| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed --regexp-extended -i \
's/((self\.)?(nodes\[[^]]+\]|[a-z_]*(wallet|node)[0-9a-z_]*))\.(generate(|toaddress|block|todescriptor)(\(|, ))/self.\5\1, /g' \
$(git grep -l generate ./test | grep -v 'test_framework/' | grep -v 'feature_rbf')
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
11d6459b6e101f05f36e13799c400bef82d2fc21 rpc: include_unsafe option for fundrawtransaction (t-bast)
Pull request description:
Allow RPC users to opt-in to unsafe inputs when funding a raw transaction.
Applications that need to manage a complex RBF flow (such as lightning nodes using anchor outputs) are very limited if they can only use safe inputs.
I also added this option to `send` and `walletcreatefundedpsbt` who internally delegate to `fundrawtransaction`.
Fixes #21299
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 11d6459b6e101f05f36e13799c400bef82d2fc21
Tree-SHA512: 5e542a4febcfd6f41cf784678ff02ec9282eae2082c274983f72c5ea87b7ebbe1bd5fdc6a020d7a9d5996157754eb4966b8aeb6c1ceebf0b1519f735579b8bac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allow RPC users to opt-in to unsafe inputs when funding a raw transaction.
Applications that need to manage a complex RBF flow (such as lightning
nodes using anchor outputs) are very limited if they can only use safe inputs.
Fixes #21299
|
|
1) add a new sane "address" field (for outputs that have an
identifiable address, which doesn't include bare multisig)
2) with -deprecatedrpc: leave "reqSigs" and "addresses" intact
(with all weird/wrong behavior they have now)
3) without -deprecatedrpc: drop "reqSigs" and "addresses" entirely,
always.
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git grep -l "self.setup_clean_chain = False" test/functional/*.py | xargs sed -i "/self.setup_clean_chain = False/d";
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
|
|
A check to raise an error on zero-fee txns was mistakenly extended in commit
a0d4957 from the bumpfee and send{toaddress, many} RPCs to also include
fundrawtransaction and walletcreatefundedpsbt.
This commit overrides zero fee rate checking for these two RPCs, not only for
the feeRate (BTC/kvB) arg to return to previous behavior, but also for the new
fee_rate (sat/vB) arg.
|
|
in RPCs fundrawtransaction and walletcreatefundedpsbt only.
This provides the existing feeRate (BTC/kvB) behavior in these two RPCs to the
new fee_rate (sat/vB) param also.
See these two GitHub review discussions for more info:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10706/#discussion_r126560525
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20305#discussion_r520032533
|
|
Co-authored-by: Murch <murch@murch.one>
|
|
and BTC/kvB for feeRate error messages.
|
|
Create a fee_rate (sat/vB) RPC param and replace overloading the conf_target and
estimate_mode params in the following 6 RPCs with it:
- sendtoaddress
- sendmany
- send
- fundrawtransaction
- walletcreatefundedpsbt
- bumpfee
In RPC bumpfee, the previously existing fee_rate remains but the unit is changed
from BTC/kvB to sat/vB. This is a breaking change, but it should not be an
overly risky one, as the units change by a factor of 1e5 and any fees specified
in BTC/kvB after this commit will either be too low and raise an error or be 1
sat/vB and can be RBFed.
Update the test coverage for each RPC.
