Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
hardcoded nChainTx
91d93aac4e3fe6fff5ef492ed152c4d8fa6f2672 validation: remove nchaintx from assumeutxo metadata (James O'Beirne)
931684b24a89aba884cb18c13fa67ccca339ee8c validation: fix ActivateSnapshot to use hardcoded nChainTx (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This fixes an oversight from the move of nChainTx from the user-supplied
snapshot metadata into the hardcoded assumeutxo chainparams.
Since the nChainTx is now unused in the metadata, it should be removed
in a future commit.
See: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19806#discussion_r612165410
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 91d93aac4e3fe6fff5ef492ed152c4d8fa6f2672
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 91d93aac4e3fe6fff5ef492ed152c4d8fa6f2672. No change to previous commit, just new commit removing now unused utxo snapshot field and updating tests.
Tree-SHA512: 445bdd738faf007451f40bbcf360dd1fb4675e17a4c96546e6818c12e33dd336dadd95cf8d4b5f8df1d6ccfbc4bf5496864bb5528e416cea894857b6b732140c
|
|
and permissions
46b025e00df40724175735eb5606ac73067cb3b8 test: add new python linter to check file names and permissions (windsok)
6f6bb3ebc7cb8e17a5dfc8ef55aa2d3f2dc6bdea test: fix file permissions on various scripts (windsok)
Pull request description:
Adds a new python linter test which tests for correct filenames and file permissions in the repository.
Replaces the existing tests in the `test/lint/lint-filenames.sh` and `test/lint/lint-shebang.sh` linter tests, as well as adding some new and increased testing. This increased coverage is intended to catch issues such as in #21728 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16807/files#r345547050
Summary of tests:
* Checks every file in the repository against an allowed regexp to make sure only lowercase or uppercase alphanumerics (a-zA-Z0-9), underscores (_), hyphens (-), at (@) and dots (.) are used in repository filenames.
* Checks only source files (*.cpp, *.h, *.py, *.sh) against a stricter allowed regexp to make sure only lowercase alphanumerics (a-z0-9), underscores (_), hyphens (-) and dots (.) are used in source code filenames. Additionally there is an exception regexp for directories or files which are excepted from matching this regexp (This should replicate the existing `test/lint/lint-filenames.sh` test)
* Checks all files in the repository match an allowed executable or non-executable file permission octal. Additionally checks that for executable files, the file contains a shebang line.
* Checks that for executable `.py` and `.sh` files, the shebang line used matches an allowable list of shebangs (This should replicate the existing `test/lint/lint-shebang.sh` test)
* Checks every file that contains a shebang line to ensure it has an executable permission
Additionally updates the permissions on various files to comply with the new tests.
Fixes #21729
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr re-ACK 46b025e00df40724175735eb5606ac73067cb3b8: patch still looks correct
kiminuo:
code review ACK 46b025e00df40724175735eb5606ac73067cb3b8 if `contrib/gitian-descriptors/assign_DISTNAME` permission change is deemed OK.
laanwj:
Code review ACK 46b025e00df40724175735eb5606ac73067cb3b8
Tree-SHA512: 1c8201a2cee0d9cbce15652b68cec9a6458a8b493fcd5392f98560aca0b1a12e668baab65a47100f116f626dadc3f591deb47f7368468c6a46c6c712c2533455
|
|
fab1eb65b196d62466fdc2ed319ffa19d3560a0c test: Fix feature_config_args.py intermittent issue (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Fix #21448
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fab1eb65b196d62466fdc2ed319ffa19d3560a0c
