| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
faaa7db qa: Only allow disconnecting all NodeConns (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Disconnecting the connection with `index=0` makes no sense when there are more than one connections, as the list "rotates around" and populates index 0 after `del`.
Just disconnect all NodeConns in any case.
Tree-SHA512: e5cf540823fccb31634b5a11501f54222be89862e80ccafc28bc06726480f8d2153b8c1b6f859fa6a6d087876251d48a6c6035bccdaaf16831e300bc17ff613d
|
|
|
|
called with address not owned by the wallet
5e0ba8f8c [wallet] getreceivedbyaddress should return error if address is not mine (John Newbery)
ea0cd24f7 [tests] Tidy up receivedby.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Two commits:
- First commit tidies up the `receivedby.py` test (and speeds it up by factor of two)
- Second commit changes getreceivedbyaddress to return error if the address is not found in wallet, and adds test to `receivedby.py`
Tree-SHA512: e41342dcbd037a6b440cbe4ecd3b8ed589e18e477333f0d866f3564e948e0f5231e497d5ffb66da4e6680eb772d9f0cf839125098bb68b92d04a5ee35c6c0a81
|
|
11413646b [trivial] (whitespace only) fix getblockchaininfo alignment (John Newbery)
bd9c18171 [rpc] Add initialblockdownload to getblockchaininfo (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Exposing whether the node is in IBD would help for testing, and may be useful in general, particularly for developers.
First discussed in #10357 here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10357#pullrequestreview-59963870
> ... we could simplify this (and possibly other) tests by just adding a way to know if a node is in IBD. I'd like to do that, but I'm not sure it makes sense to complicate this PR with discussion over how that information should be made available. Eg it's not clear to me that the notion of being in IBD is worth exposing to the casual user, versus a hidden rpc call or something, since the definition has changed over time, and may continue to change in the future. But I still do agree that at least for testing purposes it would be far simpler to expose the field somehow...
This PR currently implements the simplest way of doing this: adding an `initialblockdownload` field to `getblockchaininfo`. Other approaches we could take:
1. add a new debug RPC method that exposes `IBD` and potentially other information.
2. add a parameter to `getblockchaininfo`, eg `debug_info`, which would cause it to return debug information including IBD
3. add a query string to the url `?debug=true` which would cause RPCs to return additional debug information.
I quite like the idea of (3). Feedback on these and other approaches very much welcomed!
@sdaftuar @laanwj
Tree-SHA512: a6dedd47f8c9bd38769cc597524466250041136feb33500644b9c48d0ffe4e3eeeb2587b5bbc6420364ebdd2667df807fbb50416f9a7913bbf11a14ea86dc0d4
|
|
|
|
- Fix flake8 warnings
- Remove the useless get_sub_array_from_array() function
- Reduce runtime for receivedby.py by about half by only using two nodes
|
|
748157913 [tests] Make comp test framework more debuggable (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
We should remove the comparison test framework entirely (see #10603).
Until we do that, let's make it a bit more debuggable. Currently, if there's an assert in the framework, it's very difficult to track down where we are in the test generator. Make the logging a bit better to help with debugging.
