| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
`DEFAULT_{ANCESTOR,DESCENDANT}_LIMIT`
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
ren() { sed -i "s:$1:$2:g" $(git grep -l "$1" ./test); }
ren MAX_ANCESTORS_CUSTOM CUSTOM_ANCESTOR_LIMIT
ren MAX_DESCENDANTS_CUSTOM CUSTOM_DESCENDANT_LIMIT
ren MAX_ANCESTORS DEFAULT_ANCESTOR_LIMIT
ren MAX_DESCENDANTS DEFAULT_DESCENDANT_LIMIT
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
non-P2PKH addresses
68006c10abbfec0f16b90efa69b7880a5e17f186 test: check that `verifymessage` RPC fails for non-P2PKH addresses (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for the `verifymessage` RPC, for the case that a non-P2PKH (but otherwise valid) address is passed:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/e09ad284c762a79d59417389e9056c18e25d9770/src/util/message.cpp#L38-L40
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/e09ad284c762a79d59417389e9056c18e25d9770/src/rpc/signmessage.cpp#L48-L49
The passed addresses to trigger the error are of the types nested segwit (P2SH-P2WPKH) and native segwit (P2WPKH) and are created with a helper function `addresses_from_privkey` using descriptors and the `deriveaddresses` RPC. At some point in the future, if we have BIP322 support, all those will likely succeed and can then be moved from error-throwing to the succedding assert loop.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 68006c10abbfec0f16b90efa69b7880a5e17f186
w0xlt:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25782/commits/68006c10abbfec0f16b90efa69b7880a5e17f186
Tree-SHA512: fec4ed97460787c2ef3d04e3fce89c9365c87207c8358b59c41890f3738355c002e64f289ab4aef794ef4dfd5c867be8b67d736fb620489204f2c6bfb8d3363c
|
|
|
|
Relying on block_connected event order in the USDT interface tests
turned out to be brittle.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25793
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25764
|
|
db10cf8ae36693cb4d3ed1b47b84709cf9c0d849 rpc/wallet: add simulaterawtransaction RPC (Karl-Johan Alm)
701a64f548662e01821765b2934b6e4b321fda6d test: add support for Decimal to assert_approx (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
(note: this was originally titled "add analyzerawtransaction RPC")
This command iterates over the inputs and outputs of the given transactions, and tallies up the balance change for the given wallet. This can be useful e.g. when verifying that a coin join like transaction doesn't contain unexpected inputs that the wallet will then sign for unintentionally.
I originally proposed this to Elements (https://github.com/ElementsProject/elements/pull/1016) and it was suggested that I propose this upstream.
There is an alternative #22776 to instead add this info to `getbalances` when providing an optional transaction as argument.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK db10cf8ae36693cb4d3ed1b47b84709cf9c0d849
achow101:
re-ACK db10cf8ae36693cb4d3ed1b47b84709cf9c0d849
Tree-SHA512: adf222ec7dcdc068d007ae6f465dbc35b692dc7bb2db337be25340ad0c2f9c64cfab4124df23400995c700f41c83c29a2c34812121782c26063b100c7969b89d
|
|
|
|
`test/get_previous_releases.py`
21a9e94dbbc47939f19fbfe39d85cb8ff2ea206a ci: remove hardcoded tag list from ci scripts (josibake)
d530ba390e7703433d3a77673c9a2b52bc446901 doc: update test/README.md (josibake)
614d4682badaadac74b825a45aaee9c2309a3e81 script: default to necessary tags in get_previous_releases.py (josibake)
Pull request description:
Almost every time I need to use this script, I forget the tag list is needed and that a specific set of tags is needed for the backwards compatibility tests to work. I end up wasting time reading through the script and googling to find the tag list before remembering it is in `test/README.md`
I assume (hope) I'm not the only one this happens to, so I figured it would make more sense to have the script default to downloading/building the necessary tags. This has the added benefit of making the script the source of truth: the script already needs to be updated with the SHA256_SUM of the binary for every new tag that is added, so it makes sense to use `SHA256_SUMS` list as the necessary tag list. This means there is less risk of the README and the script drifting (i.e updating the readme with a new tag and forgetting to update the script, or updating the script and forgetting to update the README). Now all that needs to happen is to update the `SHA256_SUMS` list in the script and everything Just Works (TM)
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-tACK 21a9e94dbbc47939f19fbfe39d85cb8ff2ea206a
Tree-SHA512: 97b488227a89a6827584edd251820a7074fad75dfd7f26f1aa5f858e2521d2e02effd0f11e6dc4676e1155d3d5aba6ff94a4b58ffef80dc201376afd5927deb9
|
|
This command iterates over the inputs and outputs of the given transactions, and tallies up the balance change for the given wallet. This can be useful e.g. when verifying that a coin join like transaction doesn't contain unexpected inputs that the wallet will then sign for unintentionally.
