diff options
author | Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> | 2013-06-14 13:15:03 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> | 2013-06-19 14:10:42 -0500 |
commit | 8281abd548d840d84223e66812491918c713e56c (patch) | |
tree | 6c753cf002fc6f8433a8408282cb609ba47de8f1 /include/hw/hw.h | |
parent | a86b35f992f107323e432c0a96107e11e1b699ad (diff) |
vl: Fix -boot order and once regressions, and related bugs
Option "once" sets up a different boot order just for the initial
boot. Boot order reverts back to normal on reset. Option "order"
changes the normal boot order.
The reversal is implemented by reset handler restore_boot_devices(),
which takes the boot order to revert to as argument.
restore_boot_devices() does nothing on its first call, because that
must be the initial machine reset. On its second call, it changes the
boot order back, and unregisters itself.
Because we register the handler right when -boot gets parsed, we can
revert to an incorrect normal boot order, and multiple -boot can
interact in funny ways.
Here's how things work without -boot once or order:
* boot_devices is "".
* main() passes machine->boot_order to to machine->init(), because
boot_devices is "". machine->init() configures firmware
accordingly. For PC machines, machine->boot_order is "cad", and
pc_cmos_init() writes it to RTC CMOS, where SeaBIOS picks it up.
Now consider -boot order=:
* boot_devices is "".
* -boot order= sets boot_devices to "" (no change).
* main() passes machine->boot_order to to machine->init(), because
boot_devices is "", as above.
Bug: -boot order= has no effect. Broken in commit e4ada29e.
Next, consider -boot once=a:
* boot_devices is "".
* -boot once=a registers restore_boot_devices() with argument "", and
sets boot_devices to "a".
* main() passes boot_devices "a" to machine->init(), which configures
firmware accordingly. For PC machines, pc_cmos_init() writes the
boot order to RTC CMOS.
* main() calls qemu_system_reset(). This runs reset handlers.
- restore_boot_devices() gets called with argument "". Does
nothing, because it's the first call.
* Machine boots, boot order is "a".
* Machine resets (e.g. monitor command). Reset handlers run.
- restore_boot_devices() gets called with argument "". Calls
qemu_boot_set("") to reconfigure firmware. For PC machines,
pc_boot_set() writes it into RTC CMOS. Reset handler
unregistered.
Bug: boot order reverts to "" instead of machine->boot_order. The
actual boot order depends on how firmware interprets "". Broken
in commit e4ada29e.
Next, consider -boot once=a -boot order=c:
* boot_devices is "".
* -boot once=a registers restore_boot_devices() with argument "", and
sets boot_devices to "a".
* -boot order=c sets boot_devices to "c".
* main() passes boot_devices "c" to machine->init(), which configures
firmware accordingly. For PC machines, pc_cmos_init() writes the
boot order to RTC CMOS.
* main() calls qemu_system_reset(). This runs reset handlers.
- restore_boot_devices() gets called with argument "". Does
nothing, because it's the first call.
* Machine boots, boot order is "c".
Bug: it should be "a". I figure this has always been broken.
* Machine resets (e.g. monitor command). Reset handlers run.
- restore_boot_devices() gets called with argument "". Calls
qemu_boot_set("") to reconfigure firmware. For PC machines,
pc_boot_set() writes it into RTC CMOS. Reset handler
unregistered.
Bug: boot order reverts to "" instead of "c". I figure this has
always been broken, just differently broken before commit
e4ada29e.
Next, consider -boot once=a -boot once=b -boot once=c:
* boot_devices is "".
* -boot once=a registers restore_boot_devices() with argument "", and
sets boot_devices to "a".
* -boot once=b registers restore_boot_devices() with argument "a", and
sets boot_devices to "b".
* -boot once=c registers restore_boot_devices() with argument "b", and
sets boot_devices to "c".
* main() passes boot_devices "c" to machine->init(), which configures
firmware accordingly. For PC machines, pc_cmos_init() writes the
boot order to RTC CMOS.
* main() calls qemu_system_reset(). This runs reset handlers.
- restore_boot_devices() gets called with argument "". Does
nothing, because it's the first call.
- restore_boot_devices() gets called with argument "a". Calls
qemu_boot_set("a") to reconfigure firmware. For PC machines,
pc_boot_set() writes it into RTC CMOS. Reset handler
unregistered.
- restore_boot_devices() gets called with argument "b". Calls
qemu_boot_set("b") to reconfigure firmware. For PC machines,
pc_boot_set() writes it into RTC CMOS. Reset handler
unregistered.
* Machine boots, boot order is "b".
Bug: should really be "c", because that came last, and for all other
-boot options, the last one wins. I figure this was broken some
time before commit 37905d6a, and fixed there only for a single
occurence of "once".
* Machine resets (e.g. monitor command). Reset handlers run.
- restore_boot_devices() gets called with argument "". Calls
qemu_boot_set("") to reconfigure firmware. For PC machines,
pc_boot_set() writes it into RTC CMOS. Reset handler
unregistered.
Same bug as above: boot order reverts to "" instead of
machine->boot_order.
Fix by acting upon -boot options order, once and menu only after
option parsing is complete, and the machine is known. This is how the
other -boot options work already.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Message-id: 1371208516-7857-4-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/hw/hw.h')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions