Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
---|---|---|---|
2021-06-23 | script, doc: spelling update | Jon Atack | |
2021-06-03 | script: fix spelling linter raising spuriously on "invokable" | Jon Atack | |
2021-01-02 | lint: ignore gitian keys file for spelling linter | Sebastian Falbesoner | |
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com> | |||
2021-01-02 | lint: update list of spelling linter false positives | Sebastian Falbesoner | |
2020-06-19 | Make lint-spelling.py happy | Glenn Willen | |
2020-03-02 | doc: Correct spelling errors in comments | Ben Woosley | |
And ci script output. Identified via test/lint/lint-spelling | |||
2019-11-04 | doc: Fix some misspellings | randymcmillan | |
2019-08-16 | Add test for setban | nicolas.dorier | |
2019-06-11 | Fix spelling errors identified by codespell 1.15.0 | Ben Woosley | |
After this commit, the only remaining output is: $ test/lint/lint-spelling.sh src/test/base32_tests.cpp:14: fo ==> of, for src/test/base64_tests.cpp:14: fo ==> of, for ^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt Note: * I ignore several valid alternative spellings * homogenous is present in tinyformat, hence should be addressed upstream * process' is correct only if there are plural processes | |||
2018-10-16 | Add ignored word: mut | practicalswift | |
2018-09-04 | lint: Add spell check linter (codespell) | practicalswift | |
2018-09-04 | Fix typos reported by codespell | practicalswift | |