aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/functional
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-07-31scripted-diff: Rename lazily initialized bloom filtersdergoegge
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i 's/m_recent_confirmed_transactions/m_lazy_recent_confirmed_transactions/g' $(git grep -l 'm_recent_confirmed_transactions') sed -i 's/m_recent_rejects_reconsiderable/m_lazy_recent_rejects_reconsiderable/g' $(git grep -l 'm_recent_rejects_reconsiderable') sed -i 's/m_recent_rejects/m_lazy_recent_rejects/g' $(git grep -l 'm_recent_rejects') -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2024-07-31test: Try previously intermittently broken USDT test againMarcoFalke
This reverts commit faf8be7c32be00f660eba90d3f07313fb25d5d1c.
2024-07-31Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30545: test: fix intermittent failures in feature_proxy.pymerge-script
a6efc7e16ed23377705a0a6a3445cab0acfd7ccc test: fix intermittent failures in feature_proxy.py (Martin Zumsande) Pull request description: Fixes #29871 If addnode connections are made with v2transport and the peer immediately disconnects us, reconnections with v1 are scheduled. This could interfere with later checks depending on timing. Avoid this by using `v2transport=False` in the addnode rpc - this test isn't about the message layer anyway, so running it with v2 would add no value. ACKs for top commit: maflcko: ACK a6efc7e16ed23377705a0a6a3445cab0acfd7ccc tdb3: cr re ACK a6efc7e16ed23377705a0a6a3445cab0acfd7ccc Tree-SHA512: 39353a392e75e4c6257d971ceecb65fb76ec6d3b121a087869831c24b767a18f57e2ae2968da445c7fa731cb03053c90df37dd2cd6e86f786ad4121bc68ca235
2024-07-31test: Make leaf_script mandatory when scriptpath is set in TaprootSignatureMsgMarcoFalke
This removes the default value, because there should not be a use-case to fall back to a an empty leaf_script by default. (If there was, it could trivially be added back)
2024-07-30test: fix constructor of msg_txMartin Zumsande
In python, if the default value is a mutable object (here: a class) its shared over all instances, so that one instance being changed would affect others to be changed as well. This was likely the source of various intermittent bugs in the functional tests.
2024-07-30test: add P2A coverage for decodescriptGreg Sanders
2024-07-30test: Add anchor mempool acceptance testGreg Sanders
2024-07-30test: fix intermittent failures in feature_proxy.pyMartin Zumsande
If addnode connections are made with v2transport and the peer immediately disconnects us, reconnections with v1 are scheduled. This could interfere with later checks depending on timing. Avoid this by using `v2transport=False` in the addnode rpc - this test isn't about the message layer anyway, so running it with v2 would add no value.
2024-07-28Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30515: rpc: add utxo's blockhash and number of ↵merge-script
confirmations to scantxoutset output 17845e7f219e2281cd7a51d2cfe67b22eb40c4ba rpc: add utxo's blockhash and number of confirmations to scantxoutset output (Luis Schwab) Pull request description: This PR resolves #30478 by adding two fields to the `scantxoutset` RPC: - blockhash: the blockhash that an UTXO was created - confirmations: the number of confirmations an UTXO has relative to the chaintip. The rationale for the first field is that a blockhash is a much more reliable identifier than the height: > When using the scantxoutset RPC, the current behaviour is to show the block height of the UTXO. This is not optimal, as block height is ambiguous, especially in the case of a block reorganization happening at the same instant of the query. In this case, an UTXO that does not exist would be assumed to exist, unless the chain's tip hash is recorded before the scan, and make sure it still exists after, as per https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/issues/895#issuecomment-1475766797 comment by evanlinjin. The second one was suggested by maflcko, and I agree it's useful for human users: > While touching this, another thing to add could be the number of confirmations? I understand that this wouldn't help machine consumers of the interface, but human callers may find it useful? This will yield an RPC output like so: ```diff bitcoin-cli scantxoutset start "[\"addr(bc1q5q9344vdyjkcgv79ve3tldz4jmx4lf7knmnx6r)\"]" { "success": true, "txouts": 185259116, "height": 853622, "bestblock": "00000000000000000002e97d9be8f0ddf31829cf873061b938c10b0f80f708b2", "unspents": [ { "txid": "fae435084345fe26e464994aebc6544875bca0b897bf4ce52a65901ae28ace92", "vout": 0, "scriptPubKey": "0014a00b1ad58d24ad8433c56662bfb45596cd5fa7d6", "desc": "addr(bc1q5q9344vdyjkcgv79ve3tldz4jmx4lf7knmnx6r)#smk4xmt7", "amount": 0.00091190, "coinbase": false, "height": 852741, + "blockhash": "00000000000000000002eefe7e7db44d5619c3dace4c65f3fdcd2913d4945c13", + "confirmations": 882 } ], "total_amount": 0.00091190 } ``` ACKs for top commit: sipa: utACK 17845e7f219e2281cd7a51d2cfe67b22eb40c4ba Eunovo: ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30515/commits/17845e7f219e2281cd7a51d2cfe67b22eb40c4ba tdb3: ACK 17845e7f219e2281cd7a51d2cfe67b22eb40c4ba Tree-SHA512: 02366d0004e5d547522115ef0efe6794a35978db53dda12c675cfae38197bf43f0bf89ca99a3d79e3d2cff95186015fe1ab764abb8ab82bda440ae9302ad973b
2024-07-27rpc: add utxo's blockhash and number of confirmations to scantxoutset outputLuis Schwab
2024-07-26Add -blocksxor boolean optionMarcoFalke
2024-07-26rpc: Return precise loadtxoutset error messagesMarcoFalke
The error messages should never happen in normal operation. However, if they do, they are helpful to return to the user to debug the issue. For example, to notice a truncated file.
