aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/scripts/qapi.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>2017-03-15 13:56:51 +0100
committerMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>2017-03-16 07:13:01 +0100
commitbc52d03ff589a033843b4603cfdfd1518867c626 (patch)
tree8196974ce1a4777947853ad331a97e5834bb19fc /scripts/qapi.py
parente04dea88727c2ac97091333ac8be6af5952634a7 (diff)
qapi: Make doc comments optional where we don't need them
Since we added the documentation generator in commit 3313b61, doc comments are mandatory. That's a very good idea for a schema that needs to be documented, but has proven to be annoying for testing. Make doc comments optional again, but add a new directive { 'pragma': { 'doc-required': true } } to let a QAPI schema require them. Add test cases for the new pragma directive. While there, plug a minor hole in includ directive test coverage. Require documentation in the schemas we actually want documented: qapi-schema.json and qga/qapi-schema.json. We could probably make qapi2texi.py cope with incomplete documentation, but for now, simply make it refuse to run unless the schema has 'doc-required': true. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1489582656-31133-3-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> [qapi-code-gen.txt wording tweaked] Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts/qapi.py')
-rw-r--r--scripts/qapi.py24
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/scripts/qapi.py b/scripts/qapi.py
index 345cde157e..fe9d3cf36d 100644
--- a/scripts/qapi.py
+++ b/scripts/qapi.py
@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ builtin_types = {
'QType': 'QTYPE_QSTRING',
}
+# Are documentation comments required?
+doc_required = False
+
# Whitelist of commands allowed to return a non-dictionary
returns_whitelist = [
# From QMP:
@@ -277,6 +280,15 @@ class QAPISchemaParser(object):
"Value of 'include' must be a string")
self._include(include, info, os.path.dirname(abs_fname),
previously_included)
+ elif "pragma" in expr:
+ if len(expr) != 1:
+ raise QAPISemError(info, "Invalid 'pragma' directive")
+ pragma = expr['pragma']
+ if not isinstance(pragma, dict):
+ raise QAPISemError(
+ info, "Value of 'pragma' must be a dictionary")
+ for name, value in pragma.iteritems():
+ self._pragma(name, value, info)
else:
expr_elem = {'expr': expr,
'info': info}
@@ -308,6 +320,16 @@ class QAPISchemaParser(object):
self.exprs.extend(exprs_include.exprs)
self.docs.extend(exprs_include.docs)
+ def _pragma(self, name, value, info):
+ global doc_required
+ if name == 'doc-required':
+ if not isinstance(value, bool):
+ raise QAPISemError(info,
+ "Pragma 'doc-required' must be boolean")
+ doc_required = value
+ else:
+ raise QAPISemError(info, "Unknown pragma '%s'" % name)
+
def accept(self, skip_comment=True):
while True:
self.tok = self.src[self.cursor]
@@ -863,7 +885,7 @@ def check_exprs(exprs):
expr = expr_elem['expr']
info = expr_elem['info']
- if 'doc' not in expr_elem:
+ if 'doc' not in expr_elem and doc_required:
raise QAPISemError(info,
"Expression missing documentation comment")