| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
way as others
f6d7636be4eb0b19878428906dd5e394df7d07a2 test: Treat `bitcoin-wallet` binary in the same way as others (Hennadii Stepanov)
dda961cec5fef318c0b043a09367d14daa87f089 test, refactor: Add `set_binary_paths` function (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR makes the `bitcoin-wallet` binary path customizable in the same way how it can be done now with other ones, including `bitcoind`, `bitcoin-cli` and `bitcoin-util`.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK f6d7636be4eb0b19878428906dd5e394df7d07a2
Tree-SHA512: 480fae14c5440e530ba78a2be19eaaf642260070435e533fc7ab98ddcc2fcac7ad83f2c7e7c6706db3167e8391d7d4abf8784889796c218c2d5bba043144e787
|
|
instead of only deleting them
c371cae07a7ba045130568b6abc470eaa4f95ef4 test, init: perturb file to ensure failure instead of only deleting them (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
In `feature_init.py` there is a TODO about perturbing the files instead of only testing by deleting them.
```py
# TODO: at some point, we should test perturbing the files instead of removing
# them, e.g.
#
# contents = target_file.read_bytes()
# tweaked_contents = bytearray(contents)
# tweaked_contents[50:250] = b'1' * 200
# target_file.write_bytes(bytes(tweaked_contents))
#
# At the moment I can't get this to work (bitcoind loads successfully?) so
# investigate doing this later.
```
This PR adds it by writing into the file random bytes and checking whether it throws an error when starting.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK c371cae07a7ba045130568b6abc470eaa4f95ef4
Tree-SHA512: d691eee60b91dd9d1b200588608f56b0a10dccd9761a75254b69e0ba5e5866cae14d2f90cb2bd7ec0f95b0617c2562cd33f20892ffd16355b6df770d3806a0ff
|
|
This change makes the `bitcoin-wallet` binary path customizable in the
same way how it can be done now with other ones, including `bitcoind`,
`bitcoin-cli` and `bitcoin-util`.
|
|
This change factors out the repeated code into a new `set_binary_paths`
function.
|
|
7e3d4f8e86e86f32d8911abd458b9e7c939ef3d5 test: add coverage to ensure the first arg of scantxoutset is needed (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
Include a test that checks whether the first argument of scantxoutset RPC call "start" is required.
The rpc call should fail if the "start" argument is not provided.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 7e3d4f8e86e86f32d8911abd458b9e7c939ef3d5
Tree-SHA512: 6a456af9f3ccd5437be2edcd61936eb9f9c21ab926a6056c2c11b6b5121d1caca4e1f2ffd09015f9414af152c635a20e1da041eefdef980afbe8a0e8ccce07bd
|
|
rpc_psbt.py
afc2dd54848fa70ed408ae259420ff8648f21efc test: various `converttopsbt` check cleanups in rpc_psbt.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
In the functional test rpc_psbt.py, some comments around the `converttopsbt` RPC checks are wrong or outdated and can be removed:
> _Error could be either "TX decode failed" (segwit inputs causes
> parsing to fail) or "Inputs must not have scriptSigs and
> scriptWitnesses"_
Decoding a valid TX with at least one input always succeeds with the [heuristic](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/e352f5ab6b60ec1cc549997275e945238508cdee/src/core_read.cpp#L126), i.e. this comment is not right and we can assert for the error string "Inputs must not have scriptSigs and scriptWitnesses" on the calls below.
> _We must set iswitness=True because the serialized transaction has
> inputs and is therefore a witness transaction_
This is also unneeded (and confusing, w.r.t. "is therefore a witness transaction"?), for a TX with one input there is no need to set the `iswitness` parameter. For sake of completeness, we still keep one variant where iswitness is explicitly set to true.
Lastly, there is a superflous `converttopsbt` call on the raw tx which is the same as just [about ~10 lines above](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/rpc_psbt.py#L393-L397), so it can be removed.
