| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
block/last_transaction in getpeerinfo
5da96210fc2fda9fbd79531f42f91262fd7a9257 doc: release note for getpeerinfo last_block/last_transaction (Jon Atack)
cfef5a2c98b9563392a4a258fedb8bdc869c9749 test: rpc_net.py logging and test naming improvements (Jon Atack)
21c57bacda766a4f56ee75a2872f5d0f94e3901e test: getpeerinfo last_block and last_transaction tests (Jon Atack)
8a560a7d57cbd9f473d6a3782893a0e2243c55bd rpc: expose nLastBlockTime/TXTime as getpeerinfo last_block/transaction (Jon Atack)
02fbe3ae0bd91cbab2828cb7aa46f6493c82f026 net: add nLastBlockTime/TXTime to CNodeStats, CNode::copyStats (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR adds inbound peer eviction criteria `nLastBlockTime` and `nLastTXTime` to `CNodeStats` and `CNode::copyStats`, which then allows exposing them in the next commit as `last_transaction` and `last_block` Unix Epoch Time fields in RPC `getpeerinfo`.
This may be useful for writing missing eviction tests. I'd also like to add `lasttx` and `lastblk` columns to the `-netinfo` dashboard as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19643#issuecomment-671093420.
Relevant discussion at the p2p irc meeting http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-08-11.html#l-549:
```text
<jonatack> i was specifically trying to observe and figure out how to test https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19500
<jonatack> which made me realise that i didn't know what was going on with my peer conns in enough detail
<jonatack> i'm running bitcoin locally with nLastBlockTime and nLastTXTime added to getpeerinfo for my peer connections dashboard
<jonatack> sipa: is there a good reason why that (eviction criteria) data is not exposed through getpeerinfo currently?
<sipa> jonatack: nope; i suspect just nobody ever added it
<jonatack> sipa: thanks. will propose.
```
The last commit is optional, but I think it would be good to have logging in `rpc_net.py`.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 5da96210fc2fda9fbd79531f42f91262fd7a9257
theStack:
Code Review ACK 5da96210fc2fda9fbd79531f42f91262fd7a9257
darosior:
ACK 5da96210fc2fda9fbd79531f42f91262fd7a9257
Tree-SHA512: 2db164bc979c014837a676e890869a128beb7cf40114853239e7280f57e768bcb43bff6c1ea76a61556212135281863b5290b50ff9d24fce16c5b89b55d4cd70
|
|
15ae4a17c430b27b58b5fce89a868a70edca80c8 test/fuzz: add a seed corpus generation option to the test_runner (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
This adds a startup option to test/fuzz/test_runner.py which allows to generate seed corpus to the passed `seed_dir` instead of using them.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 15ae4a17c4
Tree-SHA512: f80ad58e48cc45272eace33dbf377848f31cbd6a25433786d50e9700f70185dff6513f71d885d0727ed57a2aa49163bfbdbc51a8091e99b4b1bae71e1504e6a5
|
|
Signed-off-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
|
|
5067c5acc30c5cf87496c1bf8eb03712cc66b206 [test] Add test for getblockheader verboseness (Torhte Butler)
Pull request description:
Improve test coverage by adding a test for getblockheader with verbose argument set to false.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19722/commits/5067c5acc30c5cf87496c1bf8eb03712cc66b206
Tree-SHA512: e55593f1026a89dc7b796fa985b4cbcdb596e91d80d42dfb0660bda1692aaa35749ec29f9cd7032803f6225afb323f085df1ef6a9982de87be8e098f7253cdd5
|
|
124e1ee1343f8bfb3748393ced9debdbdee60d3b doc: Add release notes for getindexinfo RPC (Fabian Jahr)
c447b09458c89c946957a211a4f5373b92af44bf test: Add tests for getindexinfo RPC (Fabian Jahr)
667bc7a7f7c5d9a15eaf6957c3d8841a75efa7bc rpc: Add getindexinfo RPC (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
As I was playing with indices a I was missing an RPC that gives information about the active indices in the node. I think this can be helpful for many users, especially since there are some new index candidates coming up (#14053, #18000) that can give a quick overview without the user having to parse the logs.
Feature summary:
- Adds new RPC `listindices` (placed in Util section)
- That RPC only lists the actively running indices
- For each index it gives the name, whether it is synced and up to which block height it is synced
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Re-ACK 124e1ee1343f8bfb3748393ced9debdbdee60d3b
jonatack:
Code review re-ACK 124e1ee per `git range-diff a57af89 47a5372 124e1ee` no change since my last re-ACK, rebase only
Tree-SHA512: 3b7174c87951e6457fef099f530337803906baf32fb64261410b8def2c0917853d6a1bf3059cd590b1cc1523608f8916dafb327a431d27ecbf8d7454406b5b35
|
|
Also, remove "C" prefix from class names to match new style
|
|
|
|
It's also clearer to have `no_version_disconnect_node` send a message
other than version or verack in order to reach the peer discouragement
threshold.
|
|
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
Co-authored-by: Samuel Dobson <dobsonsa68@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
Add test for getblockheader with verbose argument set to false.
|
|
specified range
7f13dfb587dd6a7a5b7dfbfe689ae0ce818fe5c9 test: test the implicit avoid partial spends functionality (Karl-Johan Alm)
b82067bf696c53f22536f9ca2e51949c164f6b06 wallet: try -avoidpartialspends mode and use its result if fees are below threshold (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
The `-avoidpartialspends` feature is normally disabled, as it may affect the optimal fee for payments. This PR introduces a new parameter `-maxapsfee` (max avoid partial spends fee) which acts on the following values:
* -1: disable partial spend avoidance completely (do not even try it)
* 0: only do partial spend avoidance if fees are the same or better as the regular coin selection
* 1..∞: use APS variant if the absolute fee difference is less than or equal to the max APS fee
For values other than -1, the code will now try partial spend avoidance once, and if that gives a value within the accepted range, it will use that.
Example: -maxapsfee=0.00001000 means the wallet will do regular coin select, APS coin select, and then pick AKS iff the absolute fee difference is <= 1000 satoshi.
Edit: updated this to reflect the fact we are now using a max fee.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tested ACK 7f13dfb587dd6a7a5b7dfbfe689ae0ce818fe5c9
achow101:
ACK 7f13dfb587dd6a7a5b7dfbfe689ae0ce818fe5c9
jonatack:
ACK 7f13dfb58, code review, debug build, verified the test fails with `AssertionError: not(2 == 1)` for the number of vouts when `-maxapsfee=0.0001` is changed to 0, and verified the new logging with an added assertion.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 7f13dfb587dd6a7a5b7dfbfe689ae0ce818fe5c9
Tree-SHA512: 475929df57f6191bb4e36bfbcad5a280a64bb0ecd8767b76cb2e44e2301235d0eb294a3f2fac5bbf15d35d7ecfba47acb2285feadb883c9ce31c08377e3afb3c
|
|
|
|
9e7894357e296dbe0be775e1527654729dbb71b0 test: speedup p2p_feefilter.py by whitelisting peers (immediate tx relay) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
fe3f0cc44ec6301a86de48cdc3883377932e44eb test: use wait_until for invs matching in p2p_feefilter.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
6d941923c318ce9cb2380d3e41ffb760636656a2 test: add logging for p2p_feefilter.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR gives some love to the functional test `p2p_feefilter.py` by introducing the following changes:
* add missing log messages for the `test_feefilter` subtest (the main one)
* deduplicate code by using the utility function `wait_until` (already using the [recently introduced version](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/12410b1feb80189061eb4a2b43421e53cbb758a8)) instead of a manual condition checking loop with `time.sleep`
* improve naming of the function `matchAllInvs` (more expressive name, snake_case) and moving it from global namespace to the connection class `FeefilterConn`
* speeding up the test significantly by the good ol' method of activating immediate tx relay (as seen on e.g. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17121, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17124, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17340, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17362, ...):
```
master branch:
$ time ./p2p_feefilter.py
...
real 0m39.367s
user 0m1.227s
sys 0m0.571s
PR branch:
$ time ./p2p_feefilter.py
...
real 0m9.386s
user 0m1.120s
sys 0m0.577s
```
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
code review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19564/commits/9e7894357e296dbe0be775e1527654729dbb71b0
jonatack:
re-ACK 9e78943 per `git range-diff 3ab2582 ea74a3c 9e78943`
Tree-SHA512: fe21c1c5413df9165fea916b5d5f609d3ba33e7b5c3364b38eb824fcc55d9e6abddf27116cbc0b325913d451a73c44542040fb916aec9c46f805c6e12f6f10cf
|
|
fa330ec2fe5f5ba68a8d43fff0b19584c0b1ff39 test: Remove confusing and broken use of wait_until global (MarcoFalke)
fa6583c30bf7d82cf7ffdae995f8f16524ad2c0d ci: Set increased --timeout-factor by default (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Assuming that tests don't have a logic error or race, setting a high timeout should not cause any issues. The tests will still pass just as fast in the fastest case, but it allows for some buffer in case of slow disks or otherwise starved ci machines.
