| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
7524b6479cb20471d827aec5500925c86c62ce1c Add tests for generateblock (Andrew Toth)
dcc8332543f8fb6d1bb47cb270fcbb6a814a7d6e Add generateblock rpc (Andrew Toth)
Pull request description:
The existing block generation rpcs for regtest, `generatetoaddress` and `generatetodescriptor`, mine everything in the mempool up to the block weight limit. This makes it difficult to test a system for several scenarios where a different set of transactions are mined. For example:
- Testing the common scenario where a transaction is replaced in the mempool but the replaced transaction is mined instead.
- Testing for a double-spent transaction where a transaction that conflicts with the mempool is mined.
- Testing for non-standard transactions that are mined.
- Testing the scenario where several blocks are mined without a specific transaction in the mempool being included in a block.
This PR introduces a new rpc, `generateblock`, that takes an array of raw transactions and txids and mines only those and the coinbase. Any txids must be in the mempool, but the raw txs can be anything conforming to consensus rules. The coinbase can be specified as either an address or descriptor.
This reopens #17653 since it was closed by mistake.
Thanks to instagibbs for code suggestions that I used here.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 7524b6479cb20471d827aec5500925c86c62ce1c 📁
Tree-SHA512: 857106007465b5b9b8a84b6d07c17cbf8378a33a72d32ff79abea1d5ab4babb4d53a11ddbb14595aa1fac9dfa1391e3a11403d742f69951beea2f683e8a01cd4
|
|
getwalletinfo.balance
5df0877f91f4ed59031b0d7dcd66780df87ac1af test: update and harden interface_bitcoin_cli tests (Jon Atack)
75019774c96795ef1a57af2a92dd9491f5065cc5 cli -getinfo: use getbalances instead of deprecated getwalletinfo balance (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Extracted from #18453 to preserve that PR as a discussion on multiwallet RPC/CLI.
This PR updates `bitcoin-cli -getinfo` to fetch the wallet balance from `getbalances` in order to no longer depend on `getwalletinfo.balance` which was deprecated a year ago in facfb41.
I found this when removing the getwalletinfo() `balance`, `unconfirmed_balance`, and `immature_balance` fields to see what broke from depending on them.
I didn't see any perceivable change in `-getinfo` run time from the change.
Test coverage for this change is provided by `test/functional/interface_bitcoin_cli.py`, which the second commit updates to (a) no longer depend on getwalletinfo.balances and (b) test the -getinfo blockcount and balance fields against non-default, non-zero values.
ACKs for top commit:
robot-visions:
ACK 5df0877
MarcoFalke:
ACK 5df0877
vasild:
re-ACK 5df0877f9
promag:
Code review ACK 5df0877f91f4ed59031b0d7dcd66780df87ac1af.
theStack:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/5df0877f91f4ed59031b0d7dcd66780df87ac1af
Tree-SHA512: 0dd8c62f915b1c0112e42b132dcf74a141bdd1f51e7c17d4a698b374ec296f4f9836f7058dbe237cf24f9bfb32ea5000e14f7089e2e86472d9c6a175be26e910
|
|
fa1da3d4bfc0511a89f5b19d5a4d89e55ff7ccde test: Add basic addr relay test (MarcoFalke)
fa1793c1c44a3f75a09f9c636467b8274c541bdd net: Pass connman const when relaying address (MarcoFalke)
fa47a0b003f53708b6d5df1ed4e7f8a7c68aa3ac net: Make addr relay mockable (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
As usual:
* Switch to std::chrono time to be type-safe and mockable
* Add basic test that relies on mocktime to add code coverage
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK fa1da3d
promag:
ACK fa1da3d4bfc0511a89f5b19d5a4d89e55ff7ccde (fabe56e44b6f683e24e37246a7a8851190947cb3 before https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18454#issuecomment-607866453), fa5bf23d527a450e72c2bf13d013e5393b664ca3 was dropped since last review.
