Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
e9d60af9889c12b4d427adefa53fd234e417f8f6 refactor: Replace init retry for loop with if statement (TheCharlatan)
c1d8870ea4155c2766d30d38fc5b1afc63dcd364 refactor: Move most of init retry for loop to a function (TheCharlatan)
781c01f58066d375c14b1a717160f51c2f2ebe20 init: Check mempool arguments in AppInitParameterInteractions (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
The for loop around the chain loading logic in `init.cpp` allows users of the GUI to retry once on failure with reindexing without having to manually set the reindex flag on startup. However this current mechanism has problems:
* It is badly documented and has led to confusion among developers and bugs making it into master. Examples:
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28830/files#r1598392660
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30132#issuecomment-2120741121
* It can only ever iterate once, making the choice of a for loop questionable.
* With its large scope it is easy for re-entry bugs to sneak in. Example:
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28830#discussion_r1601589963
Attempt to fix this by moving the bulk of the logic into a separate function and replacing the for loop with a simpler `if` statement.
The diff's in this pull request are best reviewed with `--color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`. The error behaviour can be tested by either manually making `LoadChainstate` return a failure, or deleting some of the block index database files.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK e9d60af9889c12b4d427adefa53fd234e417f8f6 🚸
josibake:
crACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/e9d60af9889c12b4d427adefa53fd234e417f8f6
achow101:
ACK e9d60af9889c12b4d427adefa53fd234e417f8f6
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK e9d60af9889c12b4d427adefa53fd234e417f8f6. Nice change to make AppInitMain shorter and more understandable.
Tree-SHA512: 5e5c0a5fd1b32225346450f8482f0ae8792e1557cdab1518112c1a3ec3a4400b64f5796692245cc5bf2f9010bb97b3a9558f07626a285ccd6ae525dd671ead13
|
|
implementation
5c7cacf649a6b474b876a7d219c7dc683a25e33d ci: Remove natpmp build option and libnatpmp dependency (laanwj)
7e7ec984da50f45491b994aaab180e7735ad1d8f doc: Remove mention of natpmp build options (laanwj)
061c3e32a26c6c04bf734d62627403758d7e51d9 depends: Drop natpmp and associated option from depends (laanwj)
20a18bf6aa38e87f72e2645482d00d0c77a344f5 build: Drop libnatpmp from build system (laanwj)
7b04709862f48e9020c7bef79cb31dd794cf91d0 qt: Changes for built-in PCP+NAT-PMP (laanwj)
52f8ef66c61b82457a161f3b90cc87f57d1dda80 net: Replace libnatpmp with built-in NATPMP+PCP implementation in mapport (laanwj)
97c97177cdb2f596aa7d4a65c4bde87de50a96f2 net: Add PCP and NATPMP implementation (laanwj)
d72df63d16941576b3523cfeaa49985cf3cd4d42 net: Use GetLocalAddresses in Discover (laanwj)
e02030432b77abbf27bb4f67d879d3ad6d6366e6 net: Add netif utility (laanwj)
754e4254388ec8ac1be6cf807bf300cd43fd3da5 crypto: Add missing WriteBE16 function (laanwj)
Pull request description:
Continues #30005. Closes #17012..
This PR adds PCP (Port Control Protocol) from [RFC6887](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6887). This adds, in addition to the existing IPv4 port mapping (which now uses PCP, with fallback to NAT-PMP), support for IPv6 pinholing-that is, opening a port on the firewall to make it reachable.
PCP, like NAT-PMP is a simple UDP-based protocol, and the implementation is self-contained, so this gets rid of lthe libnatpnp dependency without adding a new one. It should otherwise be a drop-in replacement. NAT-PMP fallback is implemented so this will not make router support worse.
For now it is disabled by default, though in the future (not in this PR) we could consider enable it by default to increase the number of connectable nodes without adding significant attack surface.
To test:
```bash
bitcoind -regtest -natpmp=1 -debug=net
```
(most of the changes in this PR are, ironically, removing the libnatpmp dependency and associated build system and build docs)
## TODO
- [x] Default gateway discovery on Linux / FreeBSD
- [x] Default gateway discovery on Windows
- [x] Default gateway discovery on MacOS
- [x] Either solve FreeBSD compile issue (probably upstream issue) or remove FreeBSD support
## Things to consider for follow-up PRs
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30043#discussion_r1658764974 avoid unreachable nets (not given to -onlynet=)
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30043#discussion_r1658949236 could announce an addr:port where we do not listen (no -bind)
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30043#discussion_r1684368824 could announce the wrong port because it uses GetListenPort()
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30043#discussion_r1679709347 if we requested one port but another was assigned, then which one to use in the renewal?
