| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e2ff385e138562fb3e1cc63bdd58715a2d8bad98 test: check for invalid `-prune` parameters (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This small PR adds missing test coverage for invalid `-prune` parameter values / combinations:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/77e23ca945030d557559a7391cb8bd368693548c/src/init.cpp#L926-L928
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/77e23ca945030d557559a7391cb8bd368693548c/src/init.cpp#L935-L937
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/77e23ca945030d557559a7391cb8bd368693548c/src/init.cpp#L844-L849
Not sure if the tests fit into `feature_config_args.py` or should rather be moved into `feature_pruning.py`; the latter though seems to be run less often due to being very memory-hungry.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK e2ff385e138562fb3e1cc63bdd58715a2d8bad98
Tree-SHA512: bb0db98090058ecac9f8a01301634e9dba9a65fd56b6a0b770f88da28c4f01e240e22b1225f0d231e28bdd4b5b51bff0e6853cccc46ed0190e91b84f7954a9db
|
|
|
|
ApproximateBestSubset
92885c4f69a5e6fc4989677d6e5be8a666fbff0d test: Test for ApproximateBestSubset edge case with too little fees (Andrew Chow)
d9262324e80da32725e21d4e0fbfee56f25490b1 wallet: Assert that enough was selected to cover the fees (Andrew Chow)
2de222c40198d3d528668d78cc52e2ce3fa96765 wallet: Use GetSelectionAmount for target value calculations (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The `m_value` used for the target calculation in `ApproximateBestSubset` is incorrect, it should be `GetSelectionAmount`. This causes a bug that is only apparent when the minimum relay fee is set to be very high.
A test case is added for this, in addition to an assert in `CreateTransactionInternal` that would have also caught this issue if someone were able to hit the edge case.
Fixes #22670
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22686/commits/92885c4f69a5e6fc4989677d6e5be8a666fbff0d
Tree-SHA512: bd61fa61ffb60873e097737eebea3afe8a42296ba429de9038b3a4706763b34de9409de6cdbab21ff7f51f4787b503f840873182d9c4a1d6e12a54b017953547
|
|
5fe8100ff36fed6d50c2a25b028f57b25af3504c Change the wallet_backup.py test to use the restorewallet RPC command instead of restoring wallets manually. (lsilva01)
ae23faba6fc5cabc896f1175456d1018576f912d Add a new RPC command: restorewallet (lsilva01)
Pull request description:
As far as I know, there is no command to restore the wallet from a backup file.
The only way to do this is to replace the `wallet.dat` of a newly created wallet with the backup file, which is hardly an intuitive way.
This PR implements the `restorewallet` RPC command which restores the wallet from the backup file.
To test:
First create a backup file:
`$ bitcoin-cli -rpcwallet="wallet-01" backupwallet /home/Backups/wallet-01.bak`
Then restore it in another wallet:
`$ bitcoin-cli restorewallet "restored-wallet-01" /home/Backups/wallet-01.bak`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 5fe8100ff36fed6d50c2a25b028f57b25af3504c
prayank23:
tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/5fe8100ff36fed6d50c2a25b028f57b25af3504c
meshcollider:
utACK 5fe8100ff36fed6d50c2a25b028f57b25af3504c
Tree-SHA512: 9639df4d8ad32f255f5b868320dc69878bd9aceb3b471b49dfad500b67681e2d354292b5410982fbf18e25a44ed0c06fd4a0dd010e82807c2e00ff32e84047a1
|
|
d930c7f5b091687eb4208a5ffe8a2abe311d8054 p2p, rpc, test: address rate-limiting follow-ups (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Incorporates review feedback in #22387.
