aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/functional/rpc_psbt.py
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-06-24tests: Check that segwit inputs in psbt have both UTXO typesAndrew Chow
2020-06-24psbt: always put a non_witness_utxo and don't remove itAndrew Chow
Offline signers will always need a non_witness_utxo so make sure it is there.
2020-06-21Merge #18027: "PSBT Operations" dialogSamuel Dobson
931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243 Make lint-spelling.py happy (Glenn Willen) 11a0ffb29d1b4dcc55c8826873f340ab4196af21 [gui] Load PSBT from clipboard (Glenn Willen) a6cb0b0c29d327d01aebb98b0504f317eb19c3dc [gui] PSBT Operations Dialog (sign & broadcast) (Glenn Willen) 5dd0c03ffa3aeaa69d8a3a716f902f450d5eaaec FillPSBT: report number of inputs signed (or would sign) (Glenn Willen) 9e7b23b73387600d175aff8bd5e6624dd51f86e7 Improve TransactionErrorString messages. (Glenn Willen) Pull request description: Add a "PSBT Operations" dialog, reached from the "Load PSBT..." menu item, giving options to sign or broadcast the loaded PSBT as appropriate, as well as copying the result to the clipboard or saving it to a file. This is based on Sjors' #17509, and depends on that PR going in first. (It effectively replaces the small "load PSBT" dialog from that PR with a more feature-rich one.) Some notes: * The way I display status information is maybe unusual (a status bar, rather than messageboxes.) I think it's helpful to have the information in it be persistent rather than transitory. But if people dislike it, I would probably move the "current state of the transaction" info to the top line of the main label, and the "what action just happened, and did it succeed" info into a messagebox. * I don't really know much about the translation/localization stuff. I put tr() in all the places it seemed like it ought to go. I did not attempt to translate the result of TransactionErrorString (which is shared by GUI and non-GUI code); I don't know if that's correct, but it matches the "error messages in logs should be googleable in English" heuristic. I don't know whether there are things I should be doing to reduce translator effort (like minimizing the total number of distinct message strings I use, or something.) * I don't really know how (if?) automated testing is applied to GUI code. I can make a list of PSBTs exercising all the codepaths for manual testing, if that's the right approach. Input appreciated. ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: tested ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18027/commits/931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243 Sjors: re-tACK 931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243 jb55: ACK 931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243 achow101: ACK 931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243 Tree-SHA512: ade52471a2242f839a8bd6a1fd231443cc4b43bb9c1de3fb5ace7c5eb59eca99b1f2e9f17dfdb4b08d84d91f5fd65677db1433dd03eef51c7774963ef4e2e74f
2020-06-21Merge #16377: [rpc] don't automatically append inputs in walletcreatefundedpsbtSamuel Dobson
e5327f947c310849e1ddbb24321e4c9f85564549 [rpc] fundrawtransaction: add_inputs option to control automatic input adding (Sjors Provoost) 79804fe24bd00e183382dfbcab9343960d158aa5 [rpc] walletcreatefundedpsbt: don't automatically append inputs (Sjors Provoost) Pull request description: When the user doesn't specificy inputs, it makes sense to automatically select them. But when the user does specify inputs, `walletcreatefundedpsbt` now fails if the amount is insufficient, unless `addInputs` is set to `true`. Similarly for `fundrawtransaction` if the original transaction already specified inputs, we only add more if `addInputs` is set to `true`. This protects against fat finger mistakes in the amount or fee rate (see also #16257). The behavior is also more similar to GUI coin selection. ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK e5327f947c310849e1ddbb24321e4c9f85564549 meshcollider: utACK e5327f947c310849e1ddbb24321e4c9f85564549 Tree-SHA512: d8653b820914396c7c25b0d0a2b7e92de214aa023bc1aa085feb37d3b20fab361ebea90416a7db989f19bdc37e26cf0adfbcb712c80985c87afa67a9bd44fecb
2020-06-18Improve TransactionErrorString messages.Glenn Willen
2020-05-07test: Remove unnecessary disconnect_nodes call in rpc_psbt.pyDanny Lee
2020-05-07test: remove redundant two-way disconnect_nodes callsDanny Lee
2020-04-23Add a --descriptors option to various testsAndrew Chow
Adds a --descriptors option globally to the test framework. This will make the test create and use descriptor wallets. However some tests may not work with this. Some tests are modified to work with --descriptors and run with that option in test_runer: * wallet_basic.py * wallet_encryption.py * wallet_keypool.py * wallet_keypool_topup.py * wallet_labels.py * wallet_avoidreuse.py
2020-04-16scripted-diff: Bump copyright headersMarcoFalke
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- ./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./ -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2020-03-12[rpc] walletcreatefundedpsbt: don't automatically append inputsSjors Provoost
When the user doesn't specificy inputs, it makes sense to automatically select them. But when the user does specify inputs, we now fail if the amount is insufficient, unless addInputs is set to true.
