| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
3e730bf90aaf53c41ff3a778f6aac15d163d1c0c zmq: Fix due to invalid argument and multiple notifiers (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
ZMQ initialization is interrupted if any notifier fails, and in that case all notifiers are destroyed. The notifier shutdown assumes that the initialization had occurred. This is not valid when there are multiple notifiers and any except the last fails to initialize.
Can be tested by running test/functional/interface_zmq.py from this branch with bitcoind from master.
Closes #17185.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 3e730bf90aaf53c41ff3a778f6aac15d163d1c0c, thanks for adding a test
Tree-SHA512: 5da710e97dcbaa94896d019e75162d470f6d381ee07c60e5b3e9db93d11e8f7ca9bf2c509efa4486199e88c96c3e720cc96b4e35b62725d4c7db8e8e9bf6e09d
|
|
8925df86c4df16b1070343fef8e4d238f3cc3bd1 doc: update release notes (Jon Atack)
8bb405bbadf11391ccba7b334b4cfe66dc85b390 test: getaddressinfo labels purpose deprecation test (Jon Atack)
60aba1f2f11529add115d963d05599130288ae28 rpc: simplify getaddressinfo labels, deprecate previous behavior (Jon Atack)
7851f14ccf2bcd1e9b2ad48e5e08881be06d9d21 rpc: incorporate review feedback from PR 17283 (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR builds on #17283 (now merged) and is followed by #17585.
It modifies the value returned by rpc getaddressinfo `labels` to an array of label name strings and deprecates the previous behavior of returning an array of JSON hash structures containing label `name` and address `purpose` key/value pairs.
before
```
"labels": [
{
"name": "DOUBLE SPEND",
"purpose": "receive"
}
```
after
```
"labels": [
"DOUBLE SPEND"
]
```
The deprecated behavior can be re-enabled by starting bitcoind with `-deprecatedrpc=labelspurpose`.
For context, see:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17283#issuecomment-554458001
- http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-12-13.html#l-425 (lines 425-427)
- http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-11-22.html#l-622
Reviewers: This PR may be tested manually by building, then running bitcoind with and without the `-deprecatedrpc=labelspurpose` flag while verifying the rpc getaddressinfo help text and `labels` output.
Next steps: deprecate the rpc getaddressinfo `label` field (EDIT: done in #17585) and add support for multiple labels per address. This PR will unblock those.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
reACK 8925df8
promag:
Code review ACK 8925df86c4df16b1070343fef8e4d238f3cc3bd1.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 8925df86c4df16b1070343fef8e4d238f3cc3bd1
Tree-SHA512: c2b717209996da32b6484de7bb8800e7048410f9ce6afdb3e02a6866bd4a8f2c730f905fca27b10b877b91cf407f546e69e8c4feb9cd934325a6c71c166bd438
|
|
091a876664af4427db670ea8244d713b1b840048 Test watchonly wallet bumpfee with PSBT return (Gregory Sanders)
e9b4f9419cc778b5164708991a55014abef6c5f9 bumpfee: Return PSBT when wallet has privkeys disabled (Gregory Sanders)
75a5e478b631d3d0821d003300c4eae3c8433973 Change bumpfee to use watch-only funds for legacy watchonly wallets (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
The main use-case here is for using with watch-only wallets with PSBT-signing cold wallets of all kinds.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 091a876664af4427db670ea8244d713b1b840048
Sjors:
Tested ACK 091a876664af4427db670ea8244d713b1b840048
meshcollider:
utACK 091a876664af4427db670ea8244d713b1b840048
Tree-SHA512: f7cf663e1af0b029e5c99eac88c5fdc3bc9e9a3841da8a608e8a9957e9bcf6a78864b8c2706fcaf78a480ffe11badd80c4fad29f97c0bb929e0470fafda5c22e
|
|
09502452bbbe21bb974f1de8cf53196373921ab9 IsUsedDestination should count any known single-key address (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
This plugs the privacy leak detailed at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17605, at least for the single-key case.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
Code Review ACK 09502452bbbe21bb974f1de8cf53196373921ab9
Tree-SHA512: e1d68281675f05072b3087171cba1df9416a69c9ccf70c72e8555e55eadda2d0fd339e5a894e3a3438ff94b9e3827fb19b8b701faade70c08756b19ff157ee0c
|
|
|
|
|
|
- change the value returned in the RPC getaddressinfo `labels` field to an array
of label name strings
- deprecate the previous behavior of returning a JSON hash structure containing
label `name` and address `purpose` key/value pairs
- update the relevant tests
|
|
3bd8db80d8d335ab63ece4f110b0fadd562e80b7 [validation] fix comments in CheckInputScripts() (John Newbery)
6f6465cefcd599c89c00f7b51f42a4b87a5ffb0b scripted-diff: [validation] Rename CheckInputs to CheckInputScripts (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
CheckInputs() used to check no double spends, scripts & sigs and amounts. Since
832e074, the double spend and amount checks
have been moved to CheckTxInputs(), and CheckInputs() now just validates
input scripts. Rename the function to CheckInputScripts().