Edit, could be considered separately: should a release note (or two) be added for 22.0? e.g. the new getpeerinfo fields in `Updated RPCs` and the rate-limiting itself in `P2P and network changes`.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK d930c7f5b091687eb4208a5ffe8a2abe311d8054
theStack:
re-ACK d930c7f5b091687eb4208a5ffe8a2abe311d8054 🌮
Zero-1729:
crACK d930c7f
Tree-SHA512: b2101cad87f59c238603f38bd8e8df7a4d48929794e4de9e0e0ff2afa935a68475c2d369aa669d124a0bec2f50280fb47e8b980bde6ad812db08cf67b71c066a
|
|
ApproximateBestSubset had an edge case (due to not using
GetSelectionAmount) where it was possible for it to return success but
fail to select enough to cover transaction fees. A test is added that
could trigger this failure prior to the fix being implemented.
|
|
instead of restoring wallets manually.
|
|
tests
fafe896a0b870d85250927bd5374caf73d379468 test: Set regtest.BIP66Height = 102 to speed up tests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
No need to waste time by forcing creation of more than 1000 blocks to get the benefits of being able to test BIP 66. Also, reducing the height makes it more likely that (third-party) tests are conforming to BIP 66, which is enforced on mainnet for all new blocks.
ACKs for top commit:
GeneFerneau:
Concept + code review ACK [fafe896](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22632/commits/fafe896a0b870d85250927bd5374caf73d379468)
0xB10C:
crACK fafe896a0b870d85250927bd5374caf73d379468
laanwj:
ACK fafe896a0b870d85250927bd5374caf73d379468
Zero-1729:
tACK fafe896
kristapsk:
ACK fafe896a0b870d85250927bd5374caf73d379468. Full functional test suite showed few second speed incrase on my laptop (although I didn't do proper benchmarking with multiple runs, just single `time ./test/functional/test_runner.py` on current master vs this PR).
theStack:
Tested ACK fafe896a0b870d85250927bd5374caf73d379468
hg333:
tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/fafe896a0b870d85250927bd5374caf73d379468
Tree-SHA512: 4bbee3c8587d612e74a59fde49b6439c1296f2fc27d3a7cf59a35e920f729fdd581c930290bd04def618f81412236676ddb99b4ceb4d80dfb9fd610b128a04b1
|
|
limits for packages
accf3d5868460b4b14ab607fd66ac985b086fbb3 [test] mempool package ancestor/descendant limits (glozow)
2b6b26e57c24d2f0abd442c1c33098e3121572ce [test] parameterizable fee for make_chain and create_child_with_parents (glozow)
313c09f7b7beddfdb74c284720d209c81dfdb94f [test] helper function to increase transaction weight (glozow)
f8253d69d6f02850995a11eeb71fedc22e6f6575 extract/rename helper functions from rpc_packages.py (glozow)
3cd663a5d33aa7ef87994e452bced7f192d021a0 [policy] ancestor/descendant limits for packages (glozow)
c6e016aa139c8363e9b38bbc1ba0dca55700b8a7 [mempool] check ancestor/descendant limits for packages (glozow)
f551841d3ec080a2d7a7988c7b35088dff6c5830 [refactor] pass size/count instead of entry to CalculateAncestorsAndCheckLimits (glozow)
97dd1c729d2bbedf9527b914c0cc8267b8a7c21b MOVEONLY: add helper function for calculating ancestors and checking limits (glozow)
f95bbf58aaf72aab8a9c5827b1f162f3b8ac38f4 misc package validation doc improvements (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR implements a function to calculate mempool ancestors for a package and enforces ancestor/descendant limits on them as a whole. It reuses a portion of `CalculateMemPoolAncestors()`; there's also a small refactor to move the reused code into a generic helper function. Instead of calculating ancestors and descendants on every single transaction in the package and their ancestors, we use a "worst case" heuristic, treating every transaction in the package as each other's ancestor and descendant. This may overestimate everyone's counts, but is still pretty accurate in the our main package use cases, in which at least one of the transactions in the package is directly related to all the others (e.g. 1 parent + 1 child, multiple parents with 1 child, or chains).
Note on Terminology: While "package" is often used to describe groups of related transactions _within_ the mempool, here, I only use package to mean the group of not-in-mempool transactions we are currently validating.