Before this PR:
```
→ ./p2p-fullblocktest.py
2017-10-09 14:05:11.302000 TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/user/1000/testzdnax_yr
2017-10-09 14:05:11.557000 TestFramework.mininode (INFO): Connecting to Bitcoin Node: 127.0.0.1:11975
2017-10-09 14:05:11.712000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Test 1: PASS
2017-10-09 14:05:11.947000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Test 2: PASS
2017-10-09 14:05:12.057000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Test 3: PASS
2017-10-09 14:05:12.058000 TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 117, in main
self.run_test()
File "./p2p-fullblocktest.py", line 72, in run_test
self.test.run()
File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/comptool.py", line 306, in run
assert test_number != 4
AssertionError
2017-10-09 14:05:12.059000 TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes
2017-10-09 14:05:14.203000 TestFramework (WARNING): Not cleaning up dir /tmp/user/1000/testzdnax_yr
2017-10-09 14:05:14.204000 TestFramework (ERROR): Test failed. Test logging available at /tmp/user/1000/testzdnax_yr/test_framework.log
```
With this PR:
```
→ ./p2p-fullblocktest.py
2017-10-09 14:03:54.069000 TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/user/1000/testuey7t3tf
2017-10-09 14:03:54.329000 TestFramework.mininode (INFO): Connecting to Bitcoin Node: 127.0.0.1:11783
2017-10-09 14:03:54.383000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Running test 1: ./p2p-fullblocktest.py line 184
2017-10-09 14:03:54.496000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Running test 2: ./p2p-fullblocktest.py line 193
2017-10-09 14:03:54.758000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Running test 3: ./p2p-fullblocktest.py line 205
2017-10-09 14:03:54.867000 TestFramework.comptool (INFO): Running test 4: ./p2p-fullblocktest.py line 208
2017-10-09 14:03:54.867000 TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 117, in main
self.run_test()
File "./p2p-fullblocktest.py", line 72, in run_test
self.test.run()
File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/comptool.py", line 309, in run
assert test_number != 4
AssertionError
2017-10-09 14:03:54.868000 TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes
2017-10-09 14:03:56.950000 TestFramework (WARNING): Not cleaning up dir /tmp/user/1000/testuey7t3tf
2017-10-09 14:03:56.950000 TestFramework (ERROR): Test failed. Test logging available at /tmp/user/1000/testuey7t3tf/test_framework.log
```
Tree-SHA512: 5525958b0098d661c281bd955c92c72bf81359464376e96d44e6c88f18aea57ba08270ecd564edda4b47d674e3b27d20e5b1060544bf8dd5c6a68103d2bb35b8
|
|
getheaders
725b79a [test] Verify node doesn't send headers that haven't been fully validated (Russell Yanofsky)
3788a84 Do not send (potentially) invalid headers in response to getheaders (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Nowhere else in the protocol do we send headers which are for
blocks we have not fully validated except in response to getheaders
messages with a null locator. On my public node I have not seen any
such request (whether for an invalid block or not) in at least two
years of debug.log output, indicating that this should have minimal
impact.
Tree-SHA512: c1f6e0cdcdfb78ea577d555f9b3ceb1b4b60eff4f6cf313bfd8b576c9562d797bea73abc23f7011f249ae36dd539c715f3d20487ac03ace60e84e1b77c0c1e1a
|
|
fb00c45c3 [tests] Explicitly disallow support for p2p versions below 60001 (John Newbery)
3858aabbd [tests] Remove support for p2p alert messages (John Newbery)
c0b127470 [tests] Remove support for bre-BIP31 ping messages (John Newbery)
2904e301c [tests] Remove dead code from mininode.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This is the first part of #11518. It removes a ~150 lines of unused code from the mininode module:
- remove unused `deliver_sleep_time` and `EarlyDisconnectError` code
- remove support for pre-BIP31 ping messages
- remove support for alert message
- explicitly don't support p2p versions lower than 60001
Should be an easy ACK for reviewers. If all extended tests pass, then this code really was dead :)
Tree-SHA512: 508e612ceb0b094250d18e75522d51e6b14cd069443050ba4af34d6f890c58721cb5653e8bc000b60635b9474d035b0dcd9c509c0dcdb3a7501df17b787f83b0
|
|
bc9c0a7 Improve wallet-accounts test (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Add comments and
- Verify sending to a account causes getaccountaddress to generate new addresses.
- Verify sending to a account causes getreceivedbyaccount to return amount received.
- Verify ways setaccount updates the accounts of existing addresses.
Tree-SHA512: 4facc8d10fb23847081e8081839d4050faa855cca40f34012b82297bf1a8cfdb975b26314bc518dc6b3f5997452a7acf309f9627e0dff359347c628b37014bfa
|
|
The mininode module includes code to support p2p versions below
60001. However, the test_framework does not support versions
of Bitcoin Core before V0.13.0. Remove code supporting
p2p versions before 60001 (which has never been run).
|
|
Alert messages were removed in p2p version 70013 (Bitcoin Core V0.13.0)
|
|
BIP31 support was added to Bitcoin Core in version 0.6.1. Our test
framework is incompatible with Bitcoin Core versions that old, so remove
all special logic for handling pre-BIP31 pings.
|
|
Removes the dead deliver_sleep_time and EarlyDisconnectError code
|
|
|
|
p2p connections can now be added to TestNode instances.
This commit also updates the example test to use the new
p2p interface in TestNode to demonstrate usage.