Tree-SHA512: cad9f684f43aa801d0c1cb5f1684ffa624df1216be225cea46b1389ba2b67cbd6159ffb786fe144bf1ca865623dd9a10289d4293cfabb678bdb243d4ea00734d
|
|
assertions
f09e6b2585200040be2e8ee44fa79b86b1970d70 test: fix off-by-ones in rpc_fundrawtransaction (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
The variables in these assertions should be the same within each line.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK f09e6b2585200040be2e8ee44fa79b86b1970d70
theStack:
ACK f09e6b2585200040be2e8ee44fa79b86b1970d70
Tree-SHA512: 7ac754eaadd8cb00a725afa55bccbb8de7547dedac9350d79a9a470918245617e075c56a91adc36fb653bbe8a0a325d59b00443155a7e1a81ebf22e4e4cf56d9
|
|
fa066f1b66ab75e6c88e11922bbd085c9d3211de test: Run feature_cltv with MiniWallet (MarcoFalke)
fa5591d38cfc917235a3dffd61c36dbf1f781a4d test: Hide tx rehash in helper (MarcoFalke)
fa5f938cfe4264054e9017fbe710c81e7b3bb150 test: Remove new_tx reference (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Allows to run the test even with no wallet compiled in
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK fa066f1b66ab75e6c88e11922bbd085c9d3211de 💽
Tree-SHA512: 3f659a178ba3ee0baffd70fddf8b8a68e5551d85626c7f254b234d7f75e6a16430a32a7952037db358b579f045b4d296b46156f72e5d226f3e80334dc635ca10
|
|
context
ebd4be43cc945e643f91d3a91007b5a35bbbd5a1 doc: add release notes for 20867 (Antoine Poinsot)
5aa50ab9cc7994b16cf13e4c73af80f0098f1bea rpc/util: multisig: only check redeemScript size is <= 520 for P2SH (Antoine Poinsot)
063df9e89730fd2c92646577e2fab894e1692130 test/functional: standardness sanity checks for P2(W)SH multisig (Antoine Poinsot)
ae0429d3af6de48f6191f144dff4ad4ab672dcd6 script: allow up to 20 keys in wsh() descriptors (Antoine Poinsot)
9fc68faf35c700ae955af194dd7f8c1aee85a05b script: match multisigs with up to MAX_PUBKEYS_PER_MULTISIG keys (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
As described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20620 multisigs are currently limited to 16 keys in descriptors and RPC helpers, even for P2WSH and P2SH-P2WSH.
This adds support for multisig with up to 20 keys (which are already standard) for Segwit v0 context for descriptors (`wsh()`, `sh(wsh())`) and RPC helpers.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20620
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
re-utACK ebd4be43cc945e643f91d3a91007b5a35bbbd5a1
instagibbs:
re-ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20867/commits/ebd4be43cc945e643f91d3a91007b5a35bbbd5a1
Tree-SHA512: 36141f10a8288010d17d5c4fe8d24878bcd4533b88a8aba3a44fa8f74ceb3182d70fee01427e0ab7f53ce7fab46c88c1cd3ac3b18ab8a10bd4a6b8b74ed79e46
|
|
bitcoin.conf and files.md
54133c59b80ccac85eaebb0668cd2f0fe360b323 doc: add indexes/coinstats/db/ to files.md (Jon Atack)
5d1050f51647980b1204e3b44b319ab31948d11f doc: fix -coinstatsindex help, and test/rpc touchups (Jon Atack)
e041ee0a80e5f3e10301acf8512a18864af750cd doc: add coinstatsindex to bitcoin.conf (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 54133c59b80ccac85eaebb0668cd2f0fe360b323
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 54133c59b80ccac85eaebb0668cd2f0fe360b323
clarkmoody:
utACK 54133c5
Tree-SHA512: 1a7f3e89873b7dc79ec71d5d39e9e3e4977ce43cc4bee208ad55291bef1bb319a9d1c34ed84a87d6a803db983bdfd0af4d9f396cec0bec86b1701ebbb6f34378
|
|
|
|
c5bb142817c53c6a217163958b5d511f12171004 test: resolve bug in test/functional/interface_bitcoin_cli.py - Test -getinfo with -rpcwallet=unloaded wallet returns no balances (klementtan)
Pull request description:
I think there is a bug in this test case where the new value of `cli_get_info` is not asserted.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK c5bb142817c53c6a217163958b5d511f12171004
