coroutine: move entry argument to qemu_coroutine_create

In practice the entry argument is always known at creation time, and
it is confusing that sometimes qemu_coroutine_enter is used with a
non-NULL argument to re-enter a coroutine (this happens in
block/sheepdog.c and tests/test-coroutine.c).  So pass the opaque value
at creation time, for consistency with e.g. aio_bh_new.

Mostly done with the following semantic patch:

@ entry1 @
expression entry, arg, co;
@@
- co = qemu_coroutine_create(entry);
+ co = qemu_coroutine_create(entry, arg);
  ...
- qemu_coroutine_enter(co, arg);
+ qemu_coroutine_enter(co);

@ entry2 @
expression entry, arg;
identifier co;
@@
- Coroutine *co = qemu_coroutine_create(entry);
+ Coroutine *co = qemu_coroutine_create(entry, arg);
  ...
- qemu_coroutine_enter(co, arg);
+ qemu_coroutine_enter(co);

@ entry3 @
expression entry, arg;
@@
- qemu_coroutine_enter(qemu_coroutine_create(entry), arg);
+ qemu_coroutine_enter(qemu_coroutine_create(entry, arg));

@ reentry @
expression co;
@@
- qemu_coroutine_enter(co, NULL);
+ qemu_coroutine_enter(co);

except for the aforementioned few places where the semantic patch
stumbled (as expected) and for test_co_queue, which would otherwise
produce an uninitialized variable warning.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/blockjob.c b/blockjob.c
index 3b9cec7440..6816b78fcb 100644
--- a/blockjob.c
+++ b/blockjob.c
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ void block_job_resume(BlockJob *job)
 void block_job_enter(BlockJob *job)
 {
     if (job->co && !job->busy) {
-        qemu_coroutine_enter(job->co, NULL);
+        qemu_coroutine_enter(job->co);
     }
 }