Tree-SHA512: 0552bf8fcbe375baa3cab62acd8c23b2994efa47daff818ad1116d0ffaa0b9e520dc1bca2bbc68369b25584e85e54861fe6fd0968de4f503b95439c099df9bd7
|
|
- no longer depend on the deprecated balance field of getwalletinfo
- test blockcount and balance against non-default, non-zero expected values
|
|
before warmup finished
faede1b293354560317b67f0b4e6874dcac6ef41 test: Properly raise FailedToStartError when rpc shutdown before warmup finished (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Should fix issues such as https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/671910152#L7034
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: ac659f29c5ec91985c916b734e24911cbf4e2c5c4b1f1891a7e6c2d2511ec285167550fb03848eee4a7a3cbc9f8cdb0c766f4e881d9e44368c7415d007006368
|
|
|
|
|
|
[part 2]
7a2ecf16df938dd95d3130a46082def7a02338eb Wallet: Change IsMine check in CWallet::DelAddressBook from assert to failure (Luke Dashjr)
2952c46b923042f2de801f319e03ed5c4c4eb735 Wallet: Replace CAddressBookData.name with GetLabel() method (Luke Dashjr)
d7092c392e10889cd7a080b3d22ed6446a59b87a QA: Test that change doesn't turn into non-change when spent in an avoid-reuse wallet (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #18192, not strictly necessary for 0.20
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 7a2ecf16df, only change is adding an assert_equal in the test 🔰
jnewbery:
utACK 7a2ecf16df938dd95d3130a46082def7a02338eb
Tree-SHA512: e0933ee40f705b751697dc27249e1868ed4874254b174ebdd0a7150125d8c818402e66df2371718c7eeb90e67ee2317215fb260aa9b9d7b9b45ee436de2988ff
|
|
avoid-reuse wallet
|
|
rpc_signrawtransaction
fa2251df5e3471e0d19d5d5c7780d34ee1498cee test: Use one node to avoid a race due to missing sync in rpc_signrawtransaction (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Node 0 creates a transaction in a block, and node 1 sends a spending transaction without properly syncing the utxo set.
Fixes intermittent test failure in rpc_signrawtransaction
```
test 2020-04-01T00:14:03.400000Z TestFramework (ERROR): JSONRPC error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\projects\bitcoin\test\functional\test_framework\test_framework.py", line 112, in main
self.run_test()
File "C:\projects\bitcoin/test/functional/rpc_signrawtransaction.py", line 213, in run_test
self.witness_script_test()
File "C:\projects\bitcoin/test/functional/rpc_signrawtransaction.py", line 208, in witness_script_test
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(spending_tx_signed['hex'])
File "C:\projects\bitcoin\test\functional\test_framework\coverage.py", line 47, in __call__
return_val = self.auth_service_proxy_instance.__call__(*args, **kwargs)
File "C:\projects\bitcoin\test\functional\test_framework\authproxy.py", line 141, in __call__
raise JSONRPCException(response['error'], status)
test_framework.authproxy.JSONRPCException: bad-txns-inputs-missingorspent (-25)
```
Full log: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/DrahtBot/bitcoin/builds/31864368
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa2251df5e3471e0d19d5d5c7780d34ee1498cee
Tree-SHA512: 9450d216d9989d6c44028ae4b9818790cfb00796e0de22331422f775f74d697bb14ebae0e88dca20c6b641363780da384fe94c708e20fce9cfde929fb343b12f
|
|
b224b4e7bd8c52bb70d933c1bc524c0fe87ac0c1 test: wallet_bumpfee assertion fixup (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #18516 to fix up an assertion as per suggested change in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18516#discussion_r404191587.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK b224b4e7bd8c52bb70d933c1bc524c0fe87ac0c1
Tree-SHA512: 4973bba73a67c1ffaf460921b3d454e9d66a40a67f73b7df742e24a0e389adba3946a3958a729391ee6bfa4ef844be759ebf71d14d788434c248e48a2bbe5bde
|
|
|
|
signrawtransaction
cd3b1569d9ad8e24d3a222aff74e0c254baadf79 Correctly compute redeemScript from witnessScript for signrawtransaction (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`ParsePrevouts` uses `GetScriptForWitness` on the given witnessScript to find the corresponding redeemScript. This is incorrect when the witnessScript is either a P2PK or P2PKH script as it returns the corresponding P2WPK script instead of turning the witnessScript into a P2WSH script. Instead this should make the script a `WitnessV0ScriptHash` destination and get the script for that.
