aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/functional/wallet_listreceivedby.py
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-04-10[wallet] [rpc] introduce 'label' API for walletWladimir J. van der Laan
Add label API to wallet RPC. This is one step towards #3816 ("Remove bolt-on account system") although it doesn't actually remove anything yet. These initially mirror the account functions, with the following differences: - These functions aren't DEPRECATED in the help - Help mentions 'label' instead of accounts. In the language used, labels are associated with addresses, instead of addresses associated with labels. (unlike with accounts.) - Labels have no balance - No balances in `listlabels` - `listlabels` has no minconf or watchonly argument - Like in the GUI, labels can be set on any address, not just receiving addreses - Unlike accounts, labels can be deleted. Being unable to delete them is a common annoyance (see #1231). Currently only by reassigning all addresses using `setlabel`, but an explicit call `deletelabel` which assigns all address to the default label may make sense. Thanks to Pierre Rochard for test fixes.
2018-03-19Rename account to label where appropriateRussell Yanofsky
This change only updates strings and adds RPC aliases, but should simplify the implementation of address labels in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729, by getting renaming out of the way and letting it focus on semantics. The difference between accounts and labels is that labels apply only to addresses, while accounts apply to both addresses and transactions (transactions have "from" and "to" accounts). The code associating accounts with transactions is clumsy and unreliable so we would like get rid of it.
2018-03-07Add tests of listreceivedbyaddress address filteringJeremy Rubin
2018-01-25[tests] Rename wallet_* functional tests.Anthony Towns