Also fix incorrect comments.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 3bd8db80d8d335ab63ece4f110b0fadd562e80b7, did the rebase myself, checked the scripted diff 👡
promag:
ACK 3bd8db80d8d335ab63ece4f110b0fadd562e80b7 :trollface:
Tree-SHA512: 7b3f8597d210492798fb784ee8ea47ea6377519111190161c7cc34a967509013f4337304f52e9bedc97b7710de7b0ff8880e08cd7f867754567f82e7b02c794c
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Sjors Provoost <sjors@sprovoost.nl>
|
|
7d263571bee8c36fbe3c854b69c6f31cf1ee3b9b rpc: require second argument only for scantxoutset start action (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
It was reported on [IRC](http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-12-11.html#l-377) that `scantxoutset`'s API was broken in 0.19.0:
```
<belcher> i think scantxoutset may have been broken in bitcoin core 0.19 ? regardless of what parameters i run it with (e.g. "scantxoutset abort", "scantxoutset status") it just returns the help doc, according to the release notes the only change was https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16285/files but i dont see anything that wouldve broken it, it works fine in 0.18
<belcher> im on regtest, in case its important
<harding> I can confirm `scantxoutset abort` returns the help doc on latest master. Waiting for 0.18.1 to start now to attempt to reproduce there.
<harding> It looks like it's expecting a second parameter (even though that doesn't make sense with "abort").
<jonatack> Same for me as well
<harding> Can also confirm that `scantxoutset abort` returns the expected result on 0.18.1.
```
As noted in the conversation, previously, the second argument of `scanobjects` is only required for the `start` action. `Stop` and `abort` actions did not and could work without them.
It appears that this was broken by #16240 which enforced the size of the arguments to match the listed required arguments.
To fix this issue, this PR makes the `scanobjects` argument an optional argument. Then only in the `start` action do we check whether the `scanobjects` argument is there and throw an informative error about that. Also a test is added for this case.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7d263571bee8c36fbe3c854b69c6f31cf1ee3b9b
promag:
ACK 7d263571bee8c36fbe3c854b69c6f31cf1ee3b9b.
Tree-SHA512: 828bdfe47f4fffa5d00a2cf88db6cea4a2714d9c49276841ca5cbdd1603b87bb6862147b86edcf36d7b40314ddb80b1a07fd399faf288572c55cc788c5cf9526
|
|
2081442c421cc4376e5d7839f68fbe7630e89103 test: Add test for rpc_whitelist (Emil Engler)
7414d3820c833566b4f48c6c120a18bf53978c55 Add RPC Whitelist Feature from #12248 (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
Summary
====
This patch adds the RPC whitelisting feature requested in #12248. RPC Whitelists help enforce application policies for services being built on top of Bitcoin Core (e.g., your Lightning Node maybe shouldn't be adding new peers). The aim of this PR is not to make it advisable to connect your Bitcoin node to arbitrary services, but to reduce risk and prevent unintended access.