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30043#discussion_r1772017020 Use `GetAdapterAddresses` to discover local addresses for Windows
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 5c7cacf649a6b474b876a7d219c7dc683a25e33d
achow101:
ACK 5c7cacf649a6b474b876a7d219c7dc683a25e33d
vasild:
ACK 5c7cacf649a6b474b876a7d219c7dc683a25e33d
Tree-SHA512: e35b69e56d5f5449a3d48a799f9b7b65107c65eeb3e245c2c1e9d42221e469ca5ead90afae423160601cd664dd553a51c859e04f4492f335b064aae3bf23e3bc
|
|
|
|
Change option help, and remove conditionals.
|
|
|
|
Add a RFC 6886 NATPMP and RFC 6887 Port Control Protocol (PCP)
implementation, to replace libnatpmp.
|
|
FailFmtWithError
6c3c619b35cc03e883f9d2b3326f906aedde9ba7 test: generalize HasReason and use it in FailFmtWithError (LÅ‘rinc)
Pull request description:
Standardized boost exception checking in recent tests introduced in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30546#discussion_r1756493521 by extending `HasReason` to accept `const char*` through `string_view` in `operator()`.
Note that `HasReason` only checks partial matches - but since we're specifying the whole error string, it doesn't affect us in this case.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 6c3c619b35cc03e883f9d2b3326f906aedde9ba7
hodlinator:
ACK 6c3c619b35cc03e883f9d2b3326f906aedde9ba7
Tree-SHA512: 740fb18b8fea78e4eb9740ceb0fe75d37246c28cfa2638b9d093e9514dd6d7926cc5be9ec57f8027cca3aa9d616e8c54322d2401cfa67fd25282f7816e63532d
|
|
The current order is incorrect:
```bash
./build/src/bitcoin-cli loadtxoutset -rpcclienttimeout=0 utxo-840000.dat
error code: -1
error message:
loadtxoutset "path"
```
|
|
1a332817665f77f55090fa166930fec0e5500727 doc: multiprocess documentation improvements (Ryan Ofsky)
d043950ba245cdcd09dc389a71d43b0a58e41a8b multiprocess: Add serialization code for BlockValidationState (Ryan Ofsky)
33c2eee285e35db50b33efb6e782ff002f9d18ec multiprocess: Add IPC wrapper for Mining interface (Ryan Ofsky)
06882f84017f6b569b46a644f39b6d3c120ec6cf multiprocess: Add serialization code for vector<char> (Russell Yanofsky)
095286f790acda4a32f04c77aa86106007e2a0d8 multiprocess: Add serialization code for CTransaction (Russell Yanofsky)
69dfeb18761cfd933b8a9a6e69ce9d3c516ba949 multiprocess: update common-types.h to use C++20 concepts (Ryan Ofsky)
206c6e78eec7c71d317666a1af07acf357ba001e build: Make bitcoin_ipc_test depend on bitcoin_ipc (Ryan Ofsky)
070e6a32d5ff4be2f4f1f6a8200fba2f61df16e3 depends: Update libmultiprocess library for cmake headers target (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Add Cap'n Proto wrapper for the Mining interface introduced in #30200, and its associated types.
This PR combined with #30509 will allow a separate mining process, like the one being implemented in https://github.com/Sjors/bitcoin/pull/48, to connect to the node over IPC, and create, manage, and submit block templates. (#30437 shows another simpler demo of a process using the Mining interface.)
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28722).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 1a332817665f77f55090fa166930fec0e5500727
TheCharlatan:
ACK 1a332817665f77f55090fa166930fec0e5500727
itornaza:
ACK 1a332817665f77f55090fa166930fec0e5500727
Tree-SHA512: 0791078dd6885dbd81e3d14c75fffff3da8d1277873af379ea6f9633e910c11485bb324e4cde3d936d50d343b16a10b0e8fc1e0fc6d7bdca7f522211da50c01e
|
|
The for loop has been a long standing source of confusion and bugs, both
because its purpose is not clearly documented and because the body of
the for loop contains a lot of logic.
Co-Authored-By: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
|
|
This makes it clearer which state is being mutated by the function and
facilitates getting rid of the for loop in the following commit. Move
creation of the required options into the function too, such that the
function takes fewer arguments and is more self-contained.