Fixes #19729
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fa330ec2fe5f5ba68a8d43fff0b19584c0b1ff39, I have reviewed the code, and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 3da80ee008c7b08bab5fdaf7804d57c79d6fed49a7d37b9c54fc89756659fcb9981fd10afc4d07bd90d93c1699fd410a0110a3cd34d016873759d114ce3cd82d
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
642ad31b418bbf8da06cb3641329b0810e18e55b Add loadwallet and createwallet RPC load_on_startup options (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This maintains a persistent list of wallets stored in settings that will automatically be loaded on startup. Being able to load a wallet automatically on startup will be more useful in the GUI, but it's reasonable to expose this feature by RPC as well.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 642ad31b418bbf8da06cb3641329b0810e18e55b Only change is the test
meshcollider:
re-utACK 642ad31b418bbf8da06cb3641329b0810e18e55b
Tree-SHA512: cca0b71bf1a83ad071830e6c459f1cd979b4add7144e899ec560da72b5910dd9bf9426e5c7d125ae96fad8990fbf81a76bc83c0459486c16086ada6cbde5eaa3
|
|
signing code (sipa)
dca28634d779c775678cba402a85fe5bb9b3a5a9 test: ensure OP_1NEGATE satisfies BIP62 minimal push rule (Jon Atack)
e629d07199b83f4ad313b23a94c9016e3276c52a Do not turn OP_1NEGATE in scriptSig into 0x0181 in signing code (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
A rebase of #13084 which additionally modifies the test code (unaddressed in the original, assuming sipa is too busy to deal with this at the moment).
Relatively simple bugfix so it'd be good to have merged soon.
Turning OP_1NEGATE into 0x0181 results in a larger-than-necessary data push instead of just actually using the OP_1NEGATE opcode (0x4f). This fails the minimal push rule of BIP 62 and makes the result non-standard.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK dca28634d779c775678cba402a85fe5bb9b3a5a9
luke-jr:
ACK dca28634d77
jonatack:
ACK dca28634d779c775678cba402a85fe5bb9b3a5a9
Tree-SHA512: 706d9a2ef20c809dea923e477a873e2fd60db8d0ae64289e510b766a38005c1f31ab0b5883f16b9c7863ff0d3f705e8e413f6121320028ac196b79c3184a4113
|
|
f0aa8aeea5a183ea44a877255d12db7732f2e0a8 test: add rpc_generate functional test (Jon Atack)
92d94ffb8d07cc0d2665c901de5903a3a90d5fd0 rpc: print useful help and error message for generate (Jon Atack)
8d32d2011d3f4e1d9e587d6f80dfa4a3e9f9393d test: consider generate covered in _get_uncovered_rpc_commands() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This was a requested follow-up to #19133 and #17700 to alleviate confusion and head-scratching by people following tutorials that use `generate`. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19455#issuecomment-668172916 below, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19133#issuecomment-636860943 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17700#issuecomment-566159096.
before
```
$ bitcoin-cli help generate
help: unknown command: generate
$ bitcoin-cli generate
error code: -32601
error message:
Method not found
```
after
```
$ bitcoin-cli help generate
generate ( nblocks maxtries ) has been replaced by the -generate cli option. Refer to -help for more information.
$ bitcoin-cli generate
error code: -32601
error message:
generate ( nblocks maxtries ) has been replaced by the -generate cli option. Refer to -help for more information.
```
In the general help it remains hidden, as requested by laanwj.
```
$ bitcoin-cli help
== Generating ==
generateblock "output" ["rawtx/txid",...]
generatetoaddress nblocks "address" ( maxtries )
generatetodescriptor num_blocks "descriptor" ( maxtries )
```
ACKs for top commit:
adamjonas:
utACK f0aa8aeea5a183ea44a877255d12db7732f2e0a8
pinheadmz:
ACK f0aa8aeea5a183ea44a877255d12db7732f2e0a8
Tree-SHA512: d083652589ad3e8228c733455245001db22397559c3946e7e573cf9bd01c46e9e88b72d934728ec7f4361436ae4c74adb8f579670b09f479011924357e729af5
|
|
fa77de2baa40ee828c850ef4068c76cc3619e87b rpc: Assert that RPCArg names are equal to CRPCCommand ones (misc) (MarcoFalke)
fa50bdc755489b2e291ea5ba0e39e44a20c6c6de rpc: Limit echo to 10 args (MarcoFalke)
fa89ca9b5bd334813fd7e7edb202c56b35076e8d refactor: Use C++11 range based for loops to simplify rpc code (MarcoFalke)
fa459bdc87bbb050ca1c8d469023a96ed798540e rpc: Treat all args after a hidden arg as hidden as well (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is split out from #18531 to just touch the RPC methods in misc. Description from the main pr:
### Motivation
RPCArg names in the rpc help are currently only used for documentation. However, in the future they could be used to teach the server the named arguments. Named arguments are currently registered by the `CRPCCommand`s and duplicate the RPCArg names from the documentation. This redundancy is fragile, and has lead to errors in the past (despite having linters to catch those kind of errors). See section "bugs found" for a list of bugs that have been found as a result of the changes here.
