| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Github-Pull: #14180
Rebased-From: fac95398366f644911b58f1605e6bc37fb76782d
|
|
Github-Pull: #14024
Rebased-From: fa3e9f7627784ee00980590e5bf044a0e1249999
|
|
44bbceeef1 [Tests] Cleanup feature_block.py, remove unnecessary PreviousSpendableOutput object (Conor Scott)
736f941424 [Tests] Cleanup extra instances of create_transaction (Conor Scott)
157651855f [Tests] Rename create_tx and move to blocktools.py (Conor Scott)
Pull request description:
There currently exist seven ([1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_cltv.py#L52-L60), [2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_csv_activation.py#L88-L95) [3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_dersig.py#L40-L48), [4](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py#L100-L108), [5](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/util.py#L529-L535), [6](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L120-L129), [7](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L1218-L1220)) implementations of a function called something similar to `create_transaction` in the functional tests, some of which are exact copies of each other.
This PR aims to clean this up into [three different cases implemented in blocktools.py](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/create_tx_cleanup/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L121-L149)
1. `create_tx_with_script`: Return transaction object spending generic tx output optionally specifying scriptSig and scriptPubKey
2. `create_transaction`: Return transaction object spending coinbase tx
2. `create_raw_transaction`: Return raw transaction (hex string) spending coinbase tx
I am not committed to any of these function names, so I'll gladly take suggestions on there.
Additionally there are some related cleanups to feature_block.py tests, specifically removing the [PreviousSpendableOutput](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L51-L54) object, which seems like an unnecessary layer given that every instance spends the 0 output.
Tree-SHA512: 63c6233b6f0942c81ba1ca67ea6770809b8c9409314c6d4cf8e5a3991cb9ee92b22bebe88c0dde45cd71e754eb351230c4c404b70ff118f5f43c034452ada65c
|
|
fa5587fe71 qa: wait_for_verack by default (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This removes the need to do so manually every time a connection is added.
Tree-SHA512: a46c92cb4df41e30778b42b9fd3dcbd8d2d82aa7503d1213cb1c1165034f648d8caee01c292e2d87d05b0f71696996eef5be8a753f35ab49e5f66b0e3bf29f21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The node will often disconnect before sending a reject code. A more
robust solution would be to read from the debug log.
|
|
d8c4998f31 Fix typos (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Fix typos.
Tree-SHA512: 9af52a9799e6892b162e4aa1bcd6585502e10650b8aced59e7346dbb2f08544330081eb79328255fad1d358c095507956e049d354c4383b6965d4d5a7d635425
|
|
This commit adds a boolean option `-enablebip61`, defaulting to `1`, that
can be used to disable the sending of BIP61 `reject` messages. This
functionality has been requested for various reasons:
- security (DoS): reject messages can reveal internal state that can be
used to target certain resources such as the mempool more easily.
- bandwidth: a typical node sends lots of reject messages; this counts
against upstream bandwidth. Also the reject messages tend to be larger
than the message that was rejected.
On the other hand, reject messages can be useful while developing client
software (I found them indispensable while creating bitcoin-submittx),
as well as for our own test cases, so whatever the default becomes on the
long run, IMO the functionality should be retained as option. But that's
a discussion for later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove unused variable reassignments in p2p_invalid_tx.py and call
send_txs_and_test() with valid transaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