Co-Authored-By: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
|
|
This makes the handling more consistent and reports errors sooner.
|
|
The comparison of m_best_invalid with the tip of the respective chainstate
makes no sense for the background chainstate, and can lead to incorrect
error messages.
|
|
7bd3ee62f6d6f59ca599e85f81776d282dee1539 test: Use shell builtins in run_command test case (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
Uses the [suggested command](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30938#issuecomment-2363906135)
Fixes #30938
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 7bd3ee62f6d6f59ca599e85f81776d282dee1539
hebasto:
ACK 7bd3ee62f6d6f59ca599e85f81776d282dee1539.
Tree-SHA512: 683b15cafaf0103eeadf872ea6ce9a7d884b2605d3dcf4e66b0173cdb149c24965e7c5fa62aaddf2ac55df3f449aeb787176992c96cfee5d0b86621259e1dfe9
|
|
f20fe33e94c6752e5d2ed92511c0bf51a10716ee test: Add basic balance coverage to wallet_assumeutxo.py (Fabian Jahr)
037b101e808ccf9e717751619e04f6e87d614efd test: Add coverage for best block locator write in wallet_backup (Fabian Jahr)
31c0df038909e40fe9618a4595254907ed1de907 wallet: migration, write best locator before unloading wallet (furszy)
7e3dbe4180cbeb65e59b53d9fa98509e9189549d wallet: Write best block to disk before backup (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
I discovered that we don't write the best block to disk when trying to explain the behavior described here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30455#discussion_r1719951882
In the context of that test, the behavior is confusing and I think it also shows that one of the already existing tests in `wallet_assumeutxo.py` doesn't actually test what it says. It only fails because the best block isn't written and actually, the height of the backup that is loaded is at the snapshot height during backup. So it really shouldn't fail since it's past the background sync blocks already.
I'm not sure if this is super relevant in practice though so I am first looking for concept ACKs on the `BackupWallet` code change. Either way, I think this behavior should be documented better if it is left as is and the test should be changed.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK f20fe33e94c6752e5d2ed92511c0bf51a10716ee
furszy:
ACK f20fe33
Tree-SHA512: bb384a940df5c942fffe2eb06314ade4fc5d9b924012bfef3b1c456c4182a30825d1e137d8ae561d93d3a8a2f4d1c1ffe568132d20fa7d04844f1e289ab4a28b
|
|
Co-authored-by: TheCharlatan <seb.kung@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add support for passing CTransaction and CTransactionRef types to IPC
functions.
These types can't be passed currently because IPC serialization code currently
only supports deserializing types that have an Unserialize() method, which
CTransaction does not, because it is supposed to represent immutable
transactions. Work around this by adding a CustomReadField overload that will
call CTransaction's deserialize_type constructor.
These types also can't be passed currently because serializing transactions
requires TransactionSerParams to be set. Fix this by setting TX_WITH_WITNESS as
default serialization parameters for IPC code.
|
|
Idea came from review comment by ion-
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30510#discussion_r1757372497
|
|
This change is needed to allow generated capnp code in src/ipc/capnp/ to be
used in unit tests for better test coverage in upcoming commits.
|
|
replace RPCNotifyBlockChange, drop CRPCSignals & g_best_block
7942951e3fcc58f7db0059546d03be9ea243f1db Remove unused g_best_block (Ryan Ofsky)
e3a560ca68d79b056a105a65ed0c174a9631aba9 rpc: use waitTipChanged for longpoll (Ryan Ofsky)
460687a09c2af336fce853d9ffb790d01429eec6 Remove unused CRPCSignals (Sjors Provoost)
dca923150e3ac10a57c23a7e29e76516d32ec10d Replace RPCNotifyBlockChange with waitTipChanged() (Sjors Provoost)
2a40ee1121903847cdd3f6c5b4796e4d5471b2df rpc: check for negative timeout arg in waitfor* (Sjors Provoost)
de7c855b3af99fe6b62279c5c2d08888a5437c4a rpc: recommend -rpcclienttimeout=0 for waitfor* (Sjors Provoost)
77ec072925a6d558b3c6b075becbed44727c5989 rpc: fix waitfornewblock description (Sjors Provoost)
285fe9fb51c808a9edd91b05bd3134fc18de0fb6 rpc: add test for waitforblock and waitfornewblock (Sjors Provoost)
b94b27cf05c709674117e308e441a8d1efddcd0a Add waitTipChanged to Mining interface (Sjors Provoost)
7eccdaf16081d6f624c4dc21df75b0474e049d2b node: Track last block that received a blockTip notification (Sjors Provoost)
ebb8215f23644f901c46fd4977b7d4b08fae5104 Rename getTipHash() to getTip() and return BlockRef (Sjors Provoost)
89a8f74bbbb900abfb3d8e946eea18ad7b1513ad refactor: rename BlockKey to BlockRef (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This continues the work in #30200 so that a future Stratum v2 Template Provider (see #29432) can avoid accessing node internals. It needs to know when a new block arrives in order to push new templates to connected clients.
