diff options
author | David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> | 2023-07-06 09:56:09 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> | 2023-07-12 09:25:37 +0200 |
commit | b01fd4b67a8fdf5a9ecf4ad5b49b70d52424f0f7 (patch) | |
tree | a09ea108464cf36872c1da1b823c7851a1c76c88 /hw | |
parent | f161c88a03c646ee308653d3ea99318901093309 (diff) |
virtio-mem: Support "x-ignore-shared" migration
To achieve desired "x-ignore-shared" functionality, we should not
discard all RAM when realizing the device and not mess with
preallocation/postcopy when loading device state. In essence, we should
not touch RAM content.
As "x-ignore-shared" gets set after realizing the device, we cannot
rely on that. Let's simply skip discarding of RAM on incoming migration.
Note that virtio_mem_post_load() will call
virtio_mem_restore_unplugged() -- unless "x-ignore-shared" is set. So
once migration finished we'll have a consistent state.
The initial system reset will also not discard any RAM, because
virtio_mem_unplug_all() will not call virtio_mem_unplug_all() when no
memory is plugged (which is the case before loading the device state).
Note that something like VM templating -- see commit b17fbbe55cba
("migration: allow private destination ram with x-ignore-shared") -- is
currently incompatible with virtio-mem and ram_block_discard_range() will
warn in case a private file mapping is supplied by virtio-mem.
For VM templating with virtio-mem, it makes more sense to either
(a) Create the template without the virtio-mem device and hotplug a
virtio-mem device to the new VM instances using proper own memory
backend.
(b) Use a virtio-mem device that doesn't provide any memory in the
template (requested-size=0) and use private anonymous memory.
Message-ID: <20230706075612.67404-5-david@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mario Casquero <mcasquer@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'hw')
-rw-r--r-- | hw/virtio/virtio-mem.c | 47 |
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-mem.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-mem.c index a922c21380..3f41e00e74 100644 --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-mem.c +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-mem.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #include "sysemu/numa.h" #include "sysemu/sysemu.h" #include "sysemu/reset.h" +#include "sysemu/runstate.h" #include "hw/virtio/virtio.h" #include "hw/virtio/virtio-bus.h" #include "hw/virtio/virtio-mem.h" @@ -901,11 +902,23 @@ static void virtio_mem_device_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) return; } - ret = ram_block_discard_range(rb, 0, qemu_ram_get_used_length(rb)); - if (ret) { - error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "Unexpected error discarding RAM"); - ram_block_coordinated_discard_require(false); - return; + /* + * We don't know at this point whether shared RAM is migrated using + * QEMU or migrated using the file content. "x-ignore-shared" will be + * configured after realizing the device. So in case we have an + * incoming migration, simply always skip the discard step. + * + * Otherwise, make sure that we start with a clean slate: either the + * memory backend might get reused or the shared file might still have + * memory allocated. + */ + if (!runstate_check(RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE)) { + ret = ram_block_discard_range(rb, 0, qemu_ram_get_used_length(rb)); + if (ret) { + error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "Unexpected error discarding RAM"); + ram_block_coordinated_discard_require(false); + return; + } } virtio_mem_resize_usable_region(vmem, vmem->requested_size, true); @@ -977,10 +990,6 @@ static int virtio_mem_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id) RamDiscardListener *rdl; int ret; - if (vmem->prealloc && !vmem->early_migration) { - warn_report("Proper preallocation with migration requires a newer QEMU machine"); - } - /* * We started out with all memory discarded and our memory region is mapped * into an address space. Replay, now that we updated the bitmap. @@ -993,6 +1002,18 @@ static int virtio_mem_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id) } } + /* + * If shared RAM is migrated using the file content and not using QEMU, + * don't mess with preallocation and postcopy. + */ + if (migrate_ram_is_ignored(vmem->memdev->mr.ram_block)) { + return 0; + } + + if (vmem->prealloc && !vmem->early_migration) { + warn_report("Proper preallocation with migration requires a newer QEMU machine"); + } + if (migration_in_incoming_postcopy()) { return 0; } @@ -1026,6 +1047,14 @@ static int virtio_mem_post_load_early(void *opaque, int version_id) } /* + * If shared RAM is migrated using the file content and not using QEMU, + * don't mess with preallocation and postcopy. + */ + if (migrate_ram_is_ignored(rb)) { + return 0; + } + + /* * We restored the bitmap and verified that the basic properties * match on source and destination, so we can go ahead and preallocate * memory for all plugged memory blocks, before actual RAM migration starts |