aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>2016-11-17 14:13:56 -0600
committerKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>2016-11-22 15:59:22 +0100
commitb2f95feec5e4d546b932848dd421ec3361e8ef77 (patch)
tree64101665dc20ac577df486347b2cb3290c4f66a6
parentecdbead659f037dc572bba9eb1cd31a5a1a9ad9a (diff)
block: Let write zeroes fallback work even with small max_transfer
Commit 443668ca rewrote the write_zeroes logic to guarantee that an unaligned request never crosses a cluster boundary. But in the rewrite, the new code assumed that at most one iteration would be needed to get to an alignment boundary. However, it is easy to trigger an assertion failure: the Linux kernel limits loopback devices to advertise a max_transfer of only 64k. Any operation that requires falling back to writes rather than more efficient zeroing must obey max_transfer during that fallback, which means an unaligned head may require multiple iterations of the write fallbacks before reaching the aligned boundaries, when layering a format with clusters larger than 64k atop the protocol of file access to a loopback device. Test case: $ qemu-img create -f qcow2 -o cluster_size=1M file 10M $ losetup /dev/loop2 /path/to/file $ qemu-io -f qcow2 /dev/loop2 qemu-io> w 7m 1k qemu-io> w -z 8003584 2093056 In fairness to Denis (as the original listed author of the culprit commit), the faulty logic for at most one iteration is probably all my fault in reworking his idea. But the solution is to restore what was in place prior to that commit: when dealing with an unaligned head or tail, iterate as many times as necessary while fragmenting the operation at max_transfer boundaries. Reported-by: Ed Swierk <eswierk@skyportsystems.com> CC: qemu-stable@nongnu.org CC: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
-rw-r--r--block/io.c13
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index aa532a5c1f..085ac34433 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -1214,6 +1214,8 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
int max_write_zeroes = MIN_NON_ZERO(bs->bl.max_pwrite_zeroes, INT_MAX);
int alignment = MAX(bs->bl.pwrite_zeroes_alignment,
bs->bl.request_alignment);
+ int max_transfer = MIN_NON_ZERO(bs->bl.max_transfer,
+ MAX_WRITE_ZEROES_BOUNCE_BUFFER);
assert(alignment % bs->bl.request_alignment == 0);
head = offset % alignment;
@@ -1229,9 +1231,12 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
* boundaries.
*/
if (head) {
- /* Make a small request up to the first aligned sector. */
- num = MIN(count, alignment - head);
- head = 0;
+ /* Make a small request up to the first aligned sector. For
+ * convenience, limit this request to max_transfer even if
+ * we don't need to fall back to writes. */
+ num = MIN(MIN(count, max_transfer), alignment - head);
+ head = (head + num) % alignment;
+ assert(num < max_write_zeroes);
} else if (tail && num > alignment) {
/* Shorten the request to the last aligned sector. */
num -= tail;
@@ -1257,8 +1262,6 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
if (ret == -ENOTSUP) {
/* Fall back to bounce buffer if write zeroes is unsupported */
- int max_transfer = MIN_NON_ZERO(bs->bl.max_transfer,
- MAX_WRITE_ZEROES_BOUNCE_BUFFER);
BdrvRequestFlags write_flags = flags & ~BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE;
if ((flags & BDRV_REQ_FUA) &&