| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
`reindex` are set in config file
deba6fe3158cd0b2283e0901a072e434ba5b594e test: update feature_config_args.py (josibake)
2e3826cbcd675dcd1d03970233ba5e143e09eb75 util: warn if reindex is used in conf (josibake)
5e744f423838fe7d45453541271bc1a07cd62eac util: disallow setting conf in bitcoin.conf (josibake)
Pull request description:
In help from `bitcoind -h` it specifes that `conf` can only be used from the commandline. However, if `conf` is set in a `bitcoin.conf` file, there is no error and from reading the logs it seems as if the `conf=<other file>` is being used, despite it being ignored. To recreate, you can setup a `bitcoin.conf` file in the default directory, add `conf=<some other file>.conf` and in the separate config file set whichever config value you want and verify that it is being ignored. alternatively, if you set `includeconf=<some other file>.conf` , your config in `<some other file>` will be picked up.
This PR fixes this by having the node error when reading the config file if `conf=` is set.
Additionally, it was mentioned in a recent [PR review club](https://bitcoincore.reviews/24858) that if `reindex=1` is set in the config file, the node will reindex on every startup, which is undesirable:
```irc
17:14 <larryruane> michaelfolkson: Reindex is requested by the user (node operator) as a configuration option (command line or in the config file, tho you probably would never put it in the file, or else it would reindex on every startup!)
```
This PR also has a commit to warn if `reindex=1` is set in the config file.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK deba6fe3158cd0b2283e0901a072e434ba5b594e, tested on Ubuntu 22.04.
aureleoules:
tACK deba6fe3158cd0b2283e0901a072e434ba5b594e
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK deba6fe3158cd0b2283e0901a072e434ba5b594e.
Tree-SHA512: 619fd0aa14e98af1166d6beb92651f5ba3f10d38b8ee132957f094f19c3a37313d9f4d7be2e4019f3fc9a2ca5fa42d03eb539ad820e27efec7ee58a26eb520b1
|
|
fafc96aaf4c92feec50074e34a3fc1edc13cab4c test: Test year 2106 block timestamps (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Alternative to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21362 that closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21356
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK fafc96a
Tree-SHA512: 196d98f42d6f7f0222312b7bd1c68b3bd30cb6f0cbaccb900cfc5fcc689494adb2a7d7d6023c1ff1e8cf871047ec37eeca41386e31029d99cabf9343b4fd2a03
|
|
specified inputs
315fd4dbabb6b631b755811742a3bdf93e1241bf test: Test for out of bounds vout in sendall (Andrew Chow)
b132c85650afb2182f2e58e903f3d6f86fd3fb22 wallet: Check utxo prevout index out of bounds in sendall (Andrew Chow)
708b72b7151c855cb5dac2fb6a81e8f35153c46f test: Test that sendall works with watchonly spending specific utxos (Andrew Chow)
6bcd7e2a3b52f855db84cd23b5ee70d27be3434f wallet: Correctly check ismine for sendall (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The `sendall` RPC would previously fail when used with a watchonly wallet and specified inputs. This failure was caused by checking isminetype equality with ISMINE_ALL rather than a bitwise AND as IsMine can never return ISMINE_ALL.
Also added a test.
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26344/commits/315fd4dbabb6b631b755811742a3bdf93e1241bf
furszy:
ACK 315fd4db
Tree-SHA512: fb55cf6524e789964770b803f401027319f0351433ea084ffa7c5e6f1797567a608c956b7f7c5bd542aa172c4b7b38b07d0976f5ec587569efead27266e8664c
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Use maximum timestamp in getblocktemplate test
* Mine block with maximum timestamp and MTP in blockchain test
|
|
being empty
e133264c5b1f72e94dcb9cebd85cdb523fcf8070 Add test for PSBT input verification (Greg Sanders)
d25699280af1ea45bebc884f63a10da7ea275ef9 Verify PSBT inputs rather than check for fields being empty (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
In a few keys spots, PSBT finality is checked by looking for non-empty witness data.
This complicates a couple things:
1) Empty data can be valid in certain cases
2) User may be passed bogus final data by a counterparty during PSBT work happening, and end up with incorrect signatures that they may not be able to check in other contexts if the UTXO doesn't exist yet in chain/mempool, timelocks, etc.