#### Motivation
It would be a potential DoS vector to allow submission of packages to mempool without a proper guard for mempool ancestors/descendants. In general, the purpose of mempool ancestor/descendant limits is to limit the computational complexity of dealing with families during removals and additions. We want to be able to validate multiple transactions on top of the mempool, but also avoid these scenarios:
- We underestimate the ancestors/descendants during package validation and end up with extremely complex families in our mempool (potentially a DoS vector).
- We expend an unreasonable amount of resources calculating everyone's ancestors and descendants during package validation.
ACKs for top commit:
JeremyRubin:
utACK accf3d5
ariard:
ACK accf3d5.
Tree-SHA512: 0d18ce4b77398fe872e0b7c2cc66d3aac2135e561b64029584339e1f4de2a6a16ebab3dd5784f376e119cbafc4d50168b28d3bd95d0b3d01158714ade2e3624d
|
|
descriptors
bb822a7af86897a9b6a5d616f193c258e8e76729 wallet, rpc: add listdescriptors private option (S3RK)
Pull request description:
Rationale: make it possible to backup your wallet with `listdescriptors` command
* The default behaviour is still to show public version
* For private version only the root xprv is returned
Example use-case:
```
> bitcoin-cli -regtest -named createwallet wallet_name=old descriptors=true
> bitcoin-cli -regtest -rpcwallet=old listdescriptors true | jq '.descriptors' > descriptors.txt
> bitcoin-cli -regtest -named createwallet wallet_name=new descriptors=true blank=true
> bitcoin-cli -regtest -rpcwallet=new importdescriptors "$(cat descriptors.txt)"
```
In case of watch-only wallet without private keys there will be following output:
```
error code: -4
error message:
Can't get descriptor string.
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK bb822a7af86897a9b6a5d616f193c258e8e76729
Rspigler:
tACK bb822a7af86897a9b6a5d616f193c258e8e76729
jonatack:
ACK bb822a7af86897a9b6a5d616f193c258e8e76729 per `git diff 2854ddc bb822a7`
prayank23:
tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21500/commits/bb822a7af86897a9b6a5d616f193c258e8e76729
meshcollider:
Code review ACK bb822a7af86897a9b6a5d616f193c258e8e76729
Tree-SHA512: f6dddc72a74e5667071ccd77f8dce578382e8e29e7ed6a0834ac2e114a6d3918b59c2f194f4079b3259e13d9ba3b4f405619940c3ecb7a1a0344615aed47c43d
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MOVEONLY; no change in behavior. Rename because there is another helper
funciton in chain_transaction in test_framework.util.py
|
|
hex-string conversion in functional test framework
5a1bef60a03b57de708a1a751bd90b8245fd8b83 test: refactor: remove binascii from test_framework (Zero-1729)
Pull request description:
This PR continues the work started in PR #22593, regarding using the `bytes` built-in module. In this PR specifically, instances of `binascii`'s methods `hexlify`, `unhexlify`, and `a2b_hex` have been replaced with the build-in `bytes` module's `hex` and `fromhex` methods where appropriate to make bytes <-> hex-string conversions consistent across the functional test files and test_framework.
Additionally, certain changes made are based on the following assumption:
```
bytes.hex(data) == binascii.hexlify(data).decode()
bytes.hex(data).encode() == binascii.hexlify(data)
```
Ran the functional tests to ensure behaviour is still consistent and changes didn't break existing tests.
closes #22605
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK 5a1bef60a03b57de708a1a751bd90b8245fd8b83 🔢
Tree-SHA512: 8f28076cf0580a0d02a156f3e1e94c9badd3d41c3fbdfb2b87cd8a761dde2c94faa5f4c448d6747b1ccc9111c3ef1a1d7b42a11c806b241fa0410b7529e2445f
|
|
|
|
And fix a typo in the test.
|
|
|
|
|
|
91b05974fc1ea38062f12d36152201af81bda1a2 Improve mempool_accept_wtxid.py (naiza)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #22253 adding changes suggested in [#22253 (review)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22253#discussion_r666933370)
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
utACK 91b05974fc1ea38062f12d36152201af81bda1a2
Tree-SHA512: 383064138a5b2160d769c9df370470fd585c91682083013a6fa15e14448a4b481bc09b3a0ed6e75554db2c378df6b2263c65f209f973c9e9d577e15814a4be1d
|
|
222290f54388270937cb6c174195717e2214ec0d test: Set BIP34Height = 2 for regtest (MarcoFalke)
fac90c55be478f0323eafa1d560ea2c56f04fb23 test: Create all blocks with version 4 or higher (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
BIP34 is active on the current tip of mainnet, so all miners must obey it. It would be nice if it also was active in fresh regtest instances from the earliest time possible.
