Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Using both txid and wtxid-based relay with peers means that we could sometimes
download the same transaction twice, if announced via two different hashes from
different peers.
Use a heuristic of delaying txid-peer-getdata requests by 2 seconds, if we have
at least one wtxid-based peer.
|
|
This adds a field to CNodeState that tracks whether to relay transactions with
that peer via wtxid, instead of txid. As of this commit the field will always
be false, but in a later commit we will add a way to negotiate turning this on
via p2p messages exchanged with the peer.
|
|
Github-Pull: #19620
Rebased-From: 9f88ded82b2898ca63d44c08072f1ba52f0e18d7
|
|
Github-Pull: #19300
Rebased-From: 9b009fae6e2eb0ab2ee7ce7882c3556a9ac363a7
|
|
Github-Pull: #19215
Rebased-From: 84d295e51341a126a6c3cbeea7a8caa04c7b5bc3
|
|
Offline signers will always need a non_witness_utxo so make sure it is
there.
Github-Pull: #19215
Rebased-From: 46004790588c24174a0bec49b540d158ce163ffd
|
|
This fix is a based on the fix by Antoine Riard <ariard@student.42.fr> in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18600.
Unlike that PR, which implements some new behavior, this just restores previous
wallet notification and status behavior for transactions removed from the
mempool because they conflict with transactions in a block. The behavior was
accidentally changed in two `CWallet::BlockConnected` updates:
a31be09bfd77eed497a8e251d31358e16e2f2eb1 and
7e89994133725125dddbfa8d45484e3b9ed51c6e from
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16624, causing issue
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18325.
The change here could be improved and replaced with a more comprehensive
cleanup, so it includes a detailed comment explaining future considerations.
Fixes #18325
Co-authored-by: Antoine Riard <ariard@student.42.fr>
Github-Pull: #18982
Rebased-From: b604c5c8b5892842f13dee89ae31812a28ab25d1
|
|
412d5fe8791c417bf46fc55a5bb8d59be98a33db QA: feature_segwit: Check that template "rules" includes "!segwit" as appropriate (Luke Dashjr)
2abe8cc3b760219cfa434e4c96e9f8d3611d0037 Bugfix: Include "csv","!segwit" in "rules" (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Original branch merges cleanly (no rebase needed)
See also #17946
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 412d5fe8791c417bf46fc55a5bb8d59be98a33db
Tree-SHA512: 8b269f7782c10f02dc245cc377d91f594474eade6a32184a49fa2ed3928d91917e4b83eefee6947bfb5ffff54eca2781f8cf2169c1f0ad3fefca1d4b3cf304dd
|
|
Add test coverage for conflicted wallet transaction notifications so we improve
current behavior and avoid future regressions
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9240 - accidental break
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9479 - bug report
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9371 - fix
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16624 - accidental break
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18325 - bug report
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18600 - potential fix
Github-Pull: #18878
Rebased-From: f963a680515eda66429b3d1537a7baf281ab9283
|
|
messages
Co-Authored-By: John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com>
Github-Pull: #18808
Rebased-From: 2f032556e08a04807c71eb02104ca9589eaadf1b
|
|
fa1da3d4bfc0511a89f5b19d5a4d89e55ff7ccde test: Add basic addr relay test (MarcoFalke)
fa1793c1c44a3f75a09f9c636467b8274c541bdd net: Pass connman const when relaying address (MarcoFalke)
fa47a0b003f53708b6d5df1ed4e7f8a7c68aa3ac net: Make addr relay mockable (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
As usual:
* Switch to std::chrono time to be type-safe and mockable
* Add basic test that relies on mocktime to add code coverage
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK fa1da3d
promag:
ACK fa1da3d4bfc0511a89f5b19d5a4d89e55ff7ccde (fabe56e44b6f683e24e37246a7a8851190947cb3 before https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18454#issuecomment-607866453), fa5bf23d527a450e72c2bf13d013e5393b664ca3 was dropped since last review.