`waitTipChanged()` uses a new kernel notification `notifications().m_tip_block_mutex`, which this PR also introduces (a previous version used `g_best_block`).
In order to ensure the new method works as intended, the `waitfornewblock`, `waitforblock` and `waitforblockheight` RPC methods are refactored to use it. This allows removing `RPCNotifyBlockChange`.
There's a commit to add (direct) tests for the methods that are about to be refactored:
- `waitfornewblock` was already implicitly tested by `feature_shutdown.py`.
- `waitforblockheight` by `feature_coinstatsindex.py` and `example_test.py`
This PR renames `getTipHash()` to `getTip()` and returns a `BlockRef` (renamed from `BlockKey`) so that callers can use either the height or hash.
The later commits make trivial improvements to the `waitfor*` RPC calls (not needed for this PR).
The `waitTipChanged()` method could probably also be used for the longpoll functionality in `getblocktemplate`, but I'm a bit reluctant to touch that.
`RPCServer::OnStarted` no longer does anything and `RPCServer::OnStopped` merely prints a log statement. They were added in #5711 as a refactor. This PR drops them entirely.
Finally `g_best_block` is also dropped.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 7942951e3fcc58f7db0059546d03be9ea243f1db
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 7942951e3fcc58f7db0059546d03be9ea243f1db. Just rebased since last review
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 7942951e3fcc58f7db0059546d03be9ea243f1db
Tree-SHA512: a5559446b4000c95e07aad33284b7ee2e57aafd87e1ae778b3825d59689566d047a8047e47a10f76e6e341e7dc72fd265a65afbc0a9c011d17c4cafd55031837
|
|
|
|
This has the same code, it's unnecessary to duplicate it.
|
|
This adds an utility header with two functions that will be needed for
PCP, `QueryDefaultGateway` and `GetLocalAddresses`.
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
|
|
Also add fuzz test, mimicing the WriteLE16 one.
|
|
accept spans, not just vectors
5e190cd11f6ed8b7ab4db0f01192de63deaf6fd7 Replace CScript _hex_v_u8 appends with _hex (LÅ‘rinc)
cac846c2fbf6fc69bfc288fd387aa3f68d84d584 Allow CScript's operator<< to accept spans, not just vectors (LÅ‘rinc)
c78d8ff4cb83506413bb73833fc5c04885d0ece8 prevector: avoid GCC bogus warnings in insert method (LÅ‘rinc)
Pull request description:
Split out of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30377#discussion_r1722326803.
Replace `_hex_v_u8` for `CScript` appends to `_hex`, to skip vector conversion before serializing to the `prevector` in `CScript`.
To enable both `unsigned char` and `std::byte` values, I've extracted the existing serialization to append the size & data in separate private methods to clarify that it does more than just a simple data insertion.
There were also discussion on eliminating the operators here completely to obviate when we're serializing fixed-size collections as raw bytes, and when we're prefixing them with their size - should also be done in a separate PR.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 5e190cd11f6ed8b7ab4db0f01192de63deaf6fd7
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 5e190cd11f6ed8b7ab4db0f01192de63deaf6fd7. Looks good!
hodlinator:
re-ACK 5e190cd11f6ed8b7ab4db0f01192de63deaf6fd7
Tree-SHA512: 27a646629e017b2a05416d5eb964dda8b25b900d466221eff7bfa1339ded443e1c5c4cf8ff20cb3bba915a2603787a9fa6f6ec12bc0b9415d9eb07b57289192b
|
|
chain work never exceeds minimum work
284bd17309ab3b124d9dcddfec62f5506383343b add check that chainwork doesn't exceed minimum work (marcofleon)
9aa5d1c3fcd10ecb94310ad515a8569bc2d418f8 add clarification in comment (marcofleon)
Pull request description:
A followup to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30661
The added assertion just makes sure that the fuzz test is working as intended. If we're sure that the total work of the test chain is never more than minimum chain work, then we can be sure that the later assertion failure would actually mean that a bug in the headers presync logic was found.