I changed the BIP34 height to `2`, so that the block at height=1 may be used to mine a duplicate coinbase. (Needed to test mainnet behaviour)
This pull is done in two commits:
* test: Create all blocks with version 4 or higher:
Now that BIP34 is activated earlier, we need to create blocks with a higher version number. Just bump it to 4 instead of 2 to avoid having to bump it again later.
* test: Set BIP34Height = 2 for regtest:
This fixes the BIP34 implementation in the tests (to match the one of the Core codebase) and updates the tests where needed
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 222290f54388270937cb6c174195717e2214ec0d
jonatack:
ACK 222290f54388270937cb6c174195717e2214ec0d tested and reviewed rebased to current master 5e213822f86d
theStack:
Tested ACK 222290f54388270937cb6c174195717e2214ec0d
Tree-SHA512: d69c637a62a64b8e87de8c7f0b305823d8f4d115c1852514b923625dbbcf9a4854b5bb3771ff41702ebf47c4c182a4442c6d7c0b9f282c95a34b83e56a73939b
|
|
82b6f89819e55af26f5264678e0f93052934bcb3 [style] Small style improvements to DNS parameters (Amiti Uttarwar)
4c89e24f64c1dc1a56a3bcb6b5e2b4fb95e8b29f [test] Test the delay before querying DNS seeds (Amiti Uttarwar)
6395c8ed5689ea72e9a1618f14551775246f6361 [test] Test the interactions between -forcednsseed and -dnsseed (Amiti Uttarwar)
6f6b7df6bdcf863af160c0426e3a22028ca8259a [init] Disallow starting up with conflicting paramters for -dnsseed and -forcednsseed (Amiti Uttarwar)
26d0ffe4f2573e0297c9b0e095c2a0868929b08b [test] Test -forcednsseed causes querying DNS seeds (Amiti Uttarwar)
35851450a928ffacca240fadbf1747a42d5ba256 [test] Test the interactions between -connect and -dnsseed (Amiti Uttarwar)
75c05af361552eeecd100cee8cc40d4cd5a3aa27 [test] Test logic to query DNS seeds with block-relay-only connections (Amiti Uttarwar)
9c0871977839c28636eff975748182888299cd2b [test] Introduce test logic to query DNS seeds (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a DNS seed to the regtest chain params to enable testing the DNS seed querying logic of `CConnman::ThreadDNSAddressSeed` and relevant startup parameters. Adds coverage for the changes in #22013 (and then some).
The main behavioral change to bitcoind is that this PR disallows starting up with conflicting parameters for `-dnsseed` and `-forcednsseed`.