|
|
Our RBF policy is different from the rules specified in BIP125. For
example, the BIP does not mention Rule 6, and our Rule 4 uses the
(configurable) incremental relay feerate (distinct from the
minimum relay feerate). Those interested in our policy should refer to
doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md instead. These rules may also
continue to diverge with package RBF and other RBF improvements. Keep
references to the BIP125 signaling wrt sequence numbers, since that is
still correct and widely used. It is helpful to refer to this as "BIP125
signaling" since it is unambiguous and succint, especially if we have
multiple ways to signal replaceability in the future.
The rule numbers in doc/policy/mempool-replacements.md correspond
largely to those of BIP 125, so we can still refer to them like "Rule 5."
|
|
Also, replace broad -acceptnonstdtxn=1 with -datacarriersize=100000
|
|
mempool_package_limits.py tests
f2f6068b69b1b532db92b276f024c89b56f38294 test: MiniWallet: add `send_self_transfer_chain` to create chain of txns (Andreas Kouloumos)
1d6b438ef0ccd05e1522ac38b44f847c1d93e72f test: use MiniWallet to simplify mempool_package_limits.py tests (Andreas Kouloumos)
Pull request description:
While `wallet.py` includes the MiniWallet class and some helper methods, it also includes some methods that have been moved there without having any direct relation with the MiniWallet class. Specifically `make_chain`, `create_child_with_parents` and `create_raw_chain` methods that were extracted from `rpc_packages.py` at f8253d69d6f02850995a11eeb71fedc22e6f6575 in order to be used on both `mempool_package_limits.py` and `rpc_packages.py`.
Since that change, due to the introduction of additional methods in MiniWallet, the functionality of those methods can now be replicated with the existing MiniWallet methods and simultaneously simplify those tests by using the MiniWallet.
This PR's goals are
- to simplify the `mempool_package_limits.py` functional tests with usage of the MiniWallet.
- to make progress towards the removal of the `make_chain`, `create_child_with_parents` and `create_raw_chain` methods of `wallet.py`.
For the purpose of the aforementioned goals, a helper method `MiniWallet.send_self_transfer_chain` is introduced and method `bulk_transaction` has been integrated in `create_self_transfer*` methods using an optional `target_weight` option.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK f2f6068b69b1b532db92b276f024c89b56f38294 👜
Tree-SHA512: 3ddfa0046168cbf7904ec6b1ca233b3fdd4f30db6aefae108b6d7fb69f34ef6fb2cf4fa7cef9473ce1434a0cc8149d236441a685352fef35359a2b7ba0d951eb
|
|
|
|
|
|
With this new method, a chain of transactions can be created. This
method is introduced to further simplify the mempool_package_limits.py
tests.
|
|
Moved `bulk_transaction` into MiniWallet class as `_bulk_tx` private
helper method to be used when the newly added `target_weight` option is
passed to `create_self_transfer*`
|
|
|
|
395767e9f15b7a1b5203da68f1fbe3df281ae906 Add test case mimicking issue 24765 (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This adds a functional test for the concern brought up in #24765. It turned out to be a non-issue, but since I wrote it anyway, it can't hurt to add it.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: fc8d57129d8c68f6d9a41b94b5ff676c87b31f53bc958195d4fe312530ec3e038ebd0bc5e8b9d56be77b7b63fd94574685901901404a4ab8726a5e09d89e86c8
|
|
cc7335edc87c6ef34429b4df94f53973db520aac ci: run USDT interface test in a VM (0xb10c)
dba6f8234217565957e37516a0ea655f1180d99c test: adopt USDT utxocache interface tests (0xb10c)
220a5a2841172a07d6d7849596316f0e0933e272 test: hook into PID in tracing tests (0xb10c)
Pull request description:
Changes a CI task that runs test the previously not run `test/functional/interface_usdt_*.py` functional tests (added in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24358).
