diff options
author | Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> | 2019-06-26 08:48:12 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> | 2019-07-04 17:00:32 -0400 |
commit | db68f4ff06cbe0517ed0d9b5634f6cddaed2547c (patch) | |
tree | 09127383fdd8160bb275cd2594fb8e6e17bdfb34 | |
parent | 457cfcccdd107a968d106934df63b836b5dd743e (diff) |
libvhost-user: add vmsg_set_reply_u64() helper
The VhostUserMsg request is reused as the reply by message processing
functions. This is risky since request fields may corrupt the reply if
the vhost-user message handler function forgets to re-initialize them.
Changing this practice would be very invasive but we can introduce a
helper function to make u64 payload replies safe. This also eliminates
code duplication in message processing functions.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190626074815.19994-2-stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
-rw-r--r-- | contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c | 26 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c b/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c index 443b7e08c3..a8657c7af2 100644 --- a/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c +++ b/contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.c @@ -216,6 +216,15 @@ vmsg_close_fds(VhostUserMsg *vmsg) } } +/* Set reply payload.u64 and clear request flags and fd_num */ +static void vmsg_set_reply_u64(VhostUserMsg *vmsg, uint64_t val) +{ + vmsg->flags = 0; /* defaults will be set by vu_send_reply() */ + vmsg->size = sizeof(vmsg->payload.u64); + vmsg->payload.u64 = val; + vmsg->fd_num = 0; +} + /* A test to see if we have userfault available */ static bool have_userfault(void) @@ -1168,10 +1177,7 @@ vu_get_protocol_features_exec(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg) features |= dev->iface->get_protocol_features(dev); } - vmsg->payload.u64 = features; - vmsg->size = sizeof(vmsg->payload.u64); - vmsg->fd_num = 0; - + vmsg_set_reply_u64(vmsg, features); return true; } @@ -1307,17 +1313,14 @@ out: static bool vu_set_postcopy_listen(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg) { - vmsg->payload.u64 = -1; - vmsg->size = sizeof(vmsg->payload.u64); - if (dev->nregions) { vu_panic(dev, "Regions already registered at postcopy-listen"); + vmsg_set_reply_u64(vmsg, -1); return true; } dev->postcopy_listening = true; - vmsg->flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION | VHOST_USER_REPLY_MASK; - vmsg->payload.u64 = 0; /* Success */ + vmsg_set_reply_u64(vmsg, 0); return true; } @@ -1332,10 +1335,7 @@ vu_set_postcopy_end(VuDev *dev, VhostUserMsg *vmsg) DPRINT("%s: Done close\n", __func__); } - vmsg->fd_num = 0; - vmsg->payload.u64 = 0; - vmsg->size = sizeof(vmsg->payload.u64); - vmsg->flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION | VHOST_USER_REPLY_MASK; + vmsg_set_reply_u64(vmsg, 0); DPRINT("%s: exit\n", __func__); return true; } |