2024-07-26Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30076: test: fix MiniWallet script-path spend (missing ↵glozow
parity bit in leaf version) e4b0dabb2115dc74e9c5794ddca3822cd8301c72 test: add functional test for tagged MiniWallet instances (Sebastian Falbesoner) 3162c917e93fde4bea6e4627bb0c3c7cdc37386c test: fix MiniWallet internal key derivation for tagged instances (Sebastian Falbesoner) c9f7364ab2bccad56a4473dbd18d9c80eaf651d4 test: fix MiniWallet script-path spend (missing parity bit in leaf version) (Sebastian Falbesoner) 7774c314fb3c342eb5d48015b1c1b8b66d3d87db test: refactor: return TaprootInfo from P2TR address creation routine (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This PR fixes a dormant bug in MiniWallet that exists since support for P2TR was initially added in #23371 (see commit 041abfebe49ae5e3e882c00cc5caea1365a27a49). In the course of spending the output, the leaf version byte of the control block in the witness stack doesn't set the parity bit, i.e. we were so far just lucky that the used combinations of relevant data (internal pubkey, leaf script / version) didn't result in a tweaked pubkey with odd y-parity. If that was the case, we'd get the following validation error: `mandatory-script-verify-flag-failed (Witness program hash mismatch) (-26)` Since MiniWallets can now optionally be tagged (#29939), resulting in different internal pubkeys, the issue is more prevalent now. Fix it by passing the parity bit, as specified in BIP341. Can be tested with the following patch (fails on master, succeeds on PR): ```diff diff --git a/test/functional/test_framework/mempool_util.py b/test/functional/test_framework/mempool_util.py index 148cc935ed..7ebe858681 100644 --- a/test/functional/test_framework/mempool_util.py +++ b/test/functional/test_framework/mempool_util.py @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ def fill_mempool(test_framework, node): # Generate UTXOs to flood the mempool # 1 to create a tx initially that will be evicted from the mempool later # 75 transactions each with a fee rate higher than the previous one - ephemeral_miniwallet = MiniWallet(node, tag_name="fill_mempool_ephemeral_wallet") + ephemeral_miniwallet = MiniWallet(node, tag_name="fill_mempool_ephemeral_wallet3") test_framework.generate(ephemeral_miniwallet, 1 + num_of_batches * tx_batch_size) # Mine enough blocks so that the UTXOs are allowed to be spent ``` In addition to that, another bug is fixed where the internal key derivation failed, as not every pseudorandom hash results in a valid x-only pubkey. Fix this by treating the hash result as private key and calculate the x-only public key out of that, to be used then as internal key. Fixes #30528. ACKs for top commit: glozow: ACK e4b0dabb2115dc74e9c5794ddca3822cd8301c72 rkrux: reACK [e4b0dab](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30076/commits/e4b0dabb2115dc74e9c5794ddca3822cd8301c72) hodlinator: ACK e4b0dabb2115dc74e9c5794ddca3822cd8301c72 Tree-SHA512: a16f33f76bcb1012857cc3129438a9f6badf28aa2b1d25696da0d385ba5866b46de0f1f93ba777ed9263fe6952f98d7d9c44ea0c0170a2bcc86cbef90bf6ac58
2024-07-25Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30482: rest: Reject truncated hex txid early in ↵merge-script
getutxos parsing fac0c3d4bfc97b94f0594f7606650921feef2c8a doc: Add release notes for two pull requests (MarcoFalke) fa7b57e5f5a6dafbbadc361ffd27b58afff1ed59 refactor: Replace ParseHashStr with FromHex (MarcoFalke) fa9077724507faad207f29509a8202fc6ac9d502 rest: Reject truncated hex txid early in getutxos parsing (MarcoFalke) fab6ddbee64e50d5e2f499aebca35b5911896ec4 refactor: Expose FromHex in transaction_identifier (MarcoFalke) fad2991ba073de0bd1f12e42bf0fbaca4a265508 refactor: Implement strict uint256::FromHex() (MarcoFalke) fa103db2bb736bce4440f0bde564e6671e36311d scripted-diff: Rename SetHex to SetHexDeprecated (MarcoFalke) fafe4b80512a5a82712a3ee81b68cfeb21271dee test: refactor: Replace SetHex with uint256 constructor directly (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: In `rest_getutxos` truncated txids such as `aa` or `ff` are accepted. This is brittle at best. Fix it by rejecting any truncated (or overlarge) input. ---- Review note: This also starts a major refactor to rework hex parsing in Bitcoin Core, meaning that a few refactor commits are included as well. They are explained individually in the commit message and the work will be continued in the future. ACKs for top commit: stickies-v: re-ACK fac0c3d4bfc97b94f0594f7606650921feef2c8a - only doc and test updates to address review comments, thanks! hodlinator: ACK fac0c3d4bfc97b94f0594f7606650921feef2c8a Tree-SHA512: 473feb3fcf6118443435d1dd321006135b0b54689bfbbcb1697bb5811a449bef51f475c715de6911ff3c4ea3bdb75f601861ff93347bc4414d6b9e5298105dd7
2024-07-25Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30275: Fee Estimation: change `estimatesmartfee` ↵merge-script
default mode to `economical` 25bf86a225b0df3f48ade1016b47f5ee1636b988 [test]: ensure `estimatesmartfee` default mode is `economical` (ismaelsadeeq) 41a2545046bce315af697a3c6baf6e3fb2e824c2 [fees]: change `estimatesmartfee` default mode to `economical` (ismaelsadeeq) Pull request description: Fixes #30009 This PR changes the `estimatesmartfee` default mode to `economical`. This was also suggested on IRC https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2024-04-26#1021609 - `conservative` mode: This is the `estimatesmartfee` RPC mode which considers a longer history of blocks. It potentially returns a higher fee rate and is more likely to be sufficient for the desired target, but it is not as responsive to short-term drops in the prevailing fee market. - `economical` mode: This is the `estimatesmartfee` RPC mode where estimates are potentially lower and more responsive to short-term drops in the prevailing fee market. Since users are likely to use the default mode, this change will reduce overestimation for many users. The conservative mode remains available for those who wish to opt-in. For an in-depth analysis of how significantly the `conservative` mode overestimates, see https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/bitcoind-policy-estimator-modes-analysis/964. ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30275/commits/25bf86a225b0df3f48ade1016b47f5ee1636b988 glozow: ACK 25bf86a225b0df3f48ade1016b47f5ee1636b988 willcl-ark: ACK 25bf86a225b0df3f48ade1016b47f5ee1636b988 Tree-SHA512: 78ebda667eb9c8f87dcc2f0e6c14968bd1de30358dc77a13611b186fb8427ad97d9f537bad6e32e0a1aa477ccd8c64fee4d41e19308ef3cb184ff1664e6ba8a6