This task is run as CirussCI `compute_engine_instance` VM as hooking into the tracepoints is not possible in CirrusCI docker containers (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23296#issuecomment-1024920845). We use an unoffical PPA and untrusted `bpfcc-tools` package in the CI as the Ubuntu jammy and Debian bullseye packages are outdated. We hope use an official package when new Ubuntu/Debian releases are available for the use with Google Compute Engine.
We make sure to hook into `bitcoind` binaries in USDT interface tests via their PID, instead of their path. This makes sure multiple functional tests running in parallel don't interfere with each other.
The utxocache USDT interface tests is adopted to a change of the functional test framework that wasn't detected as the tests weren't run in the CI. As the tracepoints expose internals, it can happen that we need to adopt the interface test when internals change. This is a bit awkward, and if it happens to frequently, we should consider generalizing the tests a bit more. For now it's fine, I think.
See the individual commit messages for more details on the changes.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24782
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23296
I'd like to hear from reviewers:
- Are we OK with using the [`hadret/bpfcc`](https://launchpad.net/~hadret/+archive/ubuntu/bpfcc) PPA for now? There is a clear plan when to drop it and as is currently, it could only impact the newly added VM task.
- ~~Adding a new task increases CI runtime and costs. Should an existing `container` CI task be ported to a VM and reused instead?~~ Yes, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25528#issuecomment-1179509525
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK cc7335edc87c6ef34429b4df94f53973db520aac
Tree-SHA512: b7fddccc0a77d82371229d048abe0bf2c4ccaa45906497ef3040cf99e7f05561890aef4c253c40e4afc96bb838c9787fae81c8454c6fd9db583276e005a4ccb3
|
|
ab3c06db1aed979847158505f3df1dcea9fd6c2b doc: Release notes for default RBF (Andrew Chow)
61d9149e7804e2cec8fecf4150837344322eb301 rpc: Default rbf enabled (Andrew Chow)
e3c33637bac7db8ae56ab497df10911fad773981 wallet: Enable -walletrbf by default (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The GUI currently opts in to RBF by default, but RPCs do not, and `-walletrbf` is default disabled. This PR makes the default in those two places to also opt in.
The last time this was proposed (#9527), the primary objections were the novelty at the time, the inability to bump transactions, and the gui not having the option to disable rbf. In the 5 years since, RBF usage has steadily grown, with ~27% of txs opting in. The GUI has the option to enable/disable RBF, and is also defaulted to having it enabled. And we have the ability to bump RBF'd transactions in both the RPC and the GUI. So I think it makes sense to finally change the default to always opt in to RBF.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
reACK ab3c06db1aed979847158505f3df1dcea9fd6c2b
aureleoules:
ACK ab3c06db1aed979847158505f3df1dcea9fd6c2b.
glozow:
utACK ab3c06db1a
Tree-SHA512: 81b012c5033e270f86a87a6a196ccc549eb54b158eebf88e917cc6621d40d7bdcd1566b602688907dd5d364b95a557b29f97dce869cea512e339588262c027b6
|
|
during coin selection
71d1d13627ccd27319f347e2d8167c8fe8a433f4 test: add unit test for AvailableCoins (josibake)
da03cb41a4ce15ebceee7fa4a4fdd2d3602fe284 test: functional test for new coin selection logic (josibake)
438e04845bf3302b7f459a50e88a1b772527f1e6 wallet: run coin selection by `OutputType` (josibake)
77b07072061c59f50c69be29fbcddf0d433e1077 refactor: use CoinsResult struct in SelectCoins (josibake)
2e67291ca3ab2d8f498fa910738ca655fde11c5e refactor: store by OutputType in CoinsResult (josibake)
Pull request description:
# Concept
Following https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23789, Bitcoin Core wallet will now generate a change address that matches the payment address type. This improves privacy by not revealing which of the outputs is the change at the time of the transaction in scenarios where the input address types differ from the payment address type. However, information about the change can be leaked in a later transaction. This proposal attempts to address that concern.