Tree-SHA512: 50c0c2c8fe63c95f951dee892fbacedf92208f47efe5ed481fbb255f15137c799d9200fa3ff31a442df0691248d7ff04d899842722c3032cd7f35553622ba38c
|
|
-getinfo with -rpcwallet=unloaded wallet returns no balances
|
|
5f96d7d22d8e05876c6fc014e70488699950fe38 rpc: gettxoutsetinfo rejects hash_serialized_2 for specific height (Fabian Jahr)
23fe50436be641d7417152adc683192649ba206a test: Add test for coinstatsindex behavior in reorgs (Fabian Jahr)
90c966b0f3cfbd6bce5883f46d8527c6853a86a2 rpc: Allow gettxoutsetinfo and getblockstats for stale blocks (Fabian Jahr)
b9362392aef2689bc106c20925859ede555d082b index, rpc: Add use_index option for gettxoutsetinfo (Fabian Jahr)
bb7788b121a30489bc81a1f46dde6a9b19ae4ec1 test: Test coinstatsindex robustness across restarts (Fabian Jahr)
e0938c29099635150014ffc9bb0cafa8049ec55a test: Add tests for block_info in gettxoutsetinfo (Fabian Jahr)
2501576eccb08af80471c7b7b843b189ad6758c0 rpc, index: Add verbose amounts tracking to Coinstats index (Fabian Jahr)
655d929836a71af23d2035d2e2e99ad8b8c340c3 test: add coinstatsindex getindexinfo coverage, improve current tests (Jon Atack)
ca01bb8d689f93e1c7669b0ba7a4994c0206dabd rpc: Add Coinstats index to getindexinfo (Fabian Jahr)
57a026c30fef3138bb8db46e6865acb9dc2674f8 test: Add unit test for Coinstats index (Fabian Jahr)
6a4c0c09ab4d073a26c3c4a02783d5dcd88f6eef test: Add functional test for Coinstats index (Fabian Jahr)
3f166ecc125fce6ccd995687fa16572090a5d099 rpc: gettxoutsetinfo can be requested for specific blockheights (Fabian Jahr)
3c914d58ff323255b32e717d0ce28209ec0abdaa index: Coinstats index can be activated with command line flag (Fabian Jahr)
dd58a4de21469d6d848ae309edc47f558628221d index: Add Coinstats index (Fabian Jahr)
a8a46c4b3cfda4b95c92a36f8cebd3606377e57d refactor: Simplify ApplyStats and ApplyHash (Fabian Jahr)
9c8a265fd21a87228c18a1661df99fedc1866baf refactor: Pass hash_type to CoinsStats in stats object (Fabian Jahr)
2e2648a9021dfbb6e17dfa81472f057dacbc34e0 crypto: Make MuHash Remove method efficient (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
This is part of the coinstats index project tracked in #18000
While the review of the new UTXO set hash algorithm (MuHash) takes longer recently #19328 was merged which added the possibility to run `gettxoutsetinfo` with a specific hash type. As the first type it added `hash_type=none` which skips the hashing of the UTXO set altogether. This alone did not make `gettxoutsetinfo` much faster but it allows the use of an index for the remaining coin statistics even before a new hashing algorithm has been added. Credit to Sjors for the idea to take this intermediate step.
Features summary:
- Users can start their node with the option `-coinstatsindex` which syncs the index in the background
- After the index is synced the user can use `gettxoutsetinfo` with `hash_type=none` or `hash_type=muhash` and will get the response instantly out of the index
- The user can specify a height or block hash when calling `gettxoutsetinfo` to see coin statistics at a specific block height
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-tACK 5f96d7d22d8e05876c6fc014e70488699950fe38
jonatack:
Code review re-ACK 5f96d7d22d8e05876c6fc014e70488699950fe38 per `git range-diff 13d27b4 07201d3 5f96d7d`
promag:
Tested ACK 5f96d7d22d8e05876c6fc014e70488699950fe38. Light code review ACK 5f96d7d22d8e05876c6fc014e70488699950fe38.
Tree-SHA512: cbca78bee8e9605c19da4fbcd184625fb280200718396c694a56c7daab6f44ad23ca9fb5456d09f245d8b8d9659fdc2b3f3ce5e953c1c6cf4003dbc74c0463c2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Never sleep for more than 5 seconds when waiting for an
inv-getdata exchange to time out.