2020-02-28Make AnalyzePSBT next role calculation simple, correctGregory Sanders
2020-02-25Merge #17264: rpc: set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methodsSamuel Dobson
5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 [test] PSBT RPC: check that bip32_derivs are present by default (Sjors Provoost) 29a21c90610aed88b796a7a5900e42e9048b990e [rpc] set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methods (Sjors Provoost) Pull request description: In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13557#pullrequestreview-135905054 I recommended not including bip32 deriviation by default in PSBTs: > _Bit of a privacy issue_: let's say person A and B are about to spend from a multisig address, sending everything to person A. Person A gives their address to person B, their wallet wallet creates a PSBT, but doesn't sign it. Wallet A then calls `walletprocesspsbt` which signs it and _spontaneously adds the master_fingerprint and bip32 path_. Same issue with `walletcreatefundedpsbt`. > > Adding `bip32_derivs` should probably be opt-in. In practice I find this default quite annoying because I forget it and end up with a confused hardware wallet. More importantly, in the multisig example I provided, it's actually essential for the other side to know the derivation details (in addition to an xpub). This allows them to check that change is going to an address you can still co-sign for (because the spending policy is unchanged except for an index). ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17264/commits/5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 jonatack: ACK 5bad7921d0 code review, built, ran tests, inspected/messed around with/pprinted values from the new tests. Thanks for adding the tests. meshcollider: utACK 5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 Tree-SHA512: 22ad71dda96856060a96758c4ae7aafa22d5e9efba30e0c8287c711e7579849bd72593cbc0f41a2e9e8821315d78bda04e848dbb006283b841b2795e2faebcfd
2020-01-31[test] PSBT RPC: check that bip32_derivs are present by defaultSjors Provoost
2020-01-06psbt: check output index is within bounds before accessingAndrew Chow
2019-12-10Don't calculate tx fees for PSBTs with invalid money valuesAndrew Chow
In decodepsbt if an invalid amount is seen, don't calculate the fee but still show the invalid value in the decode. In analyze psbt, if an invalid amount is seen, set the next step to be the creator as the creator needs to remake the transaction so that it is valid.
2019-12-10Merge #17524: psbt: handle unspendable psbtsMarcoFalke
773d4572a4864ab7b6380858d07d9579ff6dd9a2 Mark PSBTs spending unspendable outputs as invalid in analysis (Andrew Chow) 638e40cb6080800c7b0a7f4028f63326acbe4700 Have a PSBTAnalysis state that indicates invalid PSBT (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: When analyzing an unspendable PSBT, report that it is unspendable and exit analysis early. ACKs for top commit: Sjors: ACK 773d457 instagibbs: After some thought ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/773d4572a4864ab7b6380858d07d9579ff6dd9a2 Tree-SHA512: 99b0cb2fa1ea37593fc65a20effe881639d69ddeeecf5197bc87bc7f2220cbeb40f1d429d517e4d27f2e9fb563a00cd845d2b4b1ce05246a75a6cb56fb9b0ba5
2019-12-06tests: Mark functional tests not supporting bitcoin-cli (--usecli) as suchpracticalswift
2019-11-19Mark PSBTs spending unspendable outputs as invalid in analysisAndrew Chow
2019-09-18Merge #16898: test: Remove connect_nodes_biMarcoFalke
fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2 test: Remove unused connect_nodes_bi (MarcoFalke) fa3b9ee8b2280af4bcbcfffff275aaf8dd125929 scripted-diff: test: Replace connect_nodes_bi with connect_nodes (MarcoFalke) faaee1e39a91b3f603881655d3980c29af09852b test: Use connect_nodes when connecting nodes in the test_framework (MarcoFalke) 1111bb91f517838e5b9f778bf6b5a9c8d561e857 test: Reformat python imports to aid scripted diff (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: By default all test nodes are connected in a chain. However, instead of just a single connection between each pair of nodes, we end up with up to four connections for a "middle" node (two outbound, two inbound, from each side). This is generally redundant (tx and block relay should succeed with just a single connection) and confusing. For example, test timeouts after a call to `sync_` may be racy and hard to reproduce. On top of that, the test `debug.log`s are hard to read because txs and block invs may be relayed on the same connection multiple times. Fix this by inlining `connect_nodes_bi` in the two tests that need it, and then replace it with a single `connect_nodes` in all other tests. Historic background: `connect_nodes_bi` has been introduced as a (temporary?) workaround for bug #5113 and #5138, which has long been fixed in #5157 and #5662. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2 jonasschnelli: utACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2 - more of less a cleanup PR. promag: Tested ACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2, ran extended tests. Tree-SHA512: 2d027a8fd150749c071b64438a0a78ec922178628a7dbb89fd1212b0fa34febd451798c940101155d3617c0426c2c4865174147709894f1f1bb6cfa336aa7e24
2019-09-18Merge #16512: rpc: Shuffle inputs and outputs after joining psbtsWladimir J. van der Laan
c0b5d9710322a614a50ab5da081558cf6a38ad2a Test that joinpsbts randomly shuffles the inputs (Andrew Chow) 6f405a1d3b38395e35571b68aae55cae50e0762a Shuffle inputs and outputs after joining psbts (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: `joinpsbts` currently just adds the inputs and outputs in the order of that the PSBTs were provided. This makes it extremely easy to identify which outputs belong to which inputs. This PR changes that so that all of the inputs and outputs are shuffled in the joined transaction. ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16512/commits/c0b5d9710322a614a50ab5da081558cf6a38ad2a jonatack: ACK c0b5d9710322a614a50ab5da081558cf6a38ad2a modulo suggestions for later. Tree-SHA512: 14a0b7aae07d92e6d2c76a3a3b228b481e1964cb7d34f97515bdda18e2ea05a9f97c5a22affc143b86ae8b95c3cb239849fb54219d65512bc2112264dca915c8
2019-09-17scripted-diff: test: Replace connect_nodes_bi with connect_nodesMarcoFalke
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i --regexp-extended -e 's/connect_nodes_bi\(self.nodes,\s*(.),\s*/connect_nodes(self.nodes[\1], /g' $(git grep -l connect_nodes_bi) sed -i --regexp-extended -e 's/connect_nodes_bi(,| )/connect_nodes\1/g' $(git grep -l connect_nodes_bi) -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2019-09-04Test that joinpsbts randomly shuffles the inputsAndrew Chow
2019-07-27[test] walletcreatefundedpsbt: check RBF is disabled when -walletrbf=0Sjors Provoost
2019-07-27[rpc] walletcreatefundedpsbt: use wallet default RBFSjors Provoost
2019-07-10Merge #16322: wallet: Fix -maxtxfee check by moving it to ↵Wladimir J. van der Laan
CWallet::CreateTransaction 0d101a340c44841cbbc5982d55354b1787bc39e2 test: Add test for maxtxfee option (MarcoFalke) 177550101b600ccb32886695326eb72cd9752c8b wallet: Remove unreachable code in CreateTransaction (MarcoFalke) 5c1b9714cb0a13be28324f91f4ec9ca66a1de8c7 wallet: Fix -maxtxfee check by moving it to CWallet::CreateTransaction (João Barbosa) Pull request description: Follow up to #16257, this PR makes `bumpfee` aware of `-maxtxfee`. It also prevents dangling locked unspents when calling `fundrawtransaction` - because the previous check was after `LockCoin`. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: re-ACK 0d101a340c44841cbbc5982d55354b1787bc39e2, only change is small test fixup Tree-SHA512: 3464b24ae7cd4e72ed41438c6661828ba1304af020f05da62720b23668ae734e16cf47c6d97e150cc84ef631ee099b16fc786c858f3d089905845437338fd512
2019-07-04[RPC] add new utxoupdatepsbt arguments to the CRPCCommand and ↵John Newbery
CPRCConvertParam tables The new `descriptors` argument needs to be added to the Command and ConvertParams tables to by usable as a named argument and by bitcoin-cli. Also update the test to use named arguments to test this.
