s390x/tcg: Implement VECTOR FP COMPARE (AND SIGNAL) SCALAR

As far as I can see, there is only a tiny difference.

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/target/s390x/translate_vx.inc.c b/target/s390x/translate_vx.inc.c
index 44da9f2645..283e8aa07a 100644
--- a/target/s390x/translate_vx.inc.c
+++ b/target/s390x/translate_vx.inc.c
@@ -2567,3 +2567,24 @@ static DisasJumpType op_vfa(DisasContext *s, DisasOps *o)
                    get_field(s->fields, v3), cpu_env, 0, fn);
     return DISAS_NEXT;
 }
+
+static DisasJumpType op_wfc(DisasContext *s, DisasOps *o)
+{
+    const uint8_t fpf = get_field(s->fields, m3);
+    const uint8_t m4 = get_field(s->fields, m4);
+
+    if (fpf != FPF_LONG || m4) {
+        gen_program_exception(s, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
+        return DISAS_NORETURN;
+    }
+
+    if (s->fields->op2 == 0xcb) {
+        gen_gvec_2_ptr(get_field(s->fields, v1), get_field(s->fields, v2),
+                       cpu_env, 0, gen_helper_gvec_wfc64);
+    } else {
+        gen_gvec_2_ptr(get_field(s->fields, v1), get_field(s->fields, v2),
+                       cpu_env, 0, gen_helper_gvec_wfk64);
+    }
+    set_cc_static(s);
+    return DISAS_NEXT;
+}