The tests include:
* parameter interactions of different combinations of `-connect`, `-dnsseed` and `-forcednsseed`
* the delay before querying DNS seeds depending on how many addresses are in the addrman
* the behavior of `-forcednsseed`
* skipping DNS querying if we have outbound full relay connections & not block-relay-only connections
Huge props to mzumsande for identifying the timing technique for testing successful connections before running `ThreadDNSAddressSeed` 🙌🏽
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
ACK 82b6f89819e55af26f5264678e0f93052934bcb3
jnewbery:
reACK 82b6f89819e55af26f5264678e0f93052934bcb3
Tree-SHA512: 9f0c29bfbf99426727e79c0a25606ae09deab91a92e3c5cee7f84c3ca7503a8ac9ab85a85c51841d40b164ef8c991326070f0b2f41d075fb7985df26f6e95d6d
|
|
3f7250b328b8b2f5d63f323702445ac5c989b73d [test] Use the new endpoint to improve tests (Amiti Uttarwar)
3893da06db1eb622f540605700f8663f8d87b2df [RPC] Add field to getpeerinfo to indicate if addr relay is enabled (Amiti Uttarwar)
0980ca78cd930a00c9985d7f00083a3b8e8be89e [test] Test that we intentionally select addr relay peers. (Amiti Uttarwar)
c061599e40dc3d379c10b914765061a7a8449dd7 [net_processing] Remove RelayAddrsWithPeer function (Amiti Uttarwar)
201e4964816f8896cfe7b4f6d8ddbfffe7102f87 [net_processing] Introduce new field to indicate if addr relay is enabled (Amiti Uttarwar)
1d1ef2db7ea0d93c7dab4a9800ec74afa7a019eb [net_processing] Defer initializing m_addr_known (Amiti Uttarwar)
6653fa3328b5608fcceda1c6ea8e68c5d58739ec [test] Update p2p_addr_relay test to prepare (Amiti Uttarwar)
2fcaec7bbb96d6fe72a7e3a5744b0c35c79733e8 [net_processing] Introduce SetupAddressRelay (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
This PR builds on the test refactors extracted into #22306 (first 5 commits).
This PR aims to reduce addr blackholes. When we receive an `addr` message that contains 10 or less addresses, we forward them to 1-2 peers. This is the main technique we use for self advertisements, so sending to peers that wouldn't relay would effectively "blackhole" the trickle. Although we cannot prevent this in a malicious case, we can improve it for the normal, honest cases, and reduce the overall likelihood of occurrence. Two known cases where peers would not participate in addr relay are if they have connected to you as a block-relay-only connection, or if they are a light client.
This implementation defers initialization of `m_addr_known` until it is needed, then uses its presence to decide if the peer is participating in addr relay. For outbound (not block-relay-only) peers, we initialize the filter before sending the initial self announcement when processing their `version` message. For inbound peers, we initialize the filter if/when we get an addr related message (`ADDR`, `ADDRV2`, `GETADDR`). We do NOT initialize the filter based on a `SENDADDRV2` message.
To communicate about these changes beyond bitcoin core & to (try to) ensure that no other software would be disrupted, I have:
- Posted to the [mailing list](https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-April/018784.html)
- Researched other open source clients to confirm compatibility, opened issues in all the projects & documented in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21528#issuecomment-809906430. Many have confirmed that this change would not be problematic.
- Raised as topic during [bitcoin-core-dev meeting](https://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2021-03-25.html#l-954)
- Raised as topic during [bitcoin p2p meeting](https://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2021-04-20.html#l-439)
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
reACK 3f7250b328b8b2f5d63f323702445ac5c989b73d
glozow:
ACK 3f7250b328b8b2f5d63f323702445ac5c989b73d
ajtowns:
utACK 3f7250b328b8b2f5d63f323702445ac5c989b73d
Tree-SHA512: 29069282af684c1cd37d107c395fdd432dcccb11626f3c2dabfe92fdc4c85e74c7c4056fbdfa88017fec240506639b72ac6c311f8ce7c583112eb15f47e421af
|
|
Improve mempool_accept_wtxid.py
Improve mempool_accept_wtxid.py
Improve mempool_accept_wtxid.py
Improve mempool_accept_wtxid.py
|
|
607076d01bf23c69ac21950c17b01fb4e1130774 test: remove confusing `MAX_BLOCK_BASE_SIZE` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
4af97c74edcda56cd15523bf3a335adea2bad14a test: introduce `get_weight()` helper for CBlock (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a084ebe1330bcec15715e08b0f65319142927ad1 test: introduce `get_weight()` helper for CTransaction (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This is a very late follow-up PR to #10618, which removed the constant `MAX_BLOCK_BASE_SIZE` from the core implementation about four years ago (see also #10608 in why it was considered confusing and superfluous).