Tree-SHA512: 0552bf8fcbe375baa3cab62acd8c23b2994efa47daff818ad1116d0ffaa0b9e520dc1bca2bbc68369b25584e85e54861fe6fd0968de4f503b95439c099df9bd7
|
|
before warmup finished
faede1b293354560317b67f0b4e6874dcac6ef41 test: Properly raise FailedToStartError when rpc shutdown before warmup finished (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Should fix issues such as https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/671910152#L7034
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: ac659f29c5ec91985c916b734e24911cbf4e2c5c4b1f1891a7e6c2d2511ec285167550fb03848eee4a7a3cbc9f8cdb0c766f4e881d9e44368c7415d007006368
|
|
|
|
|
|
[part 2]
7a2ecf16df938dd95d3130a46082def7a02338eb Wallet: Change IsMine check in CWallet::DelAddressBook from assert to failure (Luke Dashjr)
2952c46b923042f2de801f319e03ed5c4c4eb735 Wallet: Replace CAddressBookData.name with GetLabel() method (Luke Dashjr)
d7092c392e10889cd7a080b3d22ed6446a59b87a QA: Test that change doesn't turn into non-change when spent in an avoid-reuse wallet (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #18192, not strictly necessary for 0.20
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 7a2ecf16df, only change is adding an assert_equal in the test 🔰
jnewbery:
utACK 7a2ecf16df938dd95d3130a46082def7a02338eb
Tree-SHA512: e0933ee40f705b751697dc27249e1868ed4874254b174ebdd0a7150125d8c818402e66df2371718c7eeb90e67ee2317215fb260aa9b9d7b9b45ee436de2988ff
|
|
avoid-reuse wallet
|
|
rpc_signrawtransaction
fa2251df5e3471e0d19d5d5c7780d34ee1498cee test: Use one node to avoid a race due to missing sync in rpc_signrawtransaction (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Node 0 creates a transaction in a block, and node 1 sends a spending transaction without properly syncing the utxo set.
Fixes intermittent test failure in rpc_signrawtransaction
```
test 2020-04-01T00:14:03.400000Z TestFramework (ERROR): JSONRPC error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\projects\bitcoin\test\functional\test_framework\test_framework.py", line 112, in main
self.run_test()
File "C:\projects\bitcoin/test/functional/rpc_signrawtransaction.py", line 213, in run_test
self.witness_script_test()
File "C:\projects\bitcoin/test/functional/rpc_signrawtransaction.py", line 208, in witness_script_test
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(spending_tx_signed['hex'])
File "C:\projects\bitcoin\test\functional\test_framework\coverage.py", line 47, in __call__
return_val = self.auth_service_proxy_instance.__call__(*args, **kwargs)
File "C:\projects\bitcoin\test\functional\test_framework\authproxy.py", line 141, in __call__
raise JSONRPCException(response['error'], status)
test_framework.authproxy.JSONRPCException: bad-txns-inputs-missingorspent (-25)
```
Full log: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/DrahtBot/bitcoin/builds/31864368
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa2251df5e3471e0d19d5d5c7780d34ee1498cee
Tree-SHA512: 9450d216d9989d6c44028ae4b9818790cfb00796e0de22331422f775f74d697bb14ebae0e88dca20c6b641363780da384fe94c708e20fce9cfde929fb343b12f
|
|
b224b4e7bd8c52bb70d933c1bc524c0fe87ac0c1 test: wallet_bumpfee assertion fixup (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #18516 to fix up an assertion as per suggested change in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18516#discussion_r404191587.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK b224b4e7bd8c52bb70d933c1bc524c0fe87ac0c1
Tree-SHA512: 4973bba73a67c1ffaf460921b3d454e9d66a40a67f73b7df742e24a0e389adba3946a3958a729391ee6bfa4ef844be759ebf71d14d788434c248e48a2bbe5bde
|
|
|
|
signrawtransaction
cd3b1569d9ad8e24d3a222aff74e0c254baadf79 Correctly compute redeemScript from witnessScript for signrawtransaction (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`ParsePrevouts` uses `GetScriptForWitness` on the given witnessScript to find the corresponding redeemScript. This is incorrect when the witnessScript is either a P2PK or P2PKH script as it returns the corresponding P2WPK script instead of turning the witnessScript into a P2WSH script. Instead this should make the script a `WitnessV0ScriptHash` destination and get the script for that.