ACKs for top commit:
ismaelsadeeq:
tested ACK afc2dd54848fa70ed408ae259420ff8648f21efc
achow101:
ACK afc2dd54848fa70ed408ae259420ff8648f21efc
Tree-SHA512: 467efefdb3f61efdb79145044b90fc8dc2f0c425f078117a99112b0074e7d4a32c34e464f665fbf8de70d06caaa5d4ad5908c1d75d2e7607eccb0837480afab3
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <github@achow101.com>
|
|
fa17767154e21e9ed00782a9e4cf9a3d1d66f5d1 test: Simplify feature_fastprune.py (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The goal of the test is a single regression check to see if a RPC times out. It shouldn't do more than calling the RPC (and the minimum work needed to get there).
Fix that by removing all blocktools imports and a `for` loop.
ACKs for top commit:
pinheadmz:
ACK fa17767154e21e9ed00782a9e4cf9a3d1d66f5d1
theStack:
ACK fa17767154e21e9ed00782a9e4cf9a3d1d66f5d1
Tree-SHA512: c9c0154102199b250015ece53005a14d52d857dfa986f3b02a2cb899f16ac8e040d24eb826f35ba15e5ee22ee6a59bf8f74bb8d576b9a12ac6e888beeaaf81cc
|
|
gettransaction and getwalletinfo
710b83938ab5bbc4bd324d8b2e69461a2a1d2eec rpc: return block hash & height in getbalances, gettransaction & getwalletinfo JSONs (Harris)
Pull request description:
Reopens #18570 and closes #18567.
I have rebased the original PR.
Not sure why the original got closed as it was about to get merged.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 710b83938ab5bbc4bd324d8b2e69461a2a1d2eec
Tree-SHA512: d4478d990be98b1642e9ffb2930987f4a224e8bd64e2e35a5dda927a54c509ec9d712cd0eac35dc2bb89f00a1678e530ce14d7445f1dd93aa3a4cce2bc9b130d
|
|
24d55fb9cfab88f546df35be5c0069b9b645438c test: added coverage to rpc_scantxoutset.py (kevkevin)
Pull request description:
Included a test that checks if an invalid first argument is entered we receive a rpc error. The rpc should fail if "start", "status" or "abort" is not the first command.
Relavant: mentioned in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27422
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 24d55fb9cfab88f546df35be5c0069b9b645438c
theStack:
ACK 24d55fb9cfab88f546df35be5c0069b9b645438c
Tree-SHA512: 4b804235d3fa17c7bf492068ab47c1f87cb6cfc1a428c51e273ec059d3c41f581bcc467bb5d6d8bbf2fab14c60cd1c52a30c50009efe1c9b5adee70c88897ad9
|
|
82e6e3cae50d30b28b98f0cb7789c28e68170d5e test: add ripemd160 to test framework modules list (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Currently test runner doesn't execute the unit tests of the ripemd160 module, so add it to the list. All other framework modules that contain unit tests are included, as can be easily checked via
`$ git grep unittest.TestCase ./test/functional/test_framework/`
This is a late follow-up to PR #23716 (commit ad3e9e1f214d739e098c6ebbd300da5df1026a44).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 82e6e3cae50d30b28b98f0cb7789c28e68170d5e
Tree-SHA512: 10940e215f728291c7149931a356bfc42795c098bda76d760dfa68f86443a3755e1cd35cb9a8a7b2f48880beb53f3bee3842de2d74bcadd45c7b05c13ff04203
|
|
|
|
Currently test runner doesn't execute the unit tests of the ripemd160
module, so add it to the list. All other framework modules that contain
unit tests are included, as can be easily checked via
`git grep unittest.TestCase ./test/functional/test_framework/`
This is a late follow-up to PR #23716 (commit
ad3e9e1f214d739e098c6ebbd300da5df1026a44).
|
|
Included a test that checks if an invalid first argument is entered we
receive a rpc error. The rpc should fail if "start", "status" or "abort"
is not the first command.
|
|
exceeds blockfile size
8f14fc86225d8fe77353f61ebd6b0bdda8d13aa9 test: cover fastprune with excessive block size (Matthew Zipkin)
271c23e87f61276d7acab74e115b25a35144c8b4 blockstorage: Adjust fastprune limit if block exceeds blockfile size (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
The debug-only `-fastprune` option used in several tests is not always safe to use:
If a `-fastprune` node receives a block larger than the maximum blockfile size of `64kb` bad things happen: The while loop in `BlockManager::FindBlockPos` never terminates, and the node runs oom because memory for `m_blockfile_info` is allocated in each iteration of the loop.