### Changes
The changes here add an assert in the `CRPCCommand` constructor that the RPCArg names are identical to the ones in the `CRPCCommand`.
### Future work
> Here or follow up, makes sense to also assert type of returned UniValue?
Sure, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. I am going to submit any further works as follow-ups, including:
* Removing the CRPCCommand arguments, now that they are asserted to be equal and thus redundant
* Removing all python regex linters on the args, now that RPCMan can be used to generate any output, including the cli.cpp table
* Auto-formatting and sanity checking the RPCExamples with RPCMan
* Checking passed-in json in self-check. Removing redundant checks
* Checking returned json against documentation to avoid regressions or false documentation
* Compile the RPC documentation at compile-time to ensure it doesn't change at runtime and is completely static
### Bugs found
* The assert identified issue #18607
* The changes itself fixed bug #19250
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa77de2baa40ee828c850ef4068c76cc3619e87b
fjahr:
tested ACK fa77de2baa40ee828c850ef4068c76cc3619e87b
theStack:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19528/commits/fa77de2baa40ee828c850ef4068c76cc3619e87b
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa77de2baa40ee828c850ef4068c76cc3619e87b. Pretty straightfoward changes
Tree-SHA512: badae1606518c0b55ce2c0bb9025d14f05556532375eb20fd6f3bfadae1e5e6568860bff8599d037e655bf1d23f1f464ca17f4db10a6ab3d502b6e9e61c7b3d3
|
|
This maintains a persistent list of wallets stored in settings that will
automatically be loaded on startup. Being able to load a wallet automatically
on startup will be more useful in the GUI when the option to create wallets is
added in #15006, but it's reasonable to expose this feature by RPC as well.
|
|
NODE_COMPACT_FILTERS
f5c003d3ead182335252558c5c6c9b9ca8968065 [test] Add test for NODE_COMPACT_FILTER. (Jim Posen)
132b30d9c84f2a8053714a438f227b583a89a9ea [net] Signal NODE_COMPACT_FILTERS if we're serving compact filters. (Jim Posen)
b3fbc94d4f2937bb682f2766cc9a8d4fde328a3f Apply cfilters review fixups (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
If -peerblockfilters is configured, signal the `NODE_COMPACT_FILTERS` service bit to indicate that we are able to serve compact block filters, headers and checkpoints.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-review and Concept ACK f5c003d3ead182335252558c5c6c9b9ca8968065
fjahr:
Code review ACK f5c003d3ead182335252558c5c6c9b9ca8968065
clarkmoody:
Concept ACK f5c003d3ead182335252558c5c6c9b9ca8968065
ariard:
Concept and Code Review ACK f5c003d
jonatack:
ACK f5c003d3e
Tree-SHA512: 34d1c153530a0e55d09046fe548c9dc37344b5d6d50e00af1b4e1de1e7b49de770fca8471346a17c151de9fe164776296bb3dd5af331977f0c3ef1e6fc906f85
|
|
count
c133cdcdc3397a734d57e05494682bf9bf6f4c15 Cap listsinceblock target_confirmations param (Adam Stein)
Pull request description:
This addresses an issue brought up in #19587.
Currently, the `target_confirmations` parameter to `listsinceblock` is not checked for being too large. When `target_confirmations` is greater than one more than the current number of blocks, `listsinceblock` fails with error code -1. In comparison, when `target_confirmations` is less than 1, a -8 "Invalid parameter" error code is thrown.
This PR fixes the issue by returning a -8 "Invalid parameter" error if the `target_confirmations` value corresponds to a block with more confirmations than the genesis block. This happens if `target_confirmations` exceeds one more than the number of blocks.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK c133cdcdc3397a734d57e05494682bf9bf6f4c15
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK c133cdcdc3397a734d57e05494682bf9bf6f4c15. Just suggested changes since last review. Thanks!
