aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/functional/interface_rpc.py
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-09-13Test batch rpc with paramsGregory Sanders
2020-04-16scripted-diff: Bump copyright headersMarcoFalke
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT- ./contrib/devtools/copyright_header.py update ./ -END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2020-02-04Merge #16681: Tests: Use self.chain instead of 'regtest' in all current testsMarcoFalke
1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125 Tests: Use self.chain instead of 'regtest' in almost all current tests (Jorge Timón) Pull request description: Simply avoiding the hardcoded string in more places for consistency. It can also allow for more easily reusing tests for other chains other than regtest. Separated from #8994 . Continues #16509 . It is still not complete (ie to be complete, we need the -chain parameter in #16680 and make whether acceptnonstdtxs is allowed for that chain or not customizable for regtest [or for custom chains like in #8994 ] ). But while being incomplete like #16509 , it's quite simple to review and another step forward IMO. ACKs for top commit: Sjors: re-ACK 1abcecc. I think it's an improvement even if incomplete and if some PR's might accidentally bring "regtest" back. Subsequent improvements hopefully don't have to touch 16 files. elichai: Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125 ryanofsky: Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125. ryanofsky: Code review ACK 1abcecc40c518a98b7d17880657ec0247abdf125 Tree-SHA512: 5620de6dab235ca8bd8670d6366c7b9f04f0e3ca9c5e7f87765b38e16ed80c17d7d1630c0d5fd7c5526f070830d94dc74cc2096d8ede87dc7180ed20569509ee
2019-12-06tests: Mark functional tests not supporting bitcoin-cli (--usecli) as suchpracticalswift
2019-10-26Tests: Use self.chain instead of 'regtest' in almost all current testsJorge Timón
2019-05-16Add a 'logpath' field to getrpcinfodarosior
2019-03-01Add regtests for HTTP status codes.Daniel Kraft
This adds explicit tests for the returned HTTP status codes to interface_rpc.py (for error cases) and the HTTP JSON-RPC client in general for success. PR 15381 brought up discussion about the HTTP status codes in general, and the general opinion was that the current choice may not be ideal but should not be changed to preserve compatibility with existing JSON-RPC clients. Thus it makes sense to actually test the current status to ensure this desired compatibility is not broken accidentally.
2019-01-02qa: Add tests for getrpcinfoJoão Barbosa
2018-11-21Add regtest for JSON-RPC batch calls.Daniel Kraft
This adds a new regtest file 'interface_rpc.py', containing a test for batch JSON-RPC requests. Those were previously not tested at all. Tests for basic requests are not really necessary, as those are used anyway in lots of other regtests. The existing interface_http.py file is more about the underlying HTTP connection, so adding a new interface file for the JSON-RPC specific things makes sense.