Since there is also no point in still keeping it in the functional test framework, the PR switches to weight-based accounting on the relevant test code parts and use `MAX_BLOCK_WEIGHT` instead for the block limit checks. To prepare that, the first two commits introduce `get_weight()` helpers for the classes CTransaction and CBlock, respectively.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 607076d01bf23c69ac21950c17b01fb4e1130774 🚴
Tree-SHA512: d59aa0b6b3dfd0a849b8063e66de275d252f705f99e25cd3bf6daec028b47d946777ee5b42a060f5283cb18e917ac073119c2c0e11bbc21211f69ef0a6ed335a
|
|
Use the built-in class method bytes.fromhex() instead,
which is available since Python 3.0.
|
|
(s/witness_program/witness_script/)
8a2b58db9ee6a14d36b5d8e430b35f18e7c7b0c5 test: fix segwit terminology (s/witness_program/witness_script/) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes wrong uses of the term "witness program", which according to [BIP141](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0141.mediawiki#Witness_program) is defined as follows:
> A scriptPubKey (or redeemScript as defined in BIP16/P2SH) that consists of a 1-byte push opcode (for 0 to 16) followed by a data push between 2 and 40 bytes gets a new special meaning. The value of the first push is called the "version byte". **The following byte vector pushed is called the "witness program".**
In most cases where "witness program" is used in tests (concerns comments, variable names and in one instance even a function name) what we really want to denote is the "witness script". Thanks to [MarcoFalke for pointing this out in a review comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22363#discussion_r666794261)!
Some historical background: At the time when the P2P segwit tests were first introduced (commit 330b0f31ee5719d94f9e52dfc83c5d82168241f9, PR #8149), the term "witness program" was not used consistently in BIP141: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/46451/what-is-the-precise-definition-of-witness-program
This was fixed in PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/416 later.
So in some way, this PR can be seen as a very late follow-up to the BIP141 fix that also reflects these changes in the tests.
ACKs for top commit:
josibake:
tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22429/commits/8a2b58db9ee6a14d36b5d8e430b35f18e7c7b0c5
Tree-SHA512: f36bb9e53d1b54b86bfa87ec12f33e3ebca64b5f59d97e9662fe35ba12c25e1c9a4f93a5425d0eaa3879dce9e50368d345555b927bfab76945511f873396892b
|
|
When starting up with a populated addrman, ThreadDNSAddressSeed adds a delay
during which time the node may be able to connect to some peers. This commit
tests the delay changes based on the number of addresses in the addrman.
|
|
Test that passing conflicting parameters for the two causes a startup error.
This logic also impacts -connect, which soft sets -dnsseed, so add a test for
that too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a node is able to properly shutdown, it will persist its block-relay-only
connections to the addrman. On startup, it will attempt to reconnect to these
anchors. Since block-relay-only connections do not participate in ADDR relay,
succesful connections are insufficient to skip querying the DNS seeds.
This test fails prior to the changes in #22013.
Co-authored-by: Martin Zumsande <mzumsande@gmail.com>
|
|
This commit introduces a DNS seed to the regest chain params in order to add
coverage to the DNS querying logic.
The first test checks that we do not query DNS seeds if we are able to
succesfully connect to 2 outbound connections. Since we participate in ADDR
relay with those connections, including sending a GETADDR message during the
VERSION handshake, querying the DNS seeds is unnecessary.
Co-authored-by: Martin Zumsande <mzumsande@gmail.com>
|
|
sub-test in feature_rbf.py
aa02c64540cd77199c2834549786b9bc91fd4bc9 test: use MiniWallet for simple doublespend test in feature_rbf.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
a3f6397c7390ca033311f2219094ac90f6e582f9 test: feature_rbf.py: make MiniWallet instance available for all sub-tests (Sebastian Falbesoner)
84c874794cc1e1aa48f2edf08c355ec2a5696cb6 test: remove unneeded initialization code in feature_rbf.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR's goal is to prepare the functional test `feature_rbf.py` for more MiniWallet usage. It first gets rid of unused initialization code (I guess that was needed at times when the nodes were still in IBD at the start of tests?), then makes the MiniWallet instance introduced in #22210 available for all sub-tests, and finally, uses that instance in the first sub-test `test_simple_doublespend`.