Co-authored-by: Murch <murch@murch.one>
|
|
0be29000c011dec0722481dbebb159873da6fa54 rpc: update conf_target helps for correctness/consistency (Jon Atack)
778b9be40667876c705e586849ea9c9e44cf451c wallet, rpc: fix send subtract_fee_from_outputs help (Jon Atack)
603c0050837ec65765208dd54dde354145fbe098 wallet: add rpc send explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
dd341e602d5160fc621c0299179b91403756b61d wallet: add sendtoaddress/sendmany explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
44e7bfa60313e4ae67da49e5ba4535038b71b453 wallet: add walletcreatefundedpsbt explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
6e1ea4273e52fdcd86c87628aa595c03a071ca8c test: refactor for walletcreatefundedpsbt fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
3ac7b0c6f1c68e74a84d868a454f508bada6b09d wallet: fundrawtx fee rate coverage, fixup ParseConfirmTarget() (Jon Atack)
2d8eba8f8425a2515022d51f1f5b4911329fbf55 wallet: combine redundant bumpfee invalid params and args tests (Jon Atack)
1697a40b6f841a54ee0d9744ed7fd09034b0ddad wallet: improve bumpfee error/help, add explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
fc5721723d34f76f9e1ffd2e31f274ea6b22f894 wallet: fix SetFeeEstimateMode() error message (Jon Atack)
052427eef1c9da84c474c5161b1910d3328ef0da wallet, bugfix: fix bumpfee with explicit fee rate modes (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #11413 providing a base to build on for #19543:
- bugfix for `bumpfee` raising a JSON error with explicit feerates, fixes issue #20219
- adds explicit feerate test coverage for `bumpfee`, `fundrawtransaction`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `send`, `sendtoaddress`, and `sendmany`
- improves a few related RPC error messages and `ParseConfirmTarget()` / error message
- fixes/improves the explicit fee rate information in the 6 RPC helps, of which 2 were also missing `conf_target` sat/B units
This provides a spec and regression coverage for the potential next step of a universal `sat/vB` feerate argument (see #19543), as well as immediate coverage and minimum fixes for 0.21.
ACKs for top commit:
kallewoof:
Concept/Tested ACK 0be29000c011dec0722481dbebb159873da6fa54
meshcollider:
Code review + functional test run ACK 0be29000c011dec0722481dbebb159873da6fa54
Tree-SHA512: efd965003e991cba51d4504e2940f06ab3d742e34022e96a673606b44fad85596aa03a8c1809f06df7ebcf21a38e18a891e54392fe3d6fb4d120bbe4ea0cf5e0
|
|
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
# max-depth=0 excludes test/functional/test_framework/...
FILES=$(git grep -l --max-depth 0 "connect_nodes" test/functional)
# Replace (dis)?connect_nodes(self.nodes[a], b) with self.(dis)?connect_nodes(a, b)
sed -i 's/\b\(dis\)\?connect_nodes(self\.nodes\[\(.*\)\]/self.\1connect_nodes(\2/g' $FILES
# Remove imports in the middle of a line
sed -i 's/\(dis\)\?connect_nodes, //g' $FILES
sed -i 's/, \(dis\)\?connect_nodes//g' $FILES
# Remove imports on a line by themselves
sed -i '/^\s*\(dis\)\?connect_nodes,\?$/d' $FILES
sed -i '/^from test_framework\.util import connect_nodes$/d' $FILES
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Co-authored-by: Elliott Jin <elliott.jin@gmail.com>
|
|
A later scripted-diff commit replaces the majority of uses, which all
follow this pattern:
(dis)?connect_nodes(self.nodes[a], b)
This commit replaces the few "special cases".
|
|
clients
b048b275d9711f70847afaea5450f17a0f7e673a [validation] Remove absurdfee from accepttomempool (John Newbery)
932564b9cfda8446a957649c2316a52e868ad5d4 scripted-diff: update max-fee-exceeded error message to include RPC (gzhao408)
8f1290c60159a3171c27250bc95687548c5c1b84 [rpc/node] check for high fee before ATMP in clients (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
Picked up from #15810. Add separate fee-checking logic for clients that need to enforce max fee rates, then remove the `absurdFee` logic from ATMP.
ATMP's `nAbsurdFee` argument is used to enforce user-specific behavior (it is not policy since it isn't applied consistently: it is only ever used in RPC and wallet, and set to 0 everywhere else internally). It should be removed from `AcceptToMemoryPool` because (1) validation results/mempool behavior should not be user-specific and (2) enforcing a max fee rate should be the responsibility of the client instead of the mempool.