2024-07-24rest: Reject truncated hex txid early in getutxos parsingMarcoFalke
2024-07-24[test]: ensure `estimatesmartfee` default mode is `economical`ismaelsadeeq
2024-07-23test: Fix intermittent issue in p2p_v2_misbehaving.pyMarcoFalke
Without the fix, the test could fail intermittently. For example: node0 2024-07-22T16:31:54.104994Z [httpworker.0] [rpc/request.cpp:232] [parse] [rpc] ThreadRPCServer method=setmocktime user=__cookie__ test 2024-07-22T16:31:54.291000Z TestFramework (INFO): Sending first 4 bytes of ellswift which match network magic test 2024-07-22T16:31:54.292000Z TestFramework (INFO): If a response is received, assertion failure would happen in our custom data_received() function test 2024-07-22T16:31:54.292000Z TestFramework.p2p (DEBUG): Connecting to Bitcoin Node: 127.0.0.1:12644 test 2024-07-22T16:31:54.293000Z TestFramework.p2p (DEBUG): Connected & Listening: 127.0.0.1:12644 test 2024-07-22T16:31:54.588000Z TestFramework.p2p (DEBUG): sending 4050 bytes of garbage data test 2024-07-22T16:31:54.588000Z TestFramework (INFO): Sending remaining ellswift and garbage which are different from V1_PREFIX. Since a response is test 2024-07-22T16:31:54.588000Z TestFramework (INFO): expected now, our custom data_received() function wouldn't result in assertion failure node0 2024-07-22T16:31:55.523868Z (mocktime: 2024-07-22T16:31:54Z) [net] [net.cpp:3764] [CNode] [net] Added connection peer=0 node0 2024-07-22T16:31:55.625145Z (mocktime: 2024-07-22T16:31:54Z) [net] [net.cpp:1814] [CreateNodeFromAcceptedSocket] [net] connection from 127.0.0.1:45154 accepted node0 2024-07-22T16:31:55.625769Z (mocktime: 2024-07-22T16:31:54Z) [http] [httpserver.cpp:305] [http_request_cb] [http] Received a POST request for / from 127.0.0.1:33320 node0 2024-07-22T16:31:55.626543Z (mocktime: 2024-07-22T16:31:54Z) [httpworker.1] [rpc/request.cpp:232] [parse] [rpc] ThreadRPCServer method=getpeerinfo user=__cookie__ test 2024-07-22T16:31:55.818000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Unexpected exception caught during testing Traceback (most recent call last): File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 132, in main self.run_test() File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/p2p_v2_misbehaving.py", line 133, in run_test self.test_earlykeyresponse() File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/p2p_v2_misbehaving.py", line 151, in test_earlykeyresponse self.wait_until(lambda: node0.getpeerinfo()[-1]["bytesrecv"] > 4) File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 791, in wait_until return wait_until_helper_internal(test_function, timeout=timeout, timeout_factor=self.options.timeout_factor) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/test_framework/util.py", line 289, in wait_until_helper_internal if predicate(): ^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/ci_container_base/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/test/functional/p2p_v2_misbehaving.py", line 151, in <lambda> self.wait_until(lambda: node0.getpeerinfo()[-1]["bytesrecv"] > 4) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^ IndexError: list index out of range
2024-07-23Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30403: test, assumeutxo: Remove resolved todo comments ↵Ava Chow
and add new test d63ef738001fb69ce04134cc8645dcd1e1cbccd1 test: Add loadtxoutset test with tip on snapshot block (Fabian Jahr) c2f86d4bcba290c33ed99383cc76380bb15ba384 test: Remove already resolved assumeutxo todo comments (Fabian Jahr) Pull request description: The first commit removes three Todos that have been addressed previously (see commit message for details). The second message resolves another todo by adding the missing test case. This is a special case of "the tip has more work than the snapshot" where the tip is the same block as the snapshot base block. Related to #28648. ACKs for top commit: jrakibi: ACK [d63ef73](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/d63ef738001fb69ce04134cc8645dcd1e1cbccd1) achow101: ACK d63ef738001fb69ce04134cc8645dcd1e1cbccd1 maflcko: ACK d63ef738001fb69ce04134cc8645dcd1e1cbccd1 alfonsoromanz: Re ACK d63ef738001fb69ce04134cc8645dcd1e1cbccd1 Tree-SHA512: 8d5a25fc0b26531db3a9740132694138f2103b7b42eeb1d4a64095bfc901c1372e23601c0855c7def84c8a4e185d10611e4e830c4e479f1b663ae6ed53abb130
2024-07-22Fix lint-spelling warningsLőrinc
These warnings were often polluting the CI output, e.g. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30499/checks?check_run_id=27745036545 > ./test/lint/lint-spelling.py before the change: ``` doc/design/libraries.md:100: targetted ==> targeted doc/developer-notes.md:495: dependant ==> dependent src/bench/sign_transaction.cpp:49: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in src/bitcoin-chainstate.cpp:213: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in src/bitcoin-chainstate.cpp:213: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in src/coins.cpp:24: viewIn ==> viewing, view in src/coins.cpp:24: viewIn ==> viewing, view in src/coins.cpp:29: viewIn ==> viewing, view in src/coins.cpp:29: viewIn ==> viewing, view in src/coins.h:44: outIn ==> outing, out in src/coins.h:44: outIn ==> outing, out in src/coins.h:45: outIn ==> outing, out in src/coins.h:45: outIn ==> outing, out in src/coins.h:215: viewIn ==> viewing, view in src/coins.h:220: viewIn ==> viewing, view in src/primitives/transaction.h:37: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in src/primitives/transaction.h:37: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in src/protocol.cpp:51: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in src/protocol.cpp:51: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in src/protocol.h:497: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in src/qt/forms/optionsdialog.ui:344: incomin ==> incoming src/qt/optionsdialog.cpp:445: proxys ==> proxies src/rpc/mining.cpp:987: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in src/rpc/mining.cpp:987: hashIn ==> hashing, hash in src/script/interpreter.h:298: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in src/script/interpreter.h:298: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in src/script/interpreter.h:299: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in src/script/interpreter.h:299: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in src/script/sigcache.h:70: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in src/script/sigcache.h:70: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in src/signet.cpp:144: amountIn ==> amounting, amount in src/test/fuzz/util/net.cpp:386: occured ==> occurred src/test/fuzz/util/net.cpp:398: occured ==> occurred src/util/vecdeque.h:79: deques ==> dequeues src/util/vecdeque.h:160: deques ==> dequeues src/util/vecdeque.h:184: deques ==> dequeues src/util/vecdeque.h:194: deques ==> dequeues src/validation.cpp:2130: re-declared ==> redeclared src/validation.h:348: outIn ==> outing, out in src/validation.h:349: outIn ==> outing, out in test/functional/wallet_bumpfee.py:851: atleast ==> at least ```