## Leaking information in a later transaction
Consider the following scenario:
1. Alice has a wallet with bech32 type UTXOs and pays Bob, who gives her a P2SH address
2. Alice's wallet generates a P2SH change output, preserving her privacy in `txid: a`
3. Alice then pays Carol, who gives her a bech32 address
4. Alice's wallet combines the P2SH UTXO with a bech32 UTXO and `txid: b` has two bech32 outputs
From a chain analysis perspective, it is reasonable to infer that the P2SH input in `txid: b` was the change from `txid: a`. To avoid leaking information in this scenario, Alice's wallet should avoid picking the P2SH output and instead fund the transaction with only bech32 Outputs. If the payment to Carol can be funded with just the P2SH output, it should be preferred over the bech32 outputs as this will convert the P2SH UTXO to bech32 UTXOs via the payment and change outputs of the new transaction.
**TLDR;** Avoid mixing output types, spend non-default `OutputTypes` when it is economical to do so.
# Approach
`AvailableCoins` now populates a struct, which makes it easier to access coins by `OutputType`. Coin selection tries to find a funding solution by each output type and chooses the most economical by waste metric. If a solution can't be found without mixing, coin selection runs over the entire wallet, allowing mixing, which is the same as the current behavior.
I've also added a functional test (`test/functional/wallet_avoid_mixing_output_types.py`) and unit test (`src/wallet/test/availablecoins_tests.cpp`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 71d1d13627ccd27319f347e2d8167c8fe8a433f4
aureleoules:
ACK 71d1d13627ccd27319f347e2d8167c8fe8a433f4.
Xekyo:
reACK 71d1d13627ccd27319f347e2d8167c8fe8a433f4 via `git range-diff master 6530d19 71d1d13`
LarryRuane:
ACK 71d1d13627ccd27319f347e2d8167c8fe8a433f4
Tree-SHA512: 2e0716efdae5adf5479446fabc731ae81d595131d3b8bade98b64ba323d0e0c6d964a67f8c14c89c428998bda47993fa924f3cfca1529e2bd49eaa4e31b7e426
|
|
txs fails
4e616d20c9e92b5118a07d4a4b8562fffc66e767 test: check that combining PSBTs with different txs fails (Sebastian Falbesoner)
2a428c79897761579efc990aaf810b0eb3e572b6 test: support passing PSBTMaps directly to PSBT ctor (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for the `combinepsbt` RPC, in the case of combining two PSBTs with different transactions:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/b8067cd435059eedb580975afc62c4e7a6f27321/src/psbt.cpp#L24-L27
The calling function `CombinePSBTs` checks for the false return value and then returns the transaction error string `PSBT_MISMATCH`:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/b8067cd435059eedb580975afc62c4e7a6f27321/src/psbt.cpp#L433-L435
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/b8067cd435059eedb580975afc62c4e7a6f27321/src/util/error.cpp#L30-L31
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25670/commits/4e616d20c9e92b5118a07d4a4b8562fffc66e767
achow101:
ACK 4e616d20c9e92b5118a07d4a4b8562fffc66e767
Tree-SHA512: 45b2b224b13b44ad69ae62e4bc20f74cab32770cf8127b026ec47a7520f7253148fdbf1fad612afece59e45a6738bef9a351ae87ea98dc83d095cc78f6db0318
|
|
|
|
|
|
This will allow to create simple PSBTs as short one-liners, without the
need to have three individual assignments (globals, inputs, outputs).
|
|
preimage types
71a751f6c3e8912e1b1cfe388e593309d210e576 test: add test for decoding PSBT with per-input preimage types (Sebastian Falbesoner)
faf43378e223c563b0741c28a4b5406f471c1332 refactor: move helper `random_bytes` to util library (Sebastian Falbesoner)
fdc1ca389646a55c4d9cb2a79feaa69f90b18c67 test: add constants for PSBT key types (BIP 174) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
1b035c03f9fbbdf7a13663a35d75fb2428f44743 refactor: move PSBT(Map) helpers from signet miner to test framework (Sebastian Falbesoner)
7c0dfec2dd9998932d13dd183c3ce4b22bd5851b refactor: move `from_binary` helper from signet miner to test framework (Sebastian Falbesoner)
597a4b35f6e11d0ec5181e0d4d2d8f9bbf59898a scripted-diff: rename `FromBinary` helper to `from_binary` (signet miner) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for the `decodepsbt` RPC in the case that a PSBT with on of the per-input preimage types (`PSBT_IN_RIPEMD160`, `PSBT_IN_SHA256`, `PSBT_IN_HASH160`, `PSBT_IN_HASH256`; see [BIP 174](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0174.mediawiki#Specification)) is passed. As preparation, the first four commits move the already existing helpers for (de)serialization of PSBTs and PSBTMaps from the signet miner to the test framework (in a new module `psbt.py`), which should be quite useful for further tests to easily create PSBTs.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 71a751f6c3e8912e1b1cfe388e593309d210e576
Tree-SHA512: 04f2671612d94029da2ac8dc15ff93c4c8fcb73fe0b8cf5970509208564df1f5e32319b53ae998dd6e544d37637a9b75609f27a3685da51f603f6ed0555635fb
|
|
take the hardcoded list out of the readme. this way, we only need to
update the script as new tags are added
|
|
in order to run the backwards compatibility tests, specific releases are needed.
