diff options
author | Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> | 2017-02-28 18:40:01 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> | 2017-03-14 13:26:36 +0100 |
commit | c0d9f7d0bcedeaa65d5c984fbe0d351e1402eab5 (patch) | |
tree | c8083b5eda8104dda97e580a3cd98b1498aa555e /docs | |
parent | e8f5fe2de125a0bfbefbaa6a69af81f4817cb7a0 (diff) |
docs: Add a note about mixing bootindex with "-boot order"
Occasionally the users try to mix the bootindex properties with the
"-boot order" parameter - and this likely does not give the expected
results. So let's add a proper statement that these two concepts
should not be used together.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1488303601-23741-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'docs')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/bootindex.txt | 9 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/bootindex.txt b/docs/bootindex.txt index f84fac7200..b9a8ba122f 100644 --- a/docs/bootindex.txt +++ b/docs/bootindex.txt @@ -41,3 +41,12 @@ has three bootable devices target1, target3, target5 connected to it, the option ROM will have a boot method for each of them, but it is not possible to map from boot method back to a specific target. This is a shortcoming of the PC BIOS boot specification. + +== Mixing bootindex and boot order parameters == + +Note that it does not make sense to use the bootindex property together +with the "-boot order=..." (or "-boot once=...") parameter. The guest +firmware implementations normally either support the one or the other, +but not both parameters at the same time. Mixing them will result in +undefined behavior, and thus the guest firmware will likely not boot +from the expected devices. |