| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
b224a47a1 Add address_types test (Pieter Wuille)
7ee54fd7c Support downgrading after recovered keypool witness keys (Pieter Wuille)
940a21932 SegWit wallet support (Pieter Wuille)
f37c64e47 Implicitly know about P2WPKH redeemscripts (Pieter Wuille)
57273f2b3 [test] Serialize CTransaction with witness by default (Pieter Wuille)
cf2c0b6f5 Support P2WPKH and P2SH-P2WPKH in dumpprivkey (Pieter Wuille)
37c03d3e0 Support P2WPKH addresses in create/addmultisig (Pieter Wuille)
3eaa003c8 Extend validateaddress information for P2SH-embedded witness (Pieter Wuille)
30a27dc5b Expose method to find key for a single-key destination (Pieter Wuille)
985c79552 Improve witness destination types and use them more (Pieter Wuille)
cbe197470 [refactor] GetAccount{PubKey,Address} -> GetAccountDestination (Pieter Wuille)
0c8ea6380 Abstract out IsSolvable from Witnessifier (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This implements a minimum viable implementation of SegWit wallet support, based on top of #11389, and includes part of the functionality from #11089.
Two new configuration options are added:
* `-addresstype`, with options `legacy`, `p2sh`, and `bech32`. It controls what kind of addresses are produced by `getnewaddress`, `getaccountaddress`, and `createmultisigaddress`.
* `-changetype`, with the same options, and by default equal to `-addresstype`, that controls what kind of change is used.
All wallet private and public keys can be used for any type of address. Support for address types dependent on different derivation paths will need a major overhaul of how our internal detection of outputs work. I expect that that will happen for a next major version.
The above also applies to imported keys, as having a distinction there but not for normal operations is a disaster for testing, and probably for comprehension of users. This has some ugly effects, like needing to associate the provided label to `importprivkey` with each style address for the corresponding key.
To deal with witness outputs requiring a corresponding redeemscript in wallet, three approaches are used:
* All SegWit addresses created through `getnewaddress` or multisig RPCs explicitly get their redeemscripts added to the wallet file. This means that downgrading after creating a witness address will work, as long as the wallet file is up to date.
* All SegWit keys in the wallet get an _implicit_ redeemscript added, without it being written to the file. This means recovery of an old backup will work, as long as you use new software.
* All keypool keys that are seen used in transactions explicitly get their redeemscripts added to the wallet files. This means that downgrading after recovering from a backup that includes a witness address will work.
These approaches correspond to solutions 3a, 1a, and 5a respectively from https://gist.github.com/sipa/125cfa1615946d0c3f3eec2ad7f250a2. As argued there, there is no full solution for dealing with the case where you both downgrade and restore a backup, so that's also not implemented.
`dumpwallet`, `importwallet`, `importmulti`, `signmessage` and `verifymessage` don't work with SegWit addresses yet. They're remaining TODOs, for this PR or a follow-up. Because of that, several tests unexpectedly run with `-addresstype=legacy` for now.
Tree-SHA512: d425dbe517c0422061ab8dacdc3a6ae47da071450932ed992c79559d922dff7b2574a31a8c94feccd3761c1dffb6422c50055e6dca8e3cf94a169bc95e39e959
|
|
This introduces two command line flags (-addresstype and -changetype) which control
the type of addresses/outputs created by the GUI and RPCs. Certain RPCs allow
overriding these (`getnewaddress` and `getrawchangeaddress`). Supported types
are "legacy" (P2PKH and P2SH-multisig), "p2sh-segwit" (P2SH-P2WPKH and P2SH-P2WSH-multisig),
and "bech32" (P2WPKH and P2WSH-multisig).
A few utility functions are added to the wallet to construct different address type
and to add the necessary entries to the wallet file to be compatible with earlier
versions (see `CWallet::LearnRelatedScripts`, `GetDestinationForKey`,
`GetAllDestinationsForKey`, `CWallet::AddAndGetDestinationForScript`).
|
|
|
|
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/assert_raises_jsonrpc/assert_raises_rpc_error/g' test/functional/*py test/functional/test_framework/*py
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
|
|
|
|
7148b74dc [tests] Functional tests must explicitly set num_nodes (John Newbery)
5448a1471 [tests] don't override __init__() in individual tests (John Newbery)
6cf094a02 [tests] Avoid passing around member variables in test_framework (John Newbery)
36b626867 [tests] TestNode: separate add_node from start_node (John Newbery)
be2a2ab6a [tests] fix - use rpc_timeout as rpc timeout (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Some additional tidyups after the introduction of TestNode:
- commit 1 makes TestNode use the correct rpc timeout. This should have been included in #11077
- commit 2 separates `add_node()` from `start_node()` as originally discussed here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10556#discussion_r121161453 with @kallewoof . The test writer no longer needs to assign to `self.nodes` when starting/stopping nodes.
- commit 3 adds a `set_test_params()` method, so individual tests don't need to override `__init__()` and call `super().__init__()`
Tree-SHA512: 0adb030623b96675b5c29e2890ce99ccd837ed05f721d0c91b35378c5ac01b6658174aac12f1f77402e1d38b61f39b3c43b4df85c96952565dde1cda05b0db84
|
|
Almost all test scripts currently need to override the __init__()
method. When they do that they need to call into super().__init__() as
the base class does some generic initialization.
This commit makes the base class __init__() call into set_test_params()
method. Individual test cases can override set_test_params() to setup
their test parameters.
|
|
|
|
Separates the act of creating a TestNode object from starting the node.
The test_framework now keeps track of its list of TestNodes, and test
writers can call start_node() and stop_node() without having to update
the self.nodes list.
|
|
|
|
This commit changes the individual test scripts to call the
start_node(s) and stop_node(s) methods in BitcoinTestFramework.
|
|
|
|
|