Using RPC Whitelists
====
The way it works is you specify (in your bitcoin.conf) configurations such as
```
rpcauth=user1:4cc74397d6e9972e5ee7671fd241$11849357f26a5be7809c68a032bc2b16ab5dcf6348ef3ed1cf30dae47b8bcc71
rpcauth=user2:181b4a25317bff60f3749adee7d6bca0$d9c331474f1322975fa170a2ffbcb176ba11644211746b27c1d317f265dd4ada
rpcauth=user3:a6c8a511b53b1edcf69c36984985e$13cfba0e626db19061c9d61fa58e712d0319c11db97ad845fa84517f454f6675
rpcwhitelist=user1:getnetworkinfo
rpcwhitelist=user2:getnetworkinfo,getwalletinfo, getbestblockhash
rpcwhitelistdefault=0
```
Now user1 can only call getnetworkinfo, user2 can only call getnetworkinfo or getwalletinfo, while user3 can still call all RPCs.
If any rpcwhitelist is set, act as if all users are subject to whitelists unless rpcwhitelistdefault is set to 0. If rpcwhitelistdefault is set to 1 and no rpcwhitelist is set, act as if all users are subject to whitelists.
Review Request
=====
In addition to normal review, would love specific review from someone working on LN (e.g., @ roasbeef) and someone working on an infrastructure team at an exchange (e.g., @ jimpo) to check that this works well with their system.
Notes
=====
The rpc list is spelling sensitive -- whitespace is stripped though. Spelling errors fail towards the RPC call being blocked, which is safer.
It was unclear to me if HTTPReq_JSONRPC is the best function to patch this functionality into, or if it would be better to place it in exec or somewhere else.
It was also unclear to me if it would be preferred to cache the whitelists on startup or parse them on every RPC as is done with multiUserAuthorized. I opted for the cached approach as I thought it was a bit cleaner.
Future Work
=====
In a future PR, I would like to add an inheritance scheme. This seemed more controversial so I didn't want to include that here. Inheritance semantics are tricky, but it would also make these whitelists easier to read.
It also might be good to add a `getrpcwhitelist` command to facilitate permission discovery.
Tests
=====
Thanks to @ emilengler for adding tests for this feature. The tests cover all cases except for where `rpcwhitelistdefault=1` is used, given difficulties around testing with the current test framework.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 2081442c421cc4376e5d7839f68fbe7630e89103
Tree-SHA512: 0dc1ac6a6f2f4b0be9c9054d495dd17752fe7b3589aeab2c6ac4e1f91cf4e7e355deedcb5d76d707cbb5a949c2f989c871b74d6bf129351f429569a701adbcbf
|
|
|
|
json.dumps()
b6f9e3576a1ea18572e4803aeb3f39330f0cb759 test: re-enable CLI test support by using EncodeDecimal in json.dumps() (fanquake)
Pull request description:
As mentioned in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17675#issuecomment-563188648.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK b6f9e3576a1ea18572e4803aeb3f39330f0cb759 assuming Travis is happy too -- diff looks correct :)
MarcoFalke:
> ACK b6f9e35 assuming Travis is happy too -- diff looks correct :)
Tree-SHA512: 79fa535cc1756c8ee610a3d6a316a1c4f036797d6990a5620e44985393a2e52f78450f8e0021d0a148c08705fd1ba765508464a365f9030ae0d2cacbd7a93e19
|
|
The second argument of scanobjects is only required for the start action.
Stop and abort actions do not need this.
|
|
Valgrind
5db506ba5943868cc2c845f717508739b7f05714 tests: Add option --valgrind to run nodes under valgrind in the functional tests (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
What is better than fixing bugs? Fixing entire bug classes of course! :)
Add option `--valgrind` to run the functional tests under Valgrind.
Regular functional testing under Valgrind would have caught many of the uninitialized reads we've seen historically.
