diff options
author | Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> | 2016-05-12 09:18:13 +0530 |
---|---|---|
committer | David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> | 2016-05-30 14:03:59 +1000 |
commit | 4c055ab54fae39b6329c57bcb5334d59b920463e (patch) | |
tree | d1bb4c50138f6283bda97737937c32733f943414 /target-s390x | |
parent | 9dfeca7c6b1d3a8f36531bbbac0322a9907bcd86 (diff) |
cpu: Reclaim vCPU objects
In order to deal well with the kvm vcpus (which can not be removed without any
protection), we do not close KVM vcpu fd, just record and mark it as stopped
into a list, so that we can reuse it for the appending cpu hot-add request if
possible. It is also the approach that kvm guys suggested:
https://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg102839.html
Signed-off-by: Chen Fan <chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhu Guihua <zhugh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[- Explicit CPU_REMOVE() from qemu_kvm/tcg_destroy_vcpu()
isn't needed as it is done from cpu_exec_exit()
- Use iothread mutex instead of global mutex during
destroy
- Don't cleanup vCPU object from vCPU thread context
but leave it to the callers (device_add/device_del)]
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Diffstat (limited to 'target-s390x')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions