diff options
author | Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> | 2021-01-18 13:34:47 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> | 2021-01-27 20:45:20 +0100 |
commit | 86b1cf322789b79c8ace977430ac6a443d491cc0 (patch) | |
tree | baac83ce91c3f7ea7c7ec61fa9249b205459b387 /block | |
parent | bf159f0bdc7b8e7aa8342dedb3829ca744c1b612 (diff) |
block: Separate blk_is_writable() and blk_supports_write_perm()
Currently, blk_is_read_only() tells whether a given BlockBackend can
only be used in read-only mode because its root node is read-only. Some
callers actually try to answer a slightly different question: Is the
BlockBackend configured to be writable, by taking write permissions on
the root node?
This can differ, for example, for CD-ROM devices which don't take write
permissions, but may be backed by a writable image file. scsi-cd allows
write requests to the drive if blk_is_read_only() returns false.
However, the write request will immediately run into an assertion
failure because the write permission is missing.
This patch introduces separate functions for both questions.
blk_supports_write_perm() answers the question whether the block
node/image file can support writable devices, whereas blk_is_writable()
tells whether the BlockBackend is currently configured to be writable.
All calls of blk_is_read_only() are converted to one of the two new
functions.
Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906693
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210118123448.307825-2-kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'block')
-rw-r--r-- | block/block-backend.c | 19 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/block/block-backend.c b/block/block-backend.c index ce78d30794..e493f17515 100644 --- a/block/block-backend.c +++ b/block/block-backend.c @@ -1826,17 +1826,30 @@ void blk_error_action(BlockBackend *blk, BlockErrorAction action, } } -bool blk_is_read_only(BlockBackend *blk) +/* + * Returns true if the BlockBackend can support taking write permissions + * (because its root node is not read-only). + */ +bool blk_supports_write_perm(BlockBackend *blk) { BlockDriverState *bs = blk_bs(blk); if (bs) { - return bdrv_is_read_only(bs); + return !bdrv_is_read_only(bs); } else { - return blk->root_state.read_only; + return !blk->root_state.read_only; } } +/* + * Returns true if the BlockBackend can be written to in its current + * configuration (i.e. if write permission have been requested) + */ +bool blk_is_writable(BlockBackend *blk) +{ + return blk->perm & BLK_PERM_WRITE; +} + bool blk_is_sg(BlockBackend *blk) { BlockDriverState *bs = blk_bs(blk); |