This PR also addresses:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30661#discussion_r1746614616
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30661#discussion_r1764943665
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30661#discussion_r1764961991
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK 284bd17309ab3b124d9dcddfec62f5506383343b
maflcko:
review ACK 284bd17309ab3b124d9dcddfec62f5506383343b
achow101:
ACK 284bd17309ab3b124d9dcddfec62f5506383343b
Tree-SHA512: 76a9dffea4b6e13499c636d6ad26af06135319d25117c0eb40cf8dfcfdca6a4549c9b4d2ba835192ca355e0f8d476227aeabf8bdb68770def72a9fb521533fe5
|
|
`crypto_aeadchacha20poly1305` target
f482d0e366a84008129913b442f0c955de79ac93 fuzz: reduce number of iterations in `crypto_aeadchacha20poly1305` target (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
By reducing the number of iterations we improve the performance of this target and may increase coverage.
Running with `-runs=100000` from qa-assets I noticed a significant performance improvement and an increase on cov:
master:
```
#100000 DONE cov: 567 ft: 4078 corp: 124/33Kb lim: 4096 exec/s: 793 rss: 499Mb
```
PR:
```
#100000 DONE cov: 568 ft: 3833 corp: 113/15188b lim: 1746 exec/s: 1250 rss: 544Mb
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK f482d0e366a84008129913b442f0c955de79ac93
marcofleon:
Tested ACK f482d0e366a84008129913b442f0c955de79ac93. Saw the same slight increase in coverage. Executed 100,000 runs several times and total time went from 30-35 sec to 20-25 sec.
stratospher:
ACK f482d0e. saw similar coverage stats
Tree-SHA512: 1a96dbc22a0aed396b7f8cc9b13534b7f20a461f64f167c69c650529d535e360499f1a501abc1f957f7541ee1860b36a5580aa488a1edbfa0270c9ed83ef741d
|
|
for risczero compile
bc52cda1f3c007bdf1ed00aa3011e207c7531017 fix use int32_t instead of int type for risczero compile with (-march=rv32i, -mabi=ilp32) (Simon)
Pull request description:
When compile bitcoin by the toolchain(`riscv32-unknown-elf-g++`) from risc0 , the compiler argument is `-march=rv32i, -mabi=ilp32`, which will get the error which due to not serialize the value of type int .
```
blockbody-guest: cargo:warning=In file included from depend/bitcoin/src/hash.h:14,
blockbody-guest: cargo:warning= from depend/bitcoin/src/script/interpreter.h:9,
blockbody-guest: cargo:warning= from depend/bitcoin/src/script/interpreter.cpp:6:
blockbody-guest: cargo:warning=depend/bitcoin/src/serialize.h: In instantiation of 'void Serialize(Stream&, const T&) [with Stream = HashWriter; T = int]':
blockbody-guest: cargo:warning=depend/bitcoin/src/hash.h:144:20: required from 'HashWriter& HashWriter::operator<<(const T&) [with T = int]'
blockbody-guest: cargo:warning=depend/bitcoin/src/script/interpreter.cpp:1613:12: required from 'uint256 SignatureHash(const CScript&, const T&, unsigned int, int, const CAmount&, SigVersion, const PrecomputedTransactionData*) [with T = CTransaction; CAmount = long long int]'
blockbody-guest: cargo:warning=depend/bitcoin/src/script/interpreter.cpp:1664:36: required from 'bool GenericTransactionSignatureChecker<T>::CheckECDSASignature(const std::vector<unsigned char>&, const std::vector<unsigned char>&, const CScript&, SigVersion) const [with T = CTransaction]'
blockbody-guest: cargo:warning=depend/bitcoin/src/script/interpreter.cpp:1785:16: required from here
blockbody-guest: cargo:warning=depend/bitcoin/src/serialize.h:776:7: error: request for member 'Serialize' in 'a', which is of non-class type 'const int'
blockbody-guest: cargo:warning= 776 | a.Serialize(os);
```
--------------
### Reason
"The toolchain from RISC Zero defines int and int32_t as different types, although they have the same width. This means that `src/compat/assumptions.h` compiles fine; however, the templated serialization code cannot accept values of type int. Fix the compilation on RISC Zero by serializing int32_t instead of int values.
This patch will explicitly use the `int32_t` type instead of `int` to avoid errors when compiling with the risc0 toolchain. Additionally, this patch will not change any behavior on platforms where compilation was previously successful.