2019-07-02wallet: Fix -maxtxfee check by moving it to CWallet::CreateTransactionJoão Barbosa
2019-07-02Merge #15427: Add support for descriptors to utxoupdatepsbtWladimir J. van der Laan
26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f Add support for descriptors to utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille) 3135c1a2d2e2fb31bc362c848bd2456d576e408b Abstract out UpdatePSBTOutput from FillPSBT (Pieter Wuille) fb90ec3c33e824f5abb6a68452c683d6ce8b3e4a Abstract out EvalDescriptorStringOrObject from scantxoutset (Pieter Wuille) eaf4f887348a08c620732125ad4430e1a133d434 Abstract out IsSegWitOutput from utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: This adds a descriptors argument to the `utxoupdatepsbt` RPC. This means: * Input and output scripts and keys will be filled in when known. * P2SH-witness inputs will be filled in from the UTXO set when a descriptor is provided that shows they're spending segwit outputs. This also moves some (newly) shared code to separate functions: `UpdatePSBTOutput` (an analogue to `SignPSBTInput`), `IsSegWitOutput`, and `EvalDescriptorStringOrObject` (implementing the string or object notation parsing used in `scantxoutset`). ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: utACK 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f laanwj: utACK 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f (will hold merging until response to promag's comments) promag: ACK 26fe9b9, checked refactors and tests look comprehensive. Still missing a release note but can be added later. Tree-SHA512: 1d833b7351b59d6c5ded6da399ff371a8a2a6ad04c0a8f90e6e46105dc737fa6f2740b1e5340280d59e01f42896c40b720c042f44417e38dfbee6477b894b245
2019-06-28[wallet] abort when attempting to fund a transaction above maxtxfeeSjors Provoost
FundTransaction calls GetMinimumFee which, when the fee rate is absurdly high, quietly reduced the fee to -maxtxfee. Becaue an absurdly high fee rate is usually the result of a fat finger, aborting seems safer behavior.
2019-05-16rpc: bugfix: Properly use iswitness in converttopsbtMarcoFalke
Also explain the param in all RPCs
2019-05-10Add support for descriptors to utxoupdatepsbtPieter Wuille
This adds a descriptors argument to the utxoupdatepsbt RPC. This means: * Input and output scripts and keys will be filled in when known * P2SH-witness outputs will be filled in from the UTXO set when a descriptor is provided to show they're segwit outputs.
2019-04-25Merge #14818: Bugfix: test/functional/rpc_psbt: Remove check for specific ↵MarcoFalke
error message that depends on uncertain assumptions c87fc71f7e Bugfix: test/functional/rpc_psbt: Correct test description comment (Luke Dashjr) 097c4aa379 Bugfix: test/functional/rpc_psbt: Remove check for specific error message that depends on uncertain assumptions (Luke Dashjr) Pull request description: When converttopsbt is called with a signed transaction, it either fails with "TX decode failed" if one or more inputs were segwit, or "Inputs must not have scriptSigs and scriptWitnesses" otherwise. Since no effort is made by the test to ensure the inputs are segwit or not, avoid checking the exact message used. The error code is still checked to ensure it is of the correct kind of failure. ACKs for commit c87fc7: instagibbs: utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14818/commits/c87fc71f7e9316bcc0653cd86c50177424b5b1f9 achow101: utACK c87fc71f7e9316bcc0653cd86c50177424b5b1f9 Tree-SHA512: 61312b5d49aa50652902f30ba9693dfba9e5b7e6478f23becda20202d8b328ddb3e040f2199b617a68df133a5f1f8b5d68bc19d4621303f17c1963dca01bd9ef
2019-04-09test: Remove unused importsMarcoFalke
2019-04-09scripted-diff: use self.sync_* methodsMarcoFalke
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i -e 's/sync_blocks(self.nodes)/self.sync_blocks()/g' $(git grep -l 'sync_blocks(self.nodes)' ./test/functional/*.py) sed -i -e 's/sync_mempools(self.nodes)/self.sync_mempools()/g' $(git grep -l 'sync_mempools(self.nodes)' ./test/functional/*.py) sed -i -e 's/ sync_blocks(/ self.sync_blocks(/g' $(git grep -l sync_blocks ./test/functional/*.py) sed -i -e 's/ sync_mempools(/ self.sync_mempools(/g' $(git grep -l sync_mempools ./test/functional/*.py) -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2019-03-12rpc: return a number for estimated_feerate in analyzepsbtfanquake
2019-03-02scripted-diff: Update copyright in ./testMarcoFalke
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- ./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./test/ -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2019-03-02scripted-diff: test: Remove brackets after assertMarcoFalke
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- sed -i --regexp-extended -e 's/assert ?\((.+)\)(( )*)?(#.*)?$/assert \1\3\3\4/g' $(git grep -l --extended-regexp 'assert ?\(' test) -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2019-02-17Address test todos by removing -txindex to nodes.Amiti Uttarwar
Originally added when updating getrawtransaction to stop searching unspent utxos.