The same would happen if a naive user used `-fastprune` on anything other than regtest (so this can be tested by syncing on signet for example, the first block that crashes the node is at height 2232).
Change the approach by raising the blockfile size to the size of the block, if that block otherwise wouldn't fit (idea by TheCharlatan).
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 8f14fc86225d8fe77353f61ebd6b0bdda8d13aa9. Added new assert, test, and comment since last review
TheCharlatan:
ACK 8f14fc86225d8fe77353f61ebd6b0bdda8d13aa9
pinheadmz:
ACK 8f14fc86225d8fe77353f61ebd6b0bdda8d13aa9
Tree-SHA512: df2fea30613ef9d40ebbc2416eacb574f6d7d96847db5c33dda22a29a2c61a8db831aa9552734ea4477e097f253dbcb6dcb1395d43d2a090cc0588c9ce66eac3
|
|
dc14ba08e6e502f3e31d935bcd053a287c6610ca test: remove modinv python util helper function (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Since #27483 was merged the `modinv()` body is just one line calling pythons own implementation of `pow()`. We can just remove the function as it doesn't seem to add any value. Additionally the comment in the function is now outdated and the test is only testing two ways of doing modular inverse but both using python's `pow()` function.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK dc14ba08e6e502f3e31d935bcd053a287c6610ca
Tree-SHA512: e8b470c72dc3f9fd53699d0684650517b1ea35ad1d4c01cf9472c80d3e4474c0c72e429c0bd201eb99d204c87eee0d68285e6a388e4c506f30e14b2bff9c1c32
|
|
`subtractfeefrom` parameter
057057a2d7e23c2e29cbfd29a5124b3947a33757 Add test for `sendmany` rpc that uses `subtractfeefrom` parameter (Yusuf Sahin HAMZA)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test that uses `sendmany` rpc to send **BTC** to multiple addresses using `subtractfeefrom` parameter, then checks receiver addresses balances to make sure fees are subtracted correctly.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 057057a2d7e23c2e29cbfd29a5124b3947a33757
Tree-SHA512: 51167120d489f0ff7b8b9855424d07cb55a8965984f904643cddf45e7a08c350eaded498c350ec9c660edf72c2f128ec142347c9c79d5043d9f6cd481b15cd7e
|
|
9c18992bbaf649f8c5461d5e4dc39eb1a07ffc77 test: add coverage for `-bantime` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for `-bantime`. This flag sets the time in seconds how long the IP is banned (in the case you don't explicitly set `bantime` when using `setban`).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 9c18992bbaf649f8c5461d5e4dc39eb1a07ffc77
Tree-SHA512: e95f8608aa5df9b09cc5577daae662ed79ef5d5c69ee5e704d7c69520b9b51cc142e9e6be69d80356eda25a5215c4770b1a208638560c48cd3bc8f6d195a371f
|
|
b922f6b5262884f42d7483f1e9af35650bdb53a7 rpc: scanblocks, add "completed" flag to the result obj (furszy)
ce50acc54fa313a92d48ed03e46ce8aabcf267e5 rpc: scanblocks, do not traverse the whole chain block by block (furszy)
Pull request description:
Coming from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23549#pullrequestreview-1105712566
The current `scanblocks` flow walks-through every block in the active chain
until hits the chain tip or processes 10k blocks, then calls `lookupFilterRange`
function to obtain all filters from that particular range.
This is only done to obtain the heights range to look up the block
filters. Which is unneeded.