Test cases are also added. These will fail on master with a `redeemScript does not correspond to witnessScript`
Reported on [Bitcointalk](https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5236818.0)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
weak ACK cd3b1569d9, only checked that the test fails without the code change 🚰
instagibbs:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18484/commits/cd3b1569d9ad8e24d3a222aff74e0c254baadf79
Tree-SHA512: afac671dbb52ce88bfb4a9ca3dd6065427ad52c9778d0549ad40e9286778f308adad24fb3b3c3089545d7f88c57c53d41224fd7a4bb207550eff2fe06600118f
|
|
|
|
25e03ba1ff18ca06954786e512000648941b4dfb test: relax bumpfee dust_to_fee txsize an extra vbyte (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Hopefully closes #18511 by allowing the transaction size to be 140-141 vbytes rather than strictly 141, and bumps with a slightly larger fee to ensure dust in the 140 vbyte case.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 25e03ba1ff18ca06954786e512000648941b4dfb
Tree-SHA512: 76a04e1ce090e48befe048ed6d412222d7f8bc951ff822850833061a0606b1bebc5289f7249737d3fb9aa26eb857f99543981037cea6babe3e578e2cfe8afcdb
|
|
and add explanatory documentation for the reasoning.
|
|
|
|
p2p_filter.py
0ed2d8e07d3806d78d03a77d2153f22f9d733a07 test: add BIP37 remote crash bug [CVE-2013-5700] test to p2p_filter.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Integrates the missing message type `filteradd` to the test framework and checks that the BIP37 implementation is not vulnerable to the "remote crash bug" [CVE-2013-5700](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2013-5700) anymore. Prior to v.0.8.4, it was possible to trigger a division-by-zero error on the following line in the function `CBloomFilter::Hash()`:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/f0d6487e290761a4fb03798240a351b5fddfdb38/src/bloom.cpp#L45
By setting a zero-length filter via `filterload`, `vData.size()` is 0, so the modulo operation above, called on any .insert() or .contains() operation then crashed the node. The test uses the approach of just sending an arbitrary `filteradd` message after, which calls `CBloomFilter::insert()` (and in turn `CBloomFilter::Hash()`) on the node. The vulnerability was fixed by commit https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/37c6389c5a0ca63ae3573440ecdfe95d28ad8f07 (an intentional covert fix, [according to gmaxwell](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18483#issuecomment-608224095)), which introduced flags `isEmpty`/`isFull` that wouldn't call the `Hash()` member function if `isFull` is true (set to true by default constructor).
To validate that the test fails if the implementation is vulnerable, one can simply set the flags to false in the member function `UpdateEmptyFull()` (that is called after a filter received via `filterload` is constructed), which activates the vulnerable code path calling `Hash` in any case on adding or testing for data in the filter:
```diff
diff --git a/src/bloom.cpp b/src/bloom.cpp
index bd6069b..ef294a3 100644
--- a/src/bloom.cpp
+++ b/src/bloom.cpp
@@ -199,8 +199,8 @@ void CBloomFilter::UpdateEmptyFull()
full &= vData[i] == 0xff;
empty &= vData[i] == 0;
}
- isFull = full;
- isEmpty = empty;
+ isFull = false;
+ isEmpty = false;
}
```
Resulting in:
```
$ ./p2p_filter.py
[...]
2020-04-03T14:38:59.593000Z TestFramework (INFO): Check that division-by-zero remote crash bug [CVE-2013-5700] is fixed
2020-04-03T14:38:59.695000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
[...]
[... some exceptions following ...]
```
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 0ed2d8e07d3806d78d03a77d2153f22f9d733a07
Tree-SHA512: 02d0253d13eab70c4bd007b0750c56a5a92d05d419d53033523eeb3ed80318bc95196ab90f7745ea3ac9ebae7caee3adbf2a055a40a4124e0915226e49018fe8
|
|
4670006762ffce654bb12edb5a7e64ad004122a7 test: remove redundant sync_with_ping after add_p2p_connection (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Now that #18247 is merged, these calls are redundant.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
utACK 4670006
Tree-SHA512: bdbfe8bcf9dbdde0a8115e3a62bfe359910798d7a3010d920ffca07049cb5f97bf8fb9b6f70079b0607105192b61a6d665774e59a2b678597b47ad6237595ad5
|
|
with send_and_ping
3dc8c012f0a40756f3c4359dbe169c03d7c8a725 test: remaining replacements of (send_message+sync_with_ping) with send_and_ping (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This is a tiny follow-up PR to #18494, substituting the remaining occurences of `send_message(...)`/`sync_with_ping(...)` pairs with `send_and_ping(...)`, as suggested in the comment https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18494#pullrequestreview-386418913. Thanks to jonatack and [MarcoFalke](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18494#issuecomment-608496342) for giving me the hint to do this follow-up.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 3dc8c012f0a40756f3c4359dbe169c03d7c8a725
Tree-SHA512: 44d64332933c23a7f59c0415e008ce1b2b2e07177f81cb9473b7c71558188f1c698e8973de5cc940280e4697f9553af852d9a42841304f82469673d1c8162852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6112a209828c43930f677c45461339cdf68a56e9 test: replace (send_message + sync_with_ping) with send_and_ping (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up to faf1d047313e71658fb31f6b94fdd5d37705ab85 yesterday.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
utACK 6112a20
MarcoFalke:
ACK 6112a209828c43930f677c45461339cdf68a56e9 🎞
Tree-SHA512: 749644ac9a1ef0e1aa6c3ac5e899eb3fa7fb9c0909352f922a80412df2bc0e539692a7757af550eff4d4914cbe57b0c75ce3948f569acc7a52852e91a55ad457
|
|
|
|
9eefc6e92fa1acef6eddd87886ed80510b439a57 gui: Delete progress dialog instead of hidding it (João Barbosa)
ee9e88ba2734b81d0ffe23fd45c4f69a970c6494 wallet: Handle duplicate fileid exception (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Handle the duplicate fileid exception thrown at `CheckUniqueFileid` in tow cases:
- when duplicate wallets are set on the command line - catch in `LoadWallets`;
- when a duplicate wallet is loaded dynamically - catch in `LoadWallet`.
