| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
d2ce315fbf [docs] add release note for change to GBT (John Newbery)
0025c9eae4 [mining] segwit option must be set in GBT (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Calling getblocktemplate without the segwit rule specified is most
likely a client error, since it results in lower fees for the miner.
Prevent this client error by failing getblocktemplate if called without
the segwit rule specified.
Of the previous 1000 blocks (measured at block [551591 (hash 0x...173c811)](https://blockstream.info/block/000000000000000000173c811e79858808abc3216af607035973f002bef60a7a)), 991 included segwit transactions.
Tree-SHA512: 7933b073d72683c9ab9318db46a085ec19a56a14937945c73f783ac7656887619a86b74db0bdfcb8121df44f63a1d6a6fb19e98505b2a26a6a8a6e768e442fee
|
|
Calling getblocktemplate without the segwit rule specified is most
likely a client error, since it results in lower fees for the miner.
Prevent this client error by failing getblocktemplate if called without
the segwit rule specified.
|
|
|
|
rpc calls
5eb20f81d9 Consistently use ParseHashV to validate hash inputs in rpc (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
ParseHashV validates the length and encoding of the string and throws
an informative RPC error on failure, which is as good or better than
these alternative calls.
Note I switched ParseHashV to check string length first, because
IsHex tests that the length is even, and an error like:
"must be of length 64 (not 63, for X)" is much more informative than
"must be hexadecimal string (not X)" in that case.
Split from #13420
Tree-SHA512: f0786b41c0d7793ff76e4b2bb35547873070bbf7561d510029e8edb93f59176277efcd4d183b3185532ea69fc0bbbf3dbe9e19362e8017007ae9d51266cd78ae
|
|
|
|
|
|
ParseHashV validates the length and encoding of the string and throws
an informative RPC error on failure, which is as good or better than
these alternative calls.
Note I switched ParseHashV to check string length first, because
IsHex tests that the length is even, and an error like:
"must be of length 64 (not 63, for X)" is much more informative than
"must be hexadecimal string (not X)"
|
|
|
|
Same reasoning as in 55f89da1a5048cf275c37bceef664e7c04831a35
|
|
|
|
|
|
tests
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/\<signrawtransaction\>/signrawtransactionwithwallet/g' test/functional/*.py
sed -i 's/\<signrawtransaction\>/signrawtransactionwithwallet/g' test/functional/test_framework/*.py
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
This will include the error code and debug output as well as the reason string.
See #11955 for the motivation.
|
|
|