As `scanblocks` only lookup block filters in the active chain, we can
directly calculate the lookup range heights, by using the chain tip,
without requiring to traverse the chain block by block.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK b922f6b5262884f42d7483f1e9af35650bdb53a7
TheCharlatan:
ACK b922f6b5262884f42d7483f1e9af35650bdb53a7
Tree-SHA512: 0587e6d9cf87a59184adb2dbc26a4e2bce3a16233594c6c330f69feb49bf7dc63fdacf44fc20308e93441159ebc604c63eb7de19204d3e745a2ff16004892b45
|
|
be72663a1521bc6cdf16d43a4feae7c5b57735c0 test: bumpfee, add coverage for "send coins back to yourself" (furszy)
7bffec6715a75bb2c8631177d39f984aabc656ba bumpfee: enable send coins back to yourself (furszy)
Pull request description:
Simple example:
1) User_1 sends 0.1 btc to user_2 on a low fee transaction.
2) After few hours, the tx is still in the mempool, user_2
is not interested anymore, so user_1 decides to cancel
it by sending coins back to himself.
3) User_1 has the bright idea of opening the explorer and
copy the change output address of the transaction. Then
call bumpfee providing such output (in the "outputs" arg).
Currently, this is not possible. The wallet fails with
"Unable to create transaction. Transaction must have at least
one recipient" error.
The error reason is because we discard the provided output
from the recipients list and set it inside the coin control
so the process adds it later (when the change is calculated).
But.. there is no later if the tx has no outputs.
ACKs for top commit:
ishaanam:
reACK be72663a1521bc6cdf16d43a4feae7c5b57735c0
achow101:
ACK be72663a1521bc6cdf16d43a4feae7c5b57735c0
Tree-SHA512: c2c38290a998f9b426a830d9624c7feb730158980ac186f8fb0138d5e200935d6538307bc60a2c3d0b7b6ee2b4ffb77a1e98baf8feb1d20a7d825f6055ac377f
|
|
To tell the user whether the process was aborted or not.
Plus, as the process can be aborted prior to the end range,
have also changed the "to_height" result value to return the
last scanned block instead of the end range block.
|
|
|
|
fac395e5eb2cd3210ba6345f777a586a9bec84e3 ci: Bump ci/lint/Dockerfile (MarcoFalke)
fa6eb6516727a8675dc6e46634d8343e282528ab test: Use python3.8 pow() (MarcoFalke)
88881cf7ac029aea660c2413ca8e2a5136fcd41b Bump python minimum version to 3.8 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There is no pressing reason to drop support for 3.7, however there are several maintenance issues:
* There is no supported operating system that ships 3.7 by default. (debian:buster is EOL and unmaintained to the extent that it doesn't run in the CI environment. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27340#issuecomment-1484988445)
* Compiling python 3.7 from source is also unsupported on at least macos, according to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24017#issuecomment-1107820790
* Recent versions of lief require 3.8, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27507#issuecomment-1517561645
Fix all maintenance issues by bumping the minimum.
ACKs for top commit:
RandyMcMillan:
ACK fac395e
fjahr:
ACK fac395e5eb2cd3210ba6345f777a586a9bec84e3
fanquake:
ACK fac395e5eb2cd3210ba6345f777a586a9bec84e3
Tree-SHA512: c198decdbbe29d186d73ea3f6549d8a38479383495d14a965a2f9211ce39637b43f13a4c2a5d3bf56e2d468be4bbe49b4ee8e8e19ec69936ff43ddf2b714c712
|
|
initialization
33fdfc7986455191df8ce339261bc0561115cf7f test: perturb anchors.dat to test it doesn't throw an error during initialization (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Got some inspiration from `feature_init`. This PR tests whether perturbing `anchors.dat` doesn't throw any error during initialization.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/3f1f5f6f1ec49d0fb2acfddec4021b3582ba0553/src/addrdb.cpp#L223-L235
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 33fdfc7986455191df8ce339261bc0561115cf7f
Tree-SHA512: e6584debb37647677581fda08366b45b42803022cc4c4f1d5a7bd5e9e04d64da77656dad2b804855337487bdcfc891f300a2e03668d6122de769dd14f39af9ed
|
|
