| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Commits of previous years:
- 2021: f47dda2c58b5d8d623e0e7ff4e74bc352dfa83d7
- 2020: fa0074e2d82928016a43ca408717154a1c70a4db
- 2019: aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0
|
|
Review note: The changes are complete, because self.options.descriptors
is set to None in parse_args (test_framework.py).
A value of None implies -disablewallet, see the previous commit.
So if a call to add_wallet_options is missing, it will lead to a test
failure when the wallet is compiled in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
addresses were found in the address book
baa3ddc49c46d00e3e0de06e494656f0f00b0ee8 doc: add release notes about `getreceivedbylabel` returning an error if the label is not in the address book. (furszy)
8897a21658ad93f7b628eb2a3411fec2265d73fb rpc: getreceivedbylabel, don't loop over the entire wallet txs map if no destinations were found for the input label. (furszy)
Pull request description:
Built on top of #23662, coming from comment https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23662#pullrequestreview-971407999.
If `wallet.GetLabelAddresses()` returns an empty vector (the wallet does not have stored destinations with that label in the addressbook) or if none of the returned destinations are from the wallet, we can return the function right away.
Otherwise, we are walking through all the wallet txs + outputs for no reason (`output_scripts` is empty).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK baa3ddc49c46d00e3e0de06e494656f0f00b0ee8
theStack:
re-ACK baa3ddc49c46d00e3e0de06e494656f0f00b0ee8
w0xlt:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25122/commits/baa3ddc49c46d00e3e0de06e494656f0f00b0ee8
Tree-SHA512: 00e10365b179bf008da2f3ef8fbb3ee04a330426374020e3f2d0151b16991baba4ef2b944e4659452f3e4d6cb20f128d0918ddf0453933a25a4d9fd8414a1911
|
|
destinations were found for the input label.
If wallet.GetLabelAddresses() returns an empty vector (the wallet does not have addresses with that label in the addressbook) or if none of the returned destinations are from the wallet, we can return the function right away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The previous diff touched most files in ./test/, so bump the headers to
avoid having to touch them again for a bump later.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./test/
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
The sync calls are redundant after a call to generate, because generate
already syncs itself.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
perl -0777 -pi -e 's/(generate[^\n]*\)[^\n]*)(\n|\s)+self.sync_(all|blocks)\([^\)]*\)\n/\1\n/g' $(git grep -l generate ./test)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed --regexp-extended -i \
's/((self\.)?(nodes\[[^]]+\]|[a-z_]*(wallet|node)[0-9a-z_]*))\.(generate(|toaddress|block|todescriptor)(\(|, ))/self.\5\1, /g' \
$(git grep -l generate ./test | grep -v 'test_framework/' | grep -v 'feature_rbf')
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
|
|
- change the value returned in the RPC getaddressinfo `labels` field to an array
of label name strings
- deprecate the previous behavior of returning a JSON hash structure containing
label `name` and address `purpose` key/value pairs
- update the relevant tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i -e 's/sync_blocks(self.nodes)/self.sync_blocks()/g' $(git grep -l 'sync_blocks(self.nodes)' ./test/functional/*.py)
sed -i -e 's/sync_mempools(self.nodes)/self.sync_mempools()/g' $(git grep -l 'sync_mempools(self.nodes)' ./test/functional/*.py)
sed -i -e 's/ sync_blocks(/ self.sync_blocks(/g' $(git grep -l sync_blocks ./test/functional/*.py)
sed -i -e 's/ sync_mempools(/ self.sync_mempools(/g' $(git grep -l sync_mempools ./test/functional/*.py)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
This requires a small changes to a few tests, but means that
deterministic addresses will always be imported (unless setup_nodes
behaviour is explicitly overridden).
|
|
Fixes #14173. Add the patch in #14173 and include a regression test.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Removes usage of account API from the following functional tests:
- wallet_listreceivedby.py
- wallet_basic.py
- wallet_keypool_topup.py
- wallet_txn_clone.py
- wallet_listsinceblock.py
- wallet_import_rescan.py
- wallet_listtransactions.py
- wallet_txn_doublespend.py
|
|
This commit fixes flake8 warnings in the following functional tests:
- wallet_listreceivedby.py
- wallet_basic.py
- wallet_txn_clone.py
- wallet_listsinceblock.py
- wallet_import_rescan.py
- wallet_listtransactions.py
- wallet_importprunedfunds.py
- wallet_txn_doublspend.py
|
|
Future commits will deprecate the accounts RPC methods, arguments and
return objects. Set the -deprecatedrpc=accounts switch now so tests
don't break in intermediate commits.
|
|
Add label API to wallet RPC.
This is one step towards #3816 ("Remove bolt-on account system") although it doesn't
actually remove anything yet.
These initially mirror the account functions, with the following differences:
- These functions aren't DEPRECATED in the help
- Help mentions 'label' instead of accounts. In the language used, labels are
associated with addresses, instead of addresses associated with labels. (unlike
with accounts.)
- Labels have no balance
- No balances in `listlabels`
- `listlabels` has no minconf or watchonly argument
- Like in the GUI, labels can be set on any address, not just receiving addreses
- Unlike accounts, labels can be deleted.
Being unable to delete them is a common annoyance (see #1231).
Currently only by reassigning all addresses using `setlabel`, but an explicit
call `deletelabel` which assigns all address to the default label may make
sense.
Thanks to Pierre Rochard for test fixes.
|
|
This change only updates strings and adds RPC aliases, but should simplify the
implementation of address labels in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729, by getting renaming out of the
way and letting it focus on semantics.
The difference between accounts and labels is that labels apply only to
addresses, while accounts apply to both addresses and transactions
(transactions have "from" and "to" accounts). The code associating accounts
with transactions is clumsy and unreliable so we would like get rid of it.
|
|
|
|
|
