': 'c', 'string1': 'd', 'string2': 'e' }");
visit_type_UserDefFlatUnion2(v, &tmp, NULL, &err);
- g_assert(err);
- error_free(err);
+ error_free_or_abort(&err);
qapi_free_UserDefFlatUnion2(tmp);
}
@@ -275,8 +269,7 @@ static void test_validate_fail_alternate(TestInputVisitorData *data,
v = validate_test_init(data, "3.14");
visit_type_UserDefAlternate(v, &tmp, NULL, &err);
- g_assert(err);
- error_free(err);
+ error_free_or_abort(&err);
qapi_free_UserDefAlternate(tmp);
}