Test cases are also added. These will fail on master with a `redeemScript does not correspond to witnessScript`
Reported on [Bitcointalk](https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5236818.0)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
weak ACK cd3b1569d9, only checked that the test fails without the code change 🚰
instagibbs:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18484/commits/cd3b1569d9ad8e24d3a222aff74e0c254baadf79
Tree-SHA512: afac671dbb52ce88bfb4a9ca3dd6065427ad52c9778d0549ad40e9286778f308adad24fb3b3c3089545d7f88c57c53d41224fd7a4bb207550eff2fe06600118f
|
|
|
|
25e03ba1ff18ca06954786e512000648941b4dfb test: relax bumpfee dust_to_fee txsize an extra vbyte (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Hopefully closes #18511 by allowing the transaction size to be 140-141 vbytes rather than strictly 141, and bumps with a slightly larger fee to ensure dust in the 140 vbyte case.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 25e03ba1ff18ca06954786e512000648941b4dfb
Tree-SHA512: 76a04e1ce090e48befe048ed6d412222d7f8bc951ff822850833061a0606b1bebc5289f7249737d3fb9aa26eb857f99543981037cea6babe3e578e2cfe8afcdb
|
|
and add explanatory documentation for the reasoning.
|
|
|
|
p2p_filter.py
0ed2d8e07d3806d78d03a77d2153f22f9d733a07 test: add BIP37 remote crash bug [CVE-2013-5700] test to p2p_filter.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Integrates the missing message type `filteradd` to the test framework and checks that the BIP37 implementation is not vulnerable to the "remote crash bug" [CVE-2013-5700](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2013-5700) anymore. Prior to v.0.8.4, it was possible to trigger a division-by-zero error on the following line in the function `CBloomFilter::Hash()`:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/f0d6487e290761a4fb03798240a351b5fddfdb38/src/bloom.cpp#L45
By setting a zero-length filter via `filterload`, `vData.size()` is 0, so the modulo operation above, called on any .insert() or .contains() operation then crashed the node. The test uses the approach of just sending an arbitrary `filteradd` message after, which calls `CBloomFilter::insert()` (and in turn `CBloomFilter::Hash()`) on the node. The vulnerability was fixed by commit https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/37c6389c5a0ca63ae3573440ecdfe95d28ad8f07 (an intentional covert fix, [according to gmaxwell](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18483#issuecomment-608224095)), which introduced flags `isEmpty`/`isFull` that wouldn't call the `Hash()` member function if `isFull` is true (set to true by default constructor).
To validate that the test fails if the implementation is vulnerable, one can simply set the flags to false in the member function `UpdateEmptyFull()` (that is called after a filter received via `filterload` is constructed), which activates the vulnerable code path calling `Hash` in any case on adding or testing for data in the filter:
```diff
diff --git a/src/bloom.cpp b/src/bloom.cpp
index bd6069b..ef294a3 100644
--- a/src/bloom.cpp
+++ b/src/bloom.cpp
@@ -199,8 +199,8 @@ void CBloomFilter::UpdateEmptyFull()
full &= vData[i] == 0xff;
empty &= vData[i] == 0;
}
- isFull = full;
- isEmpty = empty;
+ isFull = false;
+ isEmpty = false;
}
```
Resulting in:
```
$ ./p2p_filter.py
[...]
2020-04-03T14:38:59.593000Z TestFramework (INFO): Check that division-by-zero remote crash bug [CVE-2013-5700] is fixed
2020-04-03T14:38:59.695000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
[...]
[... some exceptions following ...]