4bdcf571584cbe44ad5533a3c991d3b0b4b2c84f test: test banlist database recreation (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for 'banlist database recreation'. If it wasn't able to read ban db (in `LoadBanlist`), so it should create a new (an empty, ofc) one.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/d8bdee0fc889def7c5f5076da13db4fce0a3728a/src/banman.cpp#L28-L45
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 4bdcf571584cbe44ad5533a3c991d3b0b4b2c84f
Tree-SHA512: d9d0cd0c4b3797189dff00d3a634878188e7cf51e78346601fc97e2bf78c495561705214062bb42ab8e491e0d111f8bfcf74dbc801768bc02cf2b45f162aad85
|
|
rescan beyond pruned data
cca4f82b828669ae23f6ac64fb83e068b81ae189 test: add coverage for rpc error when trying to rescan beyond pruned data (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following rpc error:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/15692e2641592394bdd4da0a7c2d371de8e576dd/src/wallet/rpc/transactions.cpp#L896-L899
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK cca4f82b828669ae23f6ac64fb83e068b81ae189
aureleoules:
ACK cca4f82b828669ae23f6ac64fb83e068b81ae189
Tree-SHA512: 724a055e9f6cddf1935699e8769015115f24f6485a0bd87e8660072ee44a15c1bddfdda848acc101ea7184b7e65a33b5b0d80b563d2ba3ecdab7a631378d6476
|
|
getwalletinfo JSONs
Co-authored-by: Aurèle Oulès <aurele@oules.com>
|
|
categories of transaction in ListTransaction
0c520679ab5f0ba99584cb356ec28ef089f14735 doc: add release notes for `abandoned` field in `gettransaction` and `listtransactions` (brunoerg)
a1aaa7f51f4205ae4d27fbceb2c3a97bc114e828 rpc, wallet: add `abandoned` field for all categories of transactions in ListTransactions (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Fixes #25130
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 0c520679ab5f0ba99584cb356ec28ef089f14735
Tree-SHA512: 1864460d76decab7898737c96517d722055eb8f81ca52248fe1035723258c6cd4a93251e06a86ecbbb0b0a80af1466b2c86fb142ace4ccb74cc40d5dc3967d7f
|
|
even in packages
bf77fc9cb45209b9c560208c65abc94209cd7919 [test] mempool full in package accept (glozow)
b51ebccc28e66c1822ab22d2d178be55c6618196 [validation] set PackageValidationState when mempool full (glozow)
563a2ee4f564c8ea5f8313d711b196e260568c04 [policy] disallow transactions under min relay fee, even in packages (glozow)
c4554fe894d7af8e666f5d424deccddf516713ef [test] package cpfp bumps parents <mempoolminfee but >=minrelaytxfee (glozow)
ac463e87df728689701810c3961155c49fdc5b31 [test util] mock mempool minimum feerate (glozow)
Pull request description:
Part of package relay, see #27463.
Note that this still allows packages to bump transactions that are below the dynamic mempool minimum feerate, which means this still solves the "mempool is congested and my presigned 1sat/vB tx is screwed" problem for all transactions.
On master, the package policy (only accessible through regtest-only RPC submitpackage) allows 0-fee (or otherwise below min relay feerate) transactions if they are bumped by a child. However, with default package limits, we don't yet have a DoS-resistant way of ensuring these transactions remain bumped throughout their time in the mempool. Primarily, the fee-bumping child may later be replaced by another transaction that doesn't bump the parent(s). The parent(s) could potentially stay bumped by other transactions, but not enough to ever be selected by the `BlockAssembler` (due to `blockmintxfee`).
For example, (tested [here](https://github.com/glozow/bitcoin/commits/26933-motivation)):
- The mempool accepts 24 below-minrelayfeerate transactions ("0-fee parents"), all bumped by a single high-fee transaction ("the fee-bumping child"). The fee-bumping child also spends a confirmed UTXO.
- Two additional children are added to each 0-fee parent. These children each pay a feerate slightly above the minimum relay feerate (e.g. 1.9sat/vB) such that, for each 0-fee parent, the total fees of its two children divided by the total size of the children and parent is above the minimum relay feerate.
- If a block template is built now, all transactions would be selected.
- A transaction replaces the the fee-bumping child, spending only the confirmed UTXO and not any of the outputs from the 0-fee parents.
