| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
explicit usage
1e62350ca20898189904a88dfef9ea11ddcd8626 refactor: Improve use of explicit keyword (Fabian Jahr)
c502a6dbfb854ca827a5a3925394f9e09d29b898 lint: Use c++17 std in cppcheck linter (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
I found the `extended-lint-cppcheck` linter still uses `std=c++11` when reviewing #20471. The only difference in the output after this change is one line is missing:
```
src/script/descriptor.cpp:159:5: warning: Struct 'PubkeyProvider' has a constructor with 1 argument that is not explicit. [noExplicitConstructor]
```
After some digging, I am still not sure why this one is ignored with c++17 when 40 other`noExplicitConstructor` warnings were still appearing.
In the second commit, I fix these warnings, adding `explicit` where appropriate and adding fixes to ignore otherwise.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 1e62350ca20898189904a88dfef9ea11ddcd8626: patch looks correct!
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 1e62350ca20898189904a88dfef9ea11ddcd8626
Tree-SHA512: dff7b324429a57160e217cf38d9ddbb6e70c6cb3d3e3e0bd4013d88e07afc2292c3df94d0acf7122e9d486322821682ecf15c8f2724a78667764c05d47f89a12
|
|
053b4fbad8729308774d5e7b53f53c12627fa88b doc: Release note regarding -rpcauth validation (João Barbosa)
46001323b1f4a57d8d6805f1bc39a5b8d401f0c5 rpc: Validate -rpcauth arguments (João Barbosa)
d37c813a43166f559a4e2d1c22e7243f70301291 rpc: Refactor to process -rpcauth once (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Invalid `-rpcauth` arguments are currently silently ignored. This make server initialization fail if any `-rpcauth` is invalid.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 053b4fbad8729308774d5e7b53f53c12627fa88b
jonatack:
ACK 053b4fbad8729308774d5e7b53f53c12627fa88b
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 053b4fbad8729308774d5e7b53f53c12627fa88b. Only changes since last review are moving a variable declaration and adding a comment, release notes, and a `const`.
Tree-SHA512: c99923d4a121f0c9f882b07f5402ea53e9b2d9455ad34468a094ffab1d64df26c82e1279734c0d42bc2e113eae7b581fbc3be52f3ed4a2d7450d11793afcf406
|
|
fada2dfcac1c4b47ee76b877d91d515cf1d36410 test: Fix wallet_multiwallet issue on windows (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The error message on windows:
> 2020-11-30T18:10:47.536032Z ListWalletDir: Error scanning C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\test_runner_₿_🏃_20201130_181042\wallet_multiwallet_0\node0\regtest\wallets\self_walletdat_symlink: boost::filesystem::status: The name of the file cannot be resolved by the system: "C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\test_runner_₿_🏃_20201130_181042\wallet_multiwallet_0\node0\regtest\wallets\self_walletdat_symlink\wallet.dat"
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fada2dfcac1c4b47ee76b877d91d515cf1d36410. Although it could ignore (don't log) directories that lead to no permission error.
fanquake:
ACK fada2dfcac1c4b47ee76b877d91d515cf1d36410
Tree-SHA512: b475162cc3cd1574209d916605b229a79c8089714295f5e16569b71f958f0007d54dc76833938492d931387784588b11b73e3ef00f963540af42c079417f8d72
|
|
|
|
|
|
2d8099c713dfd4b546150fd53c2e4f364b9009f4 Mention units of MAX_STANDARD_ policy constants (Pieter Wuille)
84e29c7c0141b52044020ec0c5dfa8a462b7e97f Mention in validation that IsWitnessStandard tests for P2TR (Pieter Wuille)
f867cbcc268a3bfaeef5510a7e40e6d3c0818b6d Clean up assets test minimizer LDFLAGS (Pieter Wuille)
ea0e78677bdbe3313f594118c500cf7784c56970 Document additional IsWitnessStandard behavior (Pieter Wuille)
6040de9a46725826330cd63cdf76e2121a18e728 Add comments on CPubKey::IsValid (Pieter Wuille)
8dbb7de67ce0a71f5fc54289c0ff048ac8dd0acc Add comments to VerifyTaprootCommitment (Pieter Wuille)
cdf900cbf26db05c7edb398ea645f1d23049d810 Document need_vin_vout_mismatch argument to make_spender (Pieter Wuille)
18246ed5f09dd078fa1410b7ec2ba4379cc5e032 Fix and improve taproot_construct comments (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Addressing some review comments raised here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19953#pullrequestreview-512238027 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19953#pullrequestreview-513499921
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 2d8099c per `git range-diff 5009159 4f10965 2d8099c`
ariard:
ACK 2d8099c, only changes are comment light improvements on IsValid/IsWitnessStandard.
