aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-02-22wallet: reuse change dest when recreating TX with avoidpartialspendsMatthew Zipkin
Github-Pull: #27053 Rebased-From: 14b4921a91920df25b19ff420bfe2bff8c56f71e
2023-02-20For feebump, ignore abandoned descendant spendsJohn Moffett
To be eligible for fee-bumping, a transaction must not have any of its outputs (eg - change) spent in other unconfirmed transactions in the wallet. However, this check should not apply to abandoned transactions. A new test case is added to cover this case. Github-Pull: #26675 Rebased-From: f9ce0eadf4eb58d1e2207c27fabe69a5642482e7
2023-02-20test: wallet: check that labels are migrated to watchonly walletSebastian Falbesoner
Github-Pull: #26761 Rebased-From: 730e14a317ae45fe871c8d6f44a51936756bbbea
2022-12-05test: Coin Selection, duplicated preset inputs selectionfurszy
This exercises the bug inside CoinsResult::Erase that ends up on (1) a wallet crash or (2) a created and broadcasted tx that contains a reduced recipient's amount. This is covered by making the wallet selects the preset inputs twice during the coin selection process. Making the wallet think that the selection process result covers the entire tx target when it does not. It's actually creating a tx that sends more coins than what inputs are covering for. Which, combined with the SFFO option, makes the wallet incorrectly reduce the recipient's amount by the difference between the original target and the wrongly counted inputs. Which means, a created and relayed tx sending less coins to the destination than what the user inputted. Github-Pull: #26560 Rebased-From: cf793846978a8783c23b66ba6b4f3f30e83ff3eb
2022-12-02[test] Add p2p_tx_privacy.pydergoegge
Github-Pull: #26569 Rebased-From: 8f2dac54096c20afd8fd12c21a2ee5465fea085e
2022-12-01wallet: Explicitly say migratewallet on encrypted wallets is unsupportedAndrew Chow
Github-Pull: #26594 Rebased-From: 5e65a216d1fd00c447757736d4f2899d235e731a
2022-12-01tests: Test for migrating encrypted walletsAndrew Chow
Due to an oversight, we cannot currently migrate encrypted wallets, regardless of whether they are unlocked. Migrating such wallets will trigger an error, and result in the cleanup being run. This conveniently allows us to check some parts of the cleanup code. Github-Pull: #26594 Rebased-From: 88afc73ae0c67a4482ecd3d77eb2a8fd2673f82d
2022-11-28Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26591: [24.x] ci: Skip COMMIT_RANGE if no CIRRUS_PRMarcoFalke
fad1c55301b9f2d091d3b0d8a75ff522ce8dae5a lint: Skip COMMIT_RANGE if no CIRRUS_PR (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Identical commit from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26588 Untested, but this may fix the red-ness in https://cirrus-ci.com/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/24.x, e.g. https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4697153604419584: Backport requested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26588#issuecomment-1328916876 ACKs for top commit: hebasto: ACK fad1c55301b9f2d091d3b0d8a75ff522ce8dae5a, the same commit as in #26588. Tree-SHA512: 8d8a735e25bc1f774f8cbf058b95b7019941138ab78fb7819852755c7a416a783ee116457b97031d447639002353d7bf12ee8445275b7b5eec4abc7421cc171d
2022-11-28lint: Skip COMMIT_RANGE if no CIRRUS_PRMarcoFalke
2022-11-04tests: Test Taproot PSBT signing with keys in other descriptorAndrew Chow
Test that the same keys included in other descriptors will still be able to sign a PSBT that requires those keys. Github-Pull: #26418 Rebased-From: 0de30ed509a9969cb254e00097671625c9e107d2
2022-11-04tests: Use new wallets for each test in wallet_taproot.pyAndrew Chow
To avoid a wallet potentially being able to sign a transaction using keys from descriptors imported in previous tests, make new wallets for each test case rather than sharing them. Github-Pull: #26418 Rebased-From: 6efcdf6b7f6daa83b5937aa630fce358fdaed333
2022-10-28rpc: make `address` field optionalw0xlt
Github-Pull: #26349 Rebased-From: eb679a7896ce00e322972a011b023661766923b9