A future commit will update the existing tests to use p2p through the
TestNode.
|
|
|
|
jnewbery)
d61845818 Have SegWit active by default (Pieter Wuille)
4bd89210a Unit tests for always-active versionbits. (Anthony Towns)
d07ee77ab Always-active versionbits support (Pieter Wuille)
18e071841 [consensus] Pin P2SH activation to block 173805 on mainnet (John Newbery)
526023aa7 Improve handling of BIP9Deployment limits (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Most tests shouldn't have to deal with the now-historical SegWit activation transition (and other deployments, but SegWit is certainly the hardest one to accomodate).
This PR makes a versionbits starttime of -1 equal to "always active", and enables it by default for SegWit on regtest. Individual tests can override this by using the existing `-vbparams` option.
A few unit tests and functional tests are adapted to indeed override vbparams, as they specifically test the transition.
This is in preparation for wallet SegWit support, but I thought having earlier eyes on it would be useful.
Tree-SHA512: 3f07a7b41cf46476e6c7a5c43244e68c9f41d223482cedaa4c02a3a7b7cd0e90cbd06b84a1f3704620559636a2268f5767d4c52d09c1b354945737046f618fe5
|
|
|
|
|
|
5d465e396 Ensure backupwallet fails when attempting to backup to source file (Tomas van der Wansem)
Pull request description:
Previous behaviour was to destroy the wallet (to zero-length)
This fixes #11375
Tree-SHA512: bfd1738659b15e3f23b6bbdf55ec12269c62c820bf701daec19500b52bd5845bb5516733c6f76f36197eb155182a8a35dc239ad4de2ef1e59bbb0f124a455759
|
|
block (more effeciently)
f3d4adf Make p2p-acceptablock not an extended test (Matt Corallo)
00dcda6 [qa] test that invalid blocks on an invalid chain get a disconnect (Matt Corallo)
015a525 Reject headers building on invalid chains by tracking invalidity (Matt Corallo)
932f118 Accept unrequested blocks with work equal to our tip (Matt Corallo)
3d9c70c Stop always storing blocks from whitelisted peers (Matt Corallo)
3b4ac43 Rewrite p2p-acceptblock in preparation for slight behavior changes (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
@sdaftuar pointed out that the version in #11487 was somewhat DoS-able as someone could feed you a valid chain that forked off the the last checkpoint block and force you to do lots of work just walking backwards across blocks for each new block they gave you. We came up with a few proposals but settled on the one implemented here as likely the simplest without obvious DoS issues. It uses our existing on-load mapBlockIndex walk to make sure everything that descends from an invalid block is marked as such, and then simply caches blocks which we attempted to connect but which were found to be invalid. To avoid DoS issues during IBD, this will need to depend on #11458.
Includes tests from #11487.
Tree-SHA512: 46aff8332908e122dae72ceb5fe8cd241902c2281a87f58a5fb486bf69d46458d84a096fdcb5f3e8e07fbcf7466232b10c429f4d67855425f11b38ac0bf612e1
|
|
659b206 Make listsinceblock refuse unknown block hash (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Change suggested by @theuni who noticed listsinceblock would ignore invalid block hashes causing it to return a completely unfiltered list of transactions.
Tree-SHA512: 3c8fb160265780d1334e856e853ab48e2e18372b8f1fc71ae480c3f45317048cc1fee0055d5c58031981a91b9c2bdbeb8e49a889d04ecba61729ce8109f2ce3f
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a simple change that makes our accept requirements the
same as our request requirements, (ever so slightly) further
decoupling our consensus logic from our FindNextBlocksToDownload
logic in net_processing.
|
|
Removes checking whitelisted behavior (which will be removed, the
difference in behavior here makes little sense) and no longer
requires that blocks at the same work as our tip be dropped if not
requested (in part because we *do* request those blocks).
|
|
e065249 Add unit test for outbound peer eviction (Suhas Daftuar)
5a6d00c Permit disconnection of outbound peers on bad/slow chains (Suhas Daftuar)
c60fd71 Disconnecting from bad outbound peers in IBD (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
The first commit will disconnect an outbound peer that serves us a headers chain with insufficient work while we're in IBD.
The second commit introduces a way to disconnect outbound peers whose chains fall out of sync with ours:
For a given outbound peer, we check whether their best known block (which is known from the blocks they announce to us) has at least as much work as our tip. If it doesn't, we set a 20 minute timeout, and if we still haven't heard about a block with as much work as our tip had when we set the timeout, then we send a single getheaders message, and wait 2 more minutes. If after two minutes their best known block has insufficient work, we disconnect that peer.