Fixes #16776.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Re-ACK 9eefc6e92fa1acef6eddd87886ed80510b439a57 no change since last review 68e0ff0e1f530c942721aab49cf67ffc07104628
hebasto:
re-ACK 9eefc6e92fa1acef6eddd87886ed80510b439a57
Tree-SHA512: 46e3c1cd6708b54e2d1c4973a74c8d5428822e04cecbc147cf200eb034efa385e867bd749c7c639020e83c9813fae8fed64a851bdd99abf60c33b07e0363f5d5
|
|
|
|
|
|
faf1d047313e71658fb31f6b94fdd5d37705ab85 test: Remove redundant sync_with_ping after add_p2p_connection (MarcoFalke)
fa9064704524a0fd1fa9ea73eea45b07316ac3d1 test: Wait for both veracks in add_p2p_connection (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This fixes the race in p2p_blocksonly
E.g. https://travis-ci.org/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/jobs/657038844#L4500
```
...
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.825000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Closed connection to: 127.0.0.1:11828
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.825642Z [net] disconnecting peer=0
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.825826Z [net] Cleared nodestate for peer=0
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.875835Z [http] Received a POST request for / from 127.0.0.1:53448
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.876067Z [httpworker.0] ThreadRPCServer method=getmempoolinfo user=__cookie__
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.877000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Connecting to Bitcoin Node: 127.0.0.1:11828
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.878000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Connected & Listening: 127.0.0.1:11828
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.878000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Send message to 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_version(nVersion=70014 nServices=9 nTime=Sun Mar 1 20:58:28 2020 addrTo=CAddress(nServices=1 ip=127.0.0.1 port=11828) addrFrom=CAddress(nServices=1 ip=0.0.0.0 port=0) nNonce=0x164D5DEB952A4A0B strSubVer=b'/python-mininode-tester:0.0.3/' nStartingHeight=-1 nRelay=1)
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.883808Z [net] Added connection peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.883950Z [net] connection from 127.0.0.1:33798 accepted
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.884300Z [msghand] received: version (116 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.884483Z [msghand] sending version (114 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.884700Z [msghand] send version message: version 70015, blocks=200, us=[::]:0, peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.884765Z [msghand] sending verack (0 bytes) peer=1
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.885000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Received message from 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_version(nVersion=70015 nServices=1033 nTime=Sun Mar 1 20:58:28 2020 addrTo=CAddress(nServices=0 ip=0.0.0.0 port=0) addrFrom=CAddress(nServices=1033 ip=0.0.0.0 port=0) nNonce=0x4A0F2F4C549B3399 strSubVer=b'/Satoshi:0.19.99(testnode0)/' nStartingHeight=200 nRelay=0)
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.885000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Send message to 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_verack()
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.885000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Received message from 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_verack()
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.885004Z [msghand] receive version message: /python-mininode-tester:0.0.3/: version 70014, blocks=-1, us=127.0.0.1:11828, peer=1
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.886000Z TestFramework (INFO): Check that txs from rpc are not rejected and relayed to other peers
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.886556Z [http] Received a POST request for / from 127.0.0.1:53448
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.886783Z [httpworker.1] ThreadRPCServer method=getpeerinfo user=__cookie__
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.889032Z [http] Received a POST request for / from 127.0.0.1:53448
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.889294Z [httpworker.2] ThreadRPCServer method=testmempoolaccept user=__cookie__
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.891655Z [http] Received a POST request for / from 127.0.0.1:53448
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.891963Z [httpworker.3] ThreadRPCServer method=sendrawtransaction user=__cookie__
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.893115Z [httpworker.3] Enqueuing TransactionAddedToMempool: txid=af34fc5ff9ea8babbd4083fbb79ffd2ad5aff1d6def803c07ca5aeed880bd60f wtxid=af34fc5ff9ea8babbd4083fbb79ffd2ad5aff1d6def803c07ca5aeed880bd60f