2024-07-22Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30463: qa: Functional test improvementsglozow
a8e3af1a82dd584a1cc3ffbe587e66889f72e3c7 qa: Do not assume running `feature_asmap.py` from source directory (Hennadii Stepanov) 9bf7ca6cad888d460f57d249264dc0062025bb3f qa: Consider `cache` and `config.ini` relative to invocation directory (Hennadii Stepanov) a0473442d1c22043f5a288bd9255c006fd85d947 scripted-diff: Add `__file__` argument to `BitcoinTestFramework.init()` (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: This PR includes changes split from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30454. They improve the functional test framework, allowing users to [run individual functional tests](https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin/issues/146) from the build directory in the new CMake-based build system. This functionality is not available for out-of-source builds using the current Autotools-based build system, which always requires write permissions for the source directory. Nevertheless, this PR can be tested as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30463#issuecomment-2232618421: 1. Make an out-of-source build: ``` $ ./autogen.sh $ mkdir ../build && cd ../build $ ../bitcoin/configure $ make ``` 2. Create a symlink in the build directory to a functional test: ``` $ ln --symbolic ../../../bitcoin/test/functional/wallet_disable.py ./test/functional/ ``` 3. Run this symlink: ``` $ ./test/functional/wallet_disable.py ``` The last command fails on the master branch: ``` Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/hebasto/git/build/./test/functional/wallet_disable.py", line 31, in <module> DisableWalletTest().main() ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/home/hebasto/git/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 106, in __init__ self.parse_args() File "/home/hebasto/git/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 210, in parse_args config.read_file(open(self.options.configfile)) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/hebasto/git/bitcoin/test/config.ini' ``` and succeeds with this PR. ACKs for top commit: maflcko: tested ACK a8e3af1a82dd584a1cc3ffbe587e66889f72e3c 🎨 glozow: ACK a8e3af1a82dd584a1cc3ffbe587e66889f72e3c7, tested with the steps in op stickies-v: ACK a8e3af1a82dd584a1cc3ffbe587e66889f72e3c7 Tree-SHA512: 899e4efc09edec13ea3f5b47825d03173fb21d3569c360deda7fa6a56b99b4d24e09ad4f0883bad1ee926b1c706e47ba07c6a6160c63c07c82b3cf4ae5816e91
2024-07-19test: Add loadtxoutset test with tip on snapshot blockFabian Jahr
Also pulls out the guarding assert and calls it explicitly before the test function is called. This is already done before the existing call of the test function so it was not needed there.
2024-07-19test: Remove already resolved assumeutxo todo commentsFabian Jahr
- "Valid snapshot file, but referencing a snapshot block that turns out to be invalid, or has an invalid parent" has been addressed in #30267 - "An ancestor of snapshot block" - If chain tip refers to blocks in this context then any successful load is addressing this because if we have synced past the snapshot base block we fail because we don't need assumeutxo anymore. And if this is about headers then this is the `test_headers_not_synced()` case. - "A descendant of the snapshot block" - If this refers to blocks the `test_snapshot_with_less_work()` addressed this and if it is just headers in this case again it would be represented in all of the successful loads in the test. Co-authored-by: Alfonso Roman Zubeldia <alfonsoromanz24@gmail.com>
2024-07-18Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30320: assumeutxo: Don't load a snapshot if it's not ↵Ava Chow
in the best header chain 55b6d7be68a6f6c3882588ffd5b9349d885ed953 validation: Don't load a snapshot if it's not in the best header chain. (Martin Zumsande) Pull request description: This was suggested by me in the discussion of #30288, which has more context. If the snapshot is not an ancestor of the most-work header (`m_best_header`), syncing from that alternative chain leading to `m_best_header` should be prioritised. Therefore it's not useful loading the snapshot in this situation. If the other chain turns out to be invalid or the chain with the snapshot retrieves additional headers so that it's the most-work one again (see functional test), `m_best_header` will change and loading the snapshot will be possible again. Because of the work required to generate a conflicting headers chain, a situation with two conflicting chains should only be possible under extreme circumstances, such as major forks. ACKs for top commit: fjahr: re-ACK 55b6d7be68a6f6c3882588ffd5b9349d885ed953 achow101: ACK 55b6d7be68a6f6c3882588ffd5b9349d885ed953 alfonsoromanz: Re ACK 55b6d7be68a6f6c3882588ffd5b9349d885ed953 Tree-SHA512: 4fbea5ab1038ae353fc949a186041cf9b397e7ce4ac59ff36f881c9437b4f22ada922490ead5b2661389eb1ca0f3d1e7e7e6a4261057678643e71594a691ac36
2024-07-18Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30444: rest: Reject negative outpoint index early in ↵Ava Chow
getutxos parsing fac932bf93d9bd8cb7bef93f04ecf48ea2ccf1d1 refactor: Use util::Split to avoid a harmless unsigned-integer-overflow (MarcoFalke) fab54db9f1d0e634f4a697480dbb87b87940dc5c rest: Reject negative outpoint index in getutxos parsing (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: In `rest_getutxos` outpoint indexes such as `+N` or `-N` are accepted. This should be harmless, because any index out of range should be treated as a non-existent utxo. However, a negative index can't exist ever, so it seems better to reject all signs, whether `+` or `-`. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK fac932bf93d9bd8cb7bef93f04ecf48ea2ccf1d1 hodlinator: ut-ACK fac932bf93d9bd8cb7bef93f04ecf48ea2ccf1d1 tdb3: re ACK fac932bf93d9bd8cb7bef93f04ecf48ea2ccf1d1 danielabrozzoni: ACK fac932bf93d9bd8cb7bef93f04ecf48ea2ccf1d1 brunoerg: reACK fac932bf93d9bd8cb7bef93f04ecf48ea2ccf1d1 Tree-SHA512: 8f1a75248cb61e1c4beceded6ed170db83b07f30fbcf93a26acfffc00ec4546572366eff87907a7e1423d7d3a2a9e57a0a7a9bacb787c86463f842d7161c16bc
