diff options
author | Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> | 2017-04-07 12:29:05 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> | 2017-04-07 14:44:06 +0200 |
commit | 1bf03e66fd03af46ff0f98dd04b6e28f432ac1e3 (patch) | |
tree | ecf68ddad2419e4259586f79b8a28c2b3a341c69 | |
parent | 89aa0465b9135d70682420918b28b6e38a0f6322 (diff) |
block: Don't check permissions for copy on read
The assertion is currently failing. We can't require callers to have
write permissions when all they are doing is a read, so comment it out.
Add a FIXME comment in the code so that the check is re-enabled when
copy on read is refactored into its own filter driver.
Reported-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
-rw-r--r-- | block/io.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c index 2709a7007f..7321ddab3d 100644 --- a/block/io.c +++ b/block/io.c @@ -945,7 +945,14 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_copy_on_readv(BdrvChild *child, size_t skip_bytes; int ret; - assert(child->perm & (BLK_PERM_WRITE_UNCHANGED | BLK_PERM_WRITE)); + /* FIXME We cannot require callers to have write permissions when all they + * are doing is a read request. If we did things right, write permissions + * would be obtained anyway, but internally by the copy-on-read code. As + * long as it is implemented here rather than in a separat filter driver, + * the copy-on-read code doesn't have its own BdrvChild, however, for which + * it could request permissions. Therefore we have to bypass the permission + * system for the moment. */ + // assert(child->perm & (BLK_PERM_WRITE_UNCHANGED | BLK_PERM_WRITE)); /* Cover entire cluster so no additional backing file I/O is required when * allocating cluster in the image file. |