Note: this PR does not intend to _remove_ protection from high fees, just re-delegate the responsibility to clients.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK b048b275d9711f70847afaea5450f17a0f7e673a
LarryRuane:
re-ACK b048b275d9711f70847afaea5450f17a0f7e673a
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK b048b275d9 , only change is squashing one commit 🏦
instagibbs:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19339/commits/b048b275d9711f70847afaea5450f17a0f7e673a
Tree-SHA512: 57c17ba16d230a4cae2896dd6a64c924f307757824e35784bf96da7b10aff2d8ea910710edf35e981035623a155f8766209a92a0fdb856549fde78bc3eaae4d2
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/Fee exceeds maximum configured by \-\maxtxfee/Fee exceeds maximum configured by user (e.g. -maxtxfee, maxfeerate)/g' src/util/error.cpp test/functional/rpc_fundrawtransaction.py test/functional/rpc_psbt.py test/functional/rpc_rawtransaction.py test/functional/wallet_bumpfee.py test/functional/wallet_create_tx.py
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
Make sure the options "change_type" and "changeAddress" of the
walletcreatefundedpsbt RPC cannot both be specified a the same time.
|
|
Make sure the wallet's default change type is respected by default when
funding a PSBT but can be overwritten by the "change_type" option.
|
|
This is of neglible use here, but it allows new RPC methods to take outputs as their first argument and make inputs optional.
|
|
manually selected coins
6d1f51343cf11b07cd401fbd0c5bc3603e185a0e [rpc] fundrawtransaction, walletcreatefundedpsbt lock manually selected coins (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
When using `fundrawtransaction` and `walletcreatefundedpsbt` with `lockUnspents`, it would only lock automatically selected coins, not manually selected coins. That doesn't make much sense to me if the goal is to prevent accidentally double-spending yourself before you broadcast a transaction.
Note that when creating a transaction, manually selected coins are automatic "unlocked" (or more accurately: the lock is ignored). Earlier versions of this PR introduced an error when a locked coin is manually selected, but this idea was abandoned after some discussion. An application that uses this RPC should either rely on automatic coin selection (with `lockUnspents`) or handle lock concurrency itself with manual coin selection. In particular it needs to make sure to avoid/pause calls with automatic coin selection between calling `lockunspent` and the subsequent spending RPC.
See #7518 for historical background.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 6d1f51343cf11b07cd401fbd0c5bc3603e185a0e
fjahr:
Code review ACK 6d1f51343cf11b07cd401fbd0c5bc3603e185a0e
Tree-SHA512: 8773c788d92f2656952e1beac147ba9956b8c5132d474e0880e4c89ff53642928b4cbfcd1cb3d17798b9284f02618a8830c93a9f7a4733e5bded96adff1d5d4d
|
|
Previously only automatically selected coins were locked when lockUnspents is set.
It now also locks selected coins.
|
|
substitutes "for x in range(N):" by "for _ in range(N):"
indicates to the reader that a block is just repeated N times, and
that the loop counter is not used in the body
|
|
Checks that the RPC decodepsbt calculates the fee correctly, in particular for
PSBTs with segwit inputs that have both a witness- and a non-witness-UTXO type
set. Before commit 75122780e2c46505d977e24c5612dfa9442ab754 ("Increment input
value sum only once per UTXO in decodepsbt") the values for those inputs were
double counted.
|
|
|
|
Offline signers will always need a non_witness_utxo so make sure it is
there.
|
|
931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243 Make lint-spelling.py happy (Glenn Willen)
11a0ffb29d1b4dcc55c8826873f340ab4196af21 [gui] Load PSBT from clipboard (Glenn Willen)
a6cb0b0c29d327d01aebb98b0504f317eb19c3dc [gui] PSBT Operations Dialog (sign & broadcast) (Glenn Willen)
5dd0c03ffa3aeaa69d8a3a716f902f450d5eaaec FillPSBT: report number of inputs signed (or would sign) (Glenn Willen)
9e7b23b73387600d175aff8bd5e6624dd51f86e7 Improve TransactionErrorString messages. (Glenn Willen)
Pull request description:
Add a "PSBT Operations" dialog, reached from the "Load PSBT..." menu item, giving options to sign or broadcast the loaded PSBT as appropriate, as well as copying the result to the clipboard or saving it to a file.