2024-07-18Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30453: test: Non-Shy version senderglozow
faed5d3870fb32fb5278961ee23e38fd9ea6ca15 test: Non-Shy version sender (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: After `add_outbound_p2p_connection`, the test framework normally sends a version message only in reply to a received version. This is fine, but the protocol does not require this and tolerates a version to be sent earlier. However, this is untested, and the missing test coverage leads to bugs being missed. For example https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30394#pullrequestreview-2166824948 Fix it by adding a test. ACKs for top commit: brunoerg: ACK faed5d3870fb32fb5278961ee23e38fd9ea6ca15 tdb3: ACK faed5d3870fb32fb5278961ee23e38fd9ea6ca15 theStack: tACK faed5d3870fb32fb5278961ee23e38fd9ea6ca15 glozow: ACK faed5d3870f Tree-SHA512: dbf527a39c932e994a1e8248ba78058000811a4bf69275278f1fd1e545716ac4d2d3be5dcf362976bbafa2a49f91d13e3601daf71d29e9c556179b01af62c03c
2024-07-17Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29523: Wallet: Add `max_tx_weight` to transaction ↵Ava Chow
funding options (take 2) 734076c6de1781f957c8bc3bf7ed6951920cfcf6 [wallet, rpc]: add `max_tx_weight` to tx funding options (ismaelsadeeq) b6fc5043c16c2467a2a6768a6ca9b18035fc400f [wallet]: update the data type of `change_output_size`, `change_spend_size` and `tx_noinputs_size` to `int` (ismaelsadeeq) baab0d2d43049a71dc90176bc4d72062f7b2ce19 [doc]: update reason for deducting change output weight (ismaelsadeeq) 7f61d31a5cec8fc61328bee43f90d3f1dcb0a035 [refactor]: update coin selection algorithms input parameter `max_weight` name (ismaelsadeeq) Pull request description: This PR taken over from #29264 The PR added an option `max_tx_weight` to transaction funding RPC's that ensures the resulting transaction weight does not exceed the specified `max_tx_weight` limit. If `max_tx_weight` is not given `MAX_STANDARD_TX_WEIGHT` is used as the max threshold. This PR addressed outstanding review comments in #29264 For more context and rationale behind this PR see https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/lightning-transactions-with-v3-and-ephemeral-anchors/418/11?u=instagibbs ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 734076c6de1781f957c8bc3bf7ed6951920cfcf6 furszy: utACK 734076c6de1781f957c8bc3bf7ed6951920cfcf6 rkrux: reACK [734076c](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29523/commits/734076c6de1781f957c8bc3bf7ed6951920cfcf6) Tree-SHA512: 013501aa443d239ee2ac01bccfc5296490c27b4edebe5cfca6b96c842375e895e5cfeb5424e82e359be581460f8be92095855763a62779a18ccd5bdfdd7ddce7
2024-07-17Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30468: test: bump mocktime only after node has ↵merge-script
received and sent bytes c322bddd08ed1f1f7f0c39768b659dd62d5e2dd5 test: bump mocktime after node has received and sent bytes (stratospher) Pull request description: Fixes an intermittent failure for `p2p_v2_misbehaving.py` reported in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30420#discussion_r1680462164. A [different error message](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/262260ce1e919613ba60194a5861b0b0a51dfe01/src/net.cpp#L1970) `"socket no message in first %i seconds"` will be displayed if `m_last_send=0` or if `m_last_recv is 0`. Fix this by: 1. mocktime bump is done after all the bytes are received. (`m_last_recv is not 0 now`) 2. wait until bytes are sent by `TestNode`/`bitcoind` (`m_last_send is not 0 now`) See https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5359619151757312?logs=ci#L3935 for an example failure (I wasn't able to reproduce the intermittent failure locally but I think the fix is logical) ACKs for top commit: maflcko: reACK c322bddd08ed1f1f7f0c39768b659dd62d5e2dd5 Tree-SHA512: 1c05524c2819041eb2001c2baf2c912d4f812a39347f784f212634e8c53131357a73116a46b4b7542bc7fc8c1370c4d36fc9898a2cbdb40bcee61105123c4a35
2024-07-17Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30457: doc: getaddressinfo[isscript] is optionalmerge-script
fa6390df205513319f28e35e3e17c40ecaa7d731 doc: getaddressinfo[isscript] is optional (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: `isscript` is unknown for unknown witness versions, so it should be marked optional in the docs Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30456 ACKs for top commit: stickies-v: ACK fa6390df205513319f28e35e3e17c40ecaa7d731 tdb3: ACK fa6390df205513319f28e35e3e17c40ecaa7d731 Tree-SHA512: f728f18e0871923225e0bf29594f8095997456cf55409f42087b5f70f95bef10f984323b48d2b484b6705f23b04e9e8a3fe42446830638fdd70453c18fd7f189
2024-07-17test: bump mocktime after node has received and sent bytesstratospher
a different error message "socket no message in first %i seconds" will be displayed if m_last_send=0 or if m_last_recv is 0. make the test robust by ensuring that they will not be 0 before bumping mocktime.
2024-07-17test: Non-Shy version senderMarcoFalke
2024-07-17doc: getaddressinfo[isscript] is optionalMarcoFalke
2024-07-16Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30357: Fix cases of calls to `FillPSBT` errantly ↵Ava Chow
returning `complete=true` 7e36dca657c66bc70b04d5b850e5a335aecfb902 test: add test for modififed walletprocesspsbt calls (willcl-ark) 39cea21ec51b9838669c38fefa14f25c36ae7096 wallet: fix FillPSBT errantly showing as complete (willcl-ark) Pull request description: Fixes: #30077 Fix cases of calls to `FillPSBT` returning `complete=true` when it's not the case. This can happen when some inputs have been signed but the transaction is subsequently modified, e.g. in the context of PayJoins. Also fixes a related bug where a finalized hex string is attempted to be added during `walletprocesspsbt` but a CHECK_NONFATAL causes an abort. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 7e36dca657c66bc70b04d5b850e5a335aecfb902 ismaelsadeeq: Tested ACK 7e36dca657c66bc70b04d5b850e5a335aecfb902 pinheadmz: re-ACK 7e36dca657c66bc70b04d5b850e5a335aecfb902 Tree-SHA512: e35d19789899c543866d86d513506494d672e4bed9aa36a995dbec4e72f0a8ec5536b57c4a940a18002ae4a8efd0b007c77ba64e57cd52af98e4ac0e7bf650d6
2024-07-16qa: Do not assume running `feature_asmap.py` from source directoryHennadii Stepanov
2024-07-16qa: Consider `cache` and `config.ini` relative to invocation directoryHennadii Stepanov
In CMake-based build system (1) `config.ini` is created in the build directory, and (2) `cache` must also be created in the same directory. This change enables running individual functional tests from the build directory.