Tree-SHA512: c4881546c379ea8efc7ef99a43cbf3b9cd3f9dde5fd97a07ee66f2b593c78aef0bd8784853c5c9c737b66c269241a1048bbbdd6c964a3d872efd8ba0ec410b68
|
|
|
|
3ebde2143aa98af213872b98b474d904e55056f7 [test] Fix wait condition in disconnect_p2ps (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
#19315 currently has a [test failure](https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4545582645641216) because of a race. `disconnect_p2ps` is intended to have a `wait_until` clause that prevents this race, but the conditional doesn't match since its comparing two different object types. `MY_SUBVERSION` is defined in messages.py as a byte string, but is compared to the value returned by the RPC. This PR simply converts types to ensure they match, which should prevent the race from occurring.
HUGE PROPS TO jnewbery for discovering the issue 🔎
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK 3ebde2143aa98af213872b98b474d904e55056f7
glozow:
Code review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20522/commits/3ebde2143aa98af213872b98b474d904e55056f7
Tree-SHA512: ca096b80a3e4d757a645f38846d6dc89d6a3d35c3435513a72d278e305faddd4aff9e75a767941b51b2abbf59c82679bac1e9a0140d6f285efe3053e51bcc2a8
|
|
matching RPC endpoint wallet
89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d RPC/Wallet: unloadwallet: Allow specifying wallet_name param matching RPC endpoint (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Allow specifying the `wallet_name` param to `unloadwallet` on RPC wallet endpoints, so long as it matches the endpoint wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d
Tree-SHA512: efb399c33f7b5596870a26a8680f453ca47aa7a6db4e550f9435d13044f1c4bad0ae11e8f0205213409d08b75c4188c3be782e54aafab1f65b97eb8cf5c252a9
|
|
MY_SUBVERSION is defined in messages.py as a byte string, but here we were
comparing this value to the value returned by the RPC. Convert to ensure the
types match.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3eb6f8b2e61c24a22ea9396d86672307845f35eb wallet (not for backport): improve upgradewallet error messages (Jon Atack)
ca8cd893bb56bf5d455154b0498b1f58f77d20ed wallet: fix and improve upgradewallet error responses (Jon Atack)
99d56e357159c7154f69f28cb5587c5ca20d6594 wallet: fix and improve upgradewallet result responses (Jon Atack)
2498b04ce88696a3216fc38b7d393906b733e8b1 Don't upgrade to HD split if it is already supported (Andrew Chow)
c46c18b788cb0862aafbb116fd37936cbed6a431 wallet: refactor GetClosestWalletFeature() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This follows up on #18836 and #20282 to fix and improve the as-yet unreleased `upgradewallet` feature and also implement review follow-up in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18836#discussion_r519328607.
This PR fixes 4 upgradewallet issues:
- this bug: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20403#discussion_r526063920
- it returns nothing in the absence of an RPC error, which isn't reassuring for users
- it returns the same thing both in the case of a successful upgrade and when no upgrade took place
- the error message object is currently dead code
This PR fixes the above and provides:
...user feedback to not silently return without upgrading
```
{
"wallet_name": "disable private keys",
"previous_version": 169900,
"current_version": 169900,
"result": "Already at latest version. Wallet version unchanged."
}
```
...better feedback after successfully upgrading
```
{
"wallet_name": "watch-only",
"previous_version": 159900,
"current_version": 169900,
"result": "Wallet upgraded successfully from version 159900 to version 169900."
}
```
...helpful error responses
```
{
"wallet_name": "blank",
"previous_version": 169900,
"current_version": 169900,
"error": "Cannot downgrade wallet from version 169900 to version 159900. Wallet version unchanged."
}
{
"wallet_name": "blank",
"previous_version": 130000,
"current_version": 130000,
"error": "Cannot upgrade a non HD split wallet from version 130000 to version 169899 without upgrading to support pre-split keypool. Please use version 169900 or no version specified."
}
```
updated help:
```
upgradewallet ( version )
Upgrade the wallet. Upgrades to the latest version if no version number is specified.
New keys may be generated and a new wallet backup will need to be made.
Arguments:
1. version (numeric, optional, default=169900) The version number to upgrade to. Default is the latest wallet version.
Result:
{ (json object)
"wallet_name" : "str", (string) Name of wallet this operation was performed on
"previous_version" : n, (numeric) Version of wallet before this operation
"current_version" : n, (numeric) Version of wallet after this operation
"result" : "str", (string, optional) Description of result, if no error
"error" : "str" (string, optional) Error message (if there is one)
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 3eb6f8b
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 3eb6f8b2e61c24a22ea9396d86672307845f35eb 🛡
Tree-SHA512: b767314069e26b5933b123acfea6aa40708507f504bdb22884da020a4ca1332af38a7072b061e36281533af9f4e236d94d3c129daf6fe5b55241127537038eed
|
|
fa05d19bd6ba619bb3f9aabc05c439cd18d34544 test: Fix intermittent issue in mempool_compatibility (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5141306890518528?command=ci#L6076
The version is too old to understand getmempoolinfo()[loaded], so it is never called when starting (See https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5141306890518528?command=ci#L5541)
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa05d19bd6ba619bb3f9aabc05c439cd18d34544
Tree-SHA512: e912d5dff6236d2d4ac608f9f3b3e255cc2b611f36d79bfe4e2a940709833a947c682d7703327887e1753eab30b95eb2615d7e2c21ce4bca4f089e717cbb51c4
|
|
fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d wallet: Do not treat default constructed types as None-type (MarcoFalke)
fac4e136fa3d0fab7fde900a6be921313e16e7a6 refactor: Change pointer to reference because it can not be null (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Equating `0==None` and `""==None` is confusing, unneeded and undocumented
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d
achow101:
ACK fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d
Sjors:
tACK fa69c2c78455fd0dc436018fece9ff7fc83a180d modulo `unset`
Tree-SHA512: c4c8d0ad80c6697621d356a9545caf28ca2facc82bb2fa8e70eceb52372d25f0685237c73688c4b01da0e75d213c77c0d45011a8bdfe81ea783d85f045786dac
|
|
request and wallet_name parameter specify a wallet
b1f59d55d920d2b35269b474762f94fec87bfb16 RPC/Wallet: unloadwallet: Clarify docs/error when both the RPC endpoint and wallet_name parameter specify a wallet (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Just documentation clarifications from #20448
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK b1f59d55d920d2b35269b474762f94fec87bfb16
jonatack:
re-ACK b1f59d55d920d2b35269b474762f94fec87bfb16 per `git diff e8303a0 b1f59d5`
Tree-SHA512: ac068b0aa7ceed49496367fdd9425b59dbba18b56e89b26afc22a6c8ece51f0b92a169cacd55740b1cadab2b32f4f8e8700e609066ab7e59d3b53c7891da585e
|
|
endpoint
|
|
wallet_name parameter specify a wallet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fundrawtransaction/walletcreatefundedpsbt and other fixes
9f08780dd7946b63476e9736745131db8e7f4e93 Use the correct incremental fee constant in bumpfee help (Jon Atack)
3f1e10b2b1cd11f7112fbad6355464bd4adbbc5c Update feeRate (BTC/kvB) to fee_rate (sat/vB) in wallet_bumpfee (Jon Atack)
1b3d7009280595108eb22ac1188bc4367804fc5d Allow zero-fee fundrawtxn and walletcreatefundedpsbt calls (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
- Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20305/files#r525406176. A check to raise an error on zero-fee txns was mistakenly extended in a0d4957 from the bumpfee and send{toaddress, many} RPCs to also include fundrawtransaction and walletcreatefundedpsbt. This commit re-overrides zero fee rate checking for these two RPCs, not only for the feeRate (BTC/kvB) arg to return to previous behavior, but also for the new fee_rate (sat/vB) arg. Negative fee rates will still raise "amount out of range" by the MoneyRange check in src/bitcoin-tx.cpp::AmountFromValue.