Fixes #30747
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review-only ACK bc52cda1f3c007bdf1ed00aa3011e207c7531017
achow101:
ACK bc52cda1f3c007bdf1ed00aa3011e207c7531017
TheCharlatan:
ACK bc52cda1f3c007bdf1ed00aa3011e207c7531017
Tree-SHA512: ef880e7dfa1335bf2704ab17c0f506f17390b8259755674dfcd57131736492b2f4cfc36babda6902202b7c55a7513991e21f6634b0cd9b2b03baf4f1c0f8d78b
|
|
e6994efe08b282dd9e46602bcbad69567fe91dcd fix: increase rpcbind check robustness (tdb3)
d38e3aed89eea665399eef07f5c3b64b14d4f586 fix: handle invalid rpcbind port earlier (tdb3)
83b67f2e6d59ea5de6573314ea4fe54ae52b7c12 refactor: move host/port checking (tdb3)
73c243965ab256ece089d14173c2d285955e83d5 test: add tests for invalid rpcbind ports (tdb3)
Pull request description:
Previously, when an invalid port was specified in `-rpcbind`, the `SplitHostPort()` return value in `HTTPBindAddresses()` was ignored and attempt would be made to bind to the default rpcbind port (with the host/port treated as a host).
This rearranges port checking code in `AppInitMain()` to handle the invalid port before reaching `HTTPBindAddresses()`. Also adds a check in `HTTPBindAddresses()` as a defensive measure for future changes.
Adds then updates associated functional tests as well.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e6994efe08b282dd9e46602bcbad69567fe91dcd
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK e6994efe08b282dd9e46602bcbad69567fe91dcd
zaidmstrr:
Code review ACK [e6994ef](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/e6994efe08b282dd9e46602bcbad69567fe91dcd)
Tree-SHA512: bcc3e5ceef21963821cd16ce6ecb83d5c5657755882c05872a7cfe661a1492b1d631f54de22f41fdd173512d62dd15dc37e394fe1a7abe4de484b82cd2438b92
|
|
84663291275248fd52da644b0c2566bbf9cc780b chain: simplify `deleteRwSettings` code and improve it's doc (ismaelsadeeq)
f8d91f49c7091102138fcb123850399e8fadfbc7 chain: dont check for null settings value in `overwriteRwSetting` (ismaelsadeeq)
df601993f2d7454f081316d6a8ddefbcefa49b3d chain: ensure `updateRwSetting` doesn't update to a null settings (ismaelsadeeq)
c8e2eeeffb494d99d95c1c45efeda5a98dce94cd chain: uniformly use `SettingsAction` enum in settings methods (ismaelsadeeq)
1e9e735670f029c975d3b7486a54e5bb67135df7 chain: move new settings safely in `overwriteRwSetting` (ismaelsadeeq)
1c409004c80bc5f2314e20cc922076e22931cf73 test: remove wallet context from `write_wallet_settings_concurrently` (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
This PR addresses the remaining review comments from #30697
1. Disallowed overwriting settings values with a `null` value.
2. Uniformly used the `SettingsAction` enum in all settings methods instead of a boolean parameter.
3. Updated `overwriteRwSetting` to receive the `common::SettingsValue` parameter by value, enabling it to be moved safely.
4. Removed wallet context from the `write_wallet_settings_concurrently` unit test, as it is not needed.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 84663291275248fd52da644b0c2566bbf9cc780b
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 84663291275248fd52da644b0c2566bbf9cc780b. Looks good, thanks for taking suggestions and applying them to the right commits. Only changes since last review were documentation improvements and simplifying delete method.
furszy:
Code review ACK 84663291275248fd52da644b0c2566bbf9cc780b
Tree-SHA512: baf2f59ed5aac4a4bda0c84fb6554a466a40d1f7b52b61dc2ff293d83ae60e82b925b7003237b633fecb65eba3a4c108e69166046895d1295809fbe0de67b052
|
|
51f7668d31e2624e41c7ce77fe33162802808f3f addrman: change nid_type from int to int64_t (Martin Zumsande)
051ba3290e30e210bfc50dea974063053313ad3e addrman, refactor: introduce user-defined type for internal nId (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
With `nIdCount` being incremented for each addr received, an attacker could cause an overflow in the past, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/2024/07/31/disclose-addrman-int-overflow/
Even though that attack was made infeasible indirectly by addr rate-limiting (PR #22387), to be on the safe side and prevent any regressions change the `nId`s used internally to `int64_t`.