previously, the list of tags was in test/README.md, but it makes more sense to
have them as the default list in script
|
|
and use it where possible
facc2fa7b8a218a0df6a19772e1641ea68dda2e3 Use AutoFile where possible (MacroFake)
6666803c897e4ad27b45cb74e3a9aa74a335f1bf streams: Add AutoFile without ser-type and ser-version (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
This was done in the context of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25284 , but I think it also makes sense standalone.
The basic idea is that serialization type should not be initialized when it is not needed. Same for the serialization version.
So do this here for `AutoFile`. `CAutoFile` remains in places where it is not yet possible.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK facc2fa7b8a218a0df6a19772e1641ea68dda2e3
fanquake:
ACK facc2fa7b8a218a0df6a19772e1641ea68dda2e3
Tree-SHA512: d82d024d55af57565ac53d9d1517afafc12b46964effba0332de62a6c77869356fa77f89e6d4834438fff44c45b64fccdf5a1358bfea03e28dfe55013b3c099d
|
|
|
|
|
|
7878f97bf15b6e7c9b47d1c0d96419b97e1bdcbd indexes, refactor: Remove CChainState use in index CommitInternal method (Ryan Ofsky)
ee3a079fab2c33b4186b62ab822753954a4e545f indexes, refactor: Remove CBlockIndex* uses in index Rewind methods (Ryan Ofsky)
dc971be0831959e7ee6a6df9e1aa46091351a8fb indexes, refactor: Remove CBlockIndex* uses in index WriteBlock methods (Ryan Ofsky)
bef4e405f3de2718dfee279a9abff4daf016da26 indexes, refactor: Remove CBlockIndex* uses in index Init methods (Ryan Ofsky)
addb4f2af183a25ce4a6b6485b5b49575a2ba31b indexes, refactor: Remove CBlockIndex* uses in coinstatsindex LookUpOne function (Ryan Ofsky)
33b4d48cfcdf145f49cb2283ac3e2936a4e23fff indexes, refactor: Pass Chain interface instead of CChainState class to indexes (Ryan Ofsky)
a0b5b4ae5a24536d333cbce2ea584f2d935c651f interfaces, refactor: Add more block information to block connected notifications (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Start transitioning index code away from using internal node types like `CBlockIndex` and `CChain` so index code is less coupled to node code and index code will later be able to stop locking cs_main and sync without having to deal with validationinterface race conditions, and so new indexes are easier to write and can run as plugins or separate processes.
This PR contains the first 7 commits from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24230#issuecomment-1165625977 which have been split off for easier review. Previous review comments can be found in #24230
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 7878f97bf15b6e7c9b47d1c0d96419b97e1bdcbd though did not review the last commit 🤼
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 7878f97bf15b6e7c9b47d1c0d96419b97e1bdcbd
Tree-SHA512: f84ac2eb6dca2c305566ddeb35ea14d0b71c00860c0fd752bbcf1a0188be833d8c2a6ac9d3ef6ab5b46fbd02d7a24cbb8f60cf12464cb8ba208e22287f709989
|
|
Create a wallet with mixed OutputTypes and send a volley of payments,
ensuring that there are no mixed OutputTypes in the txs. Finally,
verify that OutputTypes are mixed only when necessary.
|
|
|
|
Can be easily reviewed with `--color-moved=dimmed-zebra`.
|
|
Also take use of the constants in the signet miner to get rid of
magic numbers and increase readability and maintainability.
|
|
Can be easily reviewed with `--color-moved=dimmed-zebra`.
|
|
Can be easily reviewed with `--color-moved=dimmed-zebra`.
|
|
|
|
The descriptor wallets allow an application to track coins of multiple
descriptors in a single wallet. However, such an application would not
previously be able to (easily) tell what received coin "belongs" to what
descriptor.