- Updates a wallet bumpfee test from feeRate (BTC/kvB) to fee_rate (sat/vB)
- Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20305/files#r525405363 to use the correct incremental fee rate constant in the bumpfee help (thanks Marco Falke for the catch) and rectifies "1.000 sat/vB sat/vB" in the help to "1.000 sat/vB"
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 9f08780dd7946b63476e9736745131db8e7f4e93 🐾
promag:
Code review ACK 9f08780dd7946b63476e9736745131db8e7f4e93.
Xekyo:
Code review reACK 9f08780dd7946b63476e9736745131db8e7f4e93.
Tree-SHA512: 413dfb4f23ebaf3d2ef210dd04610a843272e64eabba428699f5de4d646a86ac4911dab66b5e2f5ebea53b76e4be8347ef40824c1592c750d5eaa12579d3cdf6
|
|
8f7b93047581c67f2133cdb8c7845471de66c30f Drop the leading 0 from the version number (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Removes the leading 0 from the version number. The minor version, which we had been using as the major version, is now the major version. The revision, which we had been using as the minor version, is now the minor version. The revision number is dropped. The build number is promoted to being part of the version number. This also avoids issues where it was accidentally not included in the version number.
The CLIENT_VERSION remains the same format as previous as previously, as the Major version was 0 so it never actually got included in it.
The user agent string formatter is updated to follow this new versioning.
***
Honestly I'm just tired of all of the people asking for "1.0" that maybe this'll shut them up. Skip the whole 1.0 thing and go straight to version 22.0!
Also, this means that the terminology we commonly use lines up with how the variables are named. So major versions are actually bumping the major version number, etc.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 8f7b930475
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 8f7b93047581c67f2133cdb8c7845471de66c30f 🎻
Tree-SHA512: b5c3fae14d4c0a9c0ab3b1db7c949ecc0ac3537646306b13d98dd0efc17c489cdd16d43f0a24aaa28e9c4a92ea360500e05480a335b03f9fb308010cdd93a436
|
|
libstdc++
0f020cdf0a8c3c88499c96522470e2e5e79f27fa sanitizers: Add suppression for unsigned-integer-overflow in libstdc++ basic_string.tcc (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Reported here: https://bitcoinbuilds.org/logs/e35cd579-0f0f-47e4-b49a-4ceba8ff9830.log
Issue: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc#L1271
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 0f020cdf0a8c3c88499c96522470e2e5e79f27fa
practicalswift:
cr ACK 0f020cdf0a8c3c88499c96522470e2e5e79f27fa
Tree-SHA512: e304259a1eed878263bd715b4d16c57f8974264c23ccd6799f85e8141b2eb0b5c6468a6452ffbc7334f57c1957b6e43bb248760b3c0718d93f092d57764d0a8f
|
|
as the feeRate argument should soon be deprecated.
Also loosen one test (and a similar one) that caused a one-off CI failure with:
expected message
'Insufficient total fee 0.00000141, must be at least 0.00001704 (oldFee 0.00000999 + incrementalFee 0.00000705)'
actual message
'Insufficient total fee 0.00000141, must be at least 0.00001712 (oldFee 0.00001007 + incrementalFee 0.00000705)'
|
|
A check to raise an error on zero-fee txns was mistakenly extended in commit
a0d4957 from the bumpfee and send{toaddress, many} RPCs to also include
fundrawtransaction and walletcreatefundedpsbt.
This commit overrides zero fee rate checking for these two RPCs, not only for
the feeRate (BTC/kvB) arg to return to previous behavior, but also for the new
fee_rate (sat/vB) arg.
|
|
7ffac12545328cadd92a3caec4f1c6ca7c127493 tests: shrink feature_taproot transfer of funds tx (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
When moving funds from node 1 to node 0 for the pre-activation tests, there can be a large number of inputs, potentially resulting in a tx that is larger than standardness rules allow, or that takes a long time to sign. This just takes the top 500 outputs, which is plenty (~90% of the wallet balance).