2024-07-16scripted-diff: Add `__file__` argument to `BitcoinTestFramework.init()`Hennadii Stepanov
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i -e 's/\s*().main\s*()/(__file__).main()/' $(git ls-files test/functional/*.py) sed -i -e 's/def __init__(self)/def __init__(self, test_file)/' test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2024-07-16Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22729: Make it possible to disable Tor binds and abort ↵Ava Chow
startup on bind failure bca346a97056748f1e3fb899f336d56d9fd45a64 net: require P2P binds to succeed (Vasil Dimov) af552534ab83c572d3bc3f93ccaee5c1961ccab5 net: report an error if unable to bind on the Tor listening addr:port (Vasil Dimov) 9a7e5f4d68dadc64a675f32d1e91199d6b1aa095 net: don't extra bind for Tor if binds are restricted (Vasil Dimov) Pull request description: Make it possible to disable the Tor binding on `127.0.0.1:8334` and stop startup if any P2P bind fails instead of "if all P2P binds fail". Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22726 Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22727 ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK bca346a97056748f1e3fb899f336d56d9fd45a64 cbergqvist: ACK bca346a97056748f1e3fb899f336d56d9fd45a64 pinheadmz: ACK bca346a97056748f1e3fb899f336d56d9fd45a64 Tree-SHA512: fabef89a957191eea4f3e3b6109d2b8389f27ecc74440a920b0c10f31fff00a85bcfd1eb3c91826c7169c618f4de8a8d0a260e2caf40fd854f07ea9a980d8603
2024-07-16Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30394: net: fix race condition in self-connect detectionglozow
16bd283b3ad05daa41259a062aee0fc05b463fa6 Reapply "test: p2p: check that connecting to ourself leads to disconnect" (Sebastian Falbesoner) 0dbcd4c14855fe2cba15a32245572b693dc18c4e net: prevent sending messages in `NetEventsInterface::InitializeNode` (Sebastian Falbesoner) 66673f1c1302c986e344c7f44bb0b352213d5dc8 net: fix race condition in self-connect detection (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: This PR fixes a recently discovered race condition in the self-connect detection (see #30362 and #30368). Initiating an outbound network connection currently involves the following steps after the socket connection is established (see [`CConnman::OpenNetworkConnection`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/bd5d1688b4311e21c0e0ff89a3ae02ef7d0543b8/src/net.cpp#L2923-L2930) method): 1. set up node state 2. queue VERSION message (both steps 1 and 2 happen in [`InitializeNode`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/bd5d1688b4311e21c0e0ff89a3ae02ef7d0543b8/src/net_processing.cpp#L1662-L1683)) 3. add new node to vector `m_nodes` If we connect to ourself, it can happen that the sent VERSION message (step 2) is received and processed locally *before* the node object is added to the connection manager's `m_nodes` vector (step 3). In this case, the self-connect remains undiscovered, as the detection doesn't find the outbound peer in `m_nodes` yet (see `CConnman::CheckIncomingNonce`). Fix this by swapping the order of 2. and 3., by taking the `PushNodeVersion` call out of `InitializeNode` and doing that in the `SendMessages` method instead, which is only called for `CNode` instances in `m_nodes`. The temporarily reverted test introduced in #30362 is readded. Fixes #30368. Thanks go to vasild, mzumsande and dergoegge for suggestions on how to fix this (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30368#issuecomment-2200625017 ff. and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30394#discussion_r1668290789). ACKs for top commit: naiyoma: tested ACK [https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30394/commits/16bd283b3ad05daa41259a062aee0fc05b463fa6](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30394/commits/16bd283b3ad05daa41259a062aee0fc05b463fa6), built and tested locally, test passes successfully. mzumsande: ACK 16bd283b3ad05daa41259a062aee0fc05b463fa6 tdb3: ACK 16bd283b3ad05daa41259a062aee0fc05b463fa6 glozow: ACK 16bd283b3ad05daa41259a062aee0fc05b463fa6 dergoegge: ACK 16bd283b3ad05daa41259a062aee0fc05b463fa6 Tree-SHA512: 5b8aced6cda8deb38d4cd3fe4980b8af505d37ffa0925afaa734c5d81efe9d490dc48a42e1d0d45dd2961c0e1172a3d5b6582ae9a2d642f2592a17fbdc184445
2024-07-16Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30420: test: Fix intermittent failure in ↵merge-script
p2p_v2_misbehaving.py c6d43367a1ec47c004991143f031417c4e4b8095 test: Fix intermittent failure in p2p_v2_misbehaving.py (stratospher) Pull request description: Fixes #30419. Make sure that ellswift computation is complete in the `NetworkThread` in `test/functional/p2p_v2_misbehaving.py` before sending the ellswift in the `MainThread`. One way to reproduce this failure on master would be: ```diff diff --git a/test/functional/test_framework/v2_p2p.py b/test/functional/test_framework/v2_p2p.py index 87600c36de..ea0615ef3b 100644 --- a/test/functional/test_framework/v2_p2p.py +++ b/test/functional/test_framework/v2_p2p.py @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ class EncryptedP2PState: def generate_keypair_and_garbage(self, garbage_len=None): """Generates ellswift keypair and 4095 bytes garbage at max""" + import time; time.sleep(3) self.privkey_ours, self.ellswift_ours = ellswift_create() if garbage_len is None: garbage_len = random.randrange(MAX_GARBAGE_LEN + 1) ``` ACKs for top commit: maflcko: ACK c6d43367a1ec47c004991143f031417c4e4b8095 mzumsande: Code Review ACK c6d43367a1ec47c004991143f031417c4e4b8095 tdb3: cr and t ACK c6d43367a1ec47c004991143f031417c4e4b8095 Tree-SHA512: dfc3a6afa09773b7e84d35aff0aa14e0b8a4475860e0b31ab5c1a8d54911c814f07138f624fea651fba90cc5c526c0d05c3fe33d2ce0ad833b2be3a3caa9f522
2024-07-15test: Fix intermittent failure in p2p_v2_misbehaving.pystratospher
The ellswift bytes are computed in the NetworkThread and sent in the MainThread. Add a `wait_until()` to make sure that ellswift computation is completed in NetworkThread before sending it in the MainThread. Also wait until bytes sent are actually received and use mocktime for more robust disconnection checking.