|
|
|
|
This avoids code-bloat and accidentally forgetting to call it
|
|
new_tx is a reference to tx. To avoid confusion and code-bloat, remove it
|
|
fa40eb5b6bfd151912c58d61771f6a6528f44e67 test: Speed up mempool_spend_coinbase.py (MarcoFalke)
fa29382ab23d52b86bfda8a267195b6c51b713c2 test: Fix test cache issue (MarcoFalke)
fa085b470a9647f3b261f506b46f4e7ca2baf0b0 test: Create MiniWallet.create_self_transfer (MarcoFalke)
fa1bedb4944b513a3c9184ad549f58bfbe69e20e test: Add MiniWallet.sendrawtransaction (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Locally the test will run 4 seconds faster with `--valgrind` (18s vs 14s)
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
crACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21762/commits/fa40eb5b6bfd151912c58d61771f6a6528f44e67
Tree-SHA512: ecfb60dda5ca5d7e6367bb9c6210390d95ebf6396ce657728901d118b75bb90c98f9351df3b01004d00682234448d6c6a13338d12097f7dced2cf7f1bd84d924
|
|
faa51ef4d33034f8c14cfd18f1c01c90883a1bb4 test: Fix intermittent issue in p2p_addr_relay.py (MarcoFalke)
fa37116c820f6a84642d57ce709a5977fd5616c4 test: Use self.send_addr_msg (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21707/files#r621048952
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
ACK faa51ef4d33034f8c14cfd18f1c01c90883a1bb4
amitiuttarwar:
ACK faa51ef4d33034f8c14cfd18f1c01c90883a1bb4
Tree-SHA512: b1fbc1a4a13b020890b465083a82762981de17dd710388c651353aefc28dee23d39803c2a1dadbf88287e92598901afcb01b488115b0fecd746ab6d73775415b
|
|
Note that it also test for sortedmulti(), which the previous commit didn't.
Signed-off-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84934bf70e11fe4cda1cfda60113a54895d4fdd5 multiprocess: Add echoipc RPC method and test (Russell Yanofsky)
7d76cf667eff512043a28d4407cc89f58796c42b multiprocess: Add comments and documentation (Russell Yanofsky)
ddf7ecc8dfc64cf121099fb047e1ac871de94f4c multiprocess: Add bitcoin-node process spawning support (Russell Yanofsky)
10afdf0280fa93bfffb0a7665c60dc155cd84514 multiprocess: Add Ipc interface implementation (Russell Yanofsky)
745c9cebd50fea1664efef571dc1ee1bddc96102 multiprocess: Add Ipc and Init interface definitions (Russell Yanofsky)
5d62d7f6cd48bbc4e9f37ecc369f38d5e1e0036c Update libmultiprocess library (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
---
This PR adds basic process spawning and IPC method call support to `bitcoin-node` executables built with `--enable-multiprocess`[*].
These changes are used in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10102 to let node, gui, and wallet functionality run in different processes, and extended in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19460 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19461 after that to allow gui and wallet processes to be started and stopped independently and connect to the node over a socket.
These changes can also be used to implement new functionality outside the `bitcoin-node` process like external indexes or pluggable transports (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18988). The `Ipc::spawnProcess` and `Ipc::serveProcess` methods added here are entry points for spawning a child process and serving a parent process, and being able to make bidirectional, multithreaded method calls between the processes. A simple example of this is implemented in commit "Add echoipc RPC method and test."
Changes in this PR aside from the echo test were originally part of #10102, but have been split and moved here for easier review, and so they can be used for other applications like external plugins.
Additional notes about this PR can be found at https://bitcoincore.reviews/19160
[*] Note: the `--enable-multiprocess` feature is still experimental, and not enabled by default, and not yet supported on windows. More information can be found in [doc/multiprocess.md](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/multiprocess.md)
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK 84934bf70e11fe4cda1cfda60113a54895d4fdd5
ariard:
ACK 84934bf. Changes since last ACK fixes the silent merge conflict about `EnsureAnyNodeContext()`. Rebuilt and checked again debug command `echoipc`.
Tree-SHA512: 52a948b5e18a26d7d7a09b83003eaae9b1ed2981978c36c959fe9a55abf70ae6a627c4ff913a3428be17400a3dace30c58b5057fa75c319662c3be98f19810c6
|
|
d831e711cab83c70bf2ded62fe33f484844e73dd [validation] RewindBlockIndex no longer needed (Dhruv Mehta)
Pull request description:
Closes #17862
Context from [original comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17862#issuecomment-744285188) (minor edits):
`RewindBlockIndex()` is a mechanism to allow nodes to be upgraded after segwit activation, while still keeping their chainstate/datadir in a consistent state. It works as follows:
- A pre-segwit (i.e. v0.13.0 or older) node is running.
- Segwit activates. The pre-segwit node remains sync'ed to the tip, but is not enforcing the new segwit rules.
- The user upgrades the node to a segwit-aware version (v0.13.1 or newer).