We protect 4 of our outbound peers (who provide some "good" headers chains, ie a chain with at least as much work as our tip at some point) from being subject to this logic, to prevent excessive network topology changes as a result of this algorithm, while still ensuring that we have a reasonable number of nodes not known to be on bogus chains.
We also don't require our peers to be on the same chain as us, to prevent accidental partitioning of the network in the event of a chain split. Note that if our peers are ever on a more work chain than our tip, then we will download and validate it, and then either reorg to it, or learn of a consensus incompatibility with that peer and disconnect. This PR is designed to protect against peers that are on a less work chain which we may never try to download and validate.
Tree-SHA512: 2e0169a1dd8a7fb95980573ac4a201924bffdd724c19afcab5efcef076fdbe1f2cec7dc5f5d7e0a6327216f56d3828884f73642e00c8534b56ec2bb4c854a656
|
|
When in IBD, we'd like to use all our outbound peers to help us
sync the chain. Disconnect any outbound peers whose headers have
insufficient work.
|
|
|
|
Change suggested by Cory Fields <cory-nospam-@coryfields.com> who noticed
listsinceblock would ignore invalid block hashes causing it to return a
completely unfiltered list of transactions.
|
|
Add comments and
- Verify sending to a account causes getaccountaddress to generate new addresses.
- Verify sending to a account causes getreceivedbyaccount to return amount received.
- Verify ways setaccount updates the accounts of existing addresses.
|
|
sendheaders.py
6d51eaefe qa: Fix race condition in sendheaders.py (Suhas Daftuar)
c96b2e4f0 qa: Fix replace-by-fee race condition failures (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
I think #11407 broke replace-by-fee by introducing a race condition. I was observing frequent failures of replace-by-fee locally, always with a mempool sync failure (the sync call was added in #11407).
It appeared to me like there were two causes: sometimes the node would be in IBD and not request the transaction that was relayed; other times the blocks generated in make_utxo wouldn't have relayed quickly enough for the spend of the transaction to be accepted. I believe I've fixed both potential errors.
ping @instagibbs
Edit: I found a race condition in the sendheaders.py test, where if the verack from the python node wasn't processed before the first block in the test was generated, then no block announcement would go out to that peer, breaking the test. Fixed by adding a sync_with_ping after waiting for verack.
Tree-SHA512: 6ad160966e432c151c1ce6e88ae67e60e47123523bda3755cf7697a00e1a5ba38de8561751826e3d7cf0e492f8c2aec298e1b4de8424ebbaf497f099a1ef1d07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make sure wallet databases have unique fileids. If they don't, throw an error.
BDB caches do not work properly when more than one open database has the same
fileid, because values written to one database may show up in reads to other
databases.
Bitcoin will never create different databases with the same fileid, but users
can create them by manually copying database files.
BDB caching bug was reported by Chris Moore <dooglus@gmail.com>
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11429
Fixes #11429
|
|
cc9ee80 Improve ZMQ functional test (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
After #11439, this PR only improves:
- test comments;
- simplicity by removing *duplicate* tests;
- also removes duplicate code.
Tree-SHA512: 3636fa9694c827128128742ad31e635d19670c3645aef8e7b1cb46069c21631e8b0db059486a6f6e7eee237a23d93bce6df95190394b5a8dcfce31a49a72d17f
|
|
fafa003 qa: Remove never used return value of sync_with_ping (MarcoFalke)
fa9de37 qa: Make tmpdir option an absolute path (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This should fix issues with the multiwallet test and its symlinks
when the tmpdir is a relative path.
Rather than fixing os.symlink to work with paths relative to a
directory descriptor, which does not work on Windows, normalize
the path instead.
Tree-SHA512: 189690f3d065ea2f0f48e06775c86d513d0916c7c86312432e8e16df160e65539e288c2bd53d49a4180735fa940f6fcd52b506ccd7d9815651a9b1a69850dda6
|
|
c5dfa90 [tests] Add uacomment tests (Cristian Mircea Messel)
Pull request description:
Checks for setting the value, max length and reserved characters
Tree-SHA512: a62e2cf8e455a3cd3987c0855f7bfc49de47504c01263e3573366e3cbff400c5678224773d4f1e4ac684fff34d987994e490a0978c4da05ff2a4bfa972c84723
|
|
a44a21517 Fix importmulti bug when importing an already imported key (Pedro Branco)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes a bug in `importmulti` RPC call where it returns an invalid response when importing an already imported key.