Tree-SHA512: 02680f4cb937d2c24d5019abd0ebfa188b8a50679a1e64e9c26bfe5c17eef6aea906832e6e2d492ba8a2ea160041bf185d66795ee691e340f6793db03c21b89a
|
|
79d6332e9e4fc01e6418247c31e31b4faa1b3b84 moveonly: Fix indentation in bumpfee RPC (Andrew Chow)
431071c28ae35be8aa012df51233be19067d625c Hide bumpfee's psbt creation behavior behind -deprecatedrpc (Andrew Chow)
4638224f64ba7c8ea7c4fb550ec89c6a6d8c7887 Add psbtbumpfee RPC (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Adds a new RPC `psbtbumpfee` which always creates a psbt. `bumpfee` will then only be able to create and broadcast fee bumping transactions instead of changing its behavior based on `IsWalletSet(WALLET_FLAG_DISABLE_PRIVATE_KEYS)`.
Split from #18627
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 79d6332
meshcollider:
utACK 79d6332e9e4fc01e6418247c31e31b4faa1b3b84
fjahr:
Code review ACK 79d6332e9e4fc01e6418247c31e31b4faa1b3b84
Tree-SHA512: 1c92c4b4461bb30e78be3ee73165f624398ef33996ce36043b61a8931be667030d0fca12fd0b30097b78c56e4e9092c69582b237cbdac51d56f6be23d8c0f1bb
|
|
Previously, listsinceblock would fail with error code -1 when the
target_confirmations exceeded the number of confirmations of the genesis
block. This commit allows target_confirmations to refer to a lastblock
hash with more confirmations than exist in the chain by setting the
lastblock hash to the genesis hash in this case. This allows for
`listsinceblock "" 6` to not fail if the block count is less than 5
which may happen on regtest.
Includes update to the functional test for listsinceblock to test for
this case.
|
|
Most of the test time is spent in wait_for_invs() after sending to addresses,
i.e. the bottleneck is in relaying transactions. By whitelisting the peers via
-whitelist, the inventory is transmissioned immediately rather than on average
every 5 seconds, speeding up the test significantly:
before:
$ time ./p2p_feefilter.py
...
real 0m39.367s
user 0m1.227s
sys 0m0.571s
with this commit:
$ time ./p2p_feefilter.py
...
real 0m9.386s
user 0m1.120s
sys 0m0.577s
|
|
additionally:
-> rename function with snake_case (s/allInvsMatch/wait_for_invs_to_match)
-> move it from global namespace to the class FeefilterConn
|
|
|
|
a51d0ad2de89b9757d158df95ddeba2bfcb23935 rpc: Improve addnode remove command error message (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
The `addnode` RPC with the `remove` command parameter is used to remove a node from the "added nodes". It did not have test coverage and in case of failure to remove the node it responded with the confusing message "Error: Node has not been added.".
This PR adds test coverage and introduces a new error code as well as changes the error message to something that makes sense.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK a51d0ad2de89b9757d158df95ddeba2bfcb23935
theStack:
Tested ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/a51d0ad2de
Tree-SHA512: 033ef5de0d4d49d58ef4df3759b838c9d19ee9dfb0aff9f814a3a63d124ca231a442c930efa7d343fe1f65727c4b59fc23dd5e26fe6ea69f9e84fda48b5c5cc2
|
|
to addrman
37a480e0cd94895b6051abef12d984ff74bdc4a3 [net] Add addpeeraddress RPC method (John Newbery)
ae8051bbd8377f2458ff1f167dc30c2d5f83e317 [test] Test that getnodeaddresses() can return all known addresses (John Newbery)
f26502e9fc8a669b30717525597e3f468eaecf79 [addrman] Specify max addresses and pct when calling GetAddresses() (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Currently addrman only allows a maximum of 1000 records or 23% of all records to be returned in a call to `GetAddr()`. Relax this limit and have the client specify the max records they want. For p2p, behaviour is unchanged (but the rate limiting is set inside net_processing, where it belongs). For RPC, `getnodeaddresses` can now return the complete addrman, which is helpful for testing and monitoring.
Also add a test-only RPC `addpeeraddress`, which adds an IP address:port to addrman. This is helpful for testing (eg #18991).
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 37a480e0cd94895b6051abef12d984ff74bdc4a3
laanwj:
Code review and lightly manually tested ACK 37a480e0cd94895b6051abef12d984ff74bdc4a3
Tree-SHA512: f86dcd410aaebaf6e9ca18ce6f23556e5e4649c1325577213d873aa09967298e65ab2dc19a72670641ae92211a923afda1fe124a82e9d2c1cad73d478ef27fdc
|
|
Allows addresses to be added to Address Manager for testing.
|
|
|
|
This also adds test coverage for the remove command which was uncovered before.
|
|
dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 refactor: test: use _ variable for unused loop counters (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This tiny PR substitutes Python loops in the form of `for x in range(N): ...` by `for _ in range(N): ...` where applicable. The idea is indicating to the reader that a block (or statement, in list comprehensions) is just repeated N times, and that the loop counter is not used in the body, hence using the throwaway variable. This is already done quite often in the current tests (see e.g. `$ git grep "for _ in range("`). Another alternative would be using `itertools.repeat` (according to Python core developer Raymond Hettinger it's [even faster](https://twitter.com/raymondh/status/1144527183341375488)), but that doesn't seem to be widespread in use and I'm not sure about a readability increase.