- On startup, in `AppInitMain()`, `RewindBlockIndex()` is called. This walks the chain backwards from the tip, disconnecting and erasing blocks that from after segwit activation that weren't validated with segwit rules.
- those blocks are then redownloaded (with witness data) and validated with segwit rules.
This logic probably isn't required any more since:
- Segwit activated at height 481824, when the block chain was 130GB and the total number of txs was 250 million. Today, we're at height 667704, the blockchain is over 315GB and the total number of txs is over 600 million. Even if 20% of that added data is witness data (a high estimate), then around 150GB of transactions would need to be rewound to get back to segwit activation height. It'd probably be faster to simply validate from genesis, especially since we won't be validating any scripts before the assumevalid block. It's also unclear whether rewinding 150GB of transactions would even work. It's certainly never been tested.
- Bitcoin Core v0.13 is hardly used any more. https://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/software.html shows less than 50 nodes running it. The software was EOL on Aug 1st 2018. It's very unlikely that anyone is running 0.13 and will want to upgrade to 0.22.
This PR introduces `NeedsRedownload()` which merely checks for insufficiently validated segwit blocks and requests that the user restarts the node with `-reindex`. Reindexing the block files upon restart will make the node rebuild chain state and block index from the `blk*.dat` files on disk. The node won't be able to index the blocks with `BLOCK_OPT_WITNESS`, so they will be missing from the chain and be re-downloaded, with witness data.
Removing this code allows the following (done in follow-up #21090):
- removal of tests using `segwitheight=-1` in `p2p_segwit.py`.
- in turn, that allows us to drop support for `-segwitheight=-1`, which is only supported for that test.
- that allows us to always set `NODE_WITNESS` in our local services. The only reason we don't do that is to support `-segwitheight=-1`.
- that in turn allows us to drop all of the `GetLocalServices() & NODE_WITNESS` checks inside `net_processing.cpp`, since our local services would always include `NODE_WITNESS`
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK d831e711cab83c70bf2ded62fe33f484844e73dd
jamesob:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21009/commits/d831e711cab83c70bf2ded62fe33f484844e73dd
laanwj:
Cursory code review ACK d831e711cab83c70bf2ded62fe33f484844e73dd. Agree with the direction of the change, thanks for simplifying the logic here.
glozow:
utACK d831e711cab83c70bf2ded62fe33f484844e73dd
Tree-SHA512: 3eddf5121ccd081ad7f15a5c6478ef867083edc8ba0bf1ee759e87bc070ee3d2f0698a3feba8db8dc087987c8452887b6f72cff05b3e178f41cb10a515fb8053
|
|
This value is no longer used and is instead specified statically
in chainparams. This change means that previously generated
snapshots will no longer be usable.
|
|
issue
fa4aec2b26696cc16dc44c6425f7dca3ef91c8ee test: Fix feature_notifications.py intermittent issue (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Fixes #21683
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 256806d82877477f4b3d795658f61127c0de4eff07216f6071f40a8ec1f5d43f3c587f35dd436d480dc261ef6646ac5547db104d22f3fcfeeb61bbdbe04bcc31
|
|
a732ee353c1922a1f9ca082775884d190893e0e9 [test] Add tests for addr relay in -blocksonly mode (Amiti Uttarwar)
a6694eaed8f86a6ad79689bbcbfdbed4d73327c9 [test] Add address relay tests involving outbound peers (Martin Zumsande)
8188b77c17d78bf608cb41978db4d0f46e91f7d8 [test] Add tests for getaddr behavior (Martin Zumsande)
d2dbfe6ff1806e5248399b28a7a1a22dab726c40 [test] Extract sending an addr message into a helper (Amiti Uttarwar)
c9919433994924931757aa7ec278c50744ede35d [test] Refactor the addr relay test to prepare for new tests (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
This extends the functional test `p2p_addr_relay.py`.
It adds test coverage for address relay involving outbound peers, tests for both outgoing and incoming `GETADDR` requests and tests for `-blocksonly` mode.
The initial refactors and some of the new tests were taken from Amiti Uttarwar's PR #21528 - they are general test improvements not directly tied to the change proposed there.