- The 0-fee parents now each have 2 children. Their descendant feerates are above minrelayfeerate, which means that they remain in the mempool, even if the mempool evicts all below-minrelayfeerate packages.
- If a block template is built now, none of the 0-fee parents or their children would be selected.
- Even more low-feerate descendants can be added to these below-minrelayfeerate packages and they will not be evicted until they expire or the mempool reaches capacity.
Unless we have a DoS-resistant way of ensuring package CPFP-bumped transactions are always bumped, allowing package CPFP to bump below-minrelayfeerate transactions can result in these problematic situations. See #27018 which proposes a partial solution with some limitations, and contains discussion about potential improvements to eviction strategy. While no adequate solution exists, for now, avoid these situations by requiring all transactions to meet min relay feerate.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
reACK bf77fc9cb45209b9c560208c65abc94209cd7919
instagibbs:
re-ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26933/commits/bf77fc9cb45209b9c560208c65abc94209cd7919
Tree-SHA512: 28940f41493a9e280b010284316fb8caf1ed7b2090ba9a4ef8a3b2eafc5933601074b142f4f7d4e3c6c4cce99d3146f5c8e1393d9406c6f2070dd41c817985c9
|
|
These routines look fancy, but do nothing more than converting between
byte objects of length 32 to/from integers in little endian byte order
and can be replaced by simple one-liners, using the int.{from,to}_bytes
methods (available since Python 3.2).
|
|
in the txindex
6e9f8bb050785dbc754b6bb493aad9139908ef98 rpc, tests: in `utxoupdatepsbt` also look for the transaction in the txindex (ishaanam)
a5b4883fb43d01bfef1244df62c64bf8691ca63a rpc: extract psbt updating logic into ProcessPSBT (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
Previously the `utxoupdatepsbt` RPC, added in #13932, only updated the inputs spending segwit outputs with the `witness_utxo`, because the full transaction is needed for legacy inputs. Before this RPC looked for just the utxos in the utxo set and the mempool. This PR makes it so that if the user has txindex enabled, then the full transaction is looked for there for all inputs. If it is not found in the txindex or txindex isn't enabled, then the mempool is checked for the full transaction. If the transaction an input is spending from is still not found at that point, then the utxo set is searched and the inputs spending segwit outputs are updated with just the utxo.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6e9f8bb050785dbc754b6bb493aad9139908ef98
Xekyo:
ACK 6e9f8bb050785dbc754b6bb493aad9139908ef98
Tree-SHA512: 078db3c37a1ecd5816d80a42e8bd1341e416d661f508fa5fce0f4e1249fefd7b92a0d45f44957781cb69d0953145ef096ecdd4545ada39062be27742402dac6f
|
|
Currently debug.log will show the wrong bitcoin.conf config file path when
bitcoind is invoked without -conf or -datadir arguments, and there's a default
bitcoin.conf file which specifies another datadir= location. When this happens,
the debug.log will include an incorrect "Config file:" line referring to a
bitcoin.conf file in the other datadir, instead of the referring to the actual
configuration file in the default datadir which was parsed.
The bad log print was reported and originally fixed in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27303 by
Matthew Zipkin <pinheadmz@gmail.com>
This PR takes a slightly different approach to fixing the bug, trying to avoid
future bugs by not allowing the GetConfigFilePath function to be called before
the the configuration is parsed, and deleting GetConfigFile function which
could be confused with GetConfigFilePath. It also includes a test for the bug
which the original fix did not have.
Co-authored-by: Matthew Zipkin <pinheadmz@gmail.com>
|
|
Show an error on startup if a bitcoin datadir that is being used contains a
`bitcoin.conf` file that is ignored. There are two cases where this could
happen:
- One case reported in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27246#issuecomment-1470006043
happens when a bitcoin.conf file in the default datadir (e.g.
$HOME/.bitcoin/bitcoin.conf) has a "datadir=/path" line that sets different
datadir containing a second bitcoin.conf file. Currently the second
bitcoin.conf file is ignored with no warning.
- Another way this could happen is if a -conf= command line argument points
to a configuration file with a "datadir=/path" line and that specified path
contains a bitcoin.conf file, which is currently ignored.