Note that the same idea of replacing the `make_utxo` calls with MiniWallet can be also applied to other sub-tests too; this just serves as a first proof-of-concept.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK aa02c64540cd77199c2834549786b9bc91fd4bc9 🌯
Tree-SHA512: 2902dd15d493d83b0790028c92d14fbd99ca05ace704c7011fb38261ce6517aeb810ef9f360fcb701d95887975b6a2911cfe538858d38fceb2c1c2a40afdbe6b
|
|
in the functional tests
8ca51af1ece371b6f1bdb88b96f16020cc787d13 test: Disable automatic connections by default (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
A node normally doesn't make automatic connections to peers in the functional tests because neither DNS seeds nor hardcoded peers are available on regtest. However, when random entries are inserted into addrman as part of a functional test (e.g. while testing addr relay), `ThreadOpenConnections` will periodically try to connect to them, resulting in log entries such as:
`[opencon] [net.cpp:400] [ConnectNode] trying connection 18.166.1.1:8333 lastseen=0.0hrs`
I don't think it's desirable that functional tests try to connect to random computers on the internet, aside from the possibility that at some point in time someone out there might actually answer in a way to ruin a test.
This PR fixes this problem by disabling `ThreadOpenConnections` by adding `-connect=0` to the default args, and adding exceptions only when needed for the test to pass.
ACKs for top commit:
tryphe:
Concept ACK, light code review ACK 8ca51af1ece371b6f1bdb88b96f16020cc787d13
Tree-SHA512: bcfb2de610e6c35a97a2bd7ad6267e968b1ac7529638d99276993cd5bc93ce9919d54e22d6dc84e1b02ecd626ab6554e201693552ea065c29794eece38c43f7d
|
|
assert on time and mediantime
ef5e9304cd407adab1563f24215da1b582274c20 test: update logging and docstring in rpc_blockchain.py (Jon Atack)
d548dc71e4849f638fccaea6be86ac4fa5304f01 test: replace magic values by constants in rpc_blockchain.py (Jon Atack)
78c361086fc0bf27612e8142bd33e05e37a36af6 test: assert on mediantime in getblockheader and getblockchaininfo (Jon Atack)
0a9129c588ab016eb0453b40a0cae918ca4aa6a2 test: assert on the value of getblockchaininfo#time (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #22407 improving test coverage per https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22407#pullrequestreview-702077013.
ACKs for top commit:
tryphe:
untested ACK ef5e9304cd407adab1563f24215da1b582274c20
Tree-SHA512: f746d56f430331bc6a2ea7ecd27b21b06275927966aacf1f1127d8d5fdfd930583cabe72e23df3adb2e005da904fc05dc573b8e5eaa2f86e0e193b89a17a5734
|
|
|
|
This test checks that we only relay addresses with inbound peers who have sent
us an addr related message. Uses a combination of GETADDR and ADDR to verify
when peers are eligible.
|
|
Use SetupAddressRelay to only initialize `m_addr_known` as needed. For outbound
peers, we initialize the filter before sending our self announcement (not
applicable for block-relay-only connections). For inbound peers, we initialize
the filter when we get an addr related message (ADDR, ADDRV2, GETADDR).
These changes intend to mitigate address blackholes. Since an inbound peer has
to send us an addr related message to become eligible as a candidate for addr
relay, this should reduce our likelihood of sending them self-announcements.
|
|
Use an init param to make clear whether a getaddr message should be sent when
the P2PConnection receives a version message. These changes are in preparation
for upcoming commits that modify the behavior of a bitcoind node and the test
framework.
|
|
fbeb8c43bc5bce131e15eb9e162ea457bfe2b83e test: add type annotations to util.get_rpc_proxy (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Split out from #22092 while we address the functional test failure.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22139/commits/fbeb8c43bc5bce131e15eb9e162ea457bfe2b83e
Tree-SHA512: 031ef8703202ae5271787719fc3fea8693574b2eb937ccf852875de95798d7fa3c39a8db7c91993d0c946b45d9b4d6de570bd1102e0344348784723bd84803a8
|
|
|