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
re-ACK a732ee353c, small diff based on code review
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK a732ee353c1922a1f9ca082775884d190893e0e9 🌊
Tree-SHA512: e80d52683808ddd6b948a5134239f002f3fecf61b60e187877b07be6251721fde847104e495c75a1a5133a09c0b41a9255a0bec82932c0b304b516fa89bce33e
|
|
|
|
Updates permissions on files to comply with the new test added in the following commit
|
|
Add simple interfaces::Echo IPC interface with one method that just takes and
returns a string, to test multiprocess framework and provide an example of how
it can be used to spawn and call between processes.
|
|
|
|
The documentation did not match the implementation, no coins
were mined to the OP_TRUE address.
|
|
|
|
Can be reviewed with --ignore-all-space --color-moved=dimmed-zebra
|
|
reasons in feature_cltv.py (BIP 65)
b01cd9471f435bb36b8ed5211a56baad51111ad2 test: check that _all_ invalid-CLTV txs are rejected after BIP65 activation (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dbc19814743cb12960a99793197c811e2750a06b test: check that _all_ invalid-CLTV txs are allowed in a block pre-BIP65 (Sebastian Falbesoner)
8d0ce50c4826529a2d30ffc850bce4d44da6019b test: prepare cltv_invalidate to test all failure reasons in feature_cltv.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
ce994e1202c4820b1ad5c375d3d671fd0a18e092 test: add tx modfication helper function in feature_cltv.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The functional test for [BIP65](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0065.mediawiki) / `OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY` (`feature_cltv.py`) currently only tests one out of five conditions that lead to failure of the op-code -- by prepending the script `OP_1NEGATE OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY OP_DROP` to a tx's first input's scriptSig, the case of "_the top item on the stack is less than 0_" is checked:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/f8462a6d2794be728cf8550f45d19a354aae59cf/test/functional/feature_cltv.py#L26-L35
This PR adds the other cases (5 in total) by taking an integer argument to the function `cltv_invalidate` that is called in a loop instead of only once per testing scenario. Here is the full list of failure conditions and how they are tested (note that the scriptSig should still be valid before activation of BIP65, when `OP_CLTV` is simply a no-op):
* _the stack is empty_
➡️ prepending `OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY` to scriptSig
* _the top item on the stack is less than 0_
➡️ prepending `OP_1NEGATE OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY OP_DROP` to scriptSig
* _the lock-time type (height vs. timestamp) of the top stack item and the nLockTime field are not the same_
➡️ prepending `OPNum(1000) OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY OP_DROP` to scriptSig
➡️ setting tx.vin[0].nSequence=0 and tx.nCheckTimeLock=1296688602 (genesis block timestamp)
* _the top stack item is greater than the transaction's nLockTime field_
➡️ prepending `OPNum(1000) OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY OP_DROP` to scriptSig
➡️ setting tx.vin[0].nSequence=0 and tx.nCheckTimeLock=500
* _the nSequence field of the txin is 0xffffffff_
➡️ prepending `OPNum(500) OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY OP_DROP` to scriptSig
➡️ setting tx.vin[0].nSequence=0xffffffff and tx.nCheckTimeLock=500
The first commit creates a helper function for the tx modification and also includes some tidying up like turning single-line to multi-line Python imports where necessary and cleaning up some PEP8 warnings. The second commit prepares the invalidation function `cltv_invalidate` and the third and the fourth use it and check for the expected reject reason strings ("Operation not valid with the current stack size", "Negative locktime" and "Locktime requirement not satisfied").
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK b01cd9471f435bb36b8ed5211a56baad51111ad2 🐣
Tree-SHA512: dd82ae86e2bc4f3ab9bb1cfc9f04e4431b2b59c8aaf2a9f4b28654a1577e003fb43c500f99d76ff57e96262168e1cad7c1a0d71158e4b01063737e8f4be1e07d
|
|
Instead of rewinding blocks, we request that the user restarts with
-reindex
|
|
Co-Authored-By: Martin Zumsande <mzumsande@gmail.com>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Amiti Uttarwar <amiti@uttarwar.org>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Amiti Uttarwar <amiti@uttarwar.org>
|
|
Also reduces mocktime to prevent idle disconnects
Co-Authored-By: Martin Zumsande <mzumsande@gmail.com>
|
|
Moves setting up the addr message into a repeatable function, and breaks up the
existing tests into separate functions for legibility.
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Sjors Provoost <sjors@sprovoost.nl>
|
|
|
|
|
|
This additional data will automatically be returned if the coinstats index is used.
|
|
|