Let's kill this bug class once and for all: let's never use an uninitialized value ever again. Or at least not one that would be triggered by running the functional tests! :)
My hope is that this addition will make it super-easy to run the functional tests under Valgrind and thus increase the probability of people making use of it :)
Hopefully `test/functional/test_runner.py --valgrind` will become a natural part of the pre-release QA process.
**Usage:**
```
$ test/functional/test_runner.py --help
…
--valgrind run nodes under the valgrind memory error detector:
expect at least a ~10x slowdown, valgrind 3.14 or
later required
```
**Live demo:**
First, let's re-introduce a memory bug by reverting the recent P2P uninitialized read bug fix from PR #17624 ("net: Fix an uninitialized read in ProcessMessage(…, "tx", …) when receiving a transaction we already have").
```
$ git diff
diff --git a/src/consensus/validation.h b/src/consensus/validation.h
index 3401eb64c..940adea33 100644
--- a/src/consensus/validation.h
+++ b/src/consensus/validation.h
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ inline ValidationState::~ValidationState() {};
class TxValidationState : public ValidationState {
private:
- TxValidationResult m_result = TxValidationResult::TX_RESULT_UNSET;
+ TxValidationResult m_result;
public:
bool Invalid(TxValidationResult result,
const std::string &reject_reason="",
```
Second, let's test as normal without Valgrind:
```
$ test/functional/p2p_segwit.py -l INFO
2019-11-28T09:30:42.810000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/bitcoin_func_test__fc8q3qo
…
2019-11-28T09:31:57.187000Z TestFramework (INFO): Subtest: test_non_standard_witness_blinding (Segwit active = True)
…
2019-11-28T09:32:08.265000Z TestFramework (INFO): Tests successful
```
Third, let's test with `--valgrind` and see if the test fail (as we expect) when the unitialized value is used:
```
$ test/functional/p2p_segwit.py -l INFO --valgrind
2019-11-28T09:32:33.018000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/bitcoin_func_test_gtjecx2l
…
2019-11-28T09:40:36.702000Z TestFramework (INFO): Subtest: test_non_standard_witness_blinding (Segwit active = True)
2019-11-28T09:40:37.813000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
ConnectionRefusedError: [Errno 111] Connection refused
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 5db506ba5943868cc2c845f717508739b7f05714
jonatack:
ACK 5db506ba5943868cc2c845f717508739b7f05714
Tree-SHA512: 2eaecacf4da166febad88b2a8ee6d7ac2bcd38d4c1892ca39516b6343e8f8c8814edf5eaf14c90f11a069a0389d24f0713076112ac284de987e72fc5f6cc3795
|
|
773d4572a4864ab7b6380858d07d9579ff6dd9a2 Mark PSBTs spending unspendable outputs as invalid in analysis (Andrew Chow)
638e40cb6080800c7b0a7f4028f63326acbe4700 Have a PSBTAnalysis state that indicates invalid PSBT (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When analyzing an unspendable PSBT, report that it is unspendable and exit analysis early.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 773d457
instagibbs:
After some thought ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/773d4572a4864ab7b6380858d07d9579ff6dd9a2
Tree-SHA512: 99b0cb2fa1ea37593fc65a20effe881639d69ddeeecf5197bc87bc7f2220cbeb40f1d429d517e4d27f2e9fb563a00cd845d2b4b1ce05246a75a6cb56fb9b0ba5
|
|
As mentioned in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17675#issuecomment-563188648
|
|
|
|
|
|
dddd09eb33d14fabda0aa40fa008b23b2bd6e589 test: Wait until mempool is loaded in wallet_abandonconflict (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This might or might not fix intermittent issues such as https://ci.appveyor.com/project/DrahtBot/bitcoin/builds/28724018#L4091
I believe the mempool was not loaded fully after the restart, in which case it was not dumped either on the next restart. Thus, the previous mempool was attempted to be loaded a second time, which succeeded and contained the txs.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK dddd09eb33d14fabda0aa40fa008b23b2bd6e589
Tree-SHA512: ab7061f946b5e5388f825dddceadb125f5197b24af3a7fcf1e700235d106a323419a56bfb4d84a2e27442e0de63e540c623b704343d83a98deaab3c02fcbdcbe
|
|
01c87015597021bf1c0856f7f6be175bdde844b2 util: remove unwanted fields from bitcoin-cli -getinfo (malevolent)
Pull request description:
Removed the following fields from -getinfo: protocolversion, walletversion and keypoololdest. This change closes #17314 .