On the whole I think these heavier checks are worth it in case someone is actually assuming the signatures are correct if our API is saying so.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e133264c5b1f72e94dcb9cebd85cdb523fcf8070
Tree-SHA512: 9de4fbb0be1257b081781f5df908fd55666e3acd5c4e36beb3b3f2f5a6aed69ff77068c44cde6127e159e773293fd9ced4c0bb47e693969f337e74dc8af030da
|
|
pruned throw an error
4aff7a48a4e0f1075306f181a276b8a74c857022 test: check importing wallets when blocks are pruned throw an error (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following error:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/437b608df289c97fd88f1dd79bdc8359e1b1c5b1/src/wallet/rpc/backup.cpp#L513-L518
ACKs for top commit:
andrewtoth:
ACK 4aff7a48a4e0f1075306f181a276b8a74c857022
Tree-SHA512: fbbf6056cb3759f726b8a5ff25fca51bf47e973e5d655ec164e2bec88e2dbd3b243677869d2cf33af268ea635ca0f2e9f737c4734077fc5a936ac3a24ad4b88b
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a8250e30f16f2919ea5aa122b2880b076bd398a3 doc: add release note about `/rest/deploymentinfo` (brunoerg)
5c960200242d237f2cf74309b8fd29e8162682ed doc: add `/deploymentinfo` in REST-interface (brunoerg)
3e44bee08eb93e086179b92007649d47652aa439 test: add coverage for `/rest/deploymentinfo` (brunoerg)
91497031cbd74a0665b7fc31eb6b73bfb7bd0d40 rest: add `/deploymentinfo` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
#23508 added a new RPC named `getdeploymentinfo`, it moved the softfork section from `getblockchaininfo` into this new one. In the REST interface, we have an endpoint named`/rest/chaininfo.json` (which refers to `getblockchaininfo`), so, this PR adds a new REST endpoint named `/deploymentinfo` which refers to `getdeploymentinfo`.
You can use it by passing a block hash, e.g: '/rest/deploymentinfo/<BLOCKHASH>.json' or you can use it without passing a block hash to get the 'deploymentinfo' for the last block.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK a8250e30f16f2919ea5aa122b2880b076bd398a3 rebase-only since my last review at c65f82bb
achow101:
ACK a8250e30f16f2919ea5aa122b2880b076bd398a3
stickies-v:
re-ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/a8250e30f16f2919ea5aa122b2880b076bd398a3
Tree-SHA512: 0735183b6828d51a72ed0e2be5a09b314ac4693f548982c6e9adaa0ef07a55aa428d3b2d1b1de70b83169811a663a8624b686166e5797f624dcc00178b9796e6
|
|
bff05bd7456d3634b0c83539293a753db6d76376 test: add functional test for -discover (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a functional test for `-discover`. It tests different scenarios where `localaddresses` should be empty or may contain the addresses. Obs: `localaddresses` is not always accurate, so it's not possible to ensure (100%) it will contain any addresses.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/515200298b555845696a07ae2bc0a84a5dd02ae4/src/init.cpp#L449
Obs: See #24258 - It adds test coverage for this field but for nodes with proxy.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code review ACK bff05bd7456d3634b0c83539293a753db6d76376
achow101:
ACK bff05bd7456d3634b0c83539293a753db6d76376
rajarshimaitra:
tACK bff05bd7456d3634b0c83539293a753db6d76376
Tree-SHA512: 8782497c146bce1ba86fda6146f3847465d7069f2cb6b84f2afc8f3b43efa813442bffe7447e9ce02adee304100b60365409bf0e5d875dfb880038442feec2a6
|
|
626b7c8493ea1063f30ae4f62e1b36eb87adf685 fuzz: add scanblocks as safe for fuzzing (James O'Beirne)
94fe5453c7f8a86136dc9a6e0b370afd32564209 test: rpc: add scanblocks functional test (Jonas Schnelli)
6ef2566b68cb8570220c13df11c5cb5a5f4f7a4d rpc: add scanblocks - scan for relevant blocks with descriptors (Jonas Schnelli)
a4258f6e81a476ce1687e2d58f7d2bf16162a172 rpc: move-only: consolidate blockchain scan args (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
Revives #20664. All feedback from the previous PR has either been responded to inline or incorporated here.
