aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/hw/ppc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>2019-09-26 15:41:39 +1000
committerDavid Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>2019-10-24 09:36:55 +1100
commit81106ddd1aee5c06e390eaffb07f857f925628f4 (patch)
tree6623bcc6770d775fecfb05e2840b35233476efc0 /hw/ppc
parent0b0e52b1317f2a51704cbf32047864869763dea3 (diff)
spapr: Formalize notion of active interrupt controller
spapr now has the mechanism of constructing both XICS and XIVE instances of the SpaprInterruptController interface. However, only one of the interrupt controllers will actually be active at any given time, depending on feature negotiation with the guest. This is handled in the current code via spapr_irq_current() which checks the OV5 vector from feature negotiation to determine the current backend. Determining the active controller at the point we need it like this can be pretty confusing, because it makes it very non obvious at what points the active controller can change. This can make it difficult to reason about the code and where a change of active controller could appear in sequence with other events. Make this mechanism more explicit by adding an 'active_intc' pointer and an explicit spapr_irq_update_active_intc() function to update it from the CAS state. We also add hooks on the intc backend which will get called when it is activated or deactivated. For now we just introduce the switch and hooks, later patches will actually start using them. Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'hw/ppc')
-rw-r--r--hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c51
1 files changed, 51 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
index 83882cfad3..249a2688ac 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
@@ -586,6 +586,7 @@ qemu_irq spapr_qirq(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq)
int spapr_irq_post_load(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int version_id)
{
+ spapr_irq_update_active_intc(spapr);
return spapr->irq->post_load(spapr, version_id);
}
@@ -593,6 +594,8 @@ void spapr_irq_reset(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp)
{
assert(!spapr->irq_map || bitmap_empty(spapr->irq_map, spapr->irq_map_nr));
+ spapr_irq_update_active_intc(spapr);
+
if (spapr->irq->reset) {
spapr->irq->reset(spapr, errp);
}
@@ -619,6 +622,54 @@ int spapr_irq_get_phandle(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt, Error **errp)
return phandle;
}
+static void set_active_intc(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
+ SpaprInterruptController *new_intc)
+{
+ SpaprInterruptControllerClass *sicc;
+
+ assert(new_intc);
+
+ if (new_intc == spapr->active_intc) {
+ /* Nothing to do */
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (spapr->active_intc) {
+ sicc = SPAPR_INTC_GET_CLASS(spapr->active_intc);
+ if (sicc->deactivate) {
+ sicc->deactivate(spapr->active_intc);
+ }
+ }
+
+ sicc = SPAPR_INTC_GET_CLASS(new_intc);
+ if (sicc->activate) {
+ sicc->activate(new_intc, &error_fatal);
+ }
+
+ spapr->active_intc = new_intc;
+}
+
+void spapr_irq_update_active_intc(SpaprMachineState *spapr)
+{
+ SpaprInterruptController *new_intc;
+
+ if (!spapr->ics) {
+ /*
+ * XXX before we run CAS, ov5_cas is initialized empty, which
+ * indicates XICS, even if we have ic-mode=xive. TODO: clean
+ * up the CAS path so that we have a clearer way of handling
+ * this.
+ */
+ new_intc = SPAPR_INTC(spapr->xive);
+ } else if (spapr_ovec_test(spapr->ov5_cas, OV5_XIVE_EXPLOIT)) {
+ new_intc = SPAPR_INTC(spapr->xive);
+ } else {
+ new_intc = SPAPR_INTC(spapr->ics);
+ }
+
+ set_active_intc(spapr, new_intc);
+}
+
/*
* XICS legacy routines - to deprecate one day
*/