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 01c87015597021bf1c0856f7f6be175bdde844b2
achow101:
ACK 01c87015597021bf1c0856f7f6be175bdde844b2
practicalswift:
ACK 01c87015597021bf1c0856f7f6be175bdde844b2 -- diff looks correct
Tree-SHA512: c98f2e8a3fee04d46766f70cb88f4e49e892a4424eff8940a7d48e9e808597b702427225788f984f5c3641591fd8d86acee56774afde1d57a4259c31d971ea08
|
|
|
|
In accordance with #17314, Removing noisy fields from -getinfo. Fields removed: protocolversion, walletversion and keypoololdest. In addition to changing bitcoin-cli -getinfo, there is another change to test/functional/interface_bitcoin_cli.py. This change deletes tests that utilize removed -getinfo calls.
|
|
fabd71076cd9493bd2d30a198467f5ea621b27aa ci: Print free disk space (MarcoFalke)
fad9fdbea5dfb19328282afda9588edc6f1d0ddf test: Properly deserialize integers in little-endian (MarcoFalke)
fa94fc10c881e502e6c9a71f3b7719aa955900f9 ci: Run functional tests on s390x (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 98ba77eb56f283131fdaeb393fda86cc308f1bf9781e1e0e5736b8d616528dc8ff2e494d55ba107c138083025c66a59e382fcfa9962d4349a5fd6cbbc52484c3
|
|
02afb0c550dc8529918460c845d1da3adf236eed Fix origfee return for bumpfee with feerate arg (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17642 and adds a simple test that would have caught it
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 02afb0c550dc8529918460c845d1da3adf236eed
Tree-SHA512: 303e392e05407f204dffe360689b5bb5dc77fd462dd0e489bc0b6c8f94f89ab7fe2bd8cb47e4dc6dc5c23a619826d15f3bf6b02b2c8e96402fbb51953c462e2d
|
|
|
|
|
|
subtractFeeFromOutputs
eadd1304c81e0b89178e4cc7630bd31650850c85 tests: Add a test for funding with sufficient preset inputs and subtractFeeFromOutputs (Andrew Chow)
ff330badd45067cb520b1cfa1844f60a4c9f2031 Default to bnb_used = false as there are many cases where BnB is not used (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
#17290 introduced a bug where, when we had preset inputs that covered the amount being sent and subtractFeeFrromOutputs was being used, transaction funding would result in a `Fee exceeds maximum configured by -maxtxfee` error. This was happening because we weren't setting `bnb_used = false` when the preset inputs were used as it should have been. This resulted in a too high fee because the change would go to fees accidentally.
Apparently this particular case doesn't have a test, so I've added one as well.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK eadd130. I can't get this new test to fail on macOS (without this PR). It passes whether or not I compile with `--enable-debug`. It does fail on Ubuntu. Yay undefined behavior... Anyway, it's a useful test.
fanquake:
ACK eadd1304c81e0b89178e4cc7630bd31650850c85
instagibbs:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17568/commits/eadd1304c81e0b89178e4cc7630bd31650850c85
Tree-SHA512: 7286c321f78666eea558cc591174630d210263594df41cab1065417510591ee514ade0e1d0cec8af09a785757da68de82592b013e8fe8d4966cec3254368706e
|
|
subtractFeeFromOutputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
imported
b84e776fd166ac422ac4a0dcdc1c6f7fd921bf70 wallet_importmulti: use addresses of the same type as being imported (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When constructing an import from the solving data of an address, make sure that the original address is the same type as the one that will be imported.