This is being done by first introducing a user-defined type for `nId`s in the first commit, and then updating it to `int64_t` (thanks sipa for help with this!).
Note that `nId` is only used internally, it is not part of the serialization, so `peers.dat` should not be affected by this.
I assume that the only reason this was not done in the past is to not draw attention to this previously undisclosed issue.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 51f7668d31e2624e41c7ce77fe33162802808f3f
stratospher:
ACK 51f7668d31e2624e41c7ce77fe33162802808f3f. I think it's a good change to make the nId space large(64 bits) so that the nId values are distinct.
achow101:
ACK 51f7668d31e2624e41c7ce77fe33162802808f3f
Tree-SHA512: 68d4b8b0269a01a9544bedfa7c1348ffde00a288537e4c8bf2b88372ac7d96c4566a44dd6b06285f2fcf31b4f9336761e3bca7253fbc20db5e0d04e887156224
|
|
cli-side commands
54227e681a4efa8961f1ad05d43366d88a9b686a rpc, cli: improve error message on multiwallet mode (pablomartin4btc)
Pull request description:
Running a CLI command when multiple wallets are loaded and `-rpcwallet` is not specified, should return a clearer error.
Currently in `master`:
```
$ bitcoin-cli -regtest -generate 1
error code: -19
error message:
Wallet file not specified (must request wallet RPC through /wallet/<filename> uri-path).
Try adding "-rpcwallet=<filename>" option to bitcoin-cli command line.
```
With this change:
```
$ bitcoin-cli -regtest -generate 1
error code: -19
error message:
Multiple wallets are loaded. Please select which wallet to use by requesting the RPC through the /wallet/<walletname> URI path. Or for the CLI, specify the "-rpcwallet=<walletname>" option before the command (run "bitcoin-cli -h" for help or "bitcoin-cli listwallets" to see which wallets are currently loaded).
```
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 54227e681a4efa8961f1ad05d43366d88a9b686a
achow101:
ACK 54227e681a4efa8961f1ad05d43366d88a9b686a
furszy:
utACK 54227e681a4
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 54227e681a4efa8961f1ad05d43366d88a9b686a
jonatack:
ACK 54227e681a4efa8961f1ad05d43366d88a9b686a
Tree-SHA512: 51ff24f64858aa6be6adf6f20105c9f076ebea743780bf2a4399f7fe8b5239cbb1ea06d32b2ef5e850da2369abb0ef7a52c50c2b8f31f4ca90d3a486abc9b77e
|
|
|
|
This ensures that the best block is included in the backup which leads to a more consistent behavior when loading the backup.
|
|
utils
58499b00d0ad1c83e433caa8fcc0e5d3fd3f2070 refactor: move `SignSignature` helpers to test utils (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
These helpers haven't been used in production code since segwit was merged more than eight years ago (see commit 605e8473, PR #8149), so it seems appropriate to move them to the test utils module. As suggested by instagibbs, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30352#discussion_r1697515508.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 58499b00d0ad1c83e433caa8fcc0e5d3fd3f2070
pablomartin4btc:
ACK 58499b00d0ad1c83e433caa8fcc0e5d3fd3f2070
Tree-SHA512: a52d3b92b477246f2ceb57c3690d0229a492b65a15dae331faeae9d96e5907f7fe1176edc1530243e0f088586984fd7ba435a0a2d2f2531c04d076fdf3f4095f
|
|
|
|
|
|
7025942687fd5e91d0a10ce5b2ac673b67a63491 build: drop superfluous `HAVE_BUILD_INFO` define (Sebastian Falbesoner)
0dd662510c52b202f7136fbcb32ed3864b52b50b build: drop obj/ subdir for generated build.h, rename to bitcoin-build-info.h (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
As indicated by the TODO, the obj subdirectory is not needed anymore now for the generated build.h header, since autotools are gone and we don't have in-source builds anymore (see #30454, #30664). In the second commit the superflous `HAVE_BUILD_INFO` macro is dropped, as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30856#pullrequestreview-2292424496.