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.893443Z [scheduler] TransactionAddedToMempool: txid=af34fc5ff9ea8babbd4083fbb79ffd2ad5aff1d6def803c07ca5aeed880bd60f wtxid=af34fc5ff9ea8babbd4083fbb79ffd2ad5aff1d6def803c07ca5aeed880bd60f
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.894814Z [msghand] received: verack (0 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.894937Z [msghand] sending sendheaders (0 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.895087Z [msghand] sending sendcmpct (9 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.895235Z [msghand] sending sendcmpct (9 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.895430Z [msghand] sending ping (8 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.895896Z [msghand] initial getheaders (199) to peer=1 (startheight:-1)
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.896000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Received message from 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_sendheaders()
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.896016Z [msghand] sending getheaders (645 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.896607Z [msghand] sending feefilter (8 bytes) peer=1
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.897000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Received message from 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_sendcmpct(announce=False, version=2)
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.897000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Received message from 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_sendcmpct(announce=False, version=1)
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.897000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Received message from 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_ping(nonce=f735096062d217b5)
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.897000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Send message to 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_pong(nonce=f735096062d217b5)
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.897000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Received message from 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_getheaders(locator=CBlockLocator(nVersion=70014 vHave=[48924041037103782797700918670732352379567180837453042168545380831411841797392, 28010422273815860773972769588722664110955084223364219183119416607410792753789, 5954376895683677137597080246740451260829355661937599865380797589540815086241, 14500403275336359851183244421245184901482464358719551678581030092830439955257, 17853919108052771837249729512111680264864054213441538187113939176285784834878, 28843166929059356839755035875664073555480989477... (msg truncated)
test 2020-03-01T20:58:28.897000Z TestFramework.mininode (DEBUG): Received message from 127.0.0.1:11828: msg_feefilter(feerate=000003e8)
node0 2020-03-01T20:58:28.898144Z [msghand] received: pong (8 bytes) peer=1
node0 2020-03-01T20:59:28.338539Z [scheduler] Feeding 13446 bytes of dynamic environment data into RNG
test 2020-03-01T20:59:28.908000Z TestFramework.utils (ERROR): wait_until() failed. Predicate: ''''
def test_function():
assert self.is_connected
if not self.last_message.get('tx'):
return False
return self.last_message['tx'].tx.rehash() == txid
'''
test 2020-03-01T20:59:28.908000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/travis/build/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 112, in main
self.run_test()
File "/home/travis/build/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/p2p_blocksonly.py", line 57, in run_test
self.nodes[0].p2p.wait_for_tx(txid)
File "/home/travis/build/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/mininode.py", line 369, in wait_for_tx
wait_until(test_function, timeout=timeout, lock=mininode_lock)
File "/home/travis/build/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/util.py", line 234, in wait_until
raise AssertionError("Predicate {} not true after {} seconds".format(predicate_source, timeout))
AssertionError: Predicate ''''
def test_function():
assert self.is_connected
if not self.last_message.get('tx'):
return False
return self.last_message['tx'].tx.rehash() == txid
''' not true after 60 seconds
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK faf1d04
Tree-SHA512: 3b1a38a5c87d11c610eee0988f0c4af9bfcd978df9ac718ef611f663df2fd4a0eb04e077df5e940d15971bb2f22328fb6021cacccb6902f1e527f288ad2c4a2c
|
|
ParsePrevouts uses GetScriptForWitness on the given witnessScript
to find the corresponding redeemScript. This is incorrect when the
witnessScript is either a P2PK or P2PKH script as it returns the
corresponding P2WPK script instead of turning the witnessScript
into a P2WSH script. Instead this should make the script a
WitnessV0ScriptHash destination and get the script for that.