ACKs for top commit:
luke-jr:
utACK 7ffac12545328cadd92a3caec4f1c6ca7c127493
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 7ffac12545328cadd92a3caec4f1c6ca7c127493
Tree-SHA512: 68445b4827dddb9a8e8614d61a68f5bbd7152557bf940be0a75741cb49deeff1566198da1a777ac66cb3fed93e64a30bf895875d6cc6ae9e48275e3febb620a6
|
|
basic_string.tcc
|
|
c92387232f750397da7d131f262c150a608408c2 refactor: Extract ParseOpCode from ParseScript (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Seems more natural to have `mapOpNames` "hidden" in `ParseOpCode` than in `ParseScript`.
A second lookup in `mapOpNames` is also removed.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK c92387232f750397da7d131f262c150a608408c2
theStack:
re-ACK c92387232f750397da7d131f262c150a608408c2
Tree-SHA512: d59d1964760622cf365479d44e3e676aa0bf46b60e77160140d967e012042df92121d3224c7551dc96eff5ff3294598cc6bade82adb3f60d28810e18e60e1257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21f24336019d438e225c7bd6653871119883a4ee test: run mempool_spend_coinbase.py even with wallet disabled (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
Run the mempool spend coinbase test even when the wallet was not compiled, as proposed in #20078.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 21f24336019d438e225c7bd6653871119883a4ee
Tree-SHA512: 301582c04376371cfa8f1ebb2418a4341b42ddcd9ad4f48b58bcf888d867a97bdc409972856b67a8339ac5e60124aefee82a049b4f7fc6bca7a18d7e92e090be
|
|
6b56c1f4d0d5857d9d61a81dc96db1b603c368b5 test: remove last_{block,header}_equals() in p2p_fingerprint.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
136d96b71f94bde2c7471ed852d447ec008e3a30 test: use wait_for_{block,header} helpers in p2p_fingerprint.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This small PR takes use of the message receiving helper functions `wait_for_block()` and `wait_for_header()` (from module `test_framework.p2p`) in the test `p2p_fingerprint.py`. It also simplifies the checks for very old stale blocks/headers requests by getting rid of the functions `last_block_equals()` and `last_header_equals()` and rather only testing that not any blocks/headers message is received at all. Unneeded sending of requests are also removed and calls to time.sleep(...) substituted by ping syncs.
ACKs for top commit:
guggero:
ACK 6b56c1f4
Tree-SHA512: 9114db70f3804adad4ab658236762d4fa73fef91158c5756dd1af2d24196ea740451b0028667e0c4047f1f89fe1355031921d3dfb973acc1370052a4bc12c2ab
|
|
faaf9c58e4aa809019d4ca12747dd47411988e37 remove CRPCCommand constructor that takes rpcfn_type function pointer (MarcoFalke)
fa19bb2cd8c575593583138a84e6bb3444d6196d remove dead rpc code (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Remove the CRPCCommand arguments, now that they are asserted to be equal and thus redundant
### Future work
> Here or follow up, makes sense to also assert type of returned UniValue?
Sure, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. I am going to submit any further works as follow-ups, including:
* Removing all python regex linters on the args, now that RPCMan can be used to generate any output, including the cli.cpp table
* Auto-formatting and sanity checking the RPCExamples with RPCMan
* Checking passed-in json in self-check. Removing redundant checks
* Checking returned json against documentation to avoid regressions or false documentation
* Compile the RPC documentation at compile-time to ensure it doesn't change at runtime and is completely static
### Bugs found
* The assert identified issue #18607
* The changes itself fixed bug #19250
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tested ACK faaf9c58e4aa809019d4ca12747dd47411988e37
promag:
Tested ACK faaf9c58e4aa809019d4ca12747dd47411988e37.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK faaf9c58e4aa809019d4ca12747dd47411988e37. Two obviously good simplifications.