2022-10-28rpc: add non-regression test about deriveaddresses crash when index is ↵muxator
2147483647 This test would cause a crash in bitcoind (see #26274) if the fix given in the previous commit was not applied. Github-Pull: #26275 Rebased-From: 9153ff3e274953ea0d92d53ddab4c72deeace1b1
2022-10-28test: Test for out of bounds vout in sendallAndrew Chow
Github-Pull: #26344 Rebased-From: 315fd4dbabb6b631b755811742a3bdf93e1241bf
2022-10-28test: Test that sendall works with watchonly spending specific utxosAndrew Chow
Github-Pull: #26344 Rebased-From: 708b72b7151c855cb5dac2fb6a81e8f35153c46f
2022-10-13tests: Test that PSBT_OUT_TAP_TREE is included correctlyAndrew Chow
Github-Pull: #25858 Rebased-From: 9e386afb67bf8fa71b72f730da1695eeb11828cd
2022-10-13tests: Test that PSBT_OUT_TAP_TREE is combined correctlyAndrew Chow
Github-Pull: #25858 Rebased-From: 22c051ca70bae73e0430b05fb9d879591df27699
2022-09-29Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26197: [24.x] test: Avoid race in disconnect_nodes helperfanquake
faeea28753a94c45618c1b0ba83bb8700c53009a test: Avoid race in disconnect_nodes helper (MacroFake) Pull request description: Backport of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26138 ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK faeea28753a94c45618c1b0ba83bb8700c53009a Tree-SHA512: f967c38750220bd6c245db953055f8e6d5402b3a24081ca03795a8403c2ed4eab772b2e9c2d3b581c3bc55d191dd4e22711b5f97d39856d676f10799fc64a9c7
2022-09-20test: Avoid race in disconnect_nodes helperMacroFake
2022-09-19init: Abort if i2p/cjdns are chosen via -onlynet but unreachableMartin Zumsande
...because -i2psam or -cjdnsreachable are not provided. This mimics existing behavior for -onlynet=onion and non-specified proxy.
2022-09-16Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26107: [test] only run feature_rbf.py onceMacroFake
667401a8557f94a3e0b7ec17096077dd8985eac7 [test] only run feature_rbf.py once (glozow) Pull request description: There is no need to run this test twice with --descriptors and --legacy-wallet, as it doesn't use the wallet. ACKs for top commit: aureleoules: ACK 667401a8557f94a3e0b7ec17096077dd8985eac7. theStack: ACK 667401a8557f94a3e0b7ec17096077dd8985eac7 brunoerg: ACK 667401a8557f94a3e0b7ec17096077dd8985eac7 Tree-SHA512: 339213159fac29ebc5678461fae41645aed57877d5525e8ca4755890b869a17ae0bea3f590114769c84b71a7df20c59c9530ab8b327912151c82ec58022f7e71
2022-09-15Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26024: wallet: fix sendall creates tx that fails ↵Andrew Chow
tx-size check cc434cbf583ec8d1b0f3aa504417231fdc81f33a wallet: fix sendall creates tx that fails tx-size check (kouloumos) Pull request description: Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26011 The `sendall` RPC doesn't use `CreateTransactionInternal` as the rest of the wallet RPCs. [This has already been discussed in the original PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24118#issuecomment-1029462114). By not going through that path, it never checks the transaction's weight against the maximum tx weight for transactions we're willing to relay. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/447f50e4aed9a8b1d80e1891cda85801aeb80b4e/src/wallet/spend.cpp#L1013-L1018 This PR adds a check for tx-size as well as test coverage for that case. _Note: It seems that the test takes a bit of time on slower machines, I'm not sure if dropping it might be for the better._ ACKs for top commit: glozow: re ACK cc434cb via range-diff. Changes were addressing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26024#discussion_r971325299 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26024#discussion_r970651614. achow101: ACK cc434cbf583ec8d1b0f3aa504417231fdc81f33a w0xlt: reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26024/commits/cc434cbf583ec8d1b0f3aa504417231fdc81f33a Tree-SHA512: 64a1d8f2c737b39f3ccee90689eda1dd9c1b65f11b2c7bc0ec8bfe72f0202ce90ab4033bb0ecfc6080af8c947575059588a00938fe48e7fd553f7fb5ee03b3cc
2022-09-15Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26091: test: Fix syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue callsAndrew Chow
fa1ce96184a1815f453e64e14d77cb0025800be9 test: Add missing syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue (MacroFake) faa4916529699f9a057e2bf2459d957bcec1de84 test/doc: Remove unused syncwithvalidationinterfacequeue (MacroFake) Pull request description: Fixes #26071 ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK fa1ce96184a1815f453e64e14d77cb0025800be9 glozow: ACK fa1ce96184a1815f453e64e14d77cb0025800be9 w0xlt: ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/fa1ce96184a1815f453e64e14d77cb0025800be9 Tree-SHA512: d1e101b55477360ead2b99ade5d42b922aabe293ec84fb26764e29161c5be6c534aef6f22d2cc5ea63a4bd6b6e77b701f1a7a2283b8e7e815d343a604cd77656
2022-09-15wallet: fix sendall creates tx that fails tx-size checkkouloumos
The `sendall` RPC doesn't use `CreateTransactionInternal`as the rest of the wallet RPCs and it never checks against the tx-size mempool limit. Add a check for tx-size as well as test coverage for that case.
2022-09-15test: Add missing syncwithvalidationinterfacequeueMacroFake
2022-09-15Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26084: sendall: check if the maxtxfee has been exceededMacroFake
6f8e3818af7585b961039bf0c768be2e4ee44e0f sendall: check if the maxtxfee has been exceeded (ishaanam) Pull request description: Previously the `sendall` RPC didn't check whether the fees of the transaction it creates exceed the set `maxtxfee`. This PR adds this check to `sendall` and a test case for it. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 6f8e3818af7585b961039bf0c768be2e4ee44e0f Xekyo: ACK 6f8e3818af7585b961039bf0c768be2e4ee44e0f glozow: Concept ACK 6f8e3818af7585b961039bf0c768be2e4ee44e0f. The high feerate is unlikely but sendall should respect the existing wallet options. Tree-SHA512: 6ef0961937091293d49be16f17e4451cff3159d901c0c7c6e508883999dfe0c20ed4d7126bf74bfea8150d4c1eef961a45f0c28ef64562e6cb817fede2319f1a
2022-09-14Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26053: rpc: bugfix, 'add_inputs' default value is true ↵Andrew Chow
unless 'inputs' are provided b00fc44ca5cb938f18d31cde7feb4e1c968dcc2f test: add coverage for 'add_inputs' dynamic default value (furszy) ddbcfdf3d050061f4e8979a0e2bb63bba5a43c47 RPC: bugfix, 'add_inputs' default value is true unless 'inputs' are provided (furszy) Pull request description: This bugfix was meant to be in #25685, but decoupled it to try to make it part of 24.0 release. It's a truly misleading functionality. This PR doesn't change behavior in any way. Just fixes two invalid RPC help messages and adds test coverage for the current behavior. #### Description In both RPC commands `send()` and `walletcreatefundedpsbt` the help message says that `add_inputs` default value is false when it's actually dynamically set by the following statement: ```c++ coin_control.m_allow_other_inputs = rawTx.vin.size() == 0; ``` Which means that, by default, `add_inputs` is true unless there is any pre-set input, in which case, the default is false. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK b00fc44ca5cb938f18d31cde7feb4e1c968dcc2f S3RK: ACK b00fc44ca5cb938f18d31cde7feb4e1c968dcc2f Tree-SHA512: 5c68a40d81c994e0ab6de0817db69c4d3dea3a9a64a60362531bf583b7a4c37d524b740905a3f3a89cdbf221913ff5b504746625adb8622788aea93a35bbcd40
2022-09-14test: add coverage for 'add_inputs' dynamic default valuefurszy
Covered cases for send() and walletcreatefundedpsbt() RPC commands: 1. Default add_inputs value with no preset inputs (add_inputs=true): Expect: automatically add coins from the wallet to the tx. 2. Default add_inputs value with preset inputs (add_inputs=false): Expect: disallow automatic coin selection. 3. Explicit add_inputs=true and preset inputs (with preset inputs not-covering the target amount). Expect: include inputs from the wallet. 4. Explicit add_inputs=true and preset inputs (with preset inputs covering the target amount). Expect: only preset inputs are used. 5. Explicit add_inputs=true, no preset inputs (same as (1) but with an explicit set): Expect: include inputs from the wallet.
2022-09-14test/doc: Remove unused syncwithvalidationinterfacequeueMacroFake
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25768#discussion_r958562071 Also fix doc typo from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25768#discussion_r958571943
2022-09-13sendall: check if the maxtxfee has been exceededishaanam
2022-09-13Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24513: CChainState -> Chainstateglozow
00eeb31c7660e2c28f189f77a6905dee946ef408 scripted-diff: rename CChainState -> Chainstate (James O'Beirne) Pull request description: Alright alright alright, I know: we hate refactors. We especially hate cosmetic refactors. Nobody knows better than I that changing broad swaths of code out from under our already-abused collaborators, only to send a cascade of rebase bankruptcies, is annoying at best and sadistic at worst. And for a rename! The indignation! But just for a second, imagine yourself. Programming `bitcoin/bitcoin`, on a sandy beach beneath a lapis lazuli sky. You go to type the name of what is probably the most commonly used data structure in the codebase, and you *only hit shift once*. What could you do in such a world? You could do anything. [The only limit is yourself.](https://zombo.com/) --- So maybe you like the idea of this patch but really don't want to deal with rebasing. You're in luck! Here're the commands that will bail you out of rebase bankruptcy: ```sh git rebase -i $(git merge-base HEAD master) \ -x 'sed -i "s/CChainState/Chainstate/g" $(git ls-files | grep -E ".*\.(py|cpp|h)$") && git commit --amend --no-edit' # <commit changed?> git add -u && git rebase --continue ``` --- ~~Anyway I'm not sure how serious I am about this, but I figured it was worth proposing.~~ I have decided I am very serious about this. Maybe we can have nice things every once in a while? ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: cr ACK 00eeb31c7660e2c28f189f77a6905dee946ef408 hebasto: ACK 00eeb31c7660e2c28f189f77a6905dee946ef408 glozow: ACK 00eeb31c7660e2c28f189f77a6905dee946ef408, thanks for being the one to propose this w0xlt: ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24513/commits/00eeb31c7660e2c28f189f77a6905dee946ef408 Tree-SHA512: b828a99780614a9b74f7a9c347ce0687de6f8d75232840f5ffc26e02bbb25a3b1f5f9deabbe44f82ada01459586ee8452a3ee2da05d1b3c48558c8df6f49e1b1
2022-09-13Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24991: init: allow startup with -onlynet=onion ↵fanquake
-listenonion=1 2d0b4e4ff66e60c85f86c526a53f8fb242ebb7d0 init: allow startup with -onlynet=onion -listenonion=1 (Vasil Dimov) Pull request description: It does not make sense to specify `-onlynet=onion` without providing a Tor proxy (even if other `-onlynet=...` are given). This is checked during startup. However, it was forgotten that a Tor proxy can also be retrieved from "Tor control" to which we connect if `-listenonion=1`. So, the full Tor proxy retrieval logic is: 1. get it from `-onion` 2. get it from `-proxy` 3. if `-listenonion=1`, then connect to "Tor control" and get the proxy from there (was forgotten before this change) Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24980 ACKs for top commit: mzumsande: Tested ACK 2d0b4e4ff66e60c85f86c526a53f8fb242ebb7d0 MarcoFalke: ACK 2d0b4e4ff66e60c85f86c526a53f8fb242ebb7d0 🕸 Tree-SHA512: d1d18e07a8a40a47b7f00c31cb291a3d3a9b24eeb28c5e4720d5df4997f488583a3a010d46902b4b600d2ed1136a368e1051c133847ae165e0748b8167603dc3
2022-09-12RPC: unify arg type error messagefurszy
We were throwing two different errors for the same problematic: * "Expected type {expected], got {type}" --> RPCTypeCheckArgument() * "JSON value of type {type} is not of expected type {expected}" --> UniValue::checkType()
2022-09-10Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26054: test: verify best blockhash after invalidating ↵MacroFake
an unknown block 4f67336f1105b7c34a9e8cdafa603edc1d899fb9 test: verify best blockhash after invalidating an unknown block (brunoerg) Pull request description: Fixes #26051 Verify the best blockhash is the same after invalidating an unknown block, not the whole `getchaintip` response. ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: ACK 4f67336f1105b7c34a9e8cdafa603edc1d899fb9 Tree-SHA512: 2d71743c1d3a317ef7b750f88437df71d1aed2728d9edac8b763a343406e168b97865ab25ec4c89caf09d002e076458376618cbd0845496375f7179633c88af9
2022-09-09test: verify best blockhash after invalidating an unknown blockbrunoerg
2022-09-09scripted-diff: rename CChainState -> ChainstateJames O'Beirne
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i 's/CChainState/Chainstate/g' $(git grep -l CChainState ':(exclude)doc/release-notes*') -END VERIFY SCRIPT- Co-authored-by: MacroFake <falke.marco@gmail.com>
2022-09-09Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25990: test: apply fixed feerate to avoid variable ↵MacroFake
dynamic fees in wallet_groups.py 2186608172b0e6c3a9907e06fed27dfd927abd45 test: apply fixed feerate to avoid variable dynamic fees (stickies-v) Pull request description: Without specifying a feerate, we let the wallet decide on an appropriate feerate, which can be influenced by various factors such as what's in the mempool. Since wallet_groups.py fails when feerates are unstable, we should use a fixed feerate across all nodes. The assumed feerate was 20 sats/vbyte, so this PR adopts that. Closes #25940. I'm not 100% sure, but I think the increased tx relay speed introduced by #25865 caused the transactions to more quickly and often enter the other nodes' mempools, affecting their feerate calculation done in [`wallet:GetMinimumFeeRate()`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/ea67232cdb80c4bc3f16fcd823f6f811fd8903e1/src/wallet/fees.cpp#L68-L72) and thus deviating slightly from the expected 20 sats/vbyte. Ran `wallet_groups.py` over 400 times without failure. ACKs for top commit: aureleoules: ACK 2186608172b0e6c3a9907e06fed27dfd927abd45. glozow: Approach ACK 2186608172b0e6c3a9907e06fed27dfd927abd45 Tree-SHA512: 0ea467a67747e6f27369ccd0adacfb21cc36ef0ae728fb28b8ea18e409aab5bd3ede559d6cebb82da0b9703c0c8b2709d686feb3ae009ddf525aa253f44d5816
2022-09-09Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26031: test: Display skipped tests reasonMacroFake
07b6e743147f410d8ceb4b6b3282e9fba4cafe50 test: Display skipped tests reason (Aurèle Oulès) Pull request description: Attempt to fix #26023. ACKs for top commit: brunoerg: ACK 07b6e743147f410d8ceb4b6b3282e9fba4cafe50 Tree-SHA512: 5d8f7fbd8d65772000a5da8c01276948b157d93d359203c6442cf2681cdcc2426b1fee7ec62cee100019c59a486a96ad98d5e819bffe1fd37624dcd28f42aed2
2022-09-08Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26038: test: invalidating an unknown block throws an errorMacroFake
4b1d5a10537ab48e3457606ba1cf2ae26a1cb2b2 test: invalidating an unknown block throws an error (brunoerg) Pull request description: While playing with `invalidateblock`, I unintentionally tried to invalidate an unknown block and it threw an error. Looking at the tests I just realized there is no test coverage for this case. This PR adds it. Top commit has no ACKs. Tree-SHA512: 25286ead809b3ad022e759127ef3134b271fbe76cb7b50ec2b0c7e2409da8d1b01dc5e80afe73e4564cc9c9c03487a1fe772aea3456988552d2f9c8fb34c730b
2022-09-08test: invalidating an unknown block throws an errorbrunoerg
2022-09-08[test] only run feature_rbf.py onceglozow
There is no need to run this test twice with --descriptors and --legacy-wallet, as it doesn't ever use the wallet.
2022-09-08test: Display skipped tests reasonAurèle Oulès
2022-09-08Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26037: test: Fix `wallet_{basic,listsinceblock}.py` ↵MacroFake
for BDB-only wallets 9f3a315c6f6af37d562a72f7d4fb2c53b5940871 test: Fix `wallet_listsinceblock.py` for BDB-only wallets (Hennadii Stepanov) 1941ce6cd15a1123db8769d17a6fd9b1cb3debcc test: Fix `wallet_basic.py` for BDB-only wallets (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: Fixes bitcoin/bitcoin#26029. ACKs for top commit: brunoerg: crACK 9f3a315c6f6af37d562a72f7d4fb2c53b5940871 Tree-SHA512: d31c76e558dedea689ff487644e9f2d2f1df1cc2bb9bb041ede4b272884871167fdb19ccc717394c6ba6af8b8c70e9575b344988e0ce55b241a3a4922d0b7f73
2022-09-07test: Fix `wallet_listsinceblock.py` for BDB-only walletsHennadii Stepanov
2022-09-07test: Fix `wallet_basic.py` for BDB-only walletsHennadii Stepanov
2022-09-07Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25678: p2p: skip querying dns seeds if `-onlynet` ↵fanquake
disables IPv4 and IPv6 385f5a4c3feb716fcf3f2b4823535df6da6bb67b p2p: Don't query DNS seeds when both IPv4 and IPv6 are unreachable (Martin Zumsande) 91f0a7fbb79fe81a75370a4b60dcdd2e55edfa81 p2p: add only reachable addresses to addrman (Martin Zumsande) Pull request description: Currently, `-onlynet` does not work well in connection with initial peer discovery, because DNS seeds only resolve to IPv6 and IPv4 adresses: With `-onlynet=i2p`, we would load clearnet addresses from DNS seeds into addrman, be content our addrman isn't empty so we don't try to query hardcoded seeds (although these exist for i2p!), and never attempt to make an automatic outbound connection. With `-onlynet=onion` and `-proxy` set, we wouldn't load addresses via DNS, but will make AddrFetch connections (through a tor exit node) to a random clearnet peer the DNS seed resolves to (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/6808#issuecomment-147652505), thus breaching the `-onlynet` preference of the user - this has been reported in the two issues listed below. This PR proposes two changes: 1.) Don't load addresses that are unreachable (so that we wouldn't connect to them) into addrman. This is already the case for addresses received via p2p addr messages, this PR implements the same for addresses received from DNS seeds and fixed seeds. This means that in the case of `-onlynet=onion`, we wouldn't load fixed seed IPv4 addresses into addrman, only the onion ones. 2.) Skip trying the DNS seeds if neither IPv4 nor IPv6 are reachable and move directly to adding the hardcoded seeds from networks we can connect to. This is done by soft-setting `-dnsseed` to 0 in this case, unless `-dnsseed=1` was explicitly specified, in which case we abort with an `InitError`. Fixes #6808 Fixes #12344 ACKs for top commit: naumenkogs: utACK 385f5a4c3feb716fcf3f2b4823535df6da6bb67b vasild: ACK 385f5a4c3feb716fcf3f2b4823535df6da6bb67b Tree-SHA512: 33a8c29faccb2d9b937b017dba4ef72c10e05e458ccf258f1aed3893bcc37c2e984ec8de998d2ecfa54282abbf44a132e97d98bbcc24a0dcf1871566016a9b91
2022-09-06p2p: Don't query DNS seeds when both IPv4 and IPv6 are unreachableMartin Zumsande
This happens, for example, if the user specified -onlynet=onion or -onlynet=i2p. DNS seeds only resolve to IPv4 / IPv6 addresses, making their answers useless to us, since we don't want to make connections to these. If, within the DNS seed thread, we'd instead do fallback AddrFetch connections to one of the clearnet addresses the DNS seed resolves to, we might get usable addresses from other networks if lucky, but would be violating our -onlynet user preference in doing so. Therefore, in this case it is better to rely on fixed seeds for networks we want to connect to. Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
2022-09-05init: allow startup with -onlynet=onion -listenonion=1Vasil Dimov
It does not make sense to specify `-onlynet=onion` without providing a Tor proxy (even if other `-onlynet=...` are given). This is checked during startup. However, it was forgotten that a Tor proxy can also be retrieved from "Tor control" to which we connect if `-listenonion=1`. So, the full Tor proxy retrieval logic is: 1. get it from `-onion` 2. get it from `-proxy` 3. if `-listenonion=1`, then connect to "Tor control" and get the proxy from there (was forgotten before this change) Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24980
2022-09-05Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25768: wallet: Properly rebroadcast unconfirmed ↵glozow
transaction chains 3405f3eed5cf841b23a569b64a376c2e5b5026cd test: Test that an unconfirmed not-in-mempool chain is rebroadcast (Andrew Chow) 10d91c5abe9ed7dcc237c9d52c588e7d26e162a4 wallet: Deduplicate Resend and ReacceptWalletTransactions (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: Currently `ResendWalletTransactions` (used for normal rebroadcasts) will attempt to rebroadcast all of the transactions in the wallet in the order they are stored in `mapWallet`. This ends up being random as `mapWallet` is a `std::unordered_map`. However `ReacceptWalletTransactions` (used for adding to the mempool on loading) first sorts the txs by wallet insertion order, then submits them. The result is that `ResendWalletTranactions` will fail to rebroadcast child transactions if their txids happen to be lexicographically less than their parent's txid. This PR resolves this issue by combining `ReacceptWalletTransactions` and `ResendWalletTransactions` into a new `ResubmitWalletTransactions` so that the iteration code and basic checks are shared. A test has also been added that checks that such transaction chains are rebroadcast correctly. ACKs for top commit: naumenkogs: utACK 3405f3eed5cf841b23a569b64a376c2e5b5026cd 1440000bytes: reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25768/commits/3405f3eed5cf841b23a569b64a376c2e5b5026cd furszy: Late code review ACK 3405f3ee stickies-v: ACK 3405f3eed5cf841b23a569b64a376c2e5b5026cd Tree-SHA512: 1240d9690ecc2ae8d476286b79e2386f537a90c41dd2b8b8a5a9c2a917aa3af85d6aee019fbbb05e772985a2b197e2788305586d9d5dac78ccba1ee5aa31d77a
2022-09-05Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25976: QA: rpc_blockchain: Test output of getblock ↵MacroFake
verbosity 0, False, and True f663b43df041da7777e6f45a8df04fa852f79106 QA: rpc_blockchain: Test output of getblock verbosity 0, False, and True (Luke Dashjr) Pull request description: Currently getblock's "verbosity" is documented as a NUM, though it has a fallback to Boolean for the (deprecated?) "verbose" alias. Since we've been doing more generic type-checking on RPC stuff, I think it would be a good idea to actually test the Boolean values work. I didn't see an existing test for verbosity=0, so this adds that too. ACKs for top commit: aureleoules: ACK f663b43df041da7777e6f45a8df04fa852f79106. Tree-SHA512: 321a7795a2f32e469d28879dd323c85cb6b221828030e2a33ad9afd35a648191151a79b04e359b2f58314e43360f81c25f05be07deb42f61efdf556850a7266c
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2024-11-19 12:11:44 +0000