aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-03-04test: add functional test for an empty, unparsable asmapJon Atack
This is now testable after separating the asmap finding and parsing checks in the previous commit.
2020-03-04config: separate the asmap finding and parsing checksJon Atack
and update the tests.
2020-03-04config: enable passing -asmap an absolute file pathJon Atack
- allow passing an absolute file path to the -asmap config arg - update the -asmap config help - add a functional test in feature_asmap.py
2020-03-04test: add feature_asmap functional testsJon Atack
to verify node behaviour and debug log when launching bitcoind in these cases: 1. `bitcoind` with no -asmap arg, using /16 prefix for IP bucketing 2. `bitcoind -asmap=<relative path>`, using the unit test skeleton asmap 3. `bitcoind -asmap/-asmap=` with no file specified, using the default asmap 4. `bitcoind -asmap` with no file specified, and a missing default asmap file The tests are order-independent. The slowest test (missing default asmap file) is placed last.
2020-03-03test: Add bad-txns-*-toolarge test cases to invalid_txsMarcoFalke
2020-03-02doc: Correct spelling errors in commentsBen Woosley
And ci script output. Identified via test/lint/lint-spelling
2020-03-02test: Bump timeouts to accomodate really slow disksMarcoFalke
2020-03-02Merge #18224: Make AnalyzePSBT next role calculation simple, correctSamuel Dobson
1ef28b4f7cfba410fef524def1dac24bbc4086ca Make AnalyzePSBT next role calculation simple, correct (Gregory Sanders) Pull request description: Sniped test and alternative to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18220 Sjors documenting the issue: ``` A PSBT signed by ColdCard was analyzed as follows (see #17509 (comment)) { "inputs": [ { "has_utxo": true, "is_final": false, "next": "finalizer" } ], "estimated_vsize": 141, "estimated_feerate": 1e-05, "fee": 1.41e-06, "next": "signer" } I changed AnalyzePSBT so that it returns "next": "finalizer" instead. ``` It makes it much clearer that the role has been decided before hitting the `calc_fee` block, and groups all state-deciding in one spot instead of 2. Note that this assumes that PSBT roles are a complete ordering, which for now and in the future seems to be a correct assumption. ACKs for top commit: Sjors: ACK 1ef28b4f7cfba410fef524def1dac24bbc4086ca, much nicer. Don't forget to document the bug fix. achow101: ACK 1ef28b4f7cfba410fef524def1dac24bbc4086ca Empact: ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18224/commits/1ef28b4f7cfba410fef524def1dac24bbc4086ca Tree-SHA512: 22ba4234985c6f9c1445b14565c71268cfaa121c4ef000ee3d5117212b09442dee8d46d9701bceddaf355263fe25dfe40def2ef614d4f2fe66c9ce876cb49934
2020-02-29test: Add missing syncwithvalidationinterfacequeueMarcoFalke
2020-02-28test: check specific reject reasons in feature_csv_activation.pySebastian Falbesoner
this also fixes a bug that was uncovered with this checks: for the BIP112 version 1 tx tests, certain txs (bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_v1) have been sent twice due to a typo, leading also to a failure as expected but for the wrong reason
2020-02-28Make AnalyzePSBT next role calculation simple, correctGregory Sanders
2020-02-28test: eliminiated magic numbers in feature_csv_activation.pySebastian Falbesoner
2020-02-28test: check for OP_CSV empty stack fail reject reason in ↵Sebastian Falbesoner
feature_csv_activation.py
2020-02-28test: test OP_CSV empty stack fail in feature_csv_activation.pySebastian Falbesoner
With BIP112 activated, the operation OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY (former OP_NOP3) leads to script interpreter termination with an error if one of the following conditions is true: -> stack is empty -> top item on stack is negative (< 0) -> top item on stack has disable flag unset and at least one of four other conditions is true (contains the core CSV logic) This commits adds the missing empty stack failure test to the functional test by prepending a valid scriptSig with just OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY. If BIP112 is inactive, the operator just behaves as a NOP (for both tx versions 1 and 2) and the transaction remains valid -- if it is active, the tx is invalid due to an empty stack (for both tx versions 1 and 2, as well).
2020-02-28Merge #18209: test: Reduce unneeded whitelist permissions in testsfanquake
fa45d606461dbf5bf1017d6ab15e89c1bcf821a6 test: Reduce unneeded whitelist permissions in tests (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: It makes the tests confusing and fragile when overwriting default command line values that are not needed to be overwritten. ACKs for top commit: fanquake: ACK fa45d606461dbf5bf1017d6ab15e89c1bcf821a6 laanwj: ACK fa45d606461dbf5bf1017d6ab15e89c1bcf821a6 Tree-SHA512: 8ae5ad8c6be156b1a983adccbca8d868ef841e00605ea88e24227f1b7493987c50b3e62e68dd7dc785ad73d6e14279eb13d7a151cb0a976426fe2fd63ce5cbcd
2020-02-28test: Fix race in p2p_segwitMarcoFalke
Co-Authored-By: Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com>
2020-02-28Merge #17461: test: check custom descendant limit in mempool_packages.pyMarcoFalke
b902bd66b0f35c5016dc5d7aaf501940935edd62 test: check custom descendant limit in mempool_packages.py (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This is a follow-up PR to #17435, testing the custom descendant limit, passed by the argument `-limitdescendantcount`. ~~It was more tricky than expected, mainly because we don't know for sure at which point node1 has got all the transactions broadcasted from node0 (for the ancestor test this wasn't a problem since the txs were immediately available through `invalidateblock`) -- a simple `sync_mempools()` doesn't work here since the mempool contents are not equal due to different ancestor/descendant limits. Hence I came up with a "hacky manual sync":~~ 1. ~~wait until the mempool has the _expected_ tx count (see conditions below)~~ 2. ~~after that, wait some time and get sure that the mempool contents haven't changed in-between~~ ~~Like for~~ Similar to the ancestor test, we overall check for ~~three~~ four conditions: - the # of txs in the node1 mempool is equal to the descendant limit (plus 1 for the parent tx, plus the # txs from the previous ancestor test which are still in) ~~(done by the hacky sync above)~~ - all txs in node1 mempool are a subset of txs in node0 mempool - part of the constructed descendant-chain (the first ones up to the limit) are contained in node1 mempool - the remaining part of the constructed descendant-chain (all after the first ones up to the limit) is *not* contained in node1 mempool ACKs for top commit: JeremyRubin: Excellent. utACK b902bd6 Tree-SHA512: 7de96dd248f16ab740e178ac5b64b57ead18cdcf74adfe989709d215e4a67b6b6d20de22c48e885d5f2edc55caaddd44a4261e996c5c87687ceb6a47f1d1fdaf
2020-02-28Merge #17771: tests: Add fuzzing harness for V1TransportDeserializer (P2P ↵MarcoFalke
transport) 2f63ffd15caeb79867e56c8cedbe2c702952db9e tests: Add fuzzing harness for V1TransportDeserializer (P2P transport) (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add fuzzing harness for `V1TransportDeserializer` (P2P transport). **Testing this PR** Run: ``` $ make distclean $ ./autogen.sh $ CC=clang CXX=clang++ ./configure --enable-fuzz \ --with-sanitizers=address,fuzzer,undefined $ make $ src/test/fuzz/p2p_transport_deserializer … ``` ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK 2f63ffd15caeb79867e56c8cedbe2c702952db9e Tree-SHA512: 8507d4a0414d16f1b8cc9649e3e638f74071dddc990d7e5d7e6faf77697f50bdaf133e49e2371edd29068a069a074469ef53148c6bfc9950510460b81d87646a
2020-02-27test: check custom descendant limit in mempool_packages.pySebastian Falbesoner
To test the custom descendant limit on node1 (passed by the argument -limitdescendantcount), we check for four conditions: -> the # of txs in the node1 mempool is equal to the limit (plus 1 for the parent tx, plus the # txs from the previous ancestor test which are still in) -> all txs in node1 mempool are a subset of txs in node0 mempool -> part of the constructed descendant-chain (the first ones up to the limit) are contained in node1 mempool -> the remaining part of the constructed descendant-chain (all after the first ones up to the limit) is *not* contained in node1 mempool
2020-02-26Merge #17985: net: Remove forcerelay of rejected txsWladimir J. van der Laan
facb71576cd4d2e90fd03e09d29b42fa3d730e8c net: Remove forcerelay of rejected txs (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: This removes the code that supposedly handled the forced relay of txs from a permissioned peer that were rejected from our mempool. The removal should be fine, because it is dead code for the following reasons: * While `RelayTransaction` enqueues the inv for all peers, the inv is never processed because it can not be found in the mempool. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/4a072330763b3ff2d1b5c5b8d30a9517873ac6de/src/net_processing.cpp#L3862-L3866 * Even if the peers we intended to send the inv to can somehow reply with a getdata to the never-received inv, they won't receive the tx as a reply because it was never added to the "relay memory" (`mapRelay`) The dead code is (obviously) untested: https://marcofalke.github.io/btc_cov/total.coverage/src/net_processing.cpp.gcov.html#2574 This feature was (intentionally or accidentally) removed in 4d8993b3469915d8c9ba4cd3b918f16782edf0de, which was released in Bitcoin Core 0.13.0. So all currently supported versions of Bitcoin Core ship without this feature. I am not aware of any complaints about this feature or actual documented use-cases. So instead of reviving an unneeded feature, just remove the dead code. ACKs for top commit: hebasto: ACK facb71576cd4d2e90fd03e09d29b42fa3d730e8c, locally running the unit and functional tests. Tree-SHA512: bfceae6f2983c1510fa0649a9a63c343cbbc1c4ab3a3698039cccf454c81e58c8f5114b147ed42a1bc867da74c43a5b53764ab14f942e191b6f59079044108b5
2020-02-26Merge #18206: tests: Add fuzzing harness for bloom filter classes ↵MarcoFalke
(CBloomFilter + CRollingBloomFilter) eabbbe409f397e97b1e6fad7385d9d1813ae2880 tests: Add fuzzing harness for rolling bloom filter class CRollingBloomFilter (practicalswift) 2a6a6ea0f5b97cba95b5678268d638c81764b9b1 tests: Add fuzzing harness for bloom filter class CBloomFilter (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add fuzzing harness for bloom filter classes (`CBloomFilter` + `CRollingBloomFilter`). Test this PR using: ``` $ make distclean $ ./autogen.sh $ CC=clang CXX=clang++ ./configure --enable-fuzz \ --with-sanitizers=address,fuzzer,undefined $ make $ src/test/fuzz/bloom_filter … $ src/test/fuzz/rolling_bloom_filter … ``` ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK eabbbe409f397e97b1e6fad7385d9d1813ae2880 🤞 Tree-SHA512: 765d30bc52e3eb04dbd4d2b8f517387aa61312416e8fea3767250ef5c074e08641699019ee4600d42303de32f98379c20bfc0c0e60cb5154d0338088c1d29cb6
2020-02-25tests: Add fuzzing harness for rolling bloom filter class CRollingBloomFilterpracticalswift
2020-02-25tests: Add fuzzing harness for bloom filter class CBloomFilterpracticalswift
2020-02-26test: Reduce unneeded whitelist permissions in testsMarcoFalke
2020-02-25Merge #17264: rpc: set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methodsSamuel Dobson
5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 [test] PSBT RPC: check that bip32_derivs are present by default (Sjors Provoost) 29a21c90610aed88b796a7a5900e42e9048b990e [rpc] set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methods (Sjors Provoost) Pull request description: In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13557#pullrequestreview-135905054 I recommended not including bip32 deriviation by default in PSBTs: > _Bit of a privacy issue_: let's say person A and B are about to spend from a multisig address, sending everything to person A. Person A gives their address to person B, their wallet wallet creates a PSBT, but doesn't sign it. Wallet A then calls `walletprocesspsbt` which signs it and _spontaneously adds the master_fingerprint and bip32 path_. Same issue with `walletcreatefundedpsbt`. > > Adding `bip32_derivs` should probably be opt-in. In practice I find this default quite annoying because I forget it and end up with a confused hardware wallet. More importantly, in the multisig example I provided, it's actually essential for the other side to know the derivation details (in addition to an xpub). This allows them to check that change is going to an address you can still co-sign for (because the spending policy is unchanged except for an index). ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17264/commits/5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 jonatack: ACK 5bad7921d0 code review, built, ran tests, inspected/messed around with/pprinted values from the new tests. Thanks for adding the tests. meshcollider: utACK 5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 Tree-SHA512: 22ad71dda96856060a96758c4ae7aafa22d5e9efba30e0c8287c711e7579849bd72593cbc0f41a2e9e8821315d78bda04e848dbb006283b841b2795e2faebcfd