See also: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17374#issuecomment-550036931
Part of #17261
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Code review ACK b84e776
meshcollider:
Tested re-ACK b84e776fd166ac422ac4a0dcdc1c6f7fd921bf70
Tree-SHA512: 53c49c63af8cbade0116a62beddc77df1a411d8ed76571c3053f6aff096f41a5325421a188bab3dcacfda69bb28fdff6ba921ddd80f29c4abbadb3b58fda884c
|
|
consistently
cb9d830a00995ee60e71780c04f6193efd02c511 test: Use proper MAX_SCRIPT_ELEMENT_SIZE (Hennadii Stepanov)
402ee706d8afab3d8d883cd15a660740fcebeb55 refactor: Use proper MAX_SCRIPT_ELEMENT_SIZE const (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR replaces well-known "magic" numbers with proper `MAX_SCRIPT_ELEMENT_SIZE` constants.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK cb9d830a00995ee60e71780c04f6193efd02c511 -- diff looks correct and change appears to be complete
instagibbs:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17439/commits/cb9d830a00995ee60e71780c04f6193efd02c511
Tree-SHA512: 5fa033275d6df7e35962c38bfdf09a7b5cd7ef2ccdd5e30a39ba47d0c21ac779a5559c23f5ef5bfd4293be0fc639e836a308bbedf0e34717e1eead983b389bbd
|
|
A transaction is rejected by the mempool with reason "scriptsig-size" if any of
the inputs' scriptSig is larger than 1650 bytes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On macOS, pidof installed via brew returns b'' rather than None.
Account for this, to remove spurious warnings from the test_runner.
|
|
38516f9078497d3e8456d48300eca40c35a281f2 Fix input size assertion in wallet_bumpfee.py (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
I was investigating a curious error for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17290 and realized that this check should have caught that error earlier in the test.
The loop is intended to ensure that only a single input exists the entire time until the change output disappears, a single additional bump occurs, then it leaves the loop.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 1d2d6ef535ec2c55f516ee5de11352386ceac6bedaabc6842229a486d9f28d35310ad5f57bfcc1f1e654fc397ecff29ec33256f9b3da897500b7e1635004b63a
|
|
|
|
|
|
49997813a4db388b2810e5e27ef771e8aa6a1f03 test: check custom ancestor limit in mempool_packages.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The functional test `mempool_packages.py` starts one node with default ancestor/descendant limit settings and one with a custom, reduced ancestor limit (currently `-limitancestorcount=5`). The effect of the latter had not been tested yet though. This is approached in this PR by checking on the expected mempool contents of node1 after the node0 ancestor tests are done, via the following three conditions:
- the # of txs in the node1 mempool is equal to the the limit
- all txs in node1 mempool are a subset of txs in node0 mempool
- the node1 mempool txs match the start of the constructed tx-chain
Note that this still doesn't *fully* check the expected mempool of node1 (e.g. that it isn't influenced by `prioritisetransaction` RPC on node0), hence I add another TODO. In the future it would make sense to also set a custom descendant limit when the second TODO about checking node1's mempool is approached: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/89e93135aedf984f7a98771f047e2beb6cdbdb8e/test/functional/mempool_packages.py#L228
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 49997813a4db388b2810e5e27ef771e8aa6a1f03 👲
Tree-SHA512: d3a1d19fb49731238ad08ee7c02e2fa81a227e3b4ef3340d68598de42ddb62be9161134f6b8e08fa76b8c9faa02fecfa01111159642e20e9f358292a757b7608
|
|
|
|
|
|
To test the custom ancestor limit on node1 (passed by the argument
-limitancestorcount), we check for three conditions:
-> the # of txs in the node1 mempool is equal to the the limit
-> all txs in node1 mempool are a subset of txs in node0 mempool
-> the node1 mempool txs match the start of the constructed tx-chain
|