Tree-SHA512: 5de3b440f7b2ed2c3e86655d4f0e2e5df9c67e8ce3c7817d5ea5311d1a38690f2f3e28fab41aad6936be9fc884326d037e5f19e85d4d2fe281474dada13911ee
|
|
|
|
46756a69877ab7d56f3b05f8c5a8899eb24d9ffd depends: Fix PYTHONPATH setting in config.site.in (Carl Dong)
618cbd2c1a630a60bed9212718dce78fe5f50108 lint: Also lint files with shellcheck directive (Carl Dong)
6c7e8f067dcf4c5d793d162aeb84f074f9a14664 depends: Allow relative CONFIG_SITE path env var (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
This changeset:
1. Allows the `CONFIG_SITE` env var to be a relative path rather than requiring an absolute one
2. Enables linting of the `config.site.in` file with `shellcheck` in our linting scripts
3. Sets the `PYTHONPATH` var sensibly in `config.site.in`
Please see commit messages for more details
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 46756a69877ab7d56f3b05f8c5a8899eb24d9ffd
Tree-SHA512: 744089b9f6e5604e56466d9a3e64563f9183a70f7e300ac9ae6248f0f17c0b53fe28a2c41d43c5ffe5da825f53c2ca21f21aacba0579442da3056fb0c4b81454
|
|
It is unnecessary to upgrade to FEATURE_HD_SPLIT if this feature is
already supported by the wallet. Because upgrading to FEATURE_HD_SPLIT
actually requires upgrading to FEATURE_PRE_SPLIT_KEYPOOL, users would
accidentally be upgraded to FEATURE_PRE_SPLIT_KEYPOOL instead of nothing
being done.
Fixes the issue described at
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20403#discussion_r526063920
|
|
Removes the leading 0 from the version number. The minor version, which
we had been using as the major version, is now the major version. The
revision, which we had been using as the minor version, is now the minor
version. The revision number is dropped. The build number is promoted to
being part of the version number. This also avoids issues where it was
accidentally not included in the version number.
The CLIENT_VERSION remains the same format as previous as previously,
the Major version was 0 so that was never a factor in CLIENT_VERSION.
|
|
97c738ff1b592270491551cc0a43472d244ffbb0 [tests] Recommend f-strings for formatting, update feature_block to use them (Anthony Towns)
8ae9d314e9af7bcce1e8bc52f0317b9d565109bf Bump minimum python version to 3.6 (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Python 3.5 has reached [end-of-life](https://devguide.python.org/#status-of-python-branches) as of September 2020, and 3.6 has some moderately nice [features](https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.6.html):
- `f'x = {x}'` as an alternative to `'x = {}'.format(x)` format strings (cf https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13718#issuecomment-406591027)
- underscore separators for large numbers, like `1_234_567`
- improvements to async
- improvements to typing module
Note that 3.6 is not available in xenial (16.04), but is available in bionic (18.04), while focal (20.04) has 3.8. CentOS 7 and 8 have 3.6.8, Debian stable has 3.7.3, and [gentoo and arch already had 3.6 and 3.7 in 2018](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14954#issuecomment-447118707).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 97c738ff1b
Tree-SHA512: ec7fce68845edde4d61a42de12c065fd49e5217311a6fda1323206f091a0afd50f293645dffc27d420127e4e5deb864e953f1b67eff735a0dfbbedd7899a9d60
|
|
05e82d86b09d914ebce05dbc92a7299cb026847b wallet: override minfee checks (fOverrideFeeRate) for fee_rate (Jon Atack)
9a670b4f07a6140de809d73cbd7f3e614eb6ea74 wallet: update sendtoaddress, send RPC examples with fee_rate (Jon Atack)
be481b72e24fb6834bd674cd8daee67c6938b42d wallet: use MIN_RELAY_TX_FEE in bumpfee help (Jon Atack)
449b730579566459e350703611629e63e54657ed wallet: provide valid values if invalid estimate mode passed (Jon Atack)
6da3afbaee5809ebf6d88efaa3958c505c2d71c7 wallet: update remaining rpcwallet fee rate units to BTC/kvB (Jon Atack)
173b5b5fe07d45be5a1e5bc7a5df996f20ab1e85 wallet: update fee rate units, use sat/vB for fee_rate error messages (Jon Atack)
7f9835a05abf3e168ad93e7195cbaa4bf61b9b07 wallet: remove fee rates from conf_target helps (Jon Atack)
b7994c01e9a3251536fe6538a22f614774eec82d wallet: add fee_rate unit warnings to bumpfee (Jon Atack)
410e471fa42d3db04e8879c71f8c824dcc151a83 wallet: remove redundant bumpfee fee_rate checks (Jon Atack)
a0d495747320c79b27a83c216dcc526ac8df8f24 wallet: introduce fee_rate (sat/vB) param/option (Jon Atack)
e21212f01b7c41eba13b0479b252053cf482bc1f wallet: remove unneeded WALLET_BTC_KB_TO_SAT_B constant (Jon Atack)
6112cf20d43b0be34fe0edce2ac3e6b27cae1bbe wallet: add CFeeRate ctor doxygen documentation (Jon Atack)
3f7279161347543ce4e997d78ea89a4043491145 wallet: fix bug in RPC send options (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR builds on #11413 and #20220 to address #19543.