2020-02-21Merge #18172: test: Transaction expiry from mempoolMarcoFalke
d6d2602a32251c1017da88b47c801b7283c66ce3 add: test that transactions expire from mempool (0xb10c) Pull request description: This adds the functional test `mempool_expiry.py` covering mempool transaction expiry. Both the default `DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_EXPIRY` of 336 hours (two weeks, set in #9312) and the user definable mempool expiry via the `-mempoolexpiry=<n>` command line option are tested. The test checks that descendants of expired transactions are removed as well. *Notes for reviewers* - `LimitMempoolSize()` (which is the only caller of `CTxMemPool::Expire()`) is only called when a transaction is added to the mempool. In order to test expiry of a transaction-that-should-expire, the mocktime is set and a random transaction is broadcast to trigger `LimitMempoolSize()`. The transaction-that-should-expire is then checked for expiry. LMK if there is another way, but I don't think there is. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK d6d2602a32251c1017da88b47c801b7283c66ce3 theStack: ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18172/commits/d6d2602a32251c1017da88b47c801b7283c66ce3 promag: Code review ACK d6d2602a32251c1017da88b47c801b7283c66ce3. Tree-SHA512: eb68cd9e2d870872b8e8e1522fed8954fb99cc9e4edda4b28bb2a4e41cddbc53fe6f7d9c090f1e0e98ab49beb24bf37ff3787a9e9801a95e8ae9ca9eb34fe6f0
2020-02-19Merge #18166: ci: Run fuzz testing test cases (bitcoin-core/qa-assets) under ↵MarcoFalke
valgrind to catch memory errors f2472f64604a0c583f950c56e8753d0bee246388 tests: Improve test runner output in case of target errors (practicalswift) 733bbec34fbec85574cc456832b2b2f807e5dce9 tests: Add --exclude integer,parse_iso8601 (temporarily) to make Travis pass until uninitialized read issue in FormatISO8601DateTime is fixed (practicalswift) 5ea81449f30a6fe6db3b6df5e8009f21a782ff44 tests: Add support for excluding fuzz targets using -x/--exclude (practicalswift) 555236f769c13518db70f5df36e5688d63486bd5 tests: Remove -detect_leaks=0 from test/fuzz/test_runner.py - no longer needed (practicalswift) a3b539a924f8611abb3096f2bd9d35094b5577e3 ci: Run fuzz testing test cases under valgrind (practicalswift) Pull request description: Run fuzz testing [test cases (bitcoin-core/qa-assets)](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets) under `valgrind`. This would have caught `util: Avoid potential uninitialized read in FormatISO8601DateTime(int64_t) by checking gmtime_s/gmtime_r return value` (#18162) and similar cases. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK f2472f64604a0c583f950c56e8753d0bee246388 👼 Tree-SHA512: bb0879d40167cf6906bc0ed31bed39db83c39c7beb46026f7b0ee53f28ff0526ad6fabc3f4cb3f5f18d3b8cafdcbf5f30105b35919f4e83697c71e838ed71493
2020-02-19tests: Improve test runner output in case of target errorspracticalswift
2020-02-19tests: Add support for excluding fuzz targets using -x/--excludepracticalswift
2020-02-19tests: Remove -detect_leaks=0 from test/fuzz/test_runner.py - no longer neededpracticalswift
2020-02-19add: test that transactions expire from mempool0xb10c
This tests that a mempool transaction expires after a given timeout and its children are removed as well. Both the default expiry timeout defied by DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_EXPIRY and a user definable expiry timeout via the -mempoolexpiry=<n> command line argument (<n> is the timeout in hours) are tested.
