diff options
| author | Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> | 2022-10-17 12:21:38 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> | 2022-11-07 14:08:17 -0500 |
| commit | 47a373faa6b272d12c8b166f7a0c45c867589005 (patch) | |
| tree | 8980a0f5d3f7ac357841da0fbc6a18f00ceb94e4 /hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c | |
| parent | ab886c7c883fa628dbb9f9b788ea855ea00f6d0a (diff) | |
acpi: pc/q35: drop ad-hoc PCI-ISA bridge AML routines and let bus ennumeration generate AML
PCI-ISA bridges that are built in PIIX/Q35 are building its own AML
using AcpiDevAmlIf interface. Now build_append_pci_bus_devices()
gained AcpiDevAmlIf interface support to get AML of devices atached
to PCI slots.
So drop ad-hoc build_q35_isa_bridge()/build_piix4_isa_bridge()
and let PCI bus enumeration to include PCI-ISA bridge AML
when it's enumerated by build_append_pci_bus_devices().
AML change is mostly contextual, which moves whole ISA hierarchy
directly under PCI host bridge instead of it being described
as separate \SB.PCI0.ISA block.
Note:
If bus/slot that hosts ISA bridge has BSEL set, it will gain new
ASUN and _DMS entries (i.e. acpi-index support, but it should not
cause any functional change and that is fine from PCI Firmware
spec point of view), potentially it's possible to suppress that
by adding a flag to PCIDevice but I don't see a reason to do that
yet, I'd rather treat bridge just as any other PCI device if it's
possible.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20221017102146.2254096-4-imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c | 23 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c index 8694e58b21..0b0a83e080 100644 --- a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c +++ b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c @@ -809,6 +809,7 @@ static void ich9_send_gpe(AcpiDeviceIf *adev, AcpiEventStatusBits ev) static void build_ich9_isa_aml(AcpiDevAmlIf *adev, Aml *scope) { + Aml *field; BusChild *kid; ICH9LPCState *s = ICH9_LPC_DEVICE(adev); BusState *bus = BUS(s->isa_bus); @@ -816,6 +817,28 @@ static void build_ich9_isa_aml(AcpiDevAmlIf *adev, Aml *scope) /* ICH9 PCI to ISA irq remapping */ aml_append(scope, aml_operation_region("PIRQ", AML_PCI_CONFIG, aml_int(0x60), 0x0C)); + /* Fields declarion has to happen *after* operation region */ + field = aml_field("PIRQ", AML_BYTE_ACC, AML_NOLOCK, AML_PRESERVE); + aml_append(field, aml_named_field("PRQA", 8)); + aml_append(field, aml_named_field("PRQB", 8)); + aml_append(field, aml_named_field("PRQC", 8)); + aml_append(field, aml_named_field("PRQD", 8)); + aml_append(field, aml_reserved_field(0x20)); + aml_append(field, aml_named_field("PRQE", 8)); + aml_append(field, aml_named_field("PRQF", 8)); + aml_append(field, aml_named_field("PRQG", 8)); + aml_append(field, aml_named_field("PRQH", 8)); + aml_append(scope, field); + + /* hack: put fields into _SB scope for LNKx to find them */ + aml_append(scope, aml_alias("PRQA", "\\_SB.PRQA")); + aml_append(scope, aml_alias("PRQB", "\\_SB.PRQB")); + aml_append(scope, aml_alias("PRQC", "\\_SB.PRQC")); + aml_append(scope, aml_alias("PRQD", "\\_SB.PRQD")); + aml_append(scope, aml_alias("PRQE", "\\_SB.PRQE")); + aml_append(scope, aml_alias("PRQF", "\\_SB.PRQF")); + aml_append(scope, aml_alias("PRQG", "\\_SB.PRQG")); + aml_append(scope, aml_alias("PRQH", "\\_SB.PRQH")); QTAILQ_FOREACH(kid, &bus->children, sibling) { call_dev_aml_func(DEVICE(kid->child), scope); |