The only drawback I see is that whenever one wants to debug loop iterations, one would need to introduce a loop variable again. Reviewing this is basically a no-brainer, since tests would fail immediately if a a substitution has taken place on a loop where the variable is used.
Instances to replace were found by `$ git grep "for.*in range("` and manually checked.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64
instagibbs:
manual inspection ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19674/commits/dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64
practicalswift:
ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 -- the updated code is easier to reason about since the throwaway nature of a variable is expressed explicitly (using the Pythonic `_` idiom) instead of implicitly. Explicit is better than implicit was we all know by now :)
Tree-SHA512: 5f43ded9ce14e5e00b3876ec445b90acda1842f813149ae7bafa93f3ac3d510bb778e2c701187fd2c73585e6b87797bb2d2987139bd1a9ba7d58775a59392406
|
|
expected
9e165d0de4c3cd168137fc85b8f31b371bd4e851 test: Wait for 'cmpctblock' in p2p_compactblocks when it is expected (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
This is a more narrowly-construed wait which eliminates the possibility of the
wait being triggered by other messages.
Note `received_block_announcement` reflect three possible messages:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/edec7f7c254294cd5c46ae5cf304353d458bb852/test/functional/p2p_compactblocks.py#L34-L53
Prompted by looking into: #19449
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 9e165d0de4c3cd168137fc85b8f31b371bd4e851
theStack:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19631/commits/9e165d0de4c3cd168137fc85b8f31b371bd4e851
Tree-SHA512: bc4a9c8bf031c8a7efb40d9625feaa3fd1f56f3b75da7034944af71ccea44328a6c708ab0c13fea85fb7cf4fd9043fe90eb94a25e95b2d42be44c2962b4904ce
|
|
fa4dfd215f62e88d668311701735c332c264fa2a test: Wait until is_connected in add_p2p_connection (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Moving the wait_until from the individual test scripts to the test framework simplifies two tests
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK fa4dfd215f62e88d668311701735c332c264fa2a
theStack:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19657/commits/fa4dfd215f62e88d668311701735c332c264fa2a :coffee:
Tree-SHA512: 36eda7eb323614a4c4f9215f1d7b40b9f9c4036d1c08eb701ea705f3e2986fdabd2fc558965a6aadabeed861034aeaeef3c00f968ca17ed7a27e42e506cda87d
|
|
566aada386e181c2ff40ef18ee660a819f485415 Test that wtxid relay peers add wtxid to reject filter (Gregory Sanders)
0fea6ede1b46f5137e8ea0fbacce169d97e4a5ee Restore test case for p2p transaction blinding (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
Introduced in ca10a03addf70421893791c2c499e82fc494d60b then erroneously removed in 8d8099e97ab8af2126f6fbd223fbd82c52f2e85e. The restored line is how we are
checking that the node will still re-request a specific txid given a witness-related failure.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tACK 566aada386e181c2ff40ef18ee660a819f485415
Tree-SHA512: be2b75b5eddb88019b79cc798f9922ca7347ccbb2210b8d4eae93fdde62e2cbb614b5247cb2fbd7ee3577dbe053875a9b62c5747aace8617f12790b8fccdeab4
|
|
9f88ded82b2898ca63d44c08072f1ba52f0e18d7 test addition of unknown segwit spends to txid reject filter (Gregory Sanders)
7989901c7eb62ca28b3d1e5d5831041a7267e495 Add txids with non-standard inputs to reject filter (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Our policy checks for non-standard inputs depend only on the non-witness
portion of a transaction: we look up the scriptPubKey of the input being
spent from our UTXO set (which is covered by the input txid), and the p2sh
checks only rely on the scriptSig portion of the input.
Consequently it's safe to add txids of transactions that fail these checks to
the reject filter, as the witness is irrelevant to the failure. This is helpful
for any situation where we might request the transaction again via txid (either
from txid-relay peers, or if we might fetch the transaction via txid due to
parent-fetching of orphans).