---
Major changes from Jonas' PR:
- consolidated arguments for scantxoutset/scanblocks
- substantial cleanup of the functional test
Here's the range-diff (`git range-diff master jonasschnelli/2020/12/filterblocks_rpc jamesob/2021-11-scanblocks`): https://gist.github.com/jamesob/aa4a975344209f0316444b8de2ec1d18
### Original PR description
> The `scanblocks` RPC call allows one to get relevant blockhashes from a set of descriptors by scanning all blockfilters in a given range.
>
> **Example:**
>
> `scanblocks start '["addr(<bitcoin_address>)"]' 661000` (returns relevant blockhashes for `<bitcoin_address>` from blockrange 661000->tip)
>
> ## Why is this useful?
> **Fast wallet rescans**: get the relevant blocks and only rescan those via `rescanblockchain getblockheader(<hash>)[height] getblockheader(<hash>)[height])`. A future PR may add an option to allow to provide an array of blockhashes to `rescanblockchain`.
>
> **prune wallet rescans**: (_needs additional changes_): together with a call to fetch blocks from the p2p network if they have been pruned, it would allow to rescan wallets back to the genesis block in pruned mode (relevant #15946).
>
> **SPV mode** (_needs additional changes_): it would be possible to build the blockfilterindex from the p2p network (rather then deriving them from the blocks) and thus allow some sort of hybrid-SPV mode with moderate bandwidth consumption (related #9483)
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
diff re-ACK 626b7c8
Tree-SHA512: f84e4dcb851b122b39e9700c58fbc31e899cdcf9b587df9505eaf1f45578cc4253e89ce2a45d1ff21bd213e31ddeedbbcad2c80810f46755b30acc17b07e2873
|
|
bf9597606166323158bbf631137b82d41f39334f doc: add note about snapshot chainstate init (James O'Beirne)
e4d799528696c5ede38c257afaffd367917e0de8 test: add testcases for snapshot initialization (James O'Beirne)
cced4e7336d93a2dc88e4a61c49941887766bd72 test: move-only-ish: factor out LoadVerifyActivateChainstate() (James O'Beirne)
51fc9241c08a00f1f407f1534853a5cddbbc0a23 test: allow on-disk coins and block tree dbs in tests (James O'Beirne)
3c361391b8f5971eb3c7b620aa7ad9b437cc515e test: add reset_chainstate parameter for snapshot unittests (James O'Beirne)
00b357c215ed900145bd770525a341ba0ed9c027 validation: add ResetChainstates() (James O'Beirne)
3a29dfbfb2c16a50d854f6f81428a68aa9180509 move-only: test: make snapshot chainstate setup reusable (James O'Beirne)
8153bd9247dad3982d54488bcdb3960470315290 blockmanager: avoid undefined behavior during FlushBlockFile (James O'Beirne)
ad67ff377c2b271cb4683da2fb25fd295557f731 validation: remove snapshot datadirs upon validation failure (James O'Beirne)
34d159033106cc595cfa852695610bfe419c989c add utilities for deleting on-disk leveldb data (James O'Beirne)
252abd1e8bc5cdf4368ad55e827a873240535b28 init: add utxo snapshot detection (James O'Beirne)
f9f1735f139b6a1f1c7fea50717ff90dc4ba2bce validation: rename snapshot chainstate dir (James O'Beirne)
d14bebf100aaaa25c7558eeed8b5c536da99885f db: add StoragePath to CDBWrapper/CCoinsViewDB (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15606)
---
Half of the replacement for #24232. The original PR grew larger than expected throughout the review process.
This change adds the ability to initialize a snapshot-based chainstate during init if one is detected on disk. This is of course unused as of now (aside from in unittests) given that we haven't yet enabled actually loading snapshots.
Don't be scared! There are some big move-only commits in here.
Accompanying changes include:
- moving the snapshot coinsdb directory from being called `chainstate_[base blockhash]` to `chainstate_snapshot`, since we only support one snapshot in use at a time. This simplifies some logic, but it necessitates writing that base blockhash out to a file within the coinsdb dir. See [discussion here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24232#discussion_r832762880).
- adding a simple fix in `FlushBlockFile()` that avoids a crash when attemping to flush to disk before `LoadBlockIndexDB()` is called, which happens when calling `MaybeRebalanceCaches()` during multiple chainstate init.
- improving the unittest to allow testing with on-disk chainstates - necessary to test a simulated restart and re-initialization.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK bf9597606166323158bbf631137b82d41f39334f
ariard:
Code Review ACK bf9597606
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK bf9597606166323158bbf631137b82d41f39334f. Changes since last review: rebasing, switching from CAutoFile to AutoFile, adding comments, switching from BOOST_CHECK to Assert in test util, using chainman.GetMutex() in tests, destroying one ChainstateManager before creating a new one in tests
fjahr:
utACK bf9597606166323158bbf631137b82d41f39334f
aureleoules:
ACK bf9597606166323158bbf631137b82d41f39334f
Tree-SHA512: 15ae75caf19f8d12a12d2647c52897904d27b265a7af6b4ae7b858592eeadb8f9da6c2394b6baebec90adc28742c053e3eb506119577dae7c1e722ebb3b7bcc0
|
|
output has a script path
9e386afb67bf8fa71b72f730da1695eeb11828cd tests: Test that PSBT_OUT_TAP_TREE is included correctly (Andrew Chow)
30ff25cf37eec4b09ab40424eb5d6a4a80410955 psbt: Only include m_tap_tree if it has scripts (Andrew Chow)
0577d423adda8e719d7611d03355680c8fbacab8 psbt: Change m_tap_tree to store just the tuples (Andrew Chow)
22c051ca70bae73e0430b05fb9d879591df27699 tests: Test that PSBT_OUT_TAP_TREE is combined correctly (Andrew Chow)
7df6e1bb77a96eac4fbcba424bbe780636b86650 psbt: Fix merging of m_tap_tree (Andrew Chow)
0652dc53b291bd295caff4093ec2854fd4b34645 [BugFix]: Do not allow deserializing PSBT with empty PSBT_OUT_TAP_TREE (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
PSBT_OUT_TAP_TREE should not be included for outputs that do not have such a tree. This should be disallowed during parsing, as well as prior to serialization when the field is populated during updating.
Also added some test cases.
Alternative to #25856
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25858/commits/9e386afb67bf8fa71b72f730da1695eeb11828cd
darosior:
ACK 9e386afb67bf8fa71b72f730da1695eeb11828cd
Tree-SHA512: ce5c02a69752d176dbd967c1e8d30129b1905c8f186aeeef034576c1de82059271a1ee846bd040f5be4e66bb77ba711dcf14ac1e597c5707d7e7e2293f6cfefb
|
|
fa08663344eb4cea335804d149b46ff4ff081b1c rpc: Return coinbase flag in scantxoutset (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
I guess it can't hurt to return this for someone that wants to know it
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK fa08663344eb4cea335804d149b46ff4ff081b1c
shaavan:
ACK fa08663344eb4cea335804d149b46ff4ff081b1c
Tree-SHA512: 04c554b3ed9877bab93ffcf0c1a4430cd41b30c5f4f3bf462a518fc8b3d68832dd85a29e81bd805eaa16e987856933d7a888a8c126f670bb2844bbd5ca1bf902
|
|
04526787b5f6613d1f1ad78434e1dd24ab88dd76 Validate `port` options (amadeuszpawlik)
f8387c42343867779170a0f96ef64e6acff5c481 Validate port value in `SplitHostPort` (amadeuszpawlik)
Pull request description:
Validate `port`-options, so that invalid values are rejected early in the startup.
Ports are `uint16_t`s, which effectively limits a port's value to <=65535. As discussed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24116 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24344, port "0" is considered invalid too.
Proposed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21893#issuecomment-835784223
The `SplitHostPort(std::string in, uint16_t& portOut, std::string& hostOut)` now returns a bool that indicates whether the port value was set and within the allowed range. This is an improvement that can be used not only for port validation of options at startup, but also in rpc calls, etc,
ACKs for top commit:
luke-jr:
utACK 04526787b5f6613d1f1ad78434e1dd24ab88dd76
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 04526787b5f6613d1f1ad78434e1dd24ab88dd76. Just suggested changes since last review: reverting some SplitHostPort changes, adding release notes, avoiding 'GetArgs[0]` problem.
Tree-SHA512: f1ac80bf98520b287a6413ceadb41bc3a93c491955de9b9319ee1298ac0ab982751905762a287e748997ead6198a8bb7a3bc8817ac9e3d2468e11ab4a0f8496d
|
|
|
|
|
|
add two new test cases for conf and reindex
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check `port` options for invalid values (ports are parsed as uint16, so
in practice values >65535 are invalid; port 0 is undefined and therefore
considered invalid too). This allows for an early rejection of faulty
values and an supplying an informative message to the user.
Splits tests in `feature_proxy.py` to cover both invalid `hostname`
and `port` values.
Adds a release-note as previously valid `-port` and `-rpcport` values
can now result in errors.
|
|
Co-authored-by: James O'Beirne <james.obeirne@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
faeea28753a94c45618c1b0ba83bb8700c53009a test: Avoid race in disconnect_nodes helper (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Also wait for the other node to notice the closed socket. Otherwise, the other node is not able to use the connect helper.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26014
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
ACK faeea2875
glozow:
ACK faeea28753a94c45618c1b0ba83bb8700c53009a
Tree-SHA512: 2f0fa6812c0519aba3eaf21f0c70073b768fcd4dad23989d57e138ee9057a7da1a6b281645e9bff4051259cdca51568700e066491ac6b6daae99f30e395159ca
|
|
Tests the change introduced in PR #25931 ("rpc: sort listdescriptors
result", commit 50996241f2b0eefeaab4fcd11b9730fa2dc107ae).
|
|
RPC_TYPE_ERROR, not RPC_MISC_ERROR
e68d380797918e655decb76fc11725197d6d5323 rpc: remove unneeded RPCTypeCheckArgument checks (furszy)
55566630c60d23993a52ed54c95e7891f4588d57 rpc: treat univalue type check error as RPC_TYPE_ERROR, not RPC_MISC_ERROR (furszy)
Pull request description:
Same rationale as #26039, tackling another angle of the problem.
#### Context
We have the same univalue type error checking code spread/duplicated few times:
`RPCTypeCheckObj`, `RPCTypeCheckArgument`, `UniValue::checkType`.
In the first two functions, we are properly returning an `RPC_TYPE_ERROR` while in `UniValue::checkType`
we are throwing an `std::runtime_error` which is caught by the RPC server request handler, who invalidly
treats it as `RPC_MISC_ERROR` (which is a generic error return code that provides no information to the user).
#### Proposed Changes
Throw a custom exception from `Univalue::checkType` (instead of a plain
`std::runtime_error`) and catch it on the RPC server request handler.
So we properly return `RPC_TYPE_ERROR` (-3) on every arg type error and
not the general `RPC_MISC_ERROR` (-1).
This will allow us to remove all the `RPCTypeCheckArgument` calls. As them are redundant since #25629.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 4e4c41851fd4e2b01a2d8b94e71513f9831f810768ebd89684caca4901e87d3677980003949bcce441f9ca607a1b38a5894839b6c492f5947b8bab8cd9423ba6
|
|
-onlynet but are unreachable
68209a7b5c0326e14508d9cf749771605bd6ffe7 rpc: make addpeeraddress work with cjdns addresses (Martin Zumsande)
a8a9ed67cc447d204304ccfd844c45fd76486c6a init: Abort if i2p/cjdns are chosen via -onlynet but unreachable (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
If the networks i2p / cjdns are chosen via `-onlynet` but the user forgot to provide `-i2psam` / `-cjdnsreachable`, no outbound connections will be made - it would be nice to inform the user about that.
The solution proposed here mimics existing behavior for `-onlynet=onion` and non-specified `-onion`/`-proxy` where we already abort with an InitError - if reviewers would prefer to just print a warning, please say so.
The second commit adds CJDNS support to the debug-only `addpeeraddress` RPC allowing to add CJDNS addresses to addrman for testing and debug purposes. (if `-cjdnsreachable=1`)
This is the result of an [IRC discussion](https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2022-09-01#848066;) with vasild.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK 68209a7b5c0326e14508d9cf749771605bd6ffe7
dergoegge:
ACK 68209a7b5c0326e14508d9cf749771605bd6ffe7
Tree-SHA512: 6db9787f01820190f14f90a0b39e4206603421eb7521f792879094d8bbf4d4d0bfd70665eadcc40994ac7941a15ab5a8d65c4779fba5634c0e6fa66eb0972b8d
|
|
index in `interface_rest`
aee29c5d9ebd8b68fc7e6607d58284f9b91078d1 test: wait for the expected basic block filter index in `interface_rest` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Fixes #26098
Wait for the expected 'basic block filter index' to not cause issues when calling `/blockfilterheaders/basic/`, like:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/9bd842a5928f160c1bc8fca6ca7d8d43f096fd6a/src/rest.cpp#L423-L424
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 36abe28a76cd01ce7ac1ae9258ce1a9a5473d985c498d915c1130256bc800d0d1207708a195b78bbcb00478ec9c373a2fbfeb26c1fddeb35abe8b253e0308058
|
|
|
|
coin fails
74eb194f8155624c598ede1a3f45545f8d74c9db test: check that bumping tx with already spent coin fails (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing coverage for the `bumpfee` RPC, for the case that a wallet transaction is passed with an input that is already spent:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/0b02ce914e8594e8938e527c91c07f57def4e943/src/wallet/feebumper.cpp#L182-L186
This is achieved by simply creating a transaction with a wallet and then mining it (I'm not aware of any other scenario how this could be achieved). Additionally, two RPC throw checks are changed in the test to be more specific:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/0b02ce914e8594e8938e527c91c07f57def4e943/src/wallet/feebumper.cpp#L42-L45
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/0b02ce914e8594e8938e527c91c07f57def4e943/src/wallet/feebumper.cpp#L47-L50
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK 74eb194f8155624c598ede1a3f45545f8d74c9db
Tree-SHA512: 487d0e30a7cc5e2a5f63424ab6aed2963e05e47e2649fb1ad2289c4b48ad488f2dae5c27bf50e532e7eb2f2f5bf0340ed7dda985d14473f31dec0d757bb56324
|
|
locked wallet
2c03465dfa18ee615f76b6e507a65ef451ce1b7c test: Test watchonly imports with passphrase-locked wallet (Aurèle Oulès)
1fcf9e6e81ea8299fad958b32777c36b696090ac rpc: Allow importmulti watchonly imports with locked wallet (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
Allows watch-only imports on locked wallets with `importmulti`.
Also adds a test.
Fixes #17867.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 2c03465dfa18ee615f76b6e507a65ef451ce1b7c
kristapsk:
re-ACK 2c03465dfa18ee615f76b6e507a65ef451ce1b7c
theStack:
re-ACK 2c03465dfa18ee615f76b6e507a65ef451ce1b7c
Tree-SHA512: 9978d6e59a230c0d160efd312c671cf59458797387d6622b6bf5c9e0681c1fcfebedb3d834fa9314dc5a1eda97e3295696352eacbeab9b43a46b942990087035
|
|
|
|
words and fix spelling
b6a65568dfbaf25839858b3114c28c07d8f9a45f Fix issues identified by codespell 2.2.1 and update ignored words (Jon Atack)
8f2010de6e7c232d540cc4a10516ae6ec98ebb22 Bump codespell version to 2.2.1 (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
as well as one in `test/lint/lint-locale-dependence.py` not seen by the spelling linter.
Can be tested locally by running `test/lint/lint-spelling.py` on this branch versus on master and by checking the CI linter result.
ACKs for top commit:
satsie:
ACK b6a65568dfbaf25839858b3114c28c07d8f9a45f
Tree-SHA512: ab4ba029a9a5de5926fa5d336bd3b21245acf0649c6aa69a48c223bd22327e13beb32e970f66f54db58cd318731b643e1c7ace9a89776ed2a069cddc02363b71
|
|
|
|
...because -i2psam or -cjdnsreachable are not provided.
This mimics existing behavior for -onlynet=onion and non-specified proxy.
|
|
|
|
667401a8557f94a3e0b7ec17096077dd8985eac7 [test] only run feature_rbf.py once (glozow)
Pull request description:
There is no need to run this test twice with --descriptors and --legacy-wallet, as it doesn't use the wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK 667401a8557f94a3e0b7ec17096077dd8985eac7.
theStack:
ACK 667401a8557f94a3e0b7ec17096077dd8985eac7
brunoerg:
ACK 667401a8557f94a3e0b7ec17096077dd8985eac7
Tree-SHA512: 339213159fac29ebc5678461fae41645aed57877d5525e8ca4755890b869a17ae0bea3f590114769c84b71a7df20c59c9530ab8b327912151c82ec58022f7e71
|
|
tx-size check
cc434cbf583ec8d1b0f3aa504417231fdc81f33a wallet: fix sendall creates tx that fails tx-size check (kouloumos)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26011
The `sendall` RPC doesn't use `CreateTransactionInternal` as the rest of
the wallet RPCs. [This has already been discussed in the original PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24118#issuecomment-1029462114).
By not going through that path, it never checks the transaction's weight
against the maximum tx weight for transactions we're willing to relay.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/447f50e4aed9a8b1d80e1891cda85801aeb80b4e/src/wallet/spend.cpp#L1013-L1018
This PR adds a check for tx-size as well as test coverage for that case.
_Note: It seems that the test takes a bit of time on slower machines,
I'm not sure if dropping it might be for the better._
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
re ACK cc434cb via range-diff. Changes were addressing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26024#discussion_r971325299 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26024#discussion_r970651614.
achow101:
ACK cc434cbf583ec8d1b0f3aa504417231fdc81f33a
w0xlt:
reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26024/commits/cc434cbf583ec8d1b0f3aa504417231fdc81f33a
Tree-SHA512: 64a1d8f2c737b39f3ccee90689eda1dd9c1b65f11b2c7bc0ec8bfe72f0202ce90ab4033bb0ecfc6080af8c947575059588a00938fe48e7fd553f7fb5ee03b3cc
|
|
fa1ce96184a1815f453e64e14d77cb0025800be9 test: Add missing syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue (MacroFake)
faa4916529699f9a057e2bf2459d957bcec1de84 test/doc: Remove unused syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Fixes #26071
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa1ce96184a1815f453e64e14d77cb0025800be9
glozow:
ACK fa1ce96184a1815f453e64e14d77cb0025800be9
w0xlt:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/fa1ce96184a1815f453e64e14d77cb0025800be9
Tree-SHA512: d1e101b55477360ead2b99ade5d42b922aabe293ec84fb26764e29161c5be6c534aef6f22d2cc5ea63a4bd6b6e77b701f1a7a2283b8e7e815d343a604cd77656
|
|
By throwing a custom exception from `Univalue::checkType` (instead of a plain
std::runtime_error) and catching it on the RPC server request handler.
So we properly return RPC_TYPE_ERROR (-3) on arg type errors and
not the general RPC_MISC_ERROR (-1).
|
|
and also fix spelling in test/lint/lint-locale-dependence.py not caught by the
spelling linter and fix up a paragraph we are touching here in test/README.md.
|
|
The `sendall` RPC doesn't use `CreateTransactionInternal`as the rest of
the wallet RPCs and it never checks against the tx-size mempool limit.
Add a check for tx-size as well as test coverage for that case.
|
|
|
|
6f8e3818af7585b961039bf0c768be2e4ee44e0f sendall: check if the maxtxfee has been exceeded (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
Previously the `sendall` RPC didn't check whether the fees of the transaction it creates exceed the set `maxtxfee`. This PR adds this check to `sendall` and a test case for it.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6f8e3818af7585b961039bf0c768be2e4ee44e0f
Xekyo:
ACK 6f8e3818af7585b961039bf0c768be2e4ee44e0f
glozow:
Concept ACK 6f8e3818af7585b961039bf0c768be2e4ee44e0f. The high feerate is unlikely but sendall should respect the existing wallet options.
Tree-SHA512: 6ef0961937091293d49be16f17e4451cff3159d901c0c7c6e508883999dfe0c20ed4d7126bf74bfea8150d4c1eef961a45f0c28ef64562e6cb817fede2319f1a
|
|
unless 'inputs' are provided
b00fc44ca5cb938f18d31cde7feb4e1c968dcc2f test: add coverage for 'add_inputs' dynamic default value (furszy)
ddbcfdf3d050061f4e8979a0e2bb63bba5a43c47 RPC: bugfix, 'add_inputs' default value is true unless 'inputs' are provided (furszy)
Pull request description:
This bugfix was meant to be in #25685, but decoupled it to try to make it part of 24.0 release.
It's a truly misleading functionality.
This PR doesn't change behavior in any way. Just fixes two invalid RPC help messages and adds test
coverage for the current behavior.
#### Description
In both RPC commands `send()` and `walletcreatefundedpsbt` the help message says
that `add_inputs` default value is false when it's actually dynamically set by the following statement:
```c++
coin_control.m_allow_other_inputs = rawTx.vin.size() == 0;
```
Which means that, by default, `add_inputs` is true unless there is any pre-set input, in which
case, the default is false.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK b00fc44ca5cb938f18d31cde7feb4e1c968dcc2f
S3RK:
ACK b00fc44ca5cb938f18d31cde7feb4e1c968dcc2f
Tree-SHA512: 5c68a40d81c994e0ab6de0817db69c4d3dea3a9a64a60362531bf583b7a4c37d524b740905a3f3a89cdbf221913ff5b504746625adb8622788aea93a35bbcd40
|