- replace overloading the conf_target and estimate_mode params with `fee_rate` in sat/vB in the sendtoaddress, sendmany, send, fundrawtransaction, walletcreatefundedpsbt, and bumpfee RPCs
- allow non-actionable conf_target value of `0` and estimate_mode value of `""` to be passed to use `fee_rate` as a positional argument, in addition to as a named argument
- fix a bug in the experimental send RPC described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20220#discussion_r513789526 where args were not being passed correctly into the options values
- update the feerate error message units for these RPCs from BTC/kB to sat/vB
- update the test coverage, help docs, doxygen docs, and some of the RPC examples
- other changes to address the excellent review feedback
See this wallet meeting log for more context: http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-11-06.html#l-309
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 05e82d8
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 05e82d86b0 did not test and found a few style nits, which can be fixed later 🍯
Xekyo:
tACK 05e82d86b09d914ebce05dbc92a7299cb026847b
Sjors:
utACK 05e82d86b09d914ebce05dbc92a7299cb026847b
Tree-SHA512: a4ee5f184ada53f1840b2923d25873bda88c5a2ae48e67eeea2417a0b35154798cfdb3c147b05dd56bd6608a784e1b91623bb985ee2ab9ef2baaec22206d0a9c
|
|
for literal comparison
b6121edf70a8d50fd16ddbba0c3168e5e49bfc2e swapped "is" for "==" in literal comparison (Tyler Chambers)
Pull request description:
In Python 3.8+ literal comparisons using "is" instead of "==" produce a SyntaxWarning [source](https://docs.python.org/3.8/whatsnew/3.8.html#changes-in-python-behavior).
I checked the entire devtools directory, this seems to be the only occurrence.
This is a small fix, but removes the SyntaxWarning.
Fixes: #20338
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK b6121edf70a8d50fd16ddbba0c3168e5e49bfc2e, only squashed since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20346#pullrequestreview-525934568) review.
practicalswift:
re-ACK b6121edf70a8d50fd16ddbba0c3168e5e49bfc2e: patch still looks correct
theStack:
utACK b6121edf70a8d50fd16ddbba0c3168e5e49bfc2e
Tree-SHA512: 82a43495d6552fbaa3b02b58f0930b049d27aa937fe44b47714e3c059f844cc494de20674557371cbccf24fb8873ecb7376fb965ae326847eed2b855ed2d59c6
|
|
|
|
5f9c0b6360215636cfa62a70d3a70f1feb3977ab wallet: Remove -upgradewallet from dummywallet (MarcoFalke)
a314271f08215feba53ead27096ac7fda34acb3c test: Remove unused wallet.dat (MarcoFalke)
bf7635963c03203e7189ddaa56c6b086a0108cbf tests: Test specific upgradewallet scenarios and that upgrades work (Andrew Chow)
4b418a9decc3e855ee4b0bbf9e61121c8e9904e5 test: Add test_framework/bdb.py module for inspecting bdb files (Andrew Chow)
092fc434854f881330771a93a1280ac67b1d3549 tests: Add a sha256sum_file function to util (Andrew Chow)
0bd995aa19be65b0dd23df1df571c71428c2bc32 wallet: upgrade the CHDChain version number when upgrading to split hd (Andrew Chow)
8e32e1c41c995e832e643f605d35a7aa112837e6 wallet: remove nWalletMaxVersion (Andrew Chow)
bd7398cc6258c258e9f4411c50630ec4a552341b wallet: have ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade check against the new version (Andrew Chow)
5f720544f34dedf75b063b962845fa8eca604514 wallet: Add GetClosestWalletFeature function (Andrew Chow)
842ae3842df489f1b8d68e67a234788966218184 wallet: Add utility method for CanSupportFeature (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR cleans up the wallet upgrade mechanism a bit, fixes some probably bugs, and adds more test cases.
