aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/scripts/kernel-doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>2020-11-17 17:52:49 +0100
committerPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>2020-12-10 12:15:20 -0500
commit9f2b463ad8beb76acaf3f5d1654b660592760e68 (patch)
tree80962609fd0cd0bb3e05ede7f0e34d7625ba7e20 /scripts/kernel-doc
parentb1e8e720b649ad1b7275d7eeef841c2528a63fe1 (diff)
scripts: kernel-doc: accept blank lines on parameter description
Sphinx is very pedantic with respect to blank lines. Sometimes, in order to make it to properly handle something, we need to add a blank line. However, currently, any blank line inside a kernel-doc comment like: /* * @foo: bar * * foobar * * some description will be considered as if "foobar" was part of the description. This patch changes kernel-doc behavior. After it, foobar will be considered as part of the parameter text. The description will only be considered as such if it starts with: zero spaces after asterisk: *foo one space after asterisk: * foo or have a explicit Description section: * Description: Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c07d2862792d75a2691d69c9eceb7b89a0164cc0.1586881715.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20201117165312.118257-7-pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts/kernel-doc')
-rwxr-xr-xscripts/kernel-doc35
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/scripts/kernel-doc b/scripts/kernel-doc
index e4b3cd486f..95f2d7adcf 100755
--- a/scripts/kernel-doc
+++ b/scripts/kernel-doc
@@ -334,13 +334,14 @@ my $lineprefix="";
# Parser states
use constant {
- STATE_NORMAL => 0, # normal code
- STATE_NAME => 1, # looking for function name
- STATE_BODY_MAYBE => 2, # body - or maybe more description
- STATE_BODY => 3, # the body of the comment
- STATE_PROTO => 4, # scanning prototype
- STATE_DOCBLOCK => 5, # documentation block
- STATE_INLINE => 6, # gathering documentation outside main block
+ STATE_NORMAL => 0, # normal code
+ STATE_NAME => 1, # looking for function name
+ STATE_BODY_MAYBE => 2, # body - or maybe more description
+ STATE_BODY => 3, # the body of the comment
+ STATE_BODY_WITH_BLANK_LINE => 4, # the body, which has a blank line
+ STATE_PROTO => 5, # scanning prototype
+ STATE_DOCBLOCK => 6, # documentation block
+ STATE_INLINE => 7, # gathering doc outside main block
};
my $state;
my $in_doc_sect;
@@ -1987,6 +1988,12 @@ sub process_body($$) {
}
}
+ if ($state == STATE_BODY_WITH_BLANK_LINE && /^\s*\*\s?\S/) {
+ dump_section($file, $section, $contents);
+ $section = $section_default;
+ $contents = "";
+ }
+
if (/$doc_sect/i) { # case insensitive for supported section names
$newsection = $1;
$newcontents = $2;
@@ -2040,18 +2047,21 @@ sub process_body($$) {
$state = STATE_PROTO;
$brcount = 0;
} elsif (/$doc_content/) {
- # miguel-style comment kludge, look for blank lines after
- # @parameter line to signify start of description
if ($1 eq "") {
- if ($section =~ m/^@/ || $section eq $section_context) {
+ if ($section eq $section_context) {
dump_section($file, $section, $contents);
$section = $section_default;
$contents = "";
$new_start_line = $.;
+ $state = STATE_BODY;
} else {
+ if ($section ne $section_default) {
+ $state = STATE_BODY_WITH_BLANK_LINE;
+ } else {
+ $state = STATE_BODY;
+ }
$contents .= "\n";
}
- $state = STATE_BODY;
} elsif ($state == STATE_BODY_MAYBE) {
# Continued declaration purpose
chomp($declaration_purpose);
@@ -2203,7 +2213,8 @@ sub process_file($) {
process_normal();
} elsif ($state == STATE_NAME) {
process_name($file, $_);
- } elsif ($state == STATE_BODY || $state == STATE_BODY_MAYBE) {
+ } elsif ($state == STATE_BODY || $state == STATE_BODY_MAYBE ||
+ $state == STATE_BODY_WITH_BLANK_LINE) {
process_body($file, $_);
} elsif ($state == STATE_INLINE) { # scanning for inline parameters
process_inline($file, $_);