2019-02-16Implement analyzepsbt RPC and testsAndrew Chow
2019-02-16Implement joinpsbts RPC and testsAndrew Chow
Adds a joinpsbts RPC which combines multiple distinct PSBTs into one PSBT.
2019-02-16Implement utxoupdatepsbt RPC and testsAndrew Chow
2019-02-11Split DecodePSBT into Base64 and Raw versionsGlenn Willen
Split up DecodePSBT, which both decodes base64 and then deserializes a PartiallySignedTransaction, into two functions: DecodeBase64PSBT, which retains the old behavior, and DecodeRawPSBT, which only performs the deserialization. Add a test for base64 decoding failure.
2019-02-04rpc: Fix for segfault if combinepsbt called with empty inputsbenthecarman
2019-01-26[RPC] Update getrawtransaction interfaceAmiti Uttarwar
2018-11-30Merge #14380: fix assert crash when specified change output spend size is ↵MarcoFalke
unknown 0fb2e69815 CreateTransaction: Assume minimum p2sh-p2wpkh spend size for unknown change (Gregory Sanders) b06483c96a Remove stale comment in CalculateMaximumSignedInputSize (Gregory Sanders) Pull request description: This is triggered anytime a fundraw type call(psbt or legacy) is used with a change output address that the wallet doesn't know how to sign for. This regression was added in 6a34ff5335786615771ca423134a484b04831c4e since BnB coin selection actually cares about this. The fix is to assume the smallest typical spend, a P2SH-P2WPKH, which is calculated using a "prototype" dummy signature flow. Future work could generalize this infrastructure to get estimated sizes of inputs for a variety of types. I also removed a comment which I believe is stale and misleading. Tree-SHA512: c7e2be189e524f81a7aa4454ad9370cefba715e3781f1e462c8bab77e4d27540191419029e3ebda11e3744c0703271e479dcd560d05e4d470048d9633e34da16
2018-11-27Bugfix: test/functional/rpc_psbt: Correct test description commentLuke Dashjr
2018-11-27Bugfix: test/functional/rpc_psbt: Remove check for specific error message ↵Luke Dashjr
that depends on uncertain assumptions When converttopsbt is called with a signed transaction, it either fails with "TX decode failed" if one or more inputs were segwit, or "Inputs must not have scriptSigs and scriptWitnesses" otherwise. Since no effort is made by the test to ensure the inputs are segwit or not, avoid checking the exact message used. The error code is still checked to ensure it is of the correct kind of failure.
2018-11-12Merge #14356: fix converttopsbt permitsigdata arg, add basic testWladimir J. van der Laan
88a79cb436b30b39d37d139da723f5a31e9d161b fix converttopsbt permitsigdata arg, add basic test (Gregory Sanders) Pull request description: The final check for extraneous sigdata has a flipped boolean, resulting in incorrect behavior. Resolves https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/14355 Tree-SHA512: 5157a74b8ddebd7d836fba96765c4d7ed15a73d4289817353d3566a0f6803bd4bbc3f936735c517c7a83a6cbdb4052b9c61d23f6cc4ad00a6077278cd51adbd4
2018-11-12CreateTransaction: Assume minimum p2sh-p2wpkh spend size for unknown changeGregory Sanders
2018-11-09Merge #14689: Require a public key to be retrieved when signing a P2PKH inputPieter Wuille
6b8d86ddb8 Require a public key to be retrieved when signing a P2PKH input (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: If we do not have the public key for a P2PKH input, we should not continue to attempt to sign for it. This fixes a problem where a PSBT with a P2PKH output would include invalid BIP 32 derivation paths that are missing the public key. Tree-SHA512: 850d5e74c06833da937d5bf0348bd134180be7167b6f9b9cecbf09f75e3543fbad60d0abbc0b9afdfa51ce165aa36168849f24a7c5abf1e75f37ce8f9a13d127
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.26.2) at 2024-11-05 03:45:35 +0000