2024-07-12Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30295: #28984 package rbf followupsmerge-script
3f00aae14092ca076cff7f9ddf6155c601979fcd package rbf: cpfp structure requires package > parent feerate (Greg Sanders) ad7f1f697f01845470f8df0944a94012fabcba09 test package rbf boundary conditions more closely (Greg Sanders) ff4558d441f377a372647972d35b5476b94579c9 doc: reword package RBF documentation (Greg Sanders) de669a883bf65c576cc596b20a576d7bb1618182 doc: replace mention of V3 with TRUC (Greg Sanders) Pull request description: Some suggested nits/changes from #28984 ACKs for top commit: glozow: ACK 3f00aae1409 murchandamus: ACK 3f00aae14092ca076cff7f9ddf6155c601979fcd Tree-SHA512: 79434cc8aba25a43e99793298cdc99cad807db2c3a2e780a31953f244b95eecd97b90559abd67fbf30996c00966675fa257253a7812ec4727420226162c629ae
2024-07-12rest: Reject negative outpoint index in getutxos parsingMarcoFalke
2024-07-11Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30353: test: fix inconsistency in fundrawtransaction ↵Ava Chow
weight limits test 00b8e26bd6a47a8207c7571ca7ef9643f0ee2668 test: fix inconsistency in fundrawtransaction weight limits test (furszy) Pull request description: Fix https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30309#discussion_r1657628378 inconsistency. Currently, the test is passing due to a mistake in the test inputs selection process. We are selecting the parent transaction change output as one of the inputs of the transaction to fund, which helps to surpass the target amount when it shouldn't due to the fee reduction. The failure arises when the test behaves as intended by its coder; that is, when it does not select the change output. In this case, the pre-selected inputs aren't enough to cover the target amount. Fix this by excluding the parent transaction's change output from the inputs selection and including an extra input to cover the tx fee. The CI failure can be replicated with the following patch in master: ```diff diff --git a/test/functional/wallet_fundrawtransaction.py b/test/functional/wallet_fundrawtransaction.py --- a/test/functional/wallet_fundrawtransaction.py(revision 9b480f7a25a737c9c4ebc33401e94d66c2da9ec3) +++ b/test/functional/wallet_fundrawtransaction.py(date 1720652934739) @@ -1322,7 +1322,7 @@ outputs = [] for _ in range(1472): outputs.append({wallet.getnewaddress(address_type="legacy"): 0.1}) - txid = self.nodes[0].send(outputs=outputs)["txid"] + txid = self.nodes[0].send(outputs=outputs, change_position=0)["txid"] self.generate(self.nodes[0], 1) # 272 WU per input (273 when high-s); picking 1471 inputs will exceed the max standard tx weight. @@ -1330,7 +1330,7 @@ # 1) Try to fund transaction only using the preset inputs input_weights = [] - for i in range(1471): + for i in range(1, 1472): # skip first output as it is the parent tx change output input_weights.append({"txid": txid, "vout": i, "weight": 273}) assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "Transaction too large", wallet.fundrawtransaction, hexstring=rawtx, input_weights=input_weights) ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 00b8e26bd6a47a8207c7571ca7ef9643f0ee2668 ismaelsadeeq: Code review and Tested ACK 00b8e26bd6a47a8207c7571ca7ef9643f0ee2668 Tree-SHA512: 5ef792961b7fad4999fc30aa03366432103ddf672ca5cbb366c9eab4c2e46d5ae1ab0c073dfc4fbb2b4e63203653bc0e54463c731c5f8655140207ba5f8e542e
2024-07-11validation: Don't load a snapshot if it's not in the best header chain.Martin Zumsande
If the snapshot is not an ancestor of the most-work header (m_best_header), syncing from that alternative chain should be prioritised. Therefore don't accept loading a snapshot in this situation. If that other chain turns out to be invalid, m_best_header would be reset and loading the snapshot should be possible again. Because of the work required to generate a conflicting headers chain, this should only be possible under extreme circumstances, such as major forks.
2024-07-11Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26596: wallet: Migrate legacy wallets to descriptor ↵glozow
wallets without requiring BDB 8ce3739edbcf6437bf2695087e0ebe8c633df19b test: verify wallet is still active post-migration failure (furszy) 771bc60f134c002a027e799639f0fed59ae8123d wallet: Use LegacyDataSPKM when loading (Ava Chow) 61d872f1b3d0dbfd0de4ff9b7deff40eeffa6a14 wallet: Move MigrateToDescriptor and DeleteRecords to LegacyDataSPKM (Ava Chow) b231f4d556876ae70305e8710e31d53525ded8ae wallet: Move LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::IsMine to LegacyDataSPKM (Ava Chow) 7461d0c006c92ede2f2595b79a5509eaf3509fb7 wallet: Move LegacySPKM data storage and handling to LegacyDataSPKM (Ava Chow) 517e204bacd9dcea6612aae57d5a2813b89cd01d Change MigrateLegacyToDescriptor to reopen wallet as BERKELEY_RO (Ava Chow) Pull request description: #26606 introduced `BerkeleyRODatabase` which is an independent parser for BDB files. This PR uses this in legacy wallet migration so that migration will continue to work once the legacy wallet and BDB are removed. `LegacyDataSPKM` is introduced to have the minimum data and functions necessary for a legacy wallet to be loaded for migration. ACKs for top commit: cbergqvist: ACK 8ce3739edbcf6437bf2695087e0ebe8c633df19b theStack: Code-review ACK 8ce3739edbcf6437bf2695087e0ebe8c633df19b furszy: Code review ACK 8ce3739edbcf6437bf2695087e0ebe8c633df19b Tree-SHA512: dccea12d6c597de15e3e42f97ab483cfd069e103611200279a177e021e8e9c4e74387c4f45d2e58b3a1e7e2bdb32a1d2d2060b1f8086c03eeaa0c68579d9d54e
2024-07-10test: fix inconsistency in fundrawtransaction weight limits testfurszy
Currently, the test is passing due to a mistake in the test inputs selection process. We are selecting the parent transaction change output as one of the inputs of the transaction to fund, which helps to surpass the target amount when it shouldn't due to the fee reduction. The failure arises when the test behaves as intended by its coder; that is, when it does not select the change output. In this case, the pre-selected inputs aren't enough to cover the target amount. Fix this by excluding the parent transaction's change output from the inputs selection and including an extra input to cover the tx fee.