This commit tackles this issues by adding a "wallet_desc" entry to the
entries for received coins in 'listsinceblock'.
|
|
messages
fae5ce8795080018875227aee8613677f92e99ce univalue: Return more detailed type check error messages (MacroFake)
fafab147e7ff41ab1b961349f20a364f6bf847d2 move-only: Move UniValue::getInt definition to keep class with definitions only (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Print the current type and the expected type
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK fae5ce8795080018875227aee8613677f92e99ce.
Tree-SHA512: 4ae720a012ff8245baf5cd7f844f93b946c58feebe62de6dfd84ebc5c8afb988295a94de7c01aef98aaf4c6228f7184ed622f37079c738924617e0f336ac5b6e
|
|
inputs' UTXOs
d2ed97656bba050051cfc677f1fa7eb3fc633f7d wallet: Precompute Txdata after setting PSBT inputs' UTXOs (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
If we are given a PSBT that is missing one or more input UTXOs, our
PrecomputedTransactionData will be incorrect and missing information
that it should otherwise have, and therefore we may not produce a
signature when we should. To avoid this problem, we can do the
precomputation after we have set the UTXOs the wallet is able to set for
the PSBT.
Also adds a test for this behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25590/commits/d2ed97656bba050051cfc677f1fa7eb3fc633f7d
Sjors:
ACK d2ed97656bba050051cfc677f1fa7eb3fc633f7d
aureleoules:
ACK d2ed97656bba050051cfc677f1fa7eb3fc633f7d.
Tree-SHA512: 71beb6c7946096e82cfca83f36277302aa9e69d27b4f6d73d7d8f2f9f0ea1c0d653e846fa6aebee5e4763f56f950b4481240e953f6a2412caa84908d519171e1
|
|
Passing abstract Chain interface will let indexes run in separate
processes.
This commit does not change behavior in any way.
|
|
Second attempt
1be796418934ae7370cb0ed501877db59e738106 test, wallet: Add mempool rescan test for import RPCs (Fabian Jahr)
833ce76df712932c19e99737e87b5569e2bca34b rpc, wallet: Document mempool rescan after importdescriptor, importwallet (Fabian Jahr)
0e396d1ba701c9ac6280a98bf37f53352167e724 rpc, wallet: Document mempool scan after importmulti (Fabian Jahr)
e6d3ef85867545a5a66a211e35e818e8a1b166fa rpc, wallet: Document mempool scan after importpubkey (Fabian Jahr)
6d3db52e667474b6c0c2e4eeb9fb5b3ba4063205 rpc, wallet: Document and test mempool scan after importprivkey (João Barbosa)
3abdbbb90a4a8f2041fec37506268e66a0b3eb31 rpc, wallet: Document and test mempool scan after importaddress (João Barbosa)
236239bd40ae1175537fc932df5af27902326329 wallet: Rescan mempool for transactions as well (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
This PR picks up the work from #18964 and closes #18954.
