1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
|
#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2014-2017 The Bitcoin Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
"""Test the abandontransaction RPC.
The abandontransaction RPC marks a transaction and all its in-wallet
descendants as abandoned which allows their inputs to be respent. It can be
used to replace "stuck" or evicted transactions. It only works on transactions
which are not included in a block and are not currently in the mempool. It has
no effect on transactions which are already conflicted or abandoned.
"""
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.util import *
class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.num_nodes = 2
self.extra_args = [["-minrelaytxfee=0.00001"], []]
def run_test(self):
self.nodes[1].generate(100)
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
balance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
txA = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10"))
txB = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10"))
txC = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10"))
sync_mempools(self.nodes)
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert(balance - newbalance < Decimal("0.001")) #no more than fees lost
balance = newbalance
# Disconnect nodes so node0's transactions don't get into node1's mempool
disconnect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 1)
# Identify the 10btc outputs
nA = next(i for i, vout in enumerate(self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(txA, 1)["vout"]) if vout["value"] == Decimal("10"))
nB = next(i for i, vout in enumerate(self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(txB, 1)["vout"]) if vout["value"] == Decimal("10"))
nC = next(i for i, vout in enumerate(self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(txC, 1)["vout"]) if vout["value"] == Decimal("10"))
inputs =[]
# spend 10btc outputs from txA and txB
inputs.append({"txid":txA, "vout":nA})
inputs.append({"txid":txB, "vout":nB})
outputs = {}
outputs[self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("14.99998")
outputs[self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("5")
signed = self.nodes[0].signrawtransaction(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
txAB1 = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed["hex"])
# Identify the 14.99998btc output
nAB = next(i for i, vout in enumerate(self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(txAB1, 1)["vout"]) if vout["value"] == Decimal("14.99998"))
#Create a child tx spending AB1 and C
inputs = []
inputs.append({"txid":txAB1, "vout":nAB})
inputs.append({"txid":txC, "vout":nC})
outputs = {}
outputs[self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("24.9996")
signed2 = self.nodes[0].signrawtransaction(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
txABC2 = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed2["hex"])
# Create a child tx spending ABC2
signed3_change = Decimal("24.999")
inputs = [ {"txid":txABC2, "vout":0} ]
outputs = { self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): signed3_change }
signed3 = self.nodes[0].signrawtransaction(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
# note tx is never directly referenced, only abandoned as a child of the above
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed3["hex"])
# In mempool txs from self should increase balance from change
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("30") + signed3_change)
balance = newbalance
# Restart the node with a higher min relay fee so the parent tx is no longer in mempool
# TODO: redo with eviction
self.stop_node(0)
self.start_node(0, extra_args=["-minrelaytxfee=0.0001"])
# Verify txs no longer in either node's mempool
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[1].getrawmempool()), 0)
# Not in mempool txs from self should only reduce balance
# inputs are still spent, but change not received
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - signed3_change)
# Unconfirmed received funds that are not in mempool, also shouldn't show
# up in unconfirmed balance
unconfbalance = self.nodes[0].getunconfirmedbalance() + self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(unconfbalance, newbalance)
# Also shouldn't show up in listunspent
assert(not txABC2 in [utxo["txid"] for utxo in self.nodes[0].listunspent(0)])
balance = newbalance
# Abandon original transaction and verify inputs are available again
# including that the child tx was also abandoned
self.nodes[0].abandontransaction(txAB1)
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(newbalance, balance + Decimal("30"))
balance = newbalance
# Verify that even with a low min relay fee, the tx is not reaccepted from wallet on startup once abandoned
self.stop_node(0)
self.start_node(0, extra_args=["-minrelaytxfee=0.00001"])
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), balance)
# But if its received again then it is unabandoned
# And since now in mempool, the change is available
# But its child tx remains abandoned
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed["hex"])
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("20") + Decimal("14.99998"))
balance = newbalance
# Send child tx again so its unabandoned
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed2["hex"])
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("10") - Decimal("14.99998") + Decimal("24.9996"))
balance = newbalance
# Remove using high relay fee again
self.stop_node(0)
self.start_node(0, extra_args=["-minrelaytxfee=0.0001"])
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("24.9996"))
balance = newbalance
# Create a double spend of AB1 by spending again from only A's 10 output
# Mine double spend from node 1
inputs =[]
inputs.append({"txid":txA, "vout":nA})
outputs = {}
outputs[self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("9.9999")
tx = self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs)
signed = self.nodes[0].signrawtransaction(tx)
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(signed["hex"])
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 1)
sync_blocks(self.nodes)
# Verify that B and C's 10 BTC outputs are available for spending again because AB1 is now conflicted
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(newbalance, balance + Decimal("20"))
balance = newbalance
# There is currently a minor bug around this and so this test doesn't work. See Issue #7315
# Invalidate the block with the double spend and B's 10 BTC output should no longer be available
# Don't think C's should either
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash())
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
#assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("10"))
self.log.info("If balance has not declined after invalidateblock then out of mempool wallet tx which is no longer")
self.log.info("conflicted has not resumed causing its inputs to be seen as spent. See Issue #7315")
self.log.info(str(balance) + " -> " + str(newbalance) + " ?")
if __name__ == '__main__':
AbandonConflictTest().main()
|