2020-02-19Merge #18067: wallet: Improve LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::CanProvide script ↵Samuel Dobson
recognition a304a3632f0437f4d0f04589a2200e2da91624a7 Revert "Store p2sh scripts in AddAndGetDestinationForScript" (Russell Yanofsky) eb7d8a5b07e89133a5fb465ad1b793362e7439f7 [test] check for addmultisigaddress regression (Sjors Provoost) 005f8a92ccb5bc10c8daa106d75e1c21390461d3 wallet: Improve LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::CanProvide script recognition (Russell Yanofsky) Pull request description: Make `LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::CanProvide` method able to recognize p2sh scripts when the redeem script is present in the `mapScripts` map without the p2sh script also having to be added to the `mapScripts` map. This restores behavior prior to #17261, which I think broke backwards compatibility with old wallet files by no longer treating addresses created by `addmultisigaddress` calls before #17261 as solvable. The reason why tests didn't fail with the CanProvide implementation in #17261 is because of a workaround added in 4a7e43e8460127a40a7895519587399feff3b682 "Store p2sh scripts in AddAndGetDestinationForScript", which masked the problem for new `addmultisigaddress` RPC calls without fixing it for multisig addresses already created in old wallet files. This change adds a lot of comments and allows reverting commit 4a7e43e8460127a40a7895519587399feff3b682 "Store p2sh scripts in AddAndGetDestinationForScript", so the `AddAndGetDestinationForScript()` function, `CanProvide()` method, and `mapScripts` map should all be more comprehensible ACKs for top commit: Sjors: re-ACK a304a3632f0437f4d0f04589a2200e2da91624a7 (rebase, slight text changes and my test) achow101: re-ACK a304a3632f0437f4d0f04589a2200e2da91624a7 meshcollider: utACK a304a3632f0437f4d0f04589a2200e2da91624a7 Tree-SHA512: 03b625220c49684c376a8062d7646aeba0e5bfe043f977dc7dc357a6754627d594e070e4d458d12d2291888405d94c1dbe08c7787c318374cedd5755e724fb6e
2020-02-18ci: Run fuzz testing test cases under valgrindpracticalswift
2020-02-17Merge #13339: wallet: Replace %w by wallet name in -walletnotify scriptWladimir J. van der Laan
4e9efac678a9c0ea4e4c7dd956ea036ae6cf17ec test: Check wallet name in -walletnotify script (João Barbosa) 9a5b5ee81f15b1d89cb25ff3e137a672536cdc46 wallet: Replace %w by wallet name in -walletnotify script (João Barbosa) Pull request description: Fixes #13237. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK 4e9efac678a9c0ea4e4c7dd956ea036ae6cf17ec Tree-SHA512: 189dd1c785485f2e974d7c12531851b2a977778b3b954aa95efd527322ba3345924cfd587fb9c90b0fa979202af0ab2d90e53d125fe266a36c94f757e4176203
2020-02-16tests: Add --valgrind option to test/fuzz/test_runner.py for running fuzzing ↵practicalswift
test cases under valgrind
2020-02-12Merge #17708: prevector: avoid misaligned member accessesWladimir J. van der Laan
5f26855f109af53a336d5f98ed0ae584e7a31f84 test: Remove ubsan alignment suppressions (Wladimir J. van der Laan) 9d933ef9191417b4b7d29eaa3c3a571f814acc8e prevector: avoid misaligned member accesses (Anthony Towns) Pull request description: Ensure prevector data is appropriately aligned. Earlier discussion in #17530. **Edit laanwj**: In contrast to #17530, it does this without increase in size of any of the coin cache data structures (x86_64, clang) | Struct | (size,align) before | (size,align) after | | ------------- | ------------- | ------- | | Coin | 48, 8 | 48, 8 | | CCoinsCacheEntry | 56, 8 | 56, 8 | | CScript | 32, 1 | 32, 8 | ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK 5f26855f109af53a336d5f98ed0ae584e7a31f84 practicalswift: ACK 5f26855f109af53a336d5f98ed0ae584e7a31f84 jonatack: ACK 5f26855f109af53a336d5f98ed0ae584e7a31f84 Tree-SHA512: 98d112d6856f683d5b212410b73f3071d2994f1efb046a2418a35890aa1cf1aa7c96a960fc2e963fa15241e861093c1ea41951cf5b4b5431f88345eb1dd0a98a
2020-02-12[test] check for addmultisigaddress regressionSjors Provoost
2020-02-11[test] add 0.19 backwards compatibility testsSjors Provoost
