diff options
author | Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> | 2022-07-26 23:11:28 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> | 2022-10-27 20:14:11 +0200 |
commit | 4eba825a8237985dc1c53a42bc810dcfa1a3d5e3 (patch) | |
tree | 87f25424bb91e0dd2d29721fe25fff6bb287496c /block.c | |
parent | 0c6100a7ff4733773e32b4b9bd00eb81955bd788 (diff) |
Revert "block: Let replace_child_noperm free children"
We are going to reimplement this behavior (clear bs->file / bs->backing
pointers automatically when child->bs is cleared) in a nicer way, see
further commit
"block: Manipulate bs->file / bs->backing pointers in .attach/.detach".
With this revert we bring back a problem that was fixed by b0a9f6fed3d8.
Still the problem was mostly theoretical, we don't have concrete bugs
fixed by b0a9f6fed3d8, we don't have a specific test. Probably some
accidental failures of iotests are related.
Alternatively, we may merge this and following three reverts into final
"block: Manipulate ..." to avoid any kind of regression. But seems that
in this case having separate clear revert commits is better.
This reverts commit b0a9f6fed3d80de610dcd04a7e66f9f30a04174f.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220726201134.924743-10-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'block.c')
-rw-r--r-- | block.c | 102 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 79 deletions
@@ -90,10 +90,8 @@ static BlockDriverState *bdrv_open_inherit(const char *filename, static bool bdrv_recurse_has_child(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState *child); -static void bdrv_child_free(BdrvChild *child); static void bdrv_replace_child_noperm(BdrvChild **child, - BlockDriverState *new_bs, - bool free_empty_child); + BlockDriverState *new_bs); static void bdrv_remove_file_or_backing_child(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *child, Transaction *tran); @@ -2345,7 +2343,6 @@ typedef struct BdrvReplaceChildState { BdrvChild *child; BdrvChild **childp; BlockDriverState *old_bs; - bool free_empty_child; } BdrvReplaceChildState; static void bdrv_replace_child_commit(void *opaque) @@ -2353,9 +2350,6 @@ static void bdrv_replace_child_commit(void *opaque) BdrvReplaceChildState *s = opaque; GLOBAL_STATE_CODE(); - if (s->free_empty_child && !s->child->bs) { - bdrv_child_free(s->child); - } bdrv_unref(s->old_bs); } @@ -2373,26 +2367,22 @@ static void bdrv_replace_child_abort(void *opaque) * modify the BdrvChild * pointer we indirectly pass to it, i.e. it * will not modify s->child. From that perspective, it does not matter * whether we pass s->childp or &s->child. + * (TODO: Right now, bdrv_replace_child_noperm() never modifies that + * pointer anyway (though it will in the future), so at this point it + * absolutely does not matter whether we pass s->childp or &s->child.) * (2) If new_bs is not NULL, s->childp will be NULL. We then cannot use * it here. * (3) If new_bs is NULL, *s->childp will have been NULLed by * bdrv_replace_child_tran()'s bdrv_replace_child_noperm() call, and we * must not pass a NULL *s->childp here. + * (TODO: In its current state, bdrv_replace_child_noperm() will not + * have NULLed *s->childp, so this does not apply yet. It will in the + * future.) * * So whether new_bs was NULL or not, we cannot pass s->childp here; and in * any case, there is no reason to pass it anyway. */ - bdrv_replace_child_noperm(&s->child, s->old_bs, true); - /* - * The child was pre-existing, so s->old_bs must be non-NULL, and - * s->child thus must not have been freed - */ - assert(s->child != NULL); - if (!new_bs) { - /* As described above, *s->childp was cleared, so restore it */ - assert(s->childp != NULL); - *s->childp = s->child; - } + bdrv_replace_child_noperm(&s->child, s->old_bs); bdrv_unref(new_bs); } @@ -2409,44 +2399,30 @@ static TransactionActionDrv bdrv_replace_child_drv = { * * The function doesn't update permissions, caller is responsible for this. * - * (*childp)->bs must not be NULL. - * * Note that if new_bs == NULL, @childp is stored in a state object attached * to @tran, so that the old child can be reinstated in the abort handler. * Therefore, if @new_bs can be NULL, @childp must stay valid until the * transaction is committed or aborted. * - * If @free_empty_child is true and @new_bs is NULL, the BdrvChild is - * freed (on commit). @free_empty_child should only be false if the - * caller will free the BDrvChild themselves (which may be important - * if this is in turn called in another transactional context). + * (TODO: The reinstating does not happen yet, but it will once + * bdrv_replace_child_noperm() NULLs *childp when new_bs is NULL.) */ static void bdrv_replace_child_tran(BdrvChild **childp, BlockDriverState *new_bs, - Transaction *tran, - bool free_empty_child) + Transaction *tran) { BdrvReplaceChildState *s = g_new(BdrvReplaceChildState, 1); *s = (BdrvReplaceChildState) { .child = *childp, .childp = new_bs == NULL ? childp : NULL, .old_bs = (*childp)->bs, - .free_empty_child = free_empty_child, }; tran_add(tran, &bdrv_replace_child_drv, s); - /* The abort handler relies on this */ - assert(s->old_bs != NULL); - if (new_bs) { bdrv_ref(new_bs); } - /* - * Pass free_empty_child=false, we will free the child (if - * necessary) in bdrv_replace_child_commit() (if our - * @free_empty_child parameter was true). - */ - bdrv_replace_child_noperm(childp, new_bs, false); + bdrv_replace_child_noperm(childp, new_bs); /* old_bs reference is transparently moved from *childp to @s */ } @@ -2828,22 +2804,8 @@ uint64_t bdrv_qapi_perm_to_blk_perm(BlockPermission qapi_perm) return permissions[qapi_perm]; } -/** - * Replace (*childp)->bs by @new_bs. - * - * If @new_bs is NULL, *childp will be set to NULL, too: BDS parents - * generally cannot handle a BdrvChild with .bs == NULL, so clearing - * BdrvChild.bs should generally immediately be followed by the - * BdrvChild pointer being cleared as well. - * - * If @free_empty_child is true and @new_bs is NULL, the BdrvChild is - * freed. @free_empty_child should only be false if the caller will - * free the BdrvChild themselves (this may be important in a - * transactional context, where it may only be freed on commit). - */ static void bdrv_replace_child_noperm(BdrvChild **childp, - BlockDriverState *new_bs, - bool free_empty_child) + BlockDriverState *new_bs) { BdrvChild *child = *childp; BlockDriverState *old_bs = child->bs; @@ -2882,9 +2844,6 @@ static void bdrv_replace_child_noperm(BdrvChild **childp, } child->bs = new_bs; - if (!new_bs) { - *childp = NULL; - } if (new_bs) { assert_bdrv_graph_writable(new_bs); @@ -2915,10 +2874,6 @@ static void bdrv_replace_child_noperm(BdrvChild **childp, bdrv_parent_drained_end_single(child); drain_saldo++; } - - if (free_empty_child && !child->bs) { - bdrv_child_free(child); - } } /** @@ -2950,14 +2905,7 @@ static void bdrv_attach_child_common_abort(void *opaque) BlockDriverState *bs = child->bs; GLOBAL_STATE_CODE(); - /* - * Pass free_empty_child=false, because we still need the child - * for the AioContext operations on the parent below; those - * BdrvChildClass methods all work on a BdrvChild object, so we - * need to keep it as an empty shell (after this function, it will - * not be attached to any parent, and it will not have a .bs). - */ - bdrv_replace_child_noperm(s->child, NULL, false); + bdrv_replace_child_noperm(s->child, NULL); if (bdrv_get_aio_context(bs) != s->old_child_ctx) { bdrv_try_set_aio_context(bs, s->old_child_ctx, &error_abort); @@ -2979,6 +2927,7 @@ static void bdrv_attach_child_common_abort(void *opaque) bdrv_unref(bs); bdrv_child_free(child); + *s->child = NULL; } static TransactionActionDrv bdrv_attach_child_common_drv = { @@ -3057,9 +3006,7 @@ static int bdrv_attach_child_common(BlockDriverState *child_bs, } bdrv_ref(child_bs); - bdrv_replace_child_noperm(&new_child, child_bs, true); - /* child_bs was non-NULL, so new_child must not have been freed */ - assert(new_child != NULL); + bdrv_replace_child_noperm(&new_child, child_bs); *child = new_child; @@ -3120,7 +3067,8 @@ static void bdrv_detach_child(BdrvChild **childp) BlockDriverState *old_bs = (*childp)->bs; GLOBAL_STATE_CODE(); - bdrv_replace_child_noperm(childp, NULL, true); + bdrv_replace_child_noperm(childp, NULL); + bdrv_child_free(*childp); if (old_bs) { /* @@ -5171,11 +5119,7 @@ static void bdrv_remove_file_or_backing_child(BlockDriverState *bs, } if (child->bs) { - /* - * Pass free_empty_child=false, we will free the child in - * bdrv_remove_filter_or_cow_child_commit() - */ - bdrv_replace_child_tran(childp, NULL, tran, false); + bdrv_replace_child_tran(childp, NULL, tran); } s = g_new(BdrvRemoveFilterOrCowChild, 1); @@ -5185,6 +5129,8 @@ static void bdrv_remove_file_or_backing_child(BlockDriverState *bs, .is_backing = (childp == &bs->backing), }; tran_add(tran, &bdrv_remove_filter_or_cow_child_drv, s); + + *childp = NULL; } /* @@ -5228,7 +5174,7 @@ static int bdrv_replace_node_noperm(BlockDriverState *from, * Passing a pointer to the local variable @c is fine here, because * @to is not NULL, and so &c will not be attached to the transaction. */ - bdrv_replace_child_tran(&c, to, tran, true); + bdrv_replace_child_tran(&c, to, tran); } return 0; @@ -5393,9 +5339,7 @@ int bdrv_replace_child_bs(BdrvChild *child, BlockDriverState *new_bs, bdrv_drained_begin(old_bs); bdrv_drained_begin(new_bs); - bdrv_replace_child_tran(&child, new_bs, tran, true); - /* @new_bs must have been non-NULL, so @child must not have been freed */ - assert(child != NULL); + bdrv_replace_child_tran(&child, new_bs, tran); found = g_hash_table_new(NULL, NULL); refresh_list = bdrv_topological_dfs(refresh_list, found, old_bs); |