```
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 0ed2d8e07d3806d78d03a77d2153f22f9d733a07
Tree-SHA512: 02d0253d13eab70c4bd007b0750c56a5a92d05d419d53033523eeb3ed80318bc95196ab90f7745ea3ac9ebae7caee3adbf2a055a40a4124e0915226e49018fe8
|
|
4670006762ffce654bb12edb5a7e64ad004122a7 test: remove redundant sync_with_ping after add_p2p_connection (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Now that #18247 is merged, these calls are redundant.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
utACK 4670006
Tree-SHA512: bdbfe8bcf9dbdde0a8115e3a62bfe359910798d7a3010d920ffca07049cb5f97bf8fb9b6f70079b0607105192b61a6d665774e59a2b678597b47ad6237595ad5
|
|
with send_and_ping
3dc8c012f0a40756f3c4359dbe169c03d7c8a725 test: remaining replacements of (send_message+sync_with_ping) with send_and_ping (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This is a tiny follow-up PR to #18494, substituting the remaining occurences of `send_message(...)`/`sync_with_ping(...)` pairs with `send_and_ping(...)`, as suggested in the comment https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18494#pullrequestreview-386418913. Thanks to jonatack and [MarcoFalke](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18494#issuecomment-608496342) for giving me the hint to do this follow-up.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 3dc8c012f0a40756f3c4359dbe169c03d7c8a725
Tree-SHA512: 44d64332933c23a7f59c0415e008ce1b2b2e07177f81cb9473b7c71558188f1c698e8973de5cc940280e4697f9553af852d9a42841304f82469673d1c8162852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6112a209828c43930f677c45461339cdf68a56e9 test: replace (send_message + sync_with_ping) with send_and_ping (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up to faf1d047313e71658fb31f6b94fdd5d37705ab85 yesterday.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
utACK 6112a20
MarcoFalke:
ACK 6112a209828c43930f677c45461339cdf68a56e9 🎞
Tree-SHA512: 749644ac9a1ef0e1aa6c3ac5e899eb3fa7fb9c0909352f922a80412df2bc0e539692a7757af550eff4d4914cbe57b0c75ce3948f569acc7a52852e91a55ad457
|
|
|
|
9eefc6e92fa1acef6eddd87886ed80510b439a57 gui: Delete progress dialog instead of hidding it (João Barbosa)
ee9e88ba2734b81d0ffe23fd45c4f69a970c6494 wallet: Handle duplicate fileid exception (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Handle the duplicate fileid exception thrown at `CheckUniqueFileid` in tow cases:
- when duplicate wallets are set on the command line - catch in `LoadWallets`;
- when a duplicate wallet is loaded dynamically - catch in `LoadWallet`.
Fixes #16776.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Re-ACK 9eefc6e92fa1acef6eddd87886ed80510b439a57 no change since last review 68e0ff0e1f530c942721aab49cf67ffc07104628
hebasto:
re-ACK 9eefc6e92fa1acef6eddd87886ed80510b439a57
Tree-SHA512: 46e3c1cd6708b54e2d1c4973a74c8d5428822e04cecbc147cf200eb034efa385e867bd749c7c639020e83c9813fae8fed64a851bdd99abf60c33b07e0363f5d5
|
|
|
|
|
|
faf1d047313e71658fb31f6b94fdd5d37705ab85 test: Remove redundant sync_with_ping after add_p2p_connection (MarcoFalke)
fa9064704524a0fd1fa9ea73eea45b07316ac3d1 test: Wait for both veracks in add_p2p_connection (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This fixes the race in p2p_blocksonly
E.g. https://travis-ci.org/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/jobs/657038844#L4500
```
...