This is based on Sjors' #17509, and depends on that PR going in first. (It effectively replaces the small "load PSBT" dialog from that PR with a more feature-rich one.)
Some notes:
* The way I display status information is maybe unusual (a status bar, rather than messageboxes.) I think it's helpful to have the information in it be persistent rather than transitory. But if people dislike it, I would probably move the "current state of the transaction" info to the top line of the main label, and the "what action just happened, and did it succeed" info into a messagebox.
* I don't really know much about the translation/localization stuff. I put tr() in all the places it seemed like it ought to go. I did not attempt to translate the result of TransactionErrorString (which is shared by GUI and non-GUI code); I don't know if that's correct, but it matches the "error messages in logs should be googleable in English" heuristic. I don't know whether there are things I should be doing to reduce translator effort (like minimizing the total number of distinct message strings I use, or something.)
* I don't really know how (if?) automated testing is applied to GUI code. I can make a list of PSBTs exercising all the codepaths for manual testing, if that's the right approach. Input appreciated.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
tested ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18027/commits/931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243
Sjors:
re-tACK 931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243
jb55:
ACK 931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243
achow101:
ACK 931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243
Tree-SHA512: ade52471a2242f839a8bd6a1fd231443cc4b43bb9c1de3fb5ace7c5eb59eca99b1f2e9f17dfdb4b08d84d91f5fd65677db1433dd03eef51c7774963ef4e2e74f
|
|
e5327f947c310849e1ddbb24321e4c9f85564549 [rpc] fundrawtransaction: add_inputs option to control automatic input adding (Sjors Provoost)
79804fe24bd00e183382dfbcab9343960d158aa5 [rpc] walletcreatefundedpsbt: don't automatically append inputs (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
When the user doesn't specificy inputs, it makes sense to automatically select them. But when the user does specify inputs, `walletcreatefundedpsbt` now fails if the amount is insufficient, unless `addInputs` is set to `true`.
Similarly for `fundrawtransaction` if the original transaction already specified inputs, we only add more if `addInputs` is set to `true`.
This protects against fat finger mistakes in the amount or fee rate (see also #16257). The behavior is also more similar to GUI coin selection.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e5327f947c310849e1ddbb24321e4c9f85564549
meshcollider:
utACK e5327f947c310849e1ddbb24321e4c9f85564549
Tree-SHA512: d8653b820914396c7c25b0d0a2b7e92de214aa023bc1aa085feb37d3b20fab361ebea90416a7db989f19bdc37e26cf0adfbcb712c80985c87afa67a9bd44fecb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adds a --descriptors option globally to the test framework. This will
make the test create and use descriptor wallets. However some tests may
not work with this.
Some tests are modified to work with --descriptors and run with that
option in test_runer:
* wallet_basic.py
* wallet_encryption.py
* wallet_keypool.py
* wallet_keypool_topup.py
* wallet_labels.py
* wallet_avoidreuse.py
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
When the user doesn't specificy inputs, it makes sense to automatically select them. But when the user does specify inputs, we now fail if the amount is insufficient, unless addInputs is set to true.
|
|
|
|
5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 [test] PSBT RPC: check that bip32_derivs are present by default (Sjors Provoost)
29a21c90610aed88b796a7a5900e42e9048b990e [rpc] set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methods (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13557#pullrequestreview-135905054 I recommended not including bip32 deriviation by default in PSBTs:
> _Bit of a privacy issue_: let's say person A and B are about to spend from a multisig address, sending everything to person A. Person A gives their address to person B, their wallet wallet creates a PSBT, but doesn't sign it. Wallet A then calls `walletprocesspsbt` which signs it and _spontaneously adds the master_fingerprint and bip32 path_. Same issue with `walletcreatefundedpsbt`.
>
> Adding `bip32_derivs` should probably be opt-in.
In practice I find this default quite annoying because I forget it and end up with a confused hardware wallet.
More importantly, in the multisig example I provided, it's actually essential for the other side to know the derivation details (in addition to an xpub). This allows them to check that change is going to an address you can still co-sign for (because the spending policy is unchanged except for an index).