Test cases are also added.
|
|
Also replace the two-line (send_message + sync_with_ping) with the one-line send_and_ping
|
|
|
|
fac3716b09bb9ee121db629873d9694a95cae942 test: check that peer is connected when calling sync_* (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Without a connection there is no way to sync, so we can fail early and don't have to wait for the timeout
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fac3716b09bb9
Tree-SHA512: 12f771473c23e152dae4bfb201fadb2c3530cf439de64fea07d048734614543080a5d05c9c36e6e398c6a69c8279f609d34706599571814172a11bcfbea4a3b9
|
|
fa3cc0bfc4c4fc13a384fc291403c9fd41082f18 test: Remove unsafe BOOST_TEST_MESSAGE (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Fixes #17987
Can be tested with
```
./src/test/test_bitcoin -l test_suite -- DEBUG_LOG_OUT
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tested ACK fa3cc0bfc4c4fc13a384fc291403c9fd41082f18
mzumsande:
Tested ACK fa3cc0bfc4c4fc13a384fc291403c9fd41082f18
Tree-SHA512: f63b110d77882cd7c0d7574ff6c9c948db8febb3400ecdac45164746b587b0fa223463041801271b3959267ddc1d9a4a67ba76939e242e7dd2f92a2834a400a0
|
|
00559229588feb19de2a0cb7506f70c483a1f433 test: add BIP37 'filterclear' test to p2p_filter.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Integrates the message type `filterclear` to the test framework and adds a simple test to `p2p_filter.py`, checking that arbitrary txs get relayed again after deleting the filter.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 00559229588feb19de2a0cb7506f70c483a1f433
Tree-SHA512: fe64e99a526865770707d8077b9968d3923f248045ec7fa56cd380dba85ac77a71a473d244ef3aede2fc0d287b8d7c6bc0156b6033b0c949c2058cc08e255697
|
|
|
|
|
|
83e1d92413e262e6a876336ec433a6fbc335223a test: listsinceblock block height checks (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This is the second commit of #17535.
This PR extends a listsinceblock test to check the new transaction 'blockheight' field recently added in #17437. It also cleans up code in the test function without changing or removing existing checks.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tested ACK 83e1d92413e262e6a876336ec433a6fbc335223a
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 83e1d92413e262e6a876336ec433a6fbc335223a. Nice test improvements!
Tree-SHA512: 92874b49a3bc0236500495f32dfcf683e1971ca3d4c51702c69ed4ce7dfce21273754f02f93d1243d73793701d9fdf49e14b149477cd249cbbd9e4e8d5bd49f8
|
|
|
|
fa156999695ddaeb016d8320bee62f8d96679d55 test: Add basic test for BIP 37 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This does not add full coverage, but should be a good start and can be extended in the future. Currently, none of the BIP 37 p2p code has test coverage.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
Code review ACK fa156999695ddaeb016d8320bee62f8d96679d55 -- more testing coverage is better than less testing coverage
Tree-SHA512: d52e8be79240dffb769105c087ae0ae9305d599282546e4ca7379c4c7add2dbcd668265b46670aa07c357638044cf0f61a6fab7dba8971dd0f80c8f99768686e
|
|
|
|
dcda81c47101196e53e379d965a2692515ef8363 test: add coverage for script parse error in ParseScript (pierrenn)
Pull request description:
Follow up on this suggestion : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18416#issuecomment-603966799
This adds a test case to raise the `script parse error` in `ParseScript`.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18447/commits/dcda81c47101196e53e379d965a2692515ef8363
Tree-SHA512: ae0ef2c00f34cee818c83582f190d5f4043159e922862f2b442b7b895b8ff3ca421533699247c12c367be77813b5205830a771cd47a18e8932807ccace2d6a1c
|
|
9ab14e4d21c73d16d8d782f1576fe29e659e2a70 Limit decimal range of numbers ParseScript accepts (pierrenn)
Pull request description:
Following up on this suggestion : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18413#issuecomment-602966490, prevent the output of `atoi64` in the `core_read.cpp:ParseScript` helper to send to `CScriptNum::serialize` values wider than 32-bit.
Since the `ParseScript` helper is only used by the tool defined in `bitcoin-tx.cpp`, this only prevents users to provide too much unrealistic values.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 9ab14e4d21c73d16d8d782f1576fe29e659e2a70
Tree-SHA512: ee228269d19d04e8fee0aa7c0ae2bb0a2b437b8e574356e8d9b2279318242057d51fcf39a842aa3afe27408d0f2d5276df245d07a3f4828644a366f80587b666
|