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.825000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Closed connection to: 127.0.0.1:11828
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.825642Z [net] disconnecting peer=0
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.825826Z [net] Cleared nodestate for peer=0
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.875835Z [http] Received a POST request for / from 127.0.0.1:53448
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.876067Z [httpworker.0] ThreadRPCServer method=getmempoolinfo user=__cookie__
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.877000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Connecting to Bitcoin Node: 127.0.0.1:11828
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.878000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Connected & Listening: 127.0.0.1:11828
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.878000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Send message to 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_version(nVersion=70014 nServices=9 nTime=Sun Mar 1 20:58:28 2020 addrTo=CAddress(nServices=1 ip=127.0.0.1 port=11828) addrFrom=CAddress(nServices=1 ip=0.0.0.0 port=0) nNonce=0x164D5DEB952A4A0B strSubVer=b'/python-mininode-tester:0.0.3/' nStartingHeight=-1 nRelay=1)
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.883808Z [net] Added connection peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.883950Z [net] connection from 127.0.0.1:33798 accepted
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.884300Z [msghand] received: version (116 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.884483Z [msghand] sending version (114 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.884700Z [msghand] send version message: version 70015, blocks=200, us=[::]:0, peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.884765Z [msghand] sending verack (0 bytes) peer=1
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.885000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Received message from 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_version(nVersion=70015 nServices=1033 nTime=Sun Mar 1 20:58:28 2020 addrTo=CAddress(nServices=0 ip=0.0.0.0 port=0) addrFrom=CAddress(nServices=1033 ip=0.0.0.0 port=0) nNonce=0x4A0F2F4C549B3399 strSubVer=b'/Satoshi:0.19.99(testnode0)/' nStartingHeight=200 nRelay=0)
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.885000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Send message to 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_verack()
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.885000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Received message from 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_verack()
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.885004Z [msghand] receive version message: /python-mininode-tester:0.0.3/: version 70014, blocks=-1, us=127.0.0.1:11828, peer=1
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.886000Z TestFramework (INFO): Check that txs from rpc are not rejected and relayed to other peers
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.886556Z [http] Received a POST request for / from 127.0.0.1:53448
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.886783Z [httpworker.1] ThreadRPCServer method=getpeerinfo user=__cookie__
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.889032Z [http] Received a POST request for / from 127.0.0.1:53448
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.889294Z [httpworker.2] ThreadRPCServer method=testmempoolaccept user=__cookie__
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.891655Z [http] Received a POST request for / from 127.0.0.1:53448
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.891963Z [httpworker.3] ThreadRPCServer method=sendrawtransaction user=__cookie__
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.893115Z [httpworker.3] Enqueuing TransactionAddedToMempool: txid=af34fc5ff9ea8babbd4083fbb79ffd2ad5aff1d6def803c07ca5aeed880bd60f wtxid=af34fc5ff9ea8babbd4083fbb79ffd2ad5aff1d6def803c07ca5aeed880bd60f
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.893443Z [scheduler] TransactionAddedToMempool: txid=af34fc5ff9ea8babbd4083fbb79ffd2ad5aff1d6def803c07ca5aeed880bd60f wtxid=af34fc5ff9ea8babbd4083fbb79ffd2ad5aff1d6def803c07ca5aeed880bd60f
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.894814Z [msghand] received: verack (0 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.894937Z [msghand] sending sendheaders (0 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.895087Z [msghand] sending sendcmpct (9 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.895235Z [msghand] sending sendcmpct (9 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.895430Z [msghand] sending ping (8 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.895896Z [msghand] initial getheaders (199) to peer=1 (startheight:-1)
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.896000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Received message from 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_sendheaders()
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.896016Z [msghand] sending getheaders (645 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.896607Z [msghand] sending feefilter (8 bytes) peer=1
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.897000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Received message from 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_sendcmpct(announce=False, version=2)
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.897000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Received message from 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_sendcmpct(announce=False, version=1)