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
utACK 7025942687fd5e91d0a10ce5b2ac673b67a63491
Tree-SHA512: 0a3b2cbbcf638344ceb74e5ba5a0fe2b1718427b23a18c8890258db36ce7177006a146178ed88d9c5ae956a5426f3844e86c1f4cca7c40946359742bffda983b
|
|
bitcoin-build-info.h should always be generated before clientversion.cpp
is compiled due to the following explicit dependency in src/CMakeLists.txt:
add_dependencies(bitcoin_clientversion generate_build_info)
Hence there is no need to gate the inclusion of that header with an
extra define.
|
|
Now that this file is not in a subfolder anymore, prefix it with
"bitcoin-" to avoid potential collisions. Also add "info" for a more
descriptive name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
facbcd4cef8890ae18976fb53b67ea56b3c04454 log: Use ConstevalFormatString (MarcoFalke)
fae9b60c4ffef38d9725f42f992b1f38765312a3 test: Use LogPrintStr to test m_log_sourcelocations (MarcoFalke)
fa39b1ca63874db8ef8bc16b87e2699e8e1b67be doc: move-only logging warning (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This changes all logging (including the wallet logging) to produce a
`ConstevalFormatString` at compile time, so that the format string can be
validated at compile-time.
I tested with `clang` and found that the compiler will use less than 1% more of time and memory.
When an error is found, the compile-time error depends on the compiler, but it may look similar to:
```
src/util/string.h: In function ‘int main(int, char**)’:
src/bitcoind.cpp:265:5: in ‘constexpr’ expansion of ‘util::ConstevalFormatString<1>(((const char*)"Hi %s %s"))’
src/util/string.h:38:98: in ‘constexpr’ expansion of ‘util::ConstevalFormatString<1>::Detail_CheckNumFormatSpecifiers(std::basic_string_view<char>(((const char*)((util::ConstevalFormatString<1>*)this)->util::ConstevalFormatString<1>::fmt)))’
src/util/string.h:78:34: error: expression ‘<throw-expression>’ is not a constant expression
78 | if (num_params != count) throw "Format specifier count must match the argument count!";
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
This refactor does not change behavior of the compiled executables.
ACKs for top commit:
hodlinator:
re-ACK facbcd4cef8890ae18976fb53b67ea56b3c04454
l0rinc:
ACK facbcd4cef8890ae18976fb53b67ea56b3c04454
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK facbcd4cef8890ae18976fb53b67ea56b3c04454
pablomartin4btc:
re-ACK facbcd4cef8890ae18976fb53b67ea56b3c04454
stickies-v:
Approach ACK and code LGTM facbcd4cef8890ae18976fb53b67ea56b3c04454 modulo a `tinyformat::format_error` concern.
Tree-SHA512: 852f74d360897020f0d0f6e5064edc5e7f7dacc2bec1d5feff22c634a2fcd2eb535aa75be0b7191d9053728be6108484c737154b02d68ad3186a2e5544ba0db8
|
|
Co-authored-by: Hodlinator <172445034+hodlinator@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
between autotools to cmake change
a9964c04447745435747d9cc557165c43902783b doc: Updating docs from autotools to cmake (kevkevinpal)
Pull request description:
A bit of a followup from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30840
- In this change the documentation where we refer to the `./configure` script which is now gone and have converted the configure params to use the `cmake` equivalent.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK a9964c04447745435747d9cc557165c43902783b
jonatack:
utACK a9964c04447745435747d9cc557165c43902783b
jarolrod:
ACK a9964c04447745435747d9cc557165c43902783b
tdb3:
ACK a9964c04447745435747d9cc557165c43902783b
pablomartin4btc:
re-ACK a9964c04447745435747d9cc557165c43902783b
Tree-SHA512: f7ed20b8ad61f028c0d242b9cc70650d8da63057d4a8f7da88f0117a8d3241c5fe8fcf19d56ec82088160b9fee9b175fe9f64e5a845260d3696dc7e94bfdd0bd
|
|
replaced --enable-debug with -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug in developer-notes
replaced --enable-multiprocess with -DWITH_MULTIPROCESS=ON
replaced --disable-zmq with -DWITH_ZMQ=OFF
|
|
Adds invalid rpcbind port checking to
`HTTPBindAddresses()`. While movement of
`CheckHostPortOptions()` in the previous
commit handles rcpbind port errors, updating
`HTTPBindAddresses()` port checking adds
a defensive measure for potential future
changes.
|
|
Previously, when an invalid port was specified
in `-rpcbind`, the `SplitHostPort()` return value
in `HTTPBindAddresses()` was ignored and attempt
would be made to bind to the default rpcbind port
(with the host/port treated as a host).
This rearranges port checking code in
`AppInitMain()` to handle the invalid
port before reaching `HTTPBindAddresses()`.
Also adjusts associated functional tests.
|