This change only adds an error message and doesn't change anything about way
settings are applied. It also doesn't trigger errors if there are redundant
-datadir or -conf settings pointing at the same configuration file, only if
they are pointing at different files and one file is being ignored.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to PR #27468 (commit 11422cc5720c8d73a87600de8fe8abb156db80dc) all
call-sites of `GetQueryParameter(...)` in the REST module could trigger
a crash. Add missing test cases for all possible code-paths as a
regression test, as a foundation for possible follow-up fixes (which aim
to resolve this issue in a more general and robust way).
|
|
failure
e07dd5fff9eb64d7615ab515b351e296c00b1861 test: fix bumpfee 'spend_one_input' occasional failure (furszy)
Pull request description:
CI test failure, in master: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5975232842825728.
In #27469 https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6452468402356224
Most of the subtests in `wallet_bumpfee.py` expect to find spendable UTXOs of 0.001 btc in the rbf wallet. They use the `spend_one_input()` method which fails if none of them exist.
The sporadic failure comes from the recently added `test_feerate_checks_replaced_outputs` subtest that can spend all them. Leaving the next subtests with no 0.001 UTXOs to spend.
To solve it, this PR moves the recently added case into a "context independent subtests" section.
Which is placed at the end to not affect other cases.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e07dd5fff9eb64d7615ab515b351e296c00b1861
pablomartin4btc:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/e07dd5fff9eb64d7615ab515b351e296c00b1861.
Tree-SHA512: c150ed6fcfbb6f1502eaf6370a57aae0da991c0fc48e8bb3d446805f4336abba5d80ff0de26094914da95432dd0255030fe527001af4510dfdcefbc7230f14d6
|
|
11422cc5720c8d73a87600de8fe8abb156db80dc bugfix: rest: avoid segfault for invalid URI (pablomartin4btc)
Pull request description:
Minimal fix to get it promptly into 25.0 release (suggested by [stickies-v](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27253#pullrequestreview-1385130381) and supported by [vasild](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27253#pullrequestreview-1385842606) )
Please check #27253 for reviewers comments and acks regarding this PR and read the commit comment message body for more details about the fix.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 11422cc5720c8d73a87600de8fe8abb156db80dc
stickies-v:
re-ACK 11422cc
Tree-SHA512: 5af6b53fb266a12b463f960910556d5e97bc88b3c2a4f437ffa343886b38749e1eb058cf7bc64d62e82e1acf6232a186bddacd8f3b4500c87bf9e550a0153386
|
|
`evhttp_uri_parse` can return a nullptr, for example when the URI
contains invalid characters (e.g. "%").
`GetQueryParameterFromUri` passes the output of `evhttp_uri_parse`
straight into `evhttp_uri_get_query`, which means that anyone calling
a REST endpoint in which query parameters are used (e.g. `rest_headers`)
can cause a segfault.
This bugfix is designed to be minimal and without additional behaviour change.
Follow-up work should be done to resolve this in a more general and robust way,
so not every endpoint has to handle it individually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most of the subtests in wallet_bumpfee.py expect to
find spendable UTXOs of 0.001 btc in the rbf wallet
(they use the 'spend_one_input()' method that tries
to spend one of them and if it doesn't find any, it
throws an exception).
The sporadic failure comes from the recently added
'test_feerate_checks_replaced_outputs' subtest that
can spend all them. Leaving the next subtests with
no 0.001 UTXOs to spend.
To solve it, this PR moves the recently added case
into a "context independent subtests" section.
Which is placed at the end to not affect other cases.
|
|
|
|
too low fee when replacing outputs
d52fa1b0a5a8eecbe1e296a44b72965717e9235b tests: Make sure that bumpfee feerate checks work when replacing outputs (Andrew Chow)
be177c15a40199fac79d8ab96bb4b4d5a9b4fe22 bumpfee: Check the correct feerate when replacing outputs (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When replacing the outputs of a transaction during `bumpfee`, it is possible to accidentally create a transaction that will not be accepted into the mempool as it does not meet the incremental relay fee requirements. This occurs because the size estimation used for checking the provided feerate does not account for the replaced outputs; it instead uses the original outputs. When the replaced outputs is significantly different from the original, there can be a large difference in estimated transaction sizes that can make a transaction miss the absolute fee requirements for the incremental relay fee. Unfortunately we do not currently inform the user when the bumped transaction fails to relay, so they could use `bumpfee` and think the transaction has been bumped when it actually has not.