Further, in preparation for future witness versions being deployed on the
network, ensure that WITNESS_UNKNOWN transactions are rejected in
AreInputsStandard(), so that transactions spending v1 (or greater) witness
outputs will fall into this category of having their txid added to the reject
filter.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 9f88ded82b2898ca63d44c08072f1ba52f0e18d7 - code review
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 9f88ded82b2898ca63d44c08072f1ba52f0e18d7
ariard:
Code Review/Tested ACK 9f88ded
naumenkogs:
utACK 9f88ded82b2898ca63d44c08072f1ba52f0e18d7
jonatack:
ACK 9f88ded82b2
Tree-SHA512: 1e93c0a5b68cb432524780ffc0093db893911fdfed9e2ed17f888e59114cc75d2a07062aefad4e5ce2e87c9270886117a8abb3c78fb889c9b9f31967f1777148
|
|
substitutes "for x in range(N):" by "for _ in range(N):"
indicates to the reader that a block is just repeated N times, and
that the loop counter is not used in the body
|
|
Co-authored-by: Fabian Jahr <fjahr@protonmail.com>
|
|
82fc4017b774aaff8799c2b6e8ba5370d94dbf4d test: Catch decimal.InvalidOperation from TestNodeCLI#send_cli (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
`decimal.InvalidOperation` is a special case of a float parsing error, which
presumably should be handled in the same way as a general parsing error,
rather than blow up.
Alternatives include: logging the error, or re-raising with more information.
Example log output:
```
File "/home/travis/build/bitcoin/bitcoin/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-i686-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 603, in sync_all
self.sync_blocks(nodes)
File "/home/travis/build/bitcoin/bitcoin/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-i686-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 568, in sync_blocks
best_hash = [x.getbestblockhash() for x in rpc_connections]
File "/home/travis/build/bitcoin/bitcoin/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-i686-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 568, in <listcomp>
best_hash = [x.getbestblockhash() for x in rpc_connections]
File "/home/travis/build/bitcoin/bitcoin/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-i686-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 571, in __call__
return self.cli.send_cli(self.command, *args, **kwargs)
File "/home/travis/build/bitcoin/bitcoin/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-i686-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 639, in send_cli
return json.loads(cli_stdout, parse_float=decimal.Decimal)
File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/json/__init__.py", line 367, in loads
return cls(**kw).decode(s)
File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/json/decoder.py", line 339, in decode
obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end())
File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/json/decoder.py", line 355, in raw_decode
obj, end = self.scan_once(s, idx)
decimal.InvalidOperation: [<class 'decimal.InvalidOperation'>]
```
See: https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/713502326
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 82fc4017b774aaff8799c2b6e8ba5370d94dbf4d
Tree-SHA512: 8c102b8bf831b05c5ca4b2e1feb5574dcbaed8cab0b2f22b013c5dfcb81788a38839a163dd1e2c6470ccbe5874214663b84485f45467738fd850ca38d539ae25
|
|
31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0 [util] add RunCommandParseJSON (Sjors Provoost)
c17f54ee535faaedf9033717403e1f775b5f1530 [ci] use boost::process (Sjors Provoost)
32128ba682033560d6eb2e4848a9f77a842016d2 [doc] include Doxygen comments for HAVE_BOOST_PROCESS (Sjors Provoost)
3c84d85f7d218fa27e9343c5cd1a55e519218980 [build] msvc: add boost::process (Sjors Provoost)
c47e4bbf0b44f2de1278f9538124ec98ee0815bb [build] make boost-process opt-in (Sjors Provoost)
929cda5470f98d1ef85c05b1cad4e2fb9227e3b0 configure: add ax_boost_process (Sjors Provoost)
8314c23d7b39fc36dde8b40b03b6efbe96f85698 [depends] boost: patch unused variable in boost_process (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Prerequisite for external signer support in #16546. Big picture overview in [this gist](https://gist.github.com/Sjors/29d06728c685e6182828c1ce9b74483d).
This adds a new dependency [boost process](https://github.com/boostorg/process/tree/boost-1.64.0). This is part of Boost since 1.64 which is part of `depends`. Because the minimum Boost version is 1.47, this functionality is skipped for older versions of Boost.
Use `./configure --with-boost-process` to opt in, which checks for the presence of Boost::Process.
We add `UniValue runCommandParseJSON(const std::string& strCommand)` to `system.{h,cpp}` which calls an arbitrary command and processes the JSON returned by it. This is currently only called by the test suite.
~For testing purposes this adds a new regtest-only RPC method `runcommand`, as well as `test/mocks/command.py` used by functional tests.~ (this is no longer the case)
TODO:
- [ ] review boost process in #15440
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0
hebasto:
re-ACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0, only rebased (verified with `git range-diff`) and removed an unintentional tab character since the [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15382#pullrequestreview-458371035) review.
meshcollider:
Very light utACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0, although I am not very confident with build stuff.
promag:
Code review ACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0, don't mind the nit.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 31cf68a3ad1f0a5537c8419e2912b55fbfb88fa0. I left some comments below that could be ignored or followed up later. The current change is clean and comprehensive.