2020-02-11[test] add v0.17.1 wallet upgrade testSjors Provoost
2020-02-11[tests] add wallet backwards compatility testsSjors Provoost
2020-02-11[tests] check v0.17.1 and v0.18.1 backwards compatibilitySjors Provoost
2020-02-11net: Remove forcerelay of rejected txsMarcoFalke
2020-02-10ci: Check for submodulesEmil Engler
2020-02-10Merge #17398: build: Update leveldb to 1.22+Wladimir J. van der Laan
677fb8e92380d4deb6a3753047c01f7cf7b5af91 test: Add ubsan surpression for crc32c (Wladimir J. van der Laan) 8e68bb1ddeca504bedd40aee8492b5478a88c1e5 build: Disable msvc warning 4722 for leveldb build (Aaron Clauson) be23949765e1b2e050574c6c2a136658a89dee5d build: MSVC changes for leveldb update (Aaron Clauson) 9ebdf047578f0da7e6578d0c51c32f55e84ac157 build: CRC32C build system integration (Wladimir J. van der Laan) 402252a8081e25f22aa1a5c60708714cf1d84ec4 build: Add LCOV exception for crc32c (Wladimir J. van der Laan) 3a037d0067c2c12a1c2c800fb85613a0a2911253 test: Add crc32c exception to various linters and generation scripts (Wladimir J. van der Laan) 84ff1b2076ef91ce688930d0aa0a7f4078ef3e1d test: Add crc32c to subtree check linter (Wladimir J. van der Laan) 7cf13a513409c18d18dff2f6203b3630937b487d doc: Add crc32c subtree to developer notes (Wladimir J. van der Laan) 24d02a9ac00a82d172b171f73554a882df264c80 build: Update build system for new leveldb (Wladimir J. van der Laan) 2e1819311a59fb5cb26e3ca50a510bfe01358350 Squashed 'src/crc32c/' content from commit 224988680f7673cd7c769963d4035cb315aa3388 (Wladimir J. van der Laan) 66480821b36c839ab7615cb9309850015bceadb0 Squashed 'src/leveldb/' changes from f545dfabff4c2e9836efed094dba99a34fbc6b88..f8ae182c1e5176d12e816fb2217ae33a5472fdd7 (Wladimir J. van der Laan) Pull request description: This updates leveldb to currently newest upstream commit https://github.com/bitcoin-core/leveldb/commit/0c40829872a9f00f38e11dc370ff8adb3e19f25b: - CRC32C hardware acceleration is now an external library [crc32c](https://github.com/google/crc32c). This adds acceleration on ARM, and should be faster on x86 because of using prefetch. It also makes it easy to support similar instruction sets on other platforms in the future. - Thread handling uses C++11, instead of platform specific code. - Native windows environment was added. No need to maintain our own hacky one, anymore. - Upstream now builds using CMake. This doesn't mean we need to use that (phew), but internal configuration changed to a a series of checks, instead of OS profiles. This means the blanket error "Cannot build leveldb for $host. Please file a bug report' is removed. All changes: https://github.com/google/leveldb/compare/a53934a3ae1244679f812d998a4f16f2c7f309a6...0c40829872a9f00f38e11dc370ff8adb3e19f25b Pretty much all our changes have been subsumed by upstream, so we figured it was cleaner to start over with a new branch from upstream with the still-relevant patches applied: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/leveldb/tree/bitcoin-fork-new There's quite some testing to be done (see below). See https://github.com/bitcoin-core/leveldb/issues/25 and https://github.com/bitcoin-core/leveldb/pull/26 for more history and context. TODO: - [x] Subtree `crc32c` - [x] Make linters happy about crc32 subtree - [x] Integrate `crc32c` library into build system - [x] MSVC build system ACKs for top commit: sipa: ACK 677fb8e92380d4deb6a3753047c01f7cf7b5af91 Tree-SHA512: 37ee92a750e053e924bc4626b12bb3fd81faa9f8c5ebaa343931fee810c45ba05aa6051fdea82535fa351bf2be7297801b98af9469865fc5ead771650a5d6240
2020-02-09Merge #18032: rpc: Output a descriptor in createmultisig and addmultisigaddressMarcoFalke
19a354b11f85a3c6c81ff83bf702bf7a40cf5046 Output a descriptor in createmultisig and addmultisigaddress (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: Give a descriptor from `createmultisig` and `addmultisigaddress`. Extracted from #16528 with `addmultisgaddress` and tests added. ACKs for top commit: Sjors: tACK 19a354b11f85a3c6c81ff83bf702bf7a40cf5046 MarcoFalke: ACK 19a354b11f85a3c6c81ff83bf702bf7a40cf5046 promag: Code review ACK 19a354b11f85a3c6c81ff83bf702bf7a40cf5046. meshcollider: utACK 19a354b11f85a3c6c81ff83bf702bf7a40cf5046 Tree-SHA512: e813125fbbc358ea8d45b1748de16a29a94efd83175b748fb8fa3b0bfc8e783ed36b6c554d84f5d4ead1ba252a83a3e937b6c3f75da7b8d3b4e55f94d6013771