This issue is resolved by replacing the outputs before doing the size estimation, and also updating the feerate checker to use the actual fee values when calculating the required minimum fee.
Also added a test for this scenario.
ACKs for top commit:
ishaanam:
reACK d52fa1b0a5a8eecbe1e296a44b72965717e9235b
Xekyo:
reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/d52fa1b0a5a8eecbe1e296a44b72965717e9235b
Tree-SHA512: d18301b587465322dd3fb1bb86496c3675265a56072047576e2baa5cf907dd3b54778f30721f662f0c235709a5568427c18542eb7efbfb6fdd9f481fe676c66b
|
|
{create,load,unload,restore}wallet
7ccdd741fe1544c13b2a9b7baa5c5727e84d6e55 test: fix importmulti/importdescriptors assertion (Jon Atack)
19d888ce407f44d90785c456a1a3e2a6870e9245 rpc: move WALLET_FLAG_CAVEATS to the compilation unit of its caller (Jon Atack)
01df011ca2bf46ee4c988b03a130eea6df692325 doc: release note for wallet RPCs "warning" field deprecation (Jon Atack)
9ea8b3739a863b0ad87593639476b3cd712ff0dc test: createwallet "warning" field deprecation test (Jon Atack)
645d7f75ac1b40e4ea88119b3711f89943d35d6c rpc: deprecate "warning" field in {create,load,unload,restore}wallet (Jon Atack)
2f4a926e95e0379397859c3ba1b5711be5f09925 test: add test coverage for "warnings" field in createwallet (Jon Atack)
4a1e479ca612056761e6247dd5b715dcd6824413 rpc: add "warnings" field to RPCs {create,load,unload,restore}wallet (Jon Atack)
079d8cdda8eeebe199fb6592fca2630c37662731 rpc: extract wallet "warnings" fields to a util helper (Jon Atack)
f73782a9032a462a71569e9424db9bf9eeababf3 doc: fix/improve warning helps in {create,load,unload,restore}wallet (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Based on discussion and concept ACKed in #27138, add a `warnings` field to RPCs createwallet, loadwallet, unloadwallet, and restorewallet as a JSON array of strings to replace the `warning` string field in these 4 RPCs. The idea is to more gracefully handle multiple warning messages and for consistency with other wallet RPCs. Then, deprecate the latter fields, which represent all the remaining RPC `warning` fields.
The first commit https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27279/commits/f73782a9032a462a71569e9424db9bf9eeababf3 implements https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27138#issuecomment-1474789198 as an alternative to #27138. One of those two could potentially be backported to our currently supported releases.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 7ccdd741fe1544c13b2a9b7baa5c5727e84d6e55
1440000bytes:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27279/commits/7ccdd741fe1544c13b2a9b7baa5c5727e84d6e55
vasild:
ACK 7ccdd741fe1544c13b2a9b7baa5c5727e84d6e55
pinheadmz:
re-ACK 7ccdd741fe1544c13b2a9b7baa5c5727e84d6e55
Tree-SHA512: 314e0a4c41fa383d95e2817bfacf359d449e460529d235c3eb902851e2f4eacbabe646d9a5a4beabc4964cdfabf6397ed8301366a58d344a2f787f83b75e9d64
|
|
Instead of storing and passing around fixed strings for the purpose of
an address, use an enum.
This also rationalizes the CAddressBookData struct, documenting all fields and
making them public, and simplifying the representation to avoid bugs like
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26761#discussion_r1134615114 and make
it not possible to invalid address data like change addresses with labels.
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
|
|
as these RPCs have a "warnings" field, not a "warning" one.
|
|
|
|
This string field has been replaced in these four RPCs by a "warnings" field
returning a JSON array of strings.
|