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17264/commits/5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5
jonatack:
ACK 5bad7921d0 code review, built, ran tests, inspected/messed around with/pprinted values from the new tests. Thanks for adding the tests.
meshcollider:
utACK 5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5
Tree-SHA512: 22ad71dda96856060a96758c4ae7aafa22d5e9efba30e0c8287c711e7579849bd72593cbc0f41a2e9e8821315d78bda04e848dbb006283b841b2795e2faebcfd
|
|
|
|
|
|
In decodepsbt if an invalid amount is seen, don't calculate the fee
but still show the invalid value in the decode.
In analyze psbt, if an invalid amount is seen, set the next step to
be the creator as the creator needs to remake the transaction so that
it is valid.
|
|
773d4572a4864ab7b6380858d07d9579ff6dd9a2 Mark PSBTs spending unspendable outputs as invalid in analysis (Andrew Chow)
638e40cb6080800c7b0a7f4028f63326acbe4700 Have a PSBTAnalysis state that indicates invalid PSBT (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When analyzing an unspendable PSBT, report that it is unspendable and exit analysis early.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 773d457
instagibbs:
After some thought ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/773d4572a4864ab7b6380858d07d9579ff6dd9a2
Tree-SHA512: 99b0cb2fa1ea37593fc65a20effe881639d69ddeeecf5197bc87bc7f2220cbeb40f1d429d517e4d27f2e9fb563a00cd845d2b4b1ce05246a75a6cb56fb9b0ba5
|
|
|
|
|
|
fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2 test: Remove unused connect_nodes_bi (MarcoFalke)
fa3b9ee8b2280af4bcbcfffff275aaf8dd125929 scripted-diff: test: Replace connect_nodes_bi with connect_nodes (MarcoFalke)
faaee1e39a91b3f603881655d3980c29af09852b test: Use connect_nodes when connecting nodes in the test_framework (MarcoFalke)
1111bb91f517838e5b9f778bf6b5a9c8d561e857 test: Reformat python imports to aid scripted diff (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
By default all test nodes are connected in a chain. However, instead of just a single connection between each pair of nodes, we end up with up to four connections for a "middle" node (two outbound, two inbound, from each side).
This is generally redundant (tx and block relay should succeed with just a single connection) and confusing. For example, test timeouts after a call to `sync_` may be racy and hard to reproduce. On top of that, the test `debug.log`s are hard to read because txs and block invs may be relayed on the same connection multiple times.
Fix this by inlining `connect_nodes_bi` in the two tests that need it, and then replace it with a single `connect_nodes` in all other tests.
Historic background:
`connect_nodes_bi` has been introduced as a (temporary?) workaround for bug #5113 and #5138, which has long been fixed in #5157 and #5662.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2
jonasschnelli:
utACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2 - more of less a cleanup PR.
promag:
Tested ACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2, ran extended tests.
Tree-SHA512: 2d027a8fd150749c071b64438a0a78ec922178628a7dbb89fd1212b0fa34febd451798c940101155d3617c0426c2c4865174147709894f1f1bb6cfa336aa7e24
|
|
c0b5d9710322a614a50ab5da081558cf6a38ad2a Test that joinpsbts randomly shuffles the inputs (Andrew Chow)
6f405a1d3b38395e35571b68aae55cae50e0762a Shuffle inputs and outputs after joining psbts (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`joinpsbts` currently just adds the inputs and outputs in the order of that the PSBTs were provided. This makes it extremely easy to identify which outputs belong to which inputs. This PR changes that so that all of the inputs and outputs are shuffled in the joined transaction.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16512/commits/c0b5d9710322a614a50ab5da081558cf6a38ad2a
jonatack:
ACK c0b5d9710322a614a50ab5da081558cf6a38ad2a modulo suggestions for later.
Tree-SHA512: 14a0b7aae07d92e6d2c76a3a3b228b481e1964cb7d34f97515bdda18e2ea05a9f97c5a22affc143b86ae8b95c3cb239849fb54219d65512bc2112264dca915c8
|