2020-02-05Merge #17482: util: Disallow network-qualified command line optionsWladimir J. van der Laan
900d8f6f70859f528e84c5c38d0332f81d19df55 util: Disallow network-qualified command line options (Russell Yanofsky) Pull request description: Previously these were allowed but ignored. This change implements one of the settings simplifications listed in #17508. Change includes release notes. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK 900d8f6f70859f528e84c5c38d0332f81d19df55 Tree-SHA512: ab020a16a86c1e8ec709fbf798d533879d32c565eceeb7eb785c33042c49c6b4d1108c5453d8166e4a2abffc2c8802fbb6d3b895e0ddeefa8f274fd647e3c8ad
2020-02-05Merge #18069: test: replace 'regtest' leftovers by self.chainMarcoFalke
eca56f89293b74f11ca631ff2a0793e970e65841 test: replace 'regtest' leftovers by self.chain (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This is a follow-up PR to #16681 (fixes #18068), replacing all remaining hardcoded `"regtest"` strings in functional tests by `self.chain`. Top commit has no ACKs. Tree-SHA512: 96524649b33164938e5a95215991103ed7855ebab55ef788d4816b3fa5cbc03d8f3b0d39f2247a87522f289fd7f4daf25e059900b8462b5127eb154bbee89054
2020-02-05Merge #18029: tests: Add fuzzing harness for AS-mapping (asmap)Wladimir J. van der Laan
4d2aceaad8d28a54246b6639966e2278d2d795e3 tests: Add fuzzer asmap to FUZZERS_MISSING_CORPORA (temporarily) (practicalswift) 8d07706985a72b105b63efa289121d17d31607a1 tests: Add fuzzing harness for AS-mapping (asmap) (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add fuzzing harness for AS-mapping (`asmap`). To test this PR: ``` $ make distclean $ ./autogen.sh $ CC=clang CXX=clang++ ./configure --enable-fuzz \ --with-sanitizers=address,fuzzer,undefined $ make $ src/test/fuzz/asmap … ``` ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK 4d2aceaad8d28a54246b6639966e2278d2d795e3 jonatack: ACK 4d2aceaad8d28a54246b6639966e2278d2d795e3 Tree-SHA512: bc4c63b48cd98c0cec9d10ecb43775b1bf1215241ff821fc7a866c7e2738605641fb88d044eabf2f48a8c16f2ced9ffce5165c9e6a83c73ece004350da7153e7
2020-02-05test: replace 'regtest' leftovers by self.chainSebastian Falbesoner
Commit 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125 replaced 'regtest' by self.chain 'regtest' "in almost all current tests", this commit takes care of the remaining ones.
2020-02-04Merge #16681: Tests: Use self.chain instead of 'regtest' in all current testsMarcoFalke
1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125 Tests: Use self.chain instead of 'regtest' in almost all current tests (Jorge Timón) Pull request description: Simply avoiding the hardcoded string in more places for consistency. It can also allow for more easily reusing tests for other chains other than regtest. Separated from #8994 . Continues #16509 . It is still not complete (ie to be complete, we need the -chain parameter in #16680 and make whether acceptnonstdtxs is allowed for that chain or not customizable for regtest [or for custom chains like in #8994 ] ). But while being incomplete like #16509 , it's quite simple to review and another step forward IMO. ACKs for top commit: Sjors: re-ACK 1abcecc. I think it's an improvement even if incomplete and if some PR's might accidentally bring "regtest" back. Subsequent improvements hopefully don't have to touch 16 files. elichai: Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125 ryanofsky: Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125. ryanofsky: Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125 Tree-SHA512: 5620de6dab235ca8bd8670d6366c7b9f04f0e3ca9c5e7f87765b38e16ed80c17d7d1630c0d5fd7c5526f070830d94dc74cc2096d8ede87dc7180ed20569509ee
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2024-07-08 20:18:20 +0000