| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
b9f4b211df24fed85dddbe69355648b57fd331ac tests: Use MAX_SCRIPT_ELEMENT_SIZE from script.py (Daniel Kraft)
Pull request description:
`p2p_segwit.py` and `test_framework/script.py` both define a constant for `MAX_SCRIPT_ELEMENT_SIZE` (=520 bytes), which is redundant. This change uses the constant defined in the `script.py` module for `p2p_segwit.py`.
Tree-SHA512: 2bc295ff26d9b052d4e05b85c27e748175884d6689a92c19337fc4db8bf439e3abe3edc91af1aaf46d8dc42ed96a85ad17110546d2274a0d9cda3abd6b878a31
|
|
|
|
p2p_segwit.py and test_framework/script.py both define a constant for
MAX_SCRIPT_ELEMENT_SIZE (=520 bytes), which is redundant. This change
uses the constant defined in the script.py module for p2p_segwit.py.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The subtest wrapper logs the name of the subtest.
|
|
This re-orders the defintions in p2p_segwit so subtests are
defined in the order that they're called.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7384a35 [tests] Remove spurious error log in p2p_segwit.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Since 265d7c44b1aae06aee93f745a865807732218a73, when wait_until() fails,
an error message is logged to the test framework log. This means that if
wait_until() is called inside a try-except with the expectation that it
will fail, a spurious error message is logged.
wait_until() shouldn't be called with the expectation of failure. Fix
that in p2p_segwit.py.
Tree-SHA512: 0a43790b58fee7d2d6bef36e736b0b9ffdde6de5f12d33d15e8e07323597e2be4cd98f17e7fc3a135e06bdafe36613466c0a57e81134e59a251383c62b91918f
|
|
364bae5 qa: Pad scriptPubKeys to get minimum sized txs (MarcoFalke)
7485488 Policy to reject extremely small transactions (Johnson Lau)
0f8719b Add transaction tests for constant scriptCode (Johnson Lau)
9dabfe4 Add constant scriptCode policy in non-segwit scripts (Johnson Lau)
Pull request description:
This disables `OP_CODESEPARATOR` in non-segwit scripts (even in an unexecuted branch), and makes a positive `FindAndDelete` result invalid. This ensures that the `scriptCode` serialized in `SignatureHash` is always the same as the script passing to the `EvalScript`.
Tree-SHA512: a0552cb920294d130251c48053fa2ff1fbdd26332e62b52147d918837852750f0ce35ce2cd1cbdb86588943312f8154ccb4925e850dbb7c2254bc353070cd5f8
|
|
Remove trailing whitespace from Python files.
Convert tabs to spaces.
|
|
Since 265d7c44b1aae06aee93f745a865807732218a73, when wait_until() fails,
an error message is logged to the test framework log. This means that if
wait_until() is called inside a try-except with the expectation that it
will fail, a spurious error message is logged.
wait_until() shouldn't be called with the expectation of failure. Fix
that in p2p_segwit.py.
|
|
|
|
8b56fc0b91 [qa] Test that v0 segwit outputs can't be spent pre-activation (Suhas Daftuar)
ccb8ca42a4 Always enforce SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS with P2SH (Suhas Daftuar)
5c31b20a35 [qa] Remove some pre-activation segwit tests (Suhas Daftuar)
95749a5836 Separate NULLDUMMY enforcement from SEGWIT enforcement (Suhas Daftuar)
ce650182f4 Use P2SH consensus rules for all blocks (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
As discussed at the IRC meeting back in October (https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-core-dev/2017-10-12/?msg=92231929&page=2), I had looked into the feasibility of enforcing P2SH and SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS back to the genesis block.
The P2SH change is pretty straightforward -- there was only one historical block on mainnet that violated the rule, so I carved out an exception to it, similar to the way we have exceptions for the BIP30 violators.
The segwit change is not entirely as clear. The code changes themselves are relatively straightforward: we can just always turn on SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS whenever P2SH is active. However conceptually, this amounts to splitting up BIP141 into two parts, the part that implements new script rules, and the part that handles witness commitments in blocks.
Arguably though the script rules are really defined in BIP 143 anyway, and so this really amounts to backdating BIP 143 -- script rules for v0 segwit outputs -- back to genesis. So maybe conceptually this isn't so bad...
I don't feel strongly about this change in either direction; I started working on it because I was searching for a way to simplify the way we understand and implement the consensus rules around segwit, but I'm not yet sure whether I think this achieves anything toward that goal.
ping @TheBlueMatt
Tree-SHA512: 73551d4a983eb9792c7ac67f56005822528ac4d1fd52c27cee6d305ebee953f69687ef4ddee8bdc0fec77f77e6b5a9d669750793efee54c076533a095e233042
|
|
9e50c337c Note new weight field in release-notes. (Matt Corallo)
d0d9112b7 Test new weight field in p2p_segwit (Matt Corallo)
2874709a9 Expose a transaction's weight via RPC (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
This seems like an obvious oversight.
Tree-SHA512: defd047de34fb06a31f589e1a4eef68fcae85095cc67b7c8fb434237bb40300d7f3f97e852d3e7226330e26b96943846b7baf6da0cfc79db8d56e9c1f7848ad9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also updates the comments for an existing test, that now should be rewritten.
Includes changes suggested by John Newbery.
|
|
This is in preparation for always enforcing SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4d9b4256d8 Fix typos (Dimitris Apostolou)
Pull request description:
Unfortunately I messed up my repo while trying to squash #12593 so I created a PR with just the correct fixes.
Tree-SHA512: 295d77b51bd2a9381f1802c263de7ffb2edd670d9647391e32f9a414705b3c8b483bb0e469a9b85ab6a70919ea13397fa8dfda2aea7a398b64b187f178fe6a06
|
|
|
|
Several test scripts define a subclass of P2PInterface called TestNode.
This commit renames those to TestP2PConn since we already have a
TestNode class in the test framework.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i s/TestNode/TestP2PConn/ test/functional/*py test/functional/test_framework/comptool.py
_END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
|