It should incorporate all the unaddressed feedback from the PR:
- Mempool rescan now expanded to all relevant import* RPCs
- Added documentation in the help of each RPC
- More tests
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 1be796418934ae7370cb0ed501877db59e738106 (only a test change)
achow101:
ACK 1be796418934ae7370cb0ed501877db59e738106
w0xlt:
reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25351/commits/1be796418934ae7370cb0ed501877db59e738106
Tree-SHA512: b62fed5f97c6c242b2af417b41c9696a1f18878483d9e1c9429791f9c05257f57a00540a9a84df23c49faf6a61c3109c22972de81540083f38b506217804fcc5
|
|
from `ArgsManager`
cb3e9a1e3f8d72daaa361fc45dd853775e754b9d Move {Load,Dump}Mempool to kernel namespace (Carl Dong)
aa306765419f7dbea12b12e15553039835ba0e4d Move DEFAULT_PERSIST_MEMPOOL out of libbitcoinkernel (Carl Dong)
06b88ffb8ae7f2b2a93a32908cd80e77fafd270c LoadMempool: Pass in load_path, stop using gArgs (Carl Dong)
b857ac60d9a0433036519c26675378bbf56a1de1 test/fuzz: Invoke LoadMempool via CChainState (Carl Dong)
b3267258b052557fc136b9a4dcb754afb9219470 Move FopenFn to fsbridge namespace (Carl Dong)
ae1e8e37567fa603a5977d7d05105c682dd3f7db mempool: Use NodeClock+friends for LoadMempool (Carl Dong)
f9e8e5719f28d84f68f7d75e26c8e7fccac8e7d3 mempool: Improve comments for [GS]etLoadTried (Carl Dong)
813962da0b17b918941c6849996845e35d84a451 scripted-diff: Rename m_is_loaded -> m_load_tried (Carl Dong)
413f4bb52b72e082ad8716664ede48352b8e7e5a DumpMempool: Pass in dump_path, stop using gArgs (Carl Dong)
bd4407817e523e3c5b347bc6be25ed007cb27034 DumpMempool: Use std::chrono instead of weird int64_t arthmetics (Carl Dong)
c84390b741ab7b61c9f702d8b447c8cadc1257c8 test/mempool_persist: Test manual savemempool when -persistmempool=0 (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
This is part of the `libbitcoinkernel` project: #24303, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/18
-----
This PR moves `{Dump,Load}Mempool` into its own `kernel/mempool_persist` module and introduces `ArgsManager` `node::` helpers in `node/mempool_persist_args`to remove the scattered calls to `GetBoolArg("-persistmempool", DEFAULT_PERSIST_MEMPOOL)`.
More context can be gleaned from the commit messages.
-----
One thing I was reflecting on as I wrote this was that in the long run, I think we should probably invert the validation <-> mempool relationship. Instead of mempool not depending on validation, it might make more sense to have validation not depend on mempool. Not super urgent since `libbitcoinkernel` will include both validation and mempool, but perhaps something for the future.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
re ACK cb3e9a1e3f8d72daaa361fc45dd853775e754b9d via `git range-diff 7ae032e...cb3e9a1`
MarcoFalke:
ACK cb3e9a1e3f 🔒
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK cb3e9a1e3f8d72daaa361fc45dd853775e754b9d
Tree-SHA512: 979d7237c3abb5a1dd9b5ad3dbf3b954f906a6d8320ed7b923557f41a4472deccae3e8a6bca0018c8e7a3c4a93afecc502acd1e26756f2054f157f1c0edd939d
|
|
|
|
Also:
1. Add the newly introduced kernel/mempool_persist.cpp to IWYU CI script
2. Add chrono mapping for iwyu
|
|
|
|
ffc79b8e492c6dd1352e528fd82e45d8d25eaa04 qa: functional test Miniscript watchonly support (Antoine Poinsot)
bfb036756ad6e187fd6d3abfefe5804bb54a5c71 Miniscript support in output descriptors (Antoine Poinsot)
4a082887bee76a96deada5dbd7f991c23b301c54 qa: better error reporting on descriptor parsing error (Antoine Poinsot)
d25d58bf5f301d3bb8683bd67c8847a4957d8e97 miniscript: add a helper to find the first insane sub with no child (Antoine Poinsot)
c38c7c5817b7e73cf0f788855c4aba59c287b0ad miniscript: don't check for top level validity at parsing time (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
This adds Miniscript support for Output Descriptors without any signing logic (yet). See the OP of #24147 for a description of Miniscript and a rationale of having it in Bitcoin Core.
On its own, this PR adds "watchonly" support for Miniscript descriptors in the descriptor wallet. A follow-up adds signing support.
A minified corpus of Miniscript Descriptors for the `descriptor_parse` fuzz target is available at https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/pull/92.
The Miniscript descriptors used in the unit tests here and in #24149 were cross-tested against the Rust implementation at https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-miniscript.
This PR contains code and insights from Pieter Wuille.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK ffc79b8e492c6dd1352e528fd82e45d8d25eaa04
achow101:
ACK ffc79b8e492c6dd1352e528fd82e45d8d25eaa04
w0xlt:
reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24148/commits/ffc79b8e492c6dd1352e528fd82e45d8d25eaa04
Tree-SHA512: 02d919d38bb626d3c557eca3680ce71117739fa161b7a92cfdb6c9c432ed88870b1ed127ba24248574c40c7428217d7e9bdd986fd8cd7c51fae8c776e1271fb9
|