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.897000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Received message from 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_ping(nonce=f735096062d217b5)
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.897000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Send message to 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_pong(nonce=f735096062d217b5)
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.897000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Received message from 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_getheaders(locator=CBlockLocator(nVersion=70014 vHave=[48924041037103782797700918670732352379567180837453042168545380831411841797392, 28010422273815860773972769588722664110955084223364219183119416607410792753789, 5954376895683677137597080246740451260829355661937599865380797589540815086241, 14500403275336359851183244421245184901482464358719551678581030092830439955257, 17853919108052771837249729512111680264864054213441538187113939176285784834878, 28843166929059356839755035875664073555480989477... (msg truncated)
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.897000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Received message from 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_feefilter(feerate=000003e8)
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.898144Z [msghand] received: pong (8 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:59:28.338539Z [scheduler] Feeding 13446 bytes of dynamic environment data into RNG
test 2020-03-01T20:59:28.908000Z TestFramework.utils (ERROR): wait_until() failed. Predicate: ''''
def test_function():
assert self.is_connected
if not self.last_message.get('tx'):
return False
return self.last_message['tx'].tx.rehash() == txid
'''
test 2020-03-01T20:59:28.908000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/travis/build/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 112, in main
self.run_test()
File "/home/travis/build/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/p2p_blocksonly.py", line 57, in run_test
self.nodes[0].p2p.wait_for_tx(txid)
File "/home/travis/build/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/mininode.py", line 369, in wait_for_tx
wait_until(test_function, timeout=timeout, lock=mininode_lock)
File "/home/travis/build/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/util.py", line 234, in wait_until
raise AssertionError("Predicate {} not true after {} seconds".format(predicate_source, timeout))
AssertionError: Predicate ''''
def test_function():
assert self.is_connected
if not self.last_message.get('tx'):
return False
return self.last_message['tx'].tx.rehash() == txid
''' not true after 60 seconds
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK faf1d04
Tree-SHA512: 3b1a38a5c87d11c610eee0988f0c4af9bfcd978df9ac718ef611f663df2fd4a0eb04e077df5e940d15971bb2f22328fb6021cacccb6902f1e527f288ad2c4a2c
|
|
ParsePrevouts uses GetScriptForWitness on the given witnessScript
to find the corresponding redeemScript. This is incorrect when the
witnessScript is either a P2PK or P2PKH script as it returns the
corresponding P2WPK script instead of turning the witnessScript
into a P2WSH script. Instead this should make the script a
WitnessV0ScriptHash destination and get the script for that.
Test cases are also added.
|
|
Also replace the two-line (send_message + sync_with_ping) with the one-line send_and_ping
|
|
|
|
fac3716b09bb9ee121db629873d9694a95cae942 test: check that peer is connected when calling sync_* (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Without a connection there is no way to sync, so we can fail early and don't have to wait for the timeout
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fac3716b09bb9
Tree-SHA512: 12f771473c23e152dae4bfb201fadb2c3530cf439de64fea07d048734614543080a5d05c9c36e6e398c6a69c8279f609d34706599571814172a11bcfbea4a3b9
|
|
fa3cc0bfc4c4fc13a384fc291403c9fd41082f18 test: Remove unsafe BOOST_TEST_MESSAGE (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Fixes #17987
Can be tested with
```
./src/test/test_bitcoin -l test_suite -- DEBUG_LOG_OUT
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tested ACK fa3cc0bfc4c4fc13a384fc291403c9fd41082f18
mzumsande:
Tested ACK fa3cc0bfc4c4fc13a384fc291403c9fd41082f18
Tree-SHA512: f63b110d77882cd7c0d7574ff6c9c948db8febb3400ecdac45164746b587b0fa223463041801271b3959267ddc1d9a4a67ba76939e242e7dd2f92a2834a400a0
|
|
00559229588feb19de2a0cb7506f70c483a1f433 test: add BIP37 'filterclear' test to p2p_filter.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Integrates the message type `filterclear` to the test framework and adds a simple test to `p2p_filter.py`, checking that arbitrary txs get relayed again after deleting the filter.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 00559229588feb19de2a0cb7506f70c483a1f433
Tree-SHA512: fe64e99a526865770707d8077b9968d3923f248045ec7fa56cd380dba85ac77a71a473d244ef3aede2fc0d287b8d7c6bc0156b6033b0c949c2058cc08e255697
|
|
|
|
|
|
83e1d92413e262e6a876336ec433a6fbc335223a test: listsinceblock block height checks (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This is the second commit of #17535.
This PR extends a listsinceblock test to check the new transaction 'blockheight' field recently added in #17437. It also cleans up code in the test function without changing or removing existing checks.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tested ACK 83e1d92413e262e6a876336ec433a6fbc335223a
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 83e1d92413e262e6a876336ec433a6fbc335223a. Nice test improvements!