2024-07-10Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29668: prune, rpc: Check undo data when finding ↵Ava Chow
pruneheight 8789dc8f315a9d9ad7142d831bc9412f780248e7 doc: Add note to getblockfrompeer on missing undo data (Fabian Jahr) 4a1975008b602aeacdad9a74d1837a7455148074 rpc: Make pruneheight also reflect undo data presence (Fabian Jahr) 96b4facc912927305b06a233cb8b36e7e5964c08 refactor, blockstorage: Generalize GetFirstStoredBlock (Fabian Jahr) Pull request description: The function `GetFirstStoredBlock()` helps us find the first block for which we have data. So far this function only looked for a block with `BLOCK_HAVE_DATA`. However, this doesn't mean that we also have the undo data of that block, and undo data might be required for what a user would like to do with those blocks. One example of how this might happen is if some blocks were fetched using the `getblockfrompeer` RPC. Blocks fetched from a peer will have data but no undo data. The first commit here allows `GetFirstStoredBlock()` to check for undo data as well by passing a parameter. This alone is useful for #29553 and I would use it there. In the second commit I am applying the undo check to the RPCs that report `pruneheight` to the user. I find this much more intuitive because I think the user expects to be able to do all operations on blocks up until the `pruneheight` but that is not the case if undo data is missing. I personally ran into this once before and now again when testing for assumeutxo when I had used `getblockfrompeer`. The following commit adds test coverage for this change of behavior. The last commit adds a note in the docs of `getblockfrompeer` that undo data will not be available. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 8789dc8f315a9d9ad7142d831bc9412f780248e7 furszy: Code review ACK 8789dc8f315a9d9ad7142d831bc9412f780248e7. stickies-v: ACK 8789dc8f315a9d9ad7142d831bc9412f780248e7 Tree-SHA512: 90ae8bdd07a496ade579aa25240609c61c9ed173ad38d30533f6c631fe674e5a41727478ade69ca4b71a571ad94c9da4b33ebba6b5d8821109313c2de3bdfb3d
2024-07-10Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29996: Assumeutxo: bugfix on loadtxoutset with a ↵Ava Chow
divergent chain + test 5b7f70ba2661a194a3c476b81e03785feddb4e1c test: loadtxoutset in divergent chain with less work (Alfonso Roman Zubeldia) d35efe1efc0dbeae0667baade2a40be08511c13e p2p: Start downloading historical blocks from common ancestor (Martin Zumsande) Pull request description: This PR adds a test to cover the scenario of loading an assumeutxo snapshot when the current chain tip is not an ancestor of the snapshot block but has less work. During the review process, a bug was discovered where blocks between the last common ancestor and the background tip were not being requested if the background tip was not an ancestor of the snapshot block. mzumsande suggested a fix (65343ec49a6b73c4197dfc38e1c2f433b0a3838a) to start downloading historical blocks from the last common ancestor to address this issue. This fix has been incorporated into the PR with a slight modification. Related to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28648 ACKs for top commit: fjahr: tACK 5b7f70ba2661a194a3c476b81e03785feddb4e1c achow101: ACK 5b7f70ba2661a194a3c476b81e03785feddb4e1c mzumsande: Code Review ACK 5b7f70ba2661a194a3c476b81e03785feddb4e1c Tree-SHA512: f8957349686a6a1292165ea9e0fd8c912d21466072632a10f8ef9d852a5f430bc6b2a531e6884a4dbf2e3adb28b3d512b25919e78f5804a67320ef54c3b1aaf6
2024-07-09Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29154: tests: improve wallet multisig descriptor test ↵Ava Chow
and docs d93b79470916b1e6f85c55cc6beb1e41b382196f tests: improve wallet multisig descriptor test and docs (Michael Dietz) Pull request description: It is best to store all key origin information (master key fingerprint and all derivation steps) in the multisig descriptor. Being explicit with this information should be beneficial if this approach is used with other wallets/signers (whether hardware or software). There is no harm including all of this with xpubs (if anything it simplifies the test code) and makes this example/docs more complete and safer incase it is referenced by others. ACKs for top commit: S3RK: Code Review ACK d93b79470916b1e6f85c55cc6beb1e41b382196f achow101: ACK d93b79470916b1e6f85c55cc6beb1e41b382196f Tree-SHA512: 0e5c4d13f060489405e6cf50c8a09911f5a0cee71023649235afd80a5e3aae38d52c6e12ad4660205b9357b09f45596941391bdcf6fceccbe07c4e5a1592a482
2024-07-09Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#29431: test/BIP324: disconnection scenarios during v2 ↵Ava Chow
handshake c9dacd958d7c1e98b08a7083c299d981e4c11193 test: Check that non empty version packet is ignored and no disconnection happens (stratospher) 997cc00b950a7d1b7f2a3971282685f4e81d87d2 test: Check that disconnection happens when AAD isn't filled (stratospher) b5e6238fdbba5c777a5adfa4477dac51a82f4448 test: Check that disconnection happens when garbage sent/received are different (stratospher) ad1482d5a20e6b155184a43d0724d2dcd950ce52 test: Check that disconnection happens when wrong garbage terminator is sent (stratospher) e351576862471fc77b1e798a16833439e23ff0b4 test: Check that disconnection happens when >4095 garbage bytes is sent (stratospher) e075fd131d668d9d1ba3c8566624481c4a57032d test: Introduce test types and modify v2 handshake function accordingly (stratospher) 7d07daa62311bdb0e2ce23d0b55f711f5088bd28 log: Add V2 handshake timeout (stratospher) d4a1da8543522a213ac75761131d878eedfd4a5b test: Make global TRANSPORT_VERSION variable an instance variable (stratospher) c642b08c4e45cb3a625a867ebd66c0ae51bde212 test: Log when the garbage is actually sent to transport layer (stratospher) 86cca2cba230c10324c6aedd12ae9655b83b2856 test: Support disconnect waiting for add_p2p_connection (stratospher) bf9669af9ccc33dcade09bceb27d6745e9d9a75a test: Rename early key response test and move random_bitflip to util (stratospher) Pull request description: Add tests for the following v2 handshake scenarios: 1. Disconnection happens when > `MAX_GARBAGE_LEN` bytes garbage is sent 2. Disconnection happens when incorrect garbage terminator is sent 3. Disconnection happens when garbage bytes are tampered with 4. Disconnection happens when AAD of first encrypted packet after the garbage terminator is not filled 5. bitcoind ignores non-empty version packet and no disconnection happens All these tests require a modified v2 P2P class (different from `EncryptedP2PState` used in `v2_p2p.py`) to implement our custom handshake behaviour based on different scenarios and have been kept in a single test file (`test/functional/p2p_v2_misbehaving.py`). Shifted the test in `test/functional/p2p_v2_earlykeyresponse.py` which is of the same pattern to this file too. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK c9dacd958d7c1e98b08a7083c299d981e4c11193 mzumsande: ACK c9dacd958d7c1e98b08a7083c299d981e4c11193 theStack: Code-review ACK c9dacd958d7c1e98b08a7083c299d981e4c11193 Tree-SHA512: 90df81f0c7f4ecf0a47762d290a618ded92cde9f83d3ef3cc70e1b005ecb16125ec39a9d80ce95f99e695d29abd63443240cb5490aa57c5bc8fa2e52149a0672