Tree-SHA512: c506e747014b263606e1f538ed4624a8ad7bcf4e025cb700c12cc5739964e254dc04a2bbb848996b170e2ccec3fbfa4fe9e2b3976b191222cfb82fc3e6ab182d
|
|
72351784b3df21a89f79076f4b814a6e700b6469 lint: Remove travis env var from commit linter (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
#19439 was recently merged and seemed to work fine but I now noticed strange behavior when it was running in Travis, which I could not reproduce locally. It turns out `TRAVIS_COMMIT_RANGE` which is used in Travis to get the commits for the linter, uses all the commits that were in a push, which includes all rebase commits for example. This means that the linter can fail on a commit that the developer has never even seen before, which can be very confusing. See an example here which caused me to look into this: https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/714296381 The commit that is reported as failing in my PR is not part of my PR.
I think we rather want to use something like `git merge-base` to get the commit range by default and in Travis. I am leaving the env variable functionality in place with a different name but this is not a variable that can be expected to be present in the CI environments so the `merge-base` range should be used there by default.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 72351784b3df21a89f79076f4b814a6e700b6469, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: afb27bb386855cb8d5cf84fd3a6c11ef1160b25af6175ed0aa146bf04b9a26eb77298df70df0a855f8c46f19f08b3f62c49872c12974fcfa5526a15ee05b3c10
|
|
|
|
|
|
faa9a74c9e99eb43ba0d27fa906767ee88011aeb test: Fail wait_until early if connection is lost (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Calling `minonode.wait_until` needs a connection to make progress (e.g. waiting for an inv), unless the mininode waits for the initial connection or for a disconnection. So for test development and failure debugging, fail early in all `wait_until`, unless opted out.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK faa9a74c9e99eb43ba0d27fa906767ee88011aeb.
Tree-SHA512: 4be850b96e23b87bc2ff42c028a5045d6f5cdbc9482ce6a6ba01cc5eb26710dab9e2ed547c363aac4bd5825151ee9996fb797261420b631bceeddbfa698d1dec
|
|
|
|
3bd67ba5a4ef3c20ef1f873b63c9f53a6c8608b6 Test addr response caching (Gleb Naumenko)
cf1569e074505dbbb9d29422803dd31bb62072d4 Add addr permission flag enabling non-cached addr sharing (Gleb Naumenko)
acd6135b43941fa51d52f5fcdb2ce944280ad01e Cache responses to addr requests (Gleb Naumenko)
7cc0e8101f01891aa8be093a00d993bb7579c385 Remove useless 2500 limit on AddrMan queries (Gleb Naumenko)
ded742bc5b96e3215d69c11fb3628d224e7ae034 Move filtering banned addrs inside GetAddresses() (Gleb Naumenko)
Pull request description:
This is a very simple code change with a big p2p privacy benefit.
It’s currently trivial to scrape any reachable node’s AddrMan (a database of all nodes known to them along with the timestamps).
We do have a limit of one GETADDR per connection, but a spy can disconnect and reconnect even from the same IP, and send GETADDR again and again.
Since we respond with 1,000 random records at most, depending on the AddrMan size it takes probably up to 100 requests for an spy to make sure they scraped (almost) everything.
I even have a script for that. It is totally doable within couple minutes.
Then, with some extra protocol knowledge a spy can infer the direct peers of the victim, and other topological stuff.
I suggest to cache responses to GETADDR on a daily basis, so that an attacker gets at most 1,000 records per day, and can’t track the changes in real time. I will be following up with more improvements to addr relay privacy, but this one alone is a very effective. And simple!
I doubt any of the real software does *reconnect to get new addrs from a given peer*, so we shouldn’t be cutting anyone.
I also believe it doesn’t have any negative implications on the overall topology quality. And the records being “outdated” for at most a day doesn’t break any honest assumptions either.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
reACK 3bd67ba5a4ef3c20ef1f873b63c9f53a6c8608b6
promag:
Code review ACK 3bd67ba5a4ef3c20ef1f873b63c9f53a6c8608b6.
ariard:
Code Review ACK 3bd67ba
Tree-SHA512: dfa5d03205c2424e40a3f8a41af9306227e1ca18beead3b3dda44aa2a082175bb1c6d929dbc7ea8e48e01aed0d50f0d54491caa1147471a2b72a46c3ca06b66f
|