Tree-SHA512: 92874b49a3bc0236500495f32dfcf683e1971ca3d4c51702c69ed4ce7dfce21273754f02f93d1243d73793701d9fdf49e14b149477cd249cbbd9e4e8d5bd49f8
|
|
|
|
fa156999695ddaeb016d8320bee62f8d96679d55 test: Add basic test for BIP 37 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This does not add full coverage, but should be a good start and can be extended in the future. Currently, none of the BIP 37 p2p code has test coverage.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
Code review ACK fa156999695ddaeb016d8320bee62f8d96679d55 -- more testing coverage is better than less testing coverage
Tree-SHA512: d52e8be79240dffb769105c087ae0ae9305d599282546e4ca7379c4c7add2dbcd668265b46670aa07c357638044cf0f61a6fab7dba8971dd0f80c8f99768686e
|
|
|
|
|
|
dcda81c47101196e53e379d965a2692515ef8363 test: add coverage for script parse error in ParseScript (pierrenn)
Pull request description:
Follow up on this suggestion : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18416#issuecomment-603966799
This adds a test case to raise the `script parse error` in `ParseScript`.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18447/commits/dcda81c47101196e53e379d965a2692515ef8363
Tree-SHA512: ae0ef2c00f34cee818c83582f190d5f4043159e922862f2b442b7b895b8ff3ca421533699247c12c367be77813b5205830a771cd47a18e8932807ccace2d6a1c
|
|
9ab14e4d21c73d16d8d782f1576fe29e659e2a70 Limit decimal range of numbers ParseScript accepts (pierrenn)
Pull request description:
Following up on this suggestion : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18413#issuecomment-602966490, prevent the output of `atoi64` in the `core_read.cpp:ParseScript` helper to send to `CScriptNum::serialize` values wider than 32-bit.
Since the `ParseScript` helper is only used by the tool defined in `bitcoin-tx.cpp`, this only prevents users to provide too much unrealistic values.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 9ab14e4d21c73d16d8d782f1576fe29e659e2a70
Tree-SHA512: ee228269d19d04e8fee0aa7c0ae2bb0a2b437b8e574356e8d9b2279318242057d51fcf39a842aa3afe27408d0f2d5276df245d07a3f4828644a366f80587b666
|
|
|
|
|
|
c3857c5fcb21836ddc1b79a6b19cffe562cade10 wallet: remove CreateTotalBumpTransaction() (Jon Atack)
4a0b27bb01738e6917e27b2cf47f9a8536249693 wallet: remove totalfee from createBumpTransaction() (Jon Atack)
e347cfa9a7244277f9d220a4dc3537182f18441e rpc: remove deprecated totalFee arg from RPC bumpfee (Jon Atack)
bd05f96d79df1a1561f84850d777808f8575fb8b test: delete wallet_bumpfee_totalfee_deprecation.py (Jon Atack)
a6d1ab8caa63bd343207baa60edb705209f16fb4 test: update bumpfee testing from totalFee to fee_rate (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Since 0.19, fee-bumping using `totalFee` was deprecated in #15996 and replaced by `fee_rate` in #16727. This changeset removes it.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK c3857c5fcb21836ddc1b79a6b19cffe562cade10
Tree-SHA512: c1bb15d664baf4d2dea06981f36384af02057d125c51fcbc8640b9d5563532187c7b84aa952f7b575255a88ce383ed4d7495bec920a47b05b6fc0d432dce1f00
|
|
|
|
d056df033a1e88554f7cc39dd709a87b17cb49df Replace std::to_string with locale-independent alternative (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
Addresses #17866 following practicalswift's suggestion:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17866#issuecomment-584287299
~Used ::ToString to avoid aliasing issues. Left uses in QT and test.~
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK d056df033a1e88554f7cc39dd709a87b17cb49df
laanwj:
ACK d056df033a1e88554f7cc39dd709a87b17cb49df
Tree-SHA512: 9e6966a9cdd14f4a1a40d9f0fa7c402aed22b2f1ad8681708e22b050d51a91c5d62220a9ec4c425be2d57acf5c964fca87a5e981b5cbff048bc3b6720dae92b7
|
|
|
