aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>2018-07-09 19:37:16 +0300
committerKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>2018-07-10 13:04:22 +0200
commit999658a05e61a8d87b65827da665302bb44ce8c9 (patch)
tree25e3fa25f83c869ae808cb081bc2570723893f2e /include
parente79c4cd1909c05a2cab6517a9c00445bd2d880a6 (diff)
block/io: fix copy_range
Here two things are fixed: 1. Architecture On each recursion step, we go to the child of src or dst, only for one of them. So, it's wrong to create tracked requests for both on each step. It leads to tracked requests duplication. 2. Wait for serializing requests on write path independently of BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING Before commit 9ded4a01149 "backup: Use copy offloading", BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING was used for only one case: read in copy-on-write operation during backup. Also, the flag was handled only on read path (in bdrv_co_preadv and bdrv_aligned_preadv). After 9ded4a01149, flag is used for not waiting serializing operations on backup target (in same case of copy-on-write operation). This behavior change is unsubstantiated and potentially dangerous, let's drop it and add additional asserts and documentation. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
-rw-r--r--include/block/block.h12
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/block/block.h b/include/block/block.h
index 706ef009ad..f7ddff45b6 100644
--- a/include/block/block.h
+++ b/include/block/block.h
@@ -50,6 +50,18 @@ typedef enum {
* opened with BDRV_O_UNMAP.
*/
BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP = 0x4,
+
+ /*
+ * The BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING flag is only valid for reads and means that
+ * we don't want wait_serialising_requests() during the read operation.
+ *
+ * This flag is used for backup copy-on-write operations, when we need to
+ * read old data before write (write notifier triggered). It is okay since
+ * we already waited for other serializing requests in the initiating write
+ * (see bdrv_aligned_pwritev), and it is necessary if the initiating write
+ * is already serializing (without the flag, the read would deadlock
+ * waiting for the serialising write to complete).
+ */
BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING = 0x8,
BDRV_REQ_FUA = 0x10,
BDRV_REQ_WRITE_COMPRESSED = 0x20,