Before:
```sh
❯ bitcoin-cli -regtest importmulti '[{ "keys": ["cNcMUunXhVK1dXJ5riixtpYSxPXZnUAMGS4vpzwChdKmYY3Rz99v"], "scriptPubKey": { "address": "n4YZAf4WE2XF3t4BfeYS2nHAhb8CVx91BR" }, "timestamp": 1507655239 }]'
[{ "success": true }]
❯ bitcoin-cli -regtest importmulti '[{ "keys": ["cNcMUunXhVK1dXJ5riixtpYSxPXZnUAMGS4vpzwChdKmYY3Rz99v"], "scriptPubKey": { "address": "n4YZAf4WE2XF3t4BfeYS2nHAhb8CVx91BR" }, "timestamp": 1507655239 }]' '{ "rescan": false }'
[ false ]
❯ bitcoin-cli -regtest importmulti '[{ "keys": ["cNcMUunXhVK1dXJ5riixtpYSxPXZnUAMGS4vpzwChdKmYY3Rz99v"], "scriptPubKey": { "address": "n4YZAf4WE2XF3t4BfeYS2nHAhb8CVx91BR" }, "timestamp": 1507655239 }]' '{ "rescan": true }'
error code: -1
error message:
JSON value is not a boolean as expected
```
After this fix:
```sh
❯ bitcoin-cli -rpcuser=u -rpcpassword=p -regtest importmulti '[{ "keys": ["cNcMUunXhVK1dXJ5riixtpYSxPXZnUAMGS4vpzwChdKmYY3Rz99v"], "scriptPubKey": { "address": "n4YZAf4WE2XF3t4BfeYS2nHAhb8CVx91BR" }, "timestamp": 1507655139 }]'
[{ "success": true }]
❯ bitcoin-cli -rpcuser=u -rpcpassword=p -regtest importmulti '[{ "keys": ["cNcMUunXhVK1dXJ5riixtpYSxPXZnUAMGS4vpzwChdKmYY3Rz99v"], "scriptPubKey": { "address": "n4YZAf4WE2XF3t4BfeYS2nHAhb8CVx91BR" }, "timestamp": 1507655139 }]'
[{ "success": false, "error": { "code": -4, "message": "The wallet already contains the private key for this address or script" } }]
```
Tree-SHA512: 4acebdfb7d0ebd7cd48e943b93ed1cec072db1ace5c42b3f5cc225603764b6e804e4b823b0710965826aafc2f0c615c53d5aefcfdb9bc9c379f5221b798a318c
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7a91ceb5e [QA] Add RPC based rescan test (Jonas Schnelli)
c77170fbd [Wallet] add rescanblockchain <start_height> <stop_height> RPC command (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
A RPC rescan command is much more flexible for the following reasons:
* You can define the start and end-height
* It can be called during runtime
* It can work in multiwallet environment
Tree-SHA512: df67177bad6ad1d08e5a621f095564524fa3eb87204c2048ef7265e77013e4b1b29f991708f807002329a507a254f35e79a4ed28a2d18d4b3da7a75d57ce0ea5
|
|
|
|
This should fix issues with the multiwallet test and symlinks
when the tmpdir is a relative path.
Rather than fixing os.symlink to work with paths relative to a
directory descriptor, which does not work on Windows, normalize
the path instead.
|
|
|
|
4526d21 Add test for multiwallet batch RPC calls (Russell Yanofsky)
74182f2 Add missing batch rpc calls to python coverage logs (Russell Yanofsky)
505530c Add missing multiwallet rpc calls to python coverage logs (Russell Yanofsky)
9f67646 Make AuthServiceProxy._batch method usable (Russell Yanofsky)
e02007a Limit AuthServiceProxyWrapper.__getattr__ wrapping (Russell Yanofsky)
edafc71 Fix uninitialized URI in batch RPC requests (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This fixes "Wallet file not specified" errors when making batch wallet RPC calls with more than one wallet loaded. This issue was reported by @NicolasDorier in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11257
Request URI is not used for anything except multiwallet request dispatching, so this change has no other effect.
Tree-SHA512: b3907af48a6323f864bb045ee2fa56b604188b835025ef82ba3d81673244c04228d796323cec208a676e7cd578a95ec7c7ba1e84d0158b93844d5dda8f6589b9
|
