aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/default-configs/ppc-softmmu.mak
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>2017-09-11 16:13:20 -0500
committerPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>2017-09-19 16:20:49 +0200
commit262a69f4282e44426c7a132138581d400053e0a1 (patch)
tree4efa11545c4676e39783bc6f90da6fc39b79b553 /default-configs/ppc-softmmu.mak
parent825bfa0052a684f71f36693976fabad185e203c4 (diff)
osdep.h: Prohibit disabling assert() in supported builds
We already have several files that knowingly require assert() to work, sometimes because refactoring the code for proper error handling has not been tackled yet; there are probably other files that have a similar situation but with no comments documenting the same. In fact, we have places in migration that handle untrusted input with assertions, where disabling the assertions risks a worse security hole than the current behavior of losing the guest to SIGABRT when migration fails because of the assertion. Promote our current per-file safety-valve to instead be project-wide, and expand it to also cover glib's g_assert(). Note that we do NOT want to encourage 'assert(side-effects);' (that is a bad practice that prevents copy-and-paste of code to other projects that CAN disable assertions; plus it costs unnecessary reviewer mental cycles to remember whether a project special-cases the crippling of asserts); and we would LIKE to fix migration to not rely on asserts (but that takes a big code audit). But in the meantime, we DO want to send a message that anyone that disables assertions has to tweak code in order to compile, making it obvious that they are taking on additional risk that we are not going to support. At the same time, leave comments mentioning NDEBUG in files that we know still need to be scrubbed, so there is at least something to grep for. It would be possible to come up with some other mechanism for doing runtime checking by default, but which does not abort the program on failure, while leaving side effects in place (unlike how crippling assert() avoids even the side effects), perhaps under the name q_verify(); but it was not deemed worth the effort (developers should not have to learn a replacement when the standard C macro works just fine, and it would be a lot of churn for little gain). The patch specifically uses #error rather than #warn so that a user is forced to tweak the header to acknowledge the issue, even when not using a -Werror compilation. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20170911211320.25385-1-eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'default-configs/ppc-softmmu.mak')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions