diff options
author | Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> | 2021-05-27 19:20:19 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> | 2021-06-02 14:23:20 +0200 |
commit | 73ebf29729d1a40feaa9f8ab8951b6ee6dbfbede (patch) | |
tree | 4ad2b9bc139e8368b56cc611e5f1b69cf14ab468 /block | |
parent | 260242a833d0cdfba5d9988169f2dc89946809a2 (diff) |
block/file-posix: Fix problem with fallocate(PUNCH_HOLE) on GPFS
A customer reported that running
qemu-img convert -t none -O qcow2 -f qcow2 input.qcow2 output.qcow2
fails for them with the following error message when the images are
stored on a GPFS file system :
qemu-img: error while writing sector 0: Invalid argument
After analyzing the strace output, it seems like the problem is in
handle_aiocb_write_zeroes(): The call to fallocate(FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)
returns EINVAL, which can apparently happen if the file system has
a different idea of the granularity of the operation. It's arguably
a bug in GPFS, since the PUNCH_HOLE mode should not result in EINVAL
according to the man-page of fallocate(), but the file system is out
there in production and so we have to deal with it. In commit 294682cc3a
("block: workaround for unaligned byte range in fallocate()") we also
already applied the a work-around for the same problem to the earlier
fallocate(FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE) call, so do it now similar with the
PUNCH_HOLE call. But instead of silently catching and returning
-ENOTSUP (which causes the caller to fall back to writing zeroes),
let's rather inform the user once about the buggy file system and
try the other fallback instead.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210527172020.847617-2-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'block')
-rw-r--r-- | block/file-posix.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c index 10b71d9a13..6e24083f3f 100644 --- a/block/file-posix.c +++ b/block/file-posix.c @@ -1650,6 +1650,17 @@ static int handle_aiocb_write_zeroes(void *opaque) return ret; } s->has_fallocate = false; + } else if (ret == -EINVAL) { + /* + * Some file systems like older versions of GPFS do not like un- + * aligned byte ranges, and return EINVAL in such a case, though + * they should not do it according to the man-page of fallocate(). + * Warn about the bad filesystem and try the final fallback instead. + */ + warn_report_once("Your file system is misbehaving: " + "fallocate(FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE) returned EINVAL. " + "Please report this bug to your file sytem " + "vendor."); } else if (ret != -ENOTSUP) { return ret; } else { |