The `nWalletMaxVersion` member variable has been removed as it made `CanSupportFeature` unintuitive and was causing a couple of bugs. The reason this was introduced originally was to allow a wallet upgrade to only occur when the new feature is first used. While this makes sense for the old `-upgradewallet` option, for an RPC, this does not quite make sense. It's more intuitive for an upgrade to occur if possible if the `upgradewallet` RPC is used as that's an explicit request to upgrade a particular wallet to a newer version. `nWalletMaxVersion` was only relevant for upgrades to `FEATURE_WALLETCRYPT` and `FEATURE_COMPRPUBKEY` both of which are incredibly old features. So for such wallets, the behavior of `upgradewallet` will be that the feature is enabled immediately without the wallet needing to be encrypted at that time (note that `FEATURE_WALLETCRYPT` indicates support for encryption, not that the wallet is encrypted) or for a new key to be generated.
`CanSupportFeature` would previously indicate whether we could upgrade to `nWalletMaxVersion` not just whether the current wallet version supported a feature. While this property was being used to determine whether we should upgrade to HD and HD chain split, it was also causing a few bugs. Determining whether we should upgrade to HD or HD chain split is resolved by passing into `ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade` the version we are upgrading to and checking against that. By removing `nWalletMaxVersion` we also fix a bug where you could upgrade to HD chain split without the pre-split keypool.
`nWalletMaxVersion` was also the version that was being reported by `getwalletinfo` which meant that the version reported was not always consistent across restarts as it depended on whether `upgradewallet` was used. Additionally to make the wallet versions consistent with actually supported versions, instead of just setting the wallet version to whatever is given to `upgradewallet`, we normalize the version number to the closest supported version number. For example, if given 150000, we would store and report 139900.
Another bug where CHDChain was not being upgraded to the version supporting HD chain split is also fixed by this PR.
Lastly several more tests have been added. Some refactoring to the test was made to make these tests easier. These tests check specific upgrading scenarios, such as from non-HD (version 60000) to HD to pre-split keypool. Although not specifically related to `upgradewallet`, `UpgradeKeyMetadata` is now being tested too.
Part of the new tests is checking that the wallet files are identical before and after failed upgrades. To facilitate this, a utility function `sha256sum_file` has been added. Another part of the tests is to examine the wallet file itself to ensure that the records in the wallet.dat file have been correctly modified. So a new `bdb.py` module has been added to deserialize the BDB db of the wallet.dat file. This format isn't explicitly documented anywhere, but the code and comments in BDB's source code in file `dbinc/db_page.h` describe it. This module just dumps all of the fields into a dict.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
approach ACK 5f9c0b6360
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5f9c0b6360215636cfa62a70d3a70f1feb3977ab
jonatack:
ACK 5f9c0b6360215636cfa62a70d3a70f1feb3977ab, approach seems fine, code review, only skimmed the test changes but they look well done, rebased on current master, debug built and verified the `wallet_upgradewallet.py` test runs green both before and after running `test/get_previous_releases.py -b v0.19.1 v0.18.1 v0.17.2 v0.16.3 v0.15.2`
Tree-SHA512: 7c4ebf420850d596a586cb6dd7f2ef39c6477847d12d105fcd362abb07f2a8aa4f7afc5bfd36cbc8b8c72fcdd1de8d2d3f16ad8e8ba736b6f4f31f133fe5feba
|
|
validation.cpp)
|
|
in RPCs fundrawtransaction and walletcreatefundedpsbt only.
This provides the existing feeRate (BTC/kvB) behavior in these two RPCs to the
new fee_rate (sat/vB) param also.
See these two GitHub review discussions for more info:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10706/#discussion_r126560525
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20305#discussion_r520032533
|
|
Co-authored-by: Murch <murch@murch.one>
|
|
and BTC/kvB for feeRate error messages.
|
|
CWallet::CreateWalletFromFile() was removed in
8b5e7297c02f3100a9cb27bfe